{ "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1", "packetId": "leadership:cyber-knowledge-resilience", "stableId": "cyber-knowledge-resilience", "family": "leadership", "slug": "cyber-knowledge-resilience", "title": "Cyber and knowledge resilience", "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started", "release": { "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14", "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0", "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25", "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z", "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com" }, "paths": { "human": "/review/leadership/cyber-knowledge-resilience", "family": "/review/leadership", "packet": "/review-packets/leadership/cyber-knowledge-resilience.dc32310410cbb3c4.json", "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/leadership/cyber-knowledge-resilience.dc32310410cbb3c4.decision-template.json", "worksheet": "/review-packets/leadership/cyber-knowledge-resilience.dc32310410cbb3c4.worksheet.md", "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/dc32310410cbb3c4c2427686d2eb32c2e22a83f22baa5f315a23e7d36a6a66b3.json" }, "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.", "governingPolicies": [ { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/editorial-policy", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Editorial governance and independent review", "publisher": "GShips Project", "maintainer": "Dammon Burden", "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.", "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.", "reviewerSelection": [ "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.", "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.", "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim." ], "reviewProcess": [ "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.", "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.", "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.", "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.", "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label." ], "appealAndCorrection": [ "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.", "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.", "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.", "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade." ], "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } }, { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/dual-use", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary", "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.", "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.", "allowedInPrinciple": [ "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection", "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response", "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity", "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery", "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research" ], "prohibited": [ "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause", "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support", "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads", "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems", "Autonomous force application", "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control", "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments" ], "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [ "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening", "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable", "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses", "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal", "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review", "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths", "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security" ], "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.", "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } } ], "reviewContract": { "questions": [ { "id": "question-1", "text": "Does the pathway reward evidence-bearing service, transferable authority, dissent, access, and stop-work competence rather than status?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-2", "text": "Are prerequisites, entry routes, first artifacts, and decision boundaries specific without pretending to assess a person?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-3", "text": "Does the diagnostic remain transparent, local, non-sensitive, accessible, and incapable of creating a qualification or eligibility judgment?", "required": true } ], "exclusions": [ "No pathway or diagnostic result qualifies, ranks, appoints, licenses, recruits, or authorizes a person.", "Lived expertise, formal credentials, operational authority, and technical qualification are not treated as interchangeable." ], "requestedScopeCodes": [ "accessibility-disability-justice", "affected-public-rights", "human-factors", "institution-building" ], "dispositions": [ "approve", "revise", "contest", "reject", "recuse" ], "prohibitedInputs": [ "private legal names or contact details", "identity documents or raw credential files", "accessibility or medical records", "confidential conflict evidence", "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material" ], "freshness": { "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 90, "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family." }, "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.", "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes." }, "primaryRecords": [ { "recordType": "leadership-pathway", "recordId": "cyber-knowledge-resilience", "title": "Cyber and knowledge resilience", "publicPath": "/leadership/pathways/cyber-knowledge-resilience", "recordFingerprint": "17af74cc6e8adc16412253334e57b5b26cc40ae319234728103c6ab71463aa1a", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "accessibility-disability-justice", "affected-public-rights", "institution-building" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "cyber-knowledge-resilience", "slug": "cyber-knowledge-resilience", "title": "Cyber and knowledge resilience", "summary": "Preserve trustworthy software, procedures, archives, keys, and recovery while excluding offensive use and life-critical AI authority.", "taskIds": [ "disconnected-cyber-recovery" ], "systemSlugs": [ "ai-autonomy", "cybersecurity", "communications-navigation" ], "entryRoutes": [ { "audience": "curious", "firstAction": "Verify whether one critical procedure remains usable offline and without an LLM.", "evidenceOfProgress": "A documented gap or reproducible offline copy with provenance." }, { "audience": "student", "firstAction": "Threat-model a synthetic disconnected habitat using only civil and defensive scenarios.", "evidenceOfProgress": "A bounded model with prohibited paths and recovery objectives." }, { "audience": "practitioner", "firstAction": "Rehearse restore, revocation, and anti-rollback against a synthetic incident.", "evidenceOfProgress": "Recovery evidence reviewed independently from implementation." } ], "prerequisiteBoundary": "Defensive security, safety, OT, software assurance, archival practice, and operations are relevant; offensive capability is out of scope.", "firstArtifact": "A bounded threat model and rehearsed recovery record.", "decisionBoundary": "Independent cyber stop-work; no offensive scope and no generative model with direct authority.", "lessonHrefs": [ "/academy/cyber-resilience/incident-without-earth", "/academy/ai-knowledge/knowledge-ark" ] } } ], "linkedRecords": [ { "recordType": "ecosystem-task", "recordId": "disconnected-cyber-recovery", "title": "Disconnected cyber recovery", "publicPath": "/partners/tasks/disconnected-cyber-recovery", "recordFingerprint": "61f1d0643ce61c0454ee0edf1aee4169766c17e3738c3235d813e5191ac3cb18" }, { "recordType": "academy-lesson", "recordId": "lesson-10-04", "title": "The Knowledge Ark", "publicPath": "/academy/ai-knowledge/knowledge-ark", "recordFingerprint": "4abe11a303b566782a022d6858d08026b74b05ae18d900b134463758d0086d65" }, { "recordType": "academy-lesson", "recordId": "lesson-11-05", "title": "Incident response without Earth", "publicPath": "/academy/cyber-resilience/incident-without-earth", "recordFingerprint": "8a0a9a1abea9615e0c99dd325a1008609a1e820cf53ff53dcee8fd333adc06ea" } ], "referenceSnapshots": [], "packetFingerprint": "dc32310410cbb3c4c2427686d2eb32c2e22a83f22baa5f315a23e7d36a6a66b3" }