{
  "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1",
  "packetId": "opportunities:opp-befellows",
  "stableId": "opp-befellows",
  "family": "opportunities",
  "slug": "opp-befellows",
  "title": "Breakthrough Energy Fellows",
  "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started",
  "release": {
    "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14",
    "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0",
    "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25",
    "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z",
    "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com"
  },
  "paths": {
    "human": "/review/opportunities/opp-befellows",
    "family": "/review/opportunities",
    "packet": "/review-packets/opportunities/opp-befellows.2fca5cc96b2fda0c.json",
    "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/opportunities/opp-befellows.2fca5cc96b2fda0c.decision-template.json",
    "worksheet": "/review-packets/opportunities/opp-befellows.2fca5cc96b2fda0c.worksheet.md",
    "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/2fca5cc96b2fda0c14644974c384894fb58b4eea1d5a4402227b0fc4e61134e0.json"
  },
  "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.",
  "governingPolicies": [
    {
      "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001",
      "version": "0.1.0",
      "path": "/editorial-policy",
      "recordType": "governing-policy",
      "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001",
        "version": "0.1.0",
        "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed",
        "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25",
        "title": "Editorial governance and independent review",
        "publisher": "GShips Project",
        "maintainer": "Dammon Burden",
        "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.",
        "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.",
        "reviewerSelection": [
          "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.",
          "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.",
          "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim."
        ],
        "reviewProcess": [
          "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.",
          "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.",
          "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.",
          "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.",
          "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label."
        ],
        "appealAndCorrection": [
          "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.",
          "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.",
          "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.",
          "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade."
        ],
        "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.",
        "correctionPath": "/corrections"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "policy-dual-use-001",
      "version": "0.1.0",
      "path": "/dual-use",
      "recordType": "governing-policy",
      "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "policy-dual-use-001",
        "version": "0.1.0",
        "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational",
        "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25",
        "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary",
        "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.",
        "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.",
        "allowedInPrinciple": [
          "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection",
          "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response",
          "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity",
          "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery",
          "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research"
        ],
        "prohibited": [
          "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause",
          "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support",
          "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads",
          "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems",
          "Autonomous force application",
          "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control",
          "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments"
        ],
        "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [
          "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening",
          "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable",
          "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses",
          "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal",
          "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review",
          "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths",
          "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security"
        ],
        "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.",
        "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.",
        "correctionPath": "/corrections"
      }
    }
  ],
  "reviewContract": {
    "questions": [
      {
        "id": "question-1",
        "text": "Does the official source support the opportunity identity, status, timing, eligibility, and access constraints?",
        "required": true
      },
      {
        "id": "question-2",
        "text": "Is the proposed fit specific and proportionate without implying availability, invitation, selection, or funding?",
        "required": true
      },
      {
        "id": "question-3",
        "text": "What deadline, rule, jurisdiction, cost, conflict, or accessibility fact would change the proposed next action?",
        "required": true
      }
    ],
    "exclusions": [
      "Review does not submit, register, apply, contact, commit, purchase, or establish eligibility.",
      "Provider prestige and apparent fit cannot replace current official terms."
    ],
    "requestedScopeCodes": [
      "ecosystem-due-diligence",
      "opportunity-eligibility-access"
    ],
    "dispositions": [
      "approve",
      "revise",
      "contest",
      "reject",
      "recuse"
    ],
    "prohibitedInputs": [
      "private legal names or contact details",
      "identity documents or raw credential files",
      "accessibility or medical records",
      "confidential conflict evidence",
      "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material"
    ],
    "freshness": {
      "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 30,
      "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family."
    },
    "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.",
    "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes."
  },
  "primaryRecords": [
    {
      "recordType": "opportunity",
      "recordId": "opp-befellows",
      "title": "Breakthrough Energy Fellows",
      "publicPath": "/opportunities/opp-befellows",
      "recordFingerprint": "1ba7f60743977b20dbde1d39395b8da4118d875dae34be1b1a52100bd8ce1d74",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "ecosystem-due-diligence",
              "opportunity-eligibility-access"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true,
        "currentUntil": "2026-08-01"
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "opp-befellows",
        "name": "Breakthrough Energy Fellows",
        "url": "https://www.breakthroughenergy.org/programs/fellows/",
        "provider": "Breakthrough Energy",
        "kind": "Founder fellowship",
        "timing": "Monitor. The official program materials describe the Fellows pathway and provide an apply link, but no current 2026 application opening or closing date was published on the reviewed official pages.",
        "fit": "Climate-relevant water, food, materials, and energy technologies",
        "status": "not currently dated; monitor",
        "verifiedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "eligibility": "The program supports climate-technology innovators moving science from laboratory to market. Exact cohort eligibility, geography, team, stage, emissions-impact, and application requirements must be taken from a future dated call.",
        "accessNotes": "Only a climate-relevant Earthside technology—such as water, food, materials, energy, circularity, or resilience—with a credible commercialization and climate-impact case should be considered. Generation ships as a general theme are not evidence of fit.",
        "founderAction": "Do not assume a fall cycle. Monitor the official application route and quantify the climate impact, technical milestones, team, and market of one specific Earthside product before seeking authorization to apply.",
        "evidenceBoundary": "The official Fellows URL did not expose usable text to one web fetch, but returned HTTP 200 directly and its official same-domain program and Fellows project pages were verified in the web renderer. They establish the climate-tech purpose and support model, but no dated open 2026 call, detailed current eligibility, or GShips fit was confirmed.",
        "relationship": "indexed only; no formal relationship",
        "actionStatus": "proposed; not undertaken",
        "conflicts": "Private-philanthropic selection, commercialization incentives, climate-impact accounting, IP, funding, and governance terms require independent diligence.",
        "whatWouldChange": "A dated official call, published current criteria, or a quantified climate technology with validated technical and emissions evidence would materially change the status.",
        "currentUntil": "2026-08-01"
      }
    }
  ],
  "linkedRecords": [],
  "referenceSnapshots": [
    {
      "sourceId": "official-opportunity-opp-befellows",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "4f95d2aea916adc49b18b86358445d617d0a78de8eeb09dab2f347807adb1be0",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "Breakthrough Energy Fellows",
        "url": "https://www.breakthroughenergy.org/programs/fellows/",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "The official Fellows URL did not expose usable text to one web fetch, but returned HTTP 200 directly and its official same-domain program and Fellows project pages were verified in the web renderer. They establish the climate-tech purpose and support model, but no dated open 2026 call, detailed current eligibility, or GShips fit was confirmed.",
        "subjectRecordType": "opportunity",
        "subjectRecordId": "opp-befellows"
      }
    }
  ],
  "packetFingerprint": "2fca5cc96b2fda0c14644974c384894fb58b4eea1d5a4402227b0fc4e61134e0"
}
