{ "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1", "packetId": "governance:operational-control-activation", "stableId": "operational-control-activation", "family": "governance", "slug": "operational-control-activation", "title": "Operational control activation register", "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started", "release": { "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14", "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0", "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25", "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z", "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com" }, "paths": { "human": "/review/governance/operational-control-activation", "family": "/review/governance", "packet": "/review-packets/governance/operational-control-activation.0a677509f0544fec.json", "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/governance/operational-control-activation.0a677509f0544fec.decision-template.json", "worksheet": "/review-packets/governance/operational-control-activation.0a677509f0544fec.worksheet.md", "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/0a677509f0544fec457a1bac113d3c87b3132fbe3e827c8db8fcd309e7b764af.json" }, "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.", "governingPolicies": [ { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/editorial-policy", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Editorial governance and independent review", "publisher": "GShips Project", "maintainer": "Dammon Burden", "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.", "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.", "reviewerSelection": [ "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.", "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.", "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim." ], "reviewProcess": [ "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.", "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.", "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.", "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.", "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label." ], "appealAndCorrection": [ "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.", "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.", "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.", "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade." ], "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } }, { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/dual-use", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary", "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.", "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.", "allowedInPrinciple": [ "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection", "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response", "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity", "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery", "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research" ], "prohibited": [ "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause", "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support", "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads", "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems", "Autonomous force application", "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control", "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments" ], "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [ "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening", "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable", "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses", "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal", "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review", "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths", "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security" ], "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.", "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } } ], "reviewContract": { "questions": [ { "id": "question-1", "text": "Are authority, recusal, appeal, correction, conflict, stop-work, anti-retaliation, and public-accountability rules legitimate and operationally testable?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-2", "text": "Do civil-and-defensive controls exclude offensive, coercive, weapon, surveillance, and autonomous-force uses without relying on intent labels?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-3", "text": "Which prerequisites remain unstaffed or untested, and what evidence is required before activation?", "required": true } ], "exclusions": [ "A prepared policy is not an operating institution, legal opinion, appointment, screening decision, or activated authority.", "Founder preference, funding, urgency, or prestige cannot compensate for a failed rights, safety, security, or legitimacy gate." ], "requestedScopeCodes": [ "affected-public-rights", "dual-use-risk", "editorial-governance" ], "dispositions": [ "approve", "revise", "contest", "reject", "recuse" ], "prohibitedInputs": [ "private legal names or contact details", "identity documents or raw credential files", "accessibility or medical records", "confidential conflict evidence", "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material" ], "freshness": { "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 90, "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family." }, "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.", "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes." }, "primaryRecords": [ { "recordType": "governance-control", "recordId": "operational-control-activation", "title": "Operational control activation register", "publicPath": "/review", "recordFingerprint": "dd931ff254e0ff8105e0952338587c2dcbce71d78450a07a176308262d2c8289", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2, "highConsequenceDomains": [ "governance", "dual-use" ], "requiredDomainCodes": [ "governance-law-rights", "dual-use-risk" ], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "domain-method", "scopeClass": "domain-method", "oneOf": [ "dual-use-risk", "editorial-governance", "governance-law-rights" ] }, { "id": "rights-public-interest", "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "schemaVersion": "gships-control-activation-register-1", "id": "control-activation-register-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "prepared-not-staffed-not-independently-reviewed", "preparedAt": "2026-07-26", "title": "Dual-use and editorial-governance activation register", "truthBoundary": "This register defines a proposed operating control system. No role is staffed, no authority is active, no engagement is authorized, no control has been exercised, and no independent policy review has occurred.", "policyBindings": [ { "policyId": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "requiredOperationalStatus": "operational-controls-independently-reviewed" }, { "policyId": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "requiredOperationalStatus": "operational-governance-independently-reviewed" } ], "currentState": { "staffing": "not-staffed", "activation": "not-activated", "independentReview": "not-independently-reviewed", "engagementAuthorization": "none", "operationalControls": false, "activeAppealAuthority": false, "activeStopWorkAuthority": false }, "roles": [ { "id": "accountable-publisher", "domain": "both", "minimumPeople": 1, "staffingStatus": "unassigned", "assignees": [], "independenceRequired": false, "authority": [ "Provide resources", "Publish records approved through the activated process" ], "prohibitedAuthority": [ "Count as an independent reviewer", "Close an appeal involving the publisher", "Override stop-work", "Approve a conflicted engagement alone" ], "alternateRoleId": null }, { "id": "editorial-coordinator", "domain": "editorial-governance", "minimumPeople": 1, "staffingStatus": "unassigned", "assignees": [], "independenceRequired": true, "authority": [ "Freeze review packets", "Verify completeness", "Route corrections and recusals" ], "prohibitedAuthority": [ "Substitute for domain review", "Suppress minority findings", "Close an appeal from the coordinator's own decision" ], "alternateRoleId": "editorial-appeal-authority" }, { "id": "editorial-council", "domain": "editorial-governance", "minimumPeople": 3, "staffingStatus": "unassigned", "assignees": [], "independenceRequired": true, "authority": [ "Adopt evidence procedures", "Resolve non-appealed editorial dispositions", "Publish material disagreement" ], "prohibitedAuthority": [ "Treat aggregate votes as domain expertise", "Approve a record outside member scope", "Override a valid recusal" ], "alternateRoleId": "editorial-appeal-authority" }, { "id": "editorial-appeal-authority", "domain": "editorial-governance", "minimumPeople": 2, "staffingStatus": "unassigned", "assignees": [], "independenceRequired": true, "authority": [ "Pause publication", "Affirm, remand, revise, or overturn an appealed editorial decision", "Order a conflict reassessment" ], "prohibitedAuthority": [ "Hear a decision the person originally made", "Act for a sponsor, customer, founder, or source author" ], "alternateRoleId": null }, { "id": "dual-use-screening-panel", "domain": "dual-use", "minimumPeople": 2, "staffingStatus": "unassigned", "assignees": [], "independenceRequired": true, "authority": [ "Screen proposed work", "Impose documented conditions", "Escalate legal, export, rights, safety, and information-hazard questions", "Reject prohibited work" ], "prohibitedAuthority": [ "Rely on a defensive label alone", "Approve offensive integration", "Approve work with unresolved ownership or end use" ], "alternateRoleId": "dual-use-stop-work-alternate" }, { "id": "dual-use-stop-work-authority", "domain": "dual-use", "minimumPeople": 1, "staffingStatus": "unassigned", "assignees": [], "independenceRequired": true, "authority": [ "Immediately suspend proposed or active work", "Preserve evidence", "Require independent reassessment before restart" ], "prohibitedAuthority": [ "Authorize restart alone", "Destroy incident evidence", "Retaliate against a reporter" ], "alternateRoleId": "dual-use-stop-work-alternate" }, { "id": "dual-use-stop-work-alternate", "domain": "dual-use", "minimumPeople": 1, "staffingStatus": "unassigned", "assignees": [], "independenceRequired": true, "authority": [ "Exercise stop-work when the primary is unavailable or conflicted" ], "prohibitedAuthority": [ "Serve as alternate while supervised by the primary for the affected matter" ], "alternateRoleId": null }, { "id": "qualified-legal-export-advisor", "domain": "dual-use", "minimumPeople": 1, "staffingStatus": "unassigned", "assignees": [], "independenceRequired": true, "authority": [ "Advise on jurisdiction, sanctions, export controls, controlled information, and required authorizations" ], "prohibitedAuthority": [ "Treat legal permissibility as ethical approval", "Approve technical scope outside legal competence" ], "alternateRoleId": null } ], "independenceAndConflicts": { "disqualifyingRelationships": [ "Current employee for the affected matter", "Investor", "Customer", "Sponsor", "Source author", "Sales beneficiary", "Direct supervisor or supervisee", "Original appealed decision-maker" ], "requiredDisclosures": [ "Qualifications and bounded scope", "Financial and institutional interests", "Compensation and who pays", "Professional, advocacy, family, personal, and reputational conflicts", "Material AI assistance", "Consent for public disclosure" ], "rules": [ "Disclosure does not create independence", "Compensation may not depend on disposition", "Unresolved conflict requires recusal", "Founder recusal is mandatory for founder interests", "A qualified but non-independent view may be consultation but cannot satisfy a gate" ] }, "dualUseBoundary": { "allowedInPrinciple": [ "Civil safety engineering", "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response", "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity", "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery", "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research" ], "excluded": [ "Weapons command, targeting, or engagement support", "Offensive cyber access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive payloads", "Autonomous force application", "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political control", "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control", "Nonconsensual experimentation", "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations" ], "notExcludedByTrackingClause": [ "Safety navigation", "Astronomy", "Collision avoidance", "Search and rescue", "Independently governed planetary defense" ], "defensiveLabelIsNotApproval": true }, "screeningQuestions": [ { "id": "screen-01", "topic": "capability", "question": "What exact capability, performance increase, data, tooling, and transfer is proposed?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-02", "topic": "actors", "question": "Who are the customer, funder, collaborator, operator, beneficial owners, intermediaries, and affected publics?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-03", "topic": "end-use", "question": "What declared, foreseeable, adjacent, and prohibited end uses exist?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-04", "topic": "jurisdiction", "question": "Which jurisdictions, sanctions, export controls, classifications, licenses, and data restrictions may apply?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-05", "topic": "weapons", "question": "Could the work enable targeting, weapons command, autonomous force, offensive cyber operations, repression, or counterspace activity?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-06", "topic": "rights", "question": "Could the work enable surveillance, coercive reproduction, discriminatory allocation, medical control, labor abuse, or denial of appeal?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-07", "topic": "information-hazard", "question": "Would publication, code, data, parameters, or demonstrations materially increase harmful capability or exploitability?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-08", "topic": "privacy", "question": "Does the work involve personal, medical, reproductive, genetic, biometric, child, disability, or communications data?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-09", "topic": "controls", "question": "Are allowed use, prohibited use, audit, termination, incident, deletion, and transfer restrictions enforceable and testable?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-10", "topic": "independence", "question": "Are screeners, stop-work holders, reviewers, and appeal authorities qualified, independent, and conflict-assessed?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-11", "topic": "reversibility", "question": "Can access and work be paused, rolled back, contained, and independently inspected?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true }, { "id": "screen-12", "topic": "benefit", "question": "Is there a named near-term civil beneficiary, measurable capability gap, and less risky alternative?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": false }, { "id": "screen-13", "topic": "reporting", "question": "Are whistleblowing, anti-retaliation, incident response, correction, transparency, and appeal paths usable?", "hardStopIfUnanswered": true } ], "dispositions": [ { "id": "allow-civil", "effect": "May proceed only within recorded civil scope and controls", "restartRequiresIndependentDecision": false }, { "id": "allow-defensive-with-conditions", "effect": "May proceed only after every recorded condition is evidenced", "restartRequiresIndependentDecision": false }, { "id": "hold-missing-evidence", "effect": "No work may proceed until named evidence is supplied and rescreened", "restartRequiresIndependentDecision": true }, { "id": "escalate-legal-export", "effect": "No work may proceed pending qualified legal and export review", "restartRequiresIndependentDecision": true }, { "id": "escalate-information-hazard", "effect": "Publication or transfer is paused pending independent hazard review", "restartRequiresIndependentDecision": true }, { "id": "reject-prohibited", "effect": "The work is outside GShips scope and may not proceed", "restartRequiresIndependentDecision": true }, { "id": "stop-work", "effect": "Work and transfer stop immediately; evidence is preserved and an independent reassessment is required", "restartRequiresIndependentDecision": true }, { "id": "recuse-reassign", "effect": "The conflicted decision-maker is removed and the matter is reassigned", "restartRequiresIndependentDecision": true } ], "recordRequirements": [ { "id": "screening-record", "requiredFields": [ "recordId", "policyVersions", "proposalFingerprint", "actors", "jurisdictions", "answers", "evidenceIds", "screeners", "conflicts", "disposition", "conditions", "decidedAt", "expiresAt" ], "publicTreatment": "Publish a privacy- and security-bounded summary" }, { "id": "conflict-record", "requiredFields": [ "recordId", "personId", "matterId", "scope", "disclosures", "independenceDecision", "decidedBy", "decidedAt", "recusal" ], "publicTreatment": "Publish bounded decision and material conflict with consent and privacy protection" }, { "id": "decision-record", "requiredFields": [ "recordId", "matterId", "inputFingerprints", "authority", "disposition", "rationale", "evidenceIds", "conditions", "dissent", "decidedAt", "reviewVersion" ], "publicTreatment": "Publish unless legitimate privacy or security requires a bounded summary" }, { "id": "appeal-record", "requiredFields": [ "recordId", "decisionId", "appellantChannel", "grounds", "originalDecisionMakers", "appealAuthority", "conflicts", "evidenceIds", "outcome", "rationale", "decidedAt" ], "publicTreatment": "Publish outcome and rationale while protecting reporter identity" }, { "id": "stop-work-record", "requiredFields": [ "recordId", "matterId", "trigger", "authority", "scope", "issuedAt", "preservationActions", "notifications", "restartDecisionId" ], "publicTreatment": "Publish bounded aggregate status; never expose exploit details or reporter identity" }, { "id": "incident-correction-record", "requiredFields": [ "recordId", "matterId", "detectedAt", "impact", "containment", "reporterProtection", "evidenceIds", "correction", "review", "closedAt" ], "publicTreatment": "Publish material correction and aggregate incident information" } ], "authorities": { "appeal": { "status": "not-active", "holderRoleId": "editorial-appeal-authority", "founderMayCloseOwnAppeal": false, "canPausePublication": true, "activationEvidenceIds": [] }, "stopWork": { "status": "not-active", "holderRoleId": "dual-use-stop-work-authority", "alternateRoleId": "dual-use-stop-work-alternate", "founderMayOverride": false, "restartRequiresIndependentDecision": true, "activationEvidenceIds": [] } }, "reviewCadence": [ { "trigger": "Before every relevant engagement, transfer, procurement, or sensitive publication", "ownerRoleId": "dual-use-screening-panel" }, { "trigger": "Before every material policy, role, control, or jurisdiction change", "ownerRoleId": "editorial-council" }, { "trigger": "Quarterly while activated", "ownerRoleId": "editorial-council" }, { "trigger": "Annually while activated, with independent reviewers", "ownerRoleId": "editorial-appeal-authority" }, { "trigger": "Immediately after a stop-work, incident, retaliation allegation, material correction, or appeal", "ownerRoleId": "editorial-coordinator" } ], "independentPolicyReview": { "status": "not-independently-reviewed", "minimumReviewers": 2, "requiredComplementaryScopes": [ "civil-and-defensive dual-use, security, or export governance", "editorial independence, rights, affected-community, or appeals" ], "decisions": [] }, "activationEvidenceRegistry": { "schemaVersion": "gships-control-activation-evidence-registry-1", "status": "prepared-empty", "activationRegisterId": "control-activation-register-001", "activationRegisterVersion": "0.1.0", "records": [] }, "activationPrerequisites": [ { "id": "prereq-staffing", "requirement": "Every mandatory role has named, consenting people meeting minimum counts", "status": "not-satisfied", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "id": "prereq-conflicts", "requirement": "Every assignee has a matter-appropriate independence and conflict decision", "status": "not-satisfied", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "id": "prereq-review", "requirement": "Two complementary independent policy reviews approve activation or all required revisions are resolved", "status": "not-satisfied", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "id": "prereq-appeal", "requirement": "An independent appeal authority and private intake path are tested", "status": "not-satisfied", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "id": "prereq-stop-work", "requirement": "Primary and alternate stop-work authorities complete a documented rehearsal", "status": "not-satisfied", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "id": "prereq-records", "requirement": "Versioned screening, decision, conflict, appeal, stop-work, incident, and correction stores exist with access and retention controls", "status": "not-satisfied", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "id": "prereq-procedures", "requirement": "Whistleblowing, anti-retaliation, incident, correction, sensitive-publication, and restart procedures are approved and tested", "status": "not-satisfied", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "id": "prereq-legal", "requirement": "Qualified legal and export escalation is available for applicable matters", "status": "not-satisfied", "evidenceIds": [] }, { "id": "prereq-transparency", "requirement": "A public aggregate reporting cadence and privacy/security redaction rule are approved", "status": "not-satisfied", "evidenceIds": [] } ], "public1Gate": { "status": "blocked", "preparednessDoesNotCountAsOperation": true, "requiredRegisterStatus": "operational-controls-independently-reviewed", "requiresAllPrerequisitesSatisfied": true, "requiresActiveAppealAndStopWork": true, "requiresNoAuthorizedEngagementBeforeActivation": true, "currentReason": "Roles are unstaffed, authorities are inactive, evidence stores and rehearsals do not exist, and independent policy review has not occurred." }, "correctionPath": "/corrections" } } ], "linkedRecords": [], "referenceSnapshots": [], "packetFingerprint": "0a677509f0544fec457a1bac113d3c87b3132fbe3e827c8db8fcd309e7b764af" }