{
  "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1",
  "packetId": "organizations:entity-bwxt",
  "stableId": "entity-bwxt",
  "family": "organizations",
  "slug": "bwxt",
  "title": "BWXT",
  "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started",
  "release": {
    "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14",
    "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0",
    "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25",
    "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z",
    "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com"
  },
  "paths": {
    "human": "/review/organizations/bwxt",
    "family": "/review/organizations",
    "packet": "/review-packets/organizations/bwxt.679e86636d1a04b9.json",
    "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/organizations/bwxt.679e86636d1a04b9.decision-template.json",
    "worksheet": "/review-packets/organizations/bwxt.679e86636d1a04b9.worksheet.md",
    "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/679e86636d1a04b9fc3135623db4207e06ccfe842f59ce8bd64d19672d3b67fb.json"
  },
  "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.",
  "governingPolicies": [
    {
      "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001",
      "version": "0.1.0",
      "path": "/editorial-policy",
      "recordType": "governing-policy",
      "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001",
        "version": "0.1.0",
        "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed",
        "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25",
        "title": "Editorial governance and independent review",
        "publisher": "GShips Project",
        "maintainer": "Dammon Burden",
        "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.",
        "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.",
        "reviewerSelection": [
          "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.",
          "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.",
          "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim."
        ],
        "reviewProcess": [
          "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.",
          "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.",
          "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.",
          "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.",
          "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label."
        ],
        "appealAndCorrection": [
          "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.",
          "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.",
          "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.",
          "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade."
        ],
        "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.",
        "correctionPath": "/corrections"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "policy-dual-use-001",
      "version": "0.1.0",
      "path": "/dual-use",
      "recordType": "governing-policy",
      "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "policy-dual-use-001",
        "version": "0.1.0",
        "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational",
        "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25",
        "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary",
        "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.",
        "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.",
        "allowedInPrinciple": [
          "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection",
          "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response",
          "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity",
          "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery",
          "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research"
        ],
        "prohibited": [
          "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause",
          "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support",
          "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads",
          "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems",
          "Autonomous force application",
          "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control",
          "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments"
        ],
        "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [
          "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening",
          "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable",
          "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses",
          "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal",
          "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review",
          "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths",
          "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security"
        ],
        "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.",
        "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.",
        "correctionPath": "/corrections"
      }
    }
  ],
  "reviewContract": {
    "questions": [
      {
        "id": "question-1",
        "text": "Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?",
        "required": true
      },
      {
        "id": "question-2",
        "text": "Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?",
        "required": true
      },
      {
        "id": "question-3",
        "text": "Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?",
        "required": true
      }
    ],
    "exclusions": [
      "Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.",
      "No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted."
    ],
    "requestedScopeCodes": [
      "ecosystem-due-diligence",
      "information-science"
    ],
    "dispositions": [
      "approve",
      "revise",
      "contest",
      "reject",
      "recuse"
    ],
    "prohibitedInputs": [
      "private legal names or contact details",
      "identity documents or raw credential files",
      "accessibility or medical records",
      "confidential conflict evidence",
      "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material"
    ],
    "freshness": {
      "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 90,
      "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family."
    },
    "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.",
    "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes."
  },
  "primaryRecords": [
    {
      "recordType": "ecosystem-organization",
      "recordId": "entity-bwxt",
      "title": "BWXT",
      "publicPath": "/partners/bwxt",
      "recordFingerprint": "45504125e8fdf46290abc200c97ec2f7ec00b3fc8ef360086f00d5b7644f6ebe",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "ecosystem-due-diligence"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "entity-bwxt",
        "legacyId": "org-company--043",
        "slug": "bwxt",
        "name": "BWXT",
        "url": "https://www.bwxt.com/",
        "category": "Company and applied technology",
        "geography": "United States",
        "relevance": "enabling",
        "engagement": "Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current access rules: if a civil power architecture reaches a regulated trade-study stage, consider a paid supplier-capability review with nuclear counsel and independent safety experts. No outreach, eligibility determination, commitment, or procurement has occurred.",
        "capability": "Nuclear fuels and components, reactor engineering and manufacturing, space nuclear power work, inspection, and lifecycle services.",
        "entityKind": "public nuclear technology and manufacturing company",
        "linkCheckedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "relationship": "indexed only; no formal relationship",
        "engagementStatus": "proposed; not undertaken",
        "profileSummary": "BWXT manufactures nuclear components, fuels, reactors, and services for U.S. government, naval, civil-energy, medical-isotope, and space-power applications.",
        "potentialFit": "Could inform civil space-power fuel, reactor manufacturability, qualification, inspection, and supply-chain questions only within strict non-weapon, safety, safeguards, and regulatory boundaries.",
        "risks": [
          "The company has extensive naval and defense work; classified, export-controlled, and weapon-adjacent scope is outside GShips’ boundary.",
          "Nuclear work requires regulators, safeguards, security, waste, liability, and public-consent processes far beyond a supplier discussion.",
          "Company claims do not establish a space reactor’s readiness, cost, lifetime, or maintainability."
        ],
        "evidenceBoundary": "Official-link review: the official corporate site was reachable and supports the nuclear manufacturing and government-program classification; program performance was not independently reviewed. Public descriptions, performance, maturity, access, procurement, and current availability were not independently verified; independent review pending.",
        "conflicts": "Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; financial, contracting, leadership, and institutional conflicts were not independently investigated.",
        "whatWouldChange": "A transparent civil-space product, regulator-engaged safety case, independently reviewed test evidence, and acceptable nonproliferation terms would materially change fit."
      }
    }
  ],
  "linkedRecords": [],
  "referenceSnapshots": [
    {
      "sourceId": "official-ecosystem-organization-entity-bwxt",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "39ba7a1c8938a40bfa7c0f34868ecb29bb43c4f23a6cce84eda8027d103b61af",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "BWXT",
        "url": "https://www.bwxt.com/",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Official-link review: the official corporate site was reachable and supports the nuclear manufacturing and government-program classification; program performance was not independently reviewed. Public descriptions, performance, maturity, access, procurement, and current availability were not independently verified; independent review pending.",
        "subjectRecordType": "ecosystem-organization",
        "subjectRecordId": "entity-bwxt"
      }
    }
  ],
  "packetFingerprint": "679e86636d1a04b9fc3135623db4207e06ccfe842f59ce8bd64d19672d3b67fb"
}
