{ "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1", "packetId": "interactives:population-sensitivity", "stableId": "population-sensitivity", "family": "interactives", "slug": "population-sensitivity", "title": "Census-index sensitivity comparison", "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started", "release": { "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14", "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0", "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25", "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z", "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com" }, "paths": { "human": "/review/interactives/population-sensitivity", "family": "/review/interactives", "packet": "/review-packets/interactives/population-sensitivity.b638f5761899b3c9.json", "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/interactives/population-sensitivity.b638f5761899b3c9.decision-template.json", "worksheet": "/review-packets/interactives/population-sensitivity.b638f5761899b3c9.worksheet.md", "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/b638f5761899b3c988b994fe3aa6fdcc369683427b22676602e0c3164e61fbe0.json" }, "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.", "governingPolicies": [ { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/editorial-policy", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Editorial governance and independent review", "publisher": "GShips Project", "maintainer": "Dammon Burden", "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.", "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.", "reviewerSelection": [ "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.", "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.", "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim." ], "reviewProcess": [ "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.", "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.", "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.", "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.", "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label." ], "appealAndCorrection": [ "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.", "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.", "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.", "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade." ], "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } }, { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/dual-use", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary", "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.", "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.", "allowedInPrinciple": [ "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection", "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response", "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity", "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery", "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research" ], "prohibited": [ "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause", "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support", "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads", "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems", "Autonomous force application", "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control", "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments" ], "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [ "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening", "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable", "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses", "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal", "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review", "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths", "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security" ], "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.", "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } } ], "reviewContract": { "questions": [ { "id": "question-1", "text": "Do the declared formulas or projection rules, constants, units, rounding, defaults, and invalid-state behavior match the shipped implementation?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-2", "text": "Are the guardrails and exclusions strong enough to prevent a teaching result from being mistaken for feasibility, safety, clinical, demographic, or mission evidence?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-3", "text": "Does the no-JavaScript presentation convey the same documented example, result, evidence boundary, and access to the underlying records?", "required": true } ], "exclusions": [ "Structural or arithmetic correctness does not establish physical, clinical, ecological, demographic, or mission validity.", "A teaching interface is not a design tool, safety case, population policy, or authorization to act." ], "requestedScopeCodes": [ "accessibility-disability-justice", "affected-public-rights", "human-factors", "reproductive-health-rights", "systems-engineering", "visual-science-communication" ], "dispositions": [ "approve", "revise", "contest", "reject", "recuse" ], "prohibitedInputs": [ "private legal names or contact details", "identity documents or raw credential files", "accessibility or medical records", "confidential conflict evidence", "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material" ], "freshness": { "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 365, "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family." }, "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.", "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes." }, "primaryRecords": [ { "recordType": "interactive", "recordId": "population-sensitivity", "title": "Census-index sensitivity comparison", "publicPath": "/systems", "recordFingerprint": "960425f3b68dcf4b7af1201a8a70c25024e443de57c2220f061e817d31f71c1e", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2, "highConsequenceDomains": [ "reproductive-rights" ], "requiredDomainCodes": [ "reproductive-health-rights" ], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "domain-method", "scopeClass": "domain-method", "oneOf": [ "human-factors", "reproductive-health-rights" ] }, { "id": "rights-public-interest", "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "population-sensitivity", "version": "1", "title": "Census-index sensitivity comparison", "purpose": "Compare compound arithmetic paths without converting the result into a population prescription.", "inputs": [ { "id": "start", "label": "Starting census-index value", "unit": "index", "default": 1000, "min": 2, "max": 10000000, "step": 1, "integerRequired": true }, { "id": "generations", "label": "Modeled generation steps", "unit": "steps", "default": 10, "min": 1, "max": 100, "step": 1, "integerRequired": true }, { "id": "change", "label": "Arithmetic sensitivity rate", "unit": "%", "default": 1, "min": 0, "max": 20, "step": 0.1, "integerRequired": false } ], "constants": [], "formulaExpressions": [ "decline = round(start * (1 - change/100)^generations)", "unchanged = round(start)", "growth = round(start * (1 + change/100)^generations)" ], "outputs": [ { "id": "decline", "label": "Decline scenario", "unit": "census-index value", "rounding": "nearest whole index" }, { "id": "unchanged", "label": "No-change scenario", "unit": "census-index value", "rounding": "nearest whole index" }, { "id": "growth", "label": "Growth scenario", "unit": "census-index value", "rounding": "nearest whole index" } ], "defaultTestVector": { "inputs": { "start": 1000, "generations": 10, "change": 1 }, "expectedOutputs": { "decline": "904", "unchanged": "1,000", "growth": "1,105" } }, "invalidInputBehavior": "Require whole start and generation values, reject invalid fields, preserve the last valid table, and perform no calculation.", "guardrails": [ "Inputs are arithmetic interface values, not viable-population bounds.", "If voluntary human choices make a mission infeasible, the mission is infeasible." ], "explicitExclusions": [ "fertility, consent, viability, policy, and biological fitness", "reproductive targets or assigned pairing", "genetic selection, coercion, discrimination, and restrictions on bodily autonomy" ], "noJavaScriptFallback": "The documented 1,000-index, ten-step, one-percent comparison and complete table remain visible while controls are disabled.", "linkedRecordKeys": [ "system:reproduction-genetics", "system:governance-law", "system:health-medicine" ] } } ], "linkedRecords": [ { "recordType": "system", "recordId": "reproduction-genetics", "title": "Reproduction, genetics & population", "publicPath": "/systems/reproduction-genetics", "recordFingerprint": "f61b7acf5663ad40872a2a6c84a25c779d917b780c22f20caa79b1aef16d2241" }, { "recordType": "system", "recordId": "governance-law", "title": "Governance, law, economics & rights", "publicPath": "/systems/governance-law", "recordFingerprint": "234fbdd0ae7a5b1356629360fbf5262b2a03e73dd4ada137ce12e6b81343c4fb" }, { "recordType": "system", "recordId": "health-medicine", "title": "Medicine, public health & human performance", "publicPath": "/systems/health-medicine", "recordFingerprint": "c5a0a79dc6997542128ab5531efc2d19b0c825fd0b3d972a5d42bb0faa49ccb3" } ], "referenceSnapshots": [], "packetFingerprint": "b638f5761899b3c988b994fe3aa6fdcc369683427b22676602e0c3164e61fbe0" }