{ "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1", "packetId": "organizations:entity-unesco-memory-of-the-world", "stableId": "entity-unesco-memory-of-the-world", "family": "organizations", "slug": "unesco-memory-of-the-world", "title": "UNESCO Memory of the World", "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started", "release": { "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14", "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0", "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25", "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z", "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com" }, "paths": { "human": "/review/organizations/unesco-memory-of-the-world", "family": "/review/organizations", "packet": "/review-packets/organizations/unesco-memory-of-the-world.845460d0f8c593a2.json", "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/organizations/unesco-memory-of-the-world.845460d0f8c593a2.decision-template.json", "worksheet": "/review-packets/organizations/unesco-memory-of-the-world.845460d0f8c593a2.worksheet.md", "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/845460d0f8c593a2f40905869933f06dc33858f248b19a064c24ac9bfb1c9779.json" }, "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.", "governingPolicies": [ { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/editorial-policy", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Editorial governance and independent review", "publisher": "GShips Project", "maintainer": "Dammon Burden", "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.", "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.", "reviewerSelection": [ "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.", "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.", "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim." ], "reviewProcess": [ "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.", "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.", "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.", "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.", "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label." ], "appealAndCorrection": [ "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.", "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.", "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.", "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade." ], "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } }, { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/dual-use", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary", "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.", "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.", "allowedInPrinciple": [ "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection", "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response", "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity", "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery", "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research" ], "prohibited": [ "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause", "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support", "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads", "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems", "Autonomous force application", "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control", "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments" ], "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [ "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening", "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable", "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses", "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal", "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review", "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths", "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security" ], "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.", "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } } ], "reviewContract": { "questions": [ { "id": "question-1", "text": "Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-2", "text": "Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-3", "text": "Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?", "required": true } ], "exclusions": [ "Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.", "No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted." ], "requestedScopeCodes": [ "ecosystem-due-diligence", "information-science" ], "dispositions": [ "approve", "revise", "contest", "reject", "recuse" ], "prohibitedInputs": [ "private legal names or contact details", "identity documents or raw credential files", "accessibility or medical records", "confidential conflict evidence", "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material" ], "freshness": { "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 90, "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family." }, "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.", "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes." }, "primaryRecords": [ { "recordType": "ecosystem-organization", "recordId": "entity-unesco-memory-of-the-world", "title": "UNESCO Memory of the World", "publicPath": "/partners/unesco-memory-of-the-world", "recordFingerprint": "b0c9848086950499e03f28bb62c371283b6248c7bd56d112d27d4d941d386f20", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "ecosystem-due-diligence" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "entity-unesco-memory-of-the-world", "legacyId": "org-public-i-006", "slug": "unesco-memory-of-the-world", "name": "UNESCO Memory of the World", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/memory-world", "category": "Public interest, governance, culture, and capital", "geography": "International", "relevance": "adjacent", "engagement": "Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current UNESCO rules: use public guidance to design plural, community-governed archives; consider a formal mechanism only if an eligible collection and responsible institution later exist. No outreach, nomination, commitment, or funding has occurred.", "capability": "Documentary-heritage policy, preservation advocacy, registers, access principles, international cooperation, and cultural-memory capacity building.", "entityKind": "United Nations documentary-heritage preservation program", "linkCheckedAt": "2026-07-25", "relationship": "indexed only; no formal relationship", "engagementStatus": "proposed; not undertaken", "profileSummary": "UNESCO's Memory of the World Programme promotes preservation of, access to, and awareness of documentary heritage and maintains international and regional registers. It addresses cultural-memory policy and preservation practice rather than guaranteeing survival of a specific archive or storage medium.", "potentialFit": "Could inform inclusive selection, provenance, authenticity, stewardship, and access principles for a durable cultural-memory system, while emphasizing that no single canon or institution should define humanity.", "risks": [ "Selection can reproduce colonial, linguistic, political, and institutional power if affected communities lack authority.", "Register status would not ensure physical durability, format readability, redundancy, or ethical future use.", "Eligibility, nomination, intellectual-property, privacy, cultural-property, and repatriation issues are context-specific." ], "evidenceBoundary": "Official-link review: direct automated retrieval failed, but the official UNESCO page was readable through the web renderer and describes preservation, access, awareness, committees, and registers. Current nomination rules, any collection's eligibility, and applicability to a GShips archive were not independently verified; independent review pending.", "conflicts": "Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; member-state nominations, institutional ownership, donor influence, community claims, and cultural-property conflicts were not independently investigated.", "whatWouldChange": "Community-led selection rules, rights and repatriation safeguards, tested multilingual recovery, diverse independent archives, and current official guidance would strengthen relevance." } } ], "linkedRecords": [], "referenceSnapshots": [ { "sourceId": "official-ecosystem-organization-entity-unesco-memory-of-the-world", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "13f7ddb453fc3e534bc5dc26c3f71126f22a60ee5522a3b8dbb3b945d1b67807", "snapshot": { "title": "UNESCO Memory of the World", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/memory-world", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Official-link review: direct automated retrieval failed, but the official UNESCO page was readable through the web renderer and describes preservation, access, awareness, committees, and registers. Current nomination rules, any collection's eligibility, and applicability to a GShips archive were not independently verified; independent review pending.", "subjectRecordType": "ecosystem-organization", "subjectRecordId": "entity-unesco-memory-of-the-world" } } ], "packetFingerprint": "845460d0f8c593a2f40905869933f06dc33858f248b19a064c24ac9bfb1c9779" }