# GShips offline review-notes worksheet

Status: blank notes companion; not a decision bundle
Packet: `organizations:entity-iso-tc-20-sc-14`
Packet SHA-256: `c77e5893cf4bd16686141444841cc02eded3500eabe0e2df326a36b95e1ff5e8`
Release: `public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14`
Source commit: `3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0`

This readable worksheet is for local notes only. It cannot satisfy the closed
decision-bundle schema and is not input to the validator. Use the fingerprinted
JSON template for any future structured decision. This worksheet appoints
nobody and records no completed review. Do not put identity documents, private
contact data, medical or accessibility records, confidential conflict evidence,
controlled material, or exploit details here. Keep notes offline until a
separately authorized private handoff exists.

## Reviewer declaration

Opaque public reviewer ID:

Public label:

Controlled scope codes:

Qualification basis:

Independence status and bounded basis:

Conflict public summary:

Compensation status and public summary:

AI assistance and human-verification statement:

Publication consent selections:


## 1. ISO TC 20 SC 14

- Record: `ecosystem-organization:entity-iso-tc-20-sc-14`
- Record SHA-256: `fd8cecebe9b9bfd47d201956d391d5e9d58a99fea9a327d80235a1c2d2d664b0`
- Public record: /partners/iso-tc-20-sc-14
- Minimum independent approvals: 1
- Required scope groups: bounded-competence (ecosystem-due-diligence)

Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse

Bounded scope:

Rationale:

Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding:

Proposed correction or recusal reason:

What would change this decision:

