{ "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1", "packetId": "leadership:public-benefit-institution-building", "stableId": "public-benefit-institution-building", "family": "leadership", "slug": "public-benefit-institution-building", "title": "Public-benefit institution building", "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started", "release": { "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14", "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0", "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25", "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z", "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com" }, "paths": { "human": "/review/leadership/public-benefit-institution-building", "family": "/review/leadership", "packet": "/review-packets/leadership/public-benefit-institution-building.ba5750cbe58633c4.json", "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/leadership/public-benefit-institution-building.ba5750cbe58633c4.decision-template.json", "worksheet": "/review-packets/leadership/public-benefit-institution-building.ba5750cbe58633c4.worksheet.md", "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/ba5750cbe58633c4bbee76469f06ae0aef3b4102affd34042151df5826e868cc.json" }, "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.", "governingPolicies": [ { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/editorial-policy", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Editorial governance and independent review", "publisher": "GShips Project", "maintainer": "Dammon Burden", "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.", "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.", "reviewerSelection": [ "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.", "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.", "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim." ], "reviewProcess": [ "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.", "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.", "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.", "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.", "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label." ], "appealAndCorrection": [ "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.", "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.", "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.", "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade." ], "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } }, { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/dual-use", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary", "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.", "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.", "allowedInPrinciple": [ "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection", "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response", "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity", "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery", "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research" ], "prohibited": [ "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause", "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support", "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads", "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems", "Autonomous force application", "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control", "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments" ], "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [ "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening", "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable", "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses", "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal", "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review", "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths", "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security" ], "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.", "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } } ], "reviewContract": { "questions": [ { "id": "question-1", "text": "Does the pathway reward evidence-bearing service, transferable authority, dissent, access, and stop-work competence rather than status?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-2", "text": "Are prerequisites, entry routes, first artifacts, and decision boundaries specific without pretending to assess a person?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-3", "text": "Does the diagnostic remain transparent, local, non-sensitive, accessible, and incapable of creating a qualification or eligibility judgment?", "required": true } ], "exclusions": [ "No pathway or diagnostic result qualifies, ranks, appoints, licenses, recruits, or authorizes a person.", "Lived expertise, formal credentials, operational authority, and technical qualification are not treated as interchangeable." ], "requestedScopeCodes": [ "accessibility-disability-justice", "affected-public-rights", "human-factors", "institution-building" ], "dispositions": [ "approve", "revise", "contest", "reject", "recuse" ], "prohibitedInputs": [ "private legal names or contact details", "identity documents or raw credential files", "accessibility or medical records", "confidential conflict evidence", "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material" ], "freshness": { "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 90, "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family." }, "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.", "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes." }, "primaryRecords": [ { "recordType": "leadership-pathway", "recordId": "public-benefit-institution-building", "title": "Public-benefit institution building", "publicPath": "/leadership/pathways/public-benefit-institution-building", "recordFingerprint": "b8e5a29b209b156c20cff75378a59a844bfa350abbd194f3720ff5ea954c937c", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "accessibility-disability-justice", "affected-public-rights", "institution-building" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "public-benefit-institution-building", "slug": "public-benefit-institution-building", "title": "Public-benefit institution building", "summary": "Create present value, shared infrastructure, succession, review, funding boundaries, and stop capacity without making the founder or company the mission.", "taskIds": [ "habitat-assurance-pilot", "commons-standards-workforce" ], "systemSlugs": [ "mission-architecture", "analogs-verification", "institutions-workforce" ], "entryRoutes": [ { "audience": "curious", "firstAction": "Contribute one correction, source, accessible explanation, or bounded volunteer artifact.", "evidenceOfProgress": "A useful accepted contribution or documented negative result." }, { "audience": "operator", "firstAction": "Name one neglected present-day coordination or assurance problem and its current workaround.", "evidenceOfProgress": "A measured problem statement with a real beneficiary and kill gate." }, { "audience": "founder", "firstAction": "Separate public evidence, commercial discovery, external authorization, conflicts, and stop authority before outreach.", "evidenceOfProgress": "A bounded product test and institution that can continue safely during founder absence." } ], "prerequisiteBoundary": "Leadership fitness is demonstrated through useful bounded work, correction, shared authority, succession, and public accountability—not title or charisma.", "firstArtifact": "A public-benefit task charter with measures, conflicts, review, and a kill gate.", "decisionBoundary": "Cannot override editorial, rights, safety, clinical, accessibility, cyber, or dual-use review.", "lessonHrefs": [ "/academy/precursors-and-action/leadership-practice", "/academy/precursors-and-action/venture-wedges" ] } } ], "linkedRecords": [ { "recordType": "ecosystem-task", "recordId": "habitat-assurance-pilot", "title": "Habitat assurance pilot", "publicPath": "/partners/tasks/habitat-assurance-pilot", "recordFingerprint": "7798bd66f11125287d094f9a55100aba409b1ebf82136a1a5f73c3758cb172c7" }, { "recordType": "ecosystem-task", "recordId": "commons-standards-workforce", "title": "Commons, standards, and workforce", "publicPath": "/partners/tasks/commons-standards-workforce", "recordFingerprint": "10a23cff15d126ec8dd4780a50c28dca003006f368cc271afd2bd1758d213652" }, { "recordType": "academy-lesson", "recordId": "lesson-12-04", "title": "Products before starships", "publicPath": "/academy/precursors-and-action/venture-wedges", "recordFingerprint": "80d95f17c3fae1175c54eb9aa53320039c46555b077ef90764d8bd299082bb45" }, { "recordType": "academy-lesson", "recordId": "lesson-12-05", "title": "Leadership as stewardship", "publicPath": "/academy/precursors-and-action/leadership-practice", "recordFingerprint": "46fd7ce7f6a65c875954f0506d6134f750154ac21720b0f7652d7ef1184711dd" } ], "referenceSnapshots": [], "packetFingerprint": "ba5750cbe58633c4bbee76469f06ae0aef3b4102affd34042151df5826e868cc" }