# GShips offline review-notes worksheet Status: blank notes companion; not a decision bundle Packet: `systems:ai-autonomy` Packet SHA-256: `533f9d7d5a5c0633ed9f3dfecd1bc1d0437d1bbf523ec9bf80b50c896d930237` Release: `public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14` Source commit: `3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0` This readable worksheet is for local notes only. It cannot satisfy the closed decision-bundle schema and is not input to the validator. Use the fingerprinted JSON template for any future structured decision. This worksheet appoints nobody and records no completed review. Do not put identity documents, private contact data, medical or accessibility records, confidential conflict evidence, controlled material, or exploit details here. Keep notes offline until a separately authorized private handoff exists. ## Reviewer declaration Opaque public reviewer ID: Public label: Controlled scope codes: Qualification basis: Independence status and bounded basis: Conflict public summary: Compensation status and public summary: AI assistance and human-verification statement: Publication consent selections: ## 1. AI, LLMs, autonomy & digital twins - Record: `system:ai-autonomy` - Record SHA-256: `28806d124fc870b3b3a457af967c5acdf047bcb5cca01431b50801a388f3e43d` - Public record: /systems/ai-autonomy - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (ai-knowledge-assurance, governance-law-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 2. AI may change specialist workloads and the speed of learning, but every safety-critical function must remain safe and operable when every generative model is unavailable, compromised, stale, or intentionally isolated. - Record: `claim:claim-11-01` - Record SHA-256: `2b2c6728e9308b88365e344f701b7c321ba36223ed5b702c44f79b6011f567f1` - Public record: /claims/claim-11-01 - Minimum independent approvals: 2 - Required scope groups: domain-method (ai-knowledge-assurance, defensive-cyber-safety, governance-law-rights); rights-public-interest (affected-public-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 3. JPL’s Deep Space 1 Remote Agent flight experiment demonstrated bounded onboard planning, execution, and response to simulated faults; it did not demonstrate indefinite autonomous operation. - Record: `claim:claim-11-02` - Record SHA-256: `38271e4711b5d6e7f7c6d2dfeb4c92a067b527bf2ccb4a97448e71da4384b806` - Public record: /claims/claim-11-02 - Minimum independent approvals: 2 - Required scope groups: domain-method (ai-knowledge-assurance, defensive-cyber-safety, governance-law-rights); rights-public-interest (affected-public-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 4. NASA’s Starling demonstrations address distributed multi-spacecraft autonomy as a separate mission and evidence class. - Record: `claim:claim-11-03` - Record SHA-256: `77f0e6c3c5d9c49ce7e4af054dbcf2fe76ad2da3bd702417d4593e5eff14272a` - Public record: /claims/claim-11-03 - Minimum independent approvals: 2 - Required scope groups: domain-method (ai-knowledge-assurance, defensive-cyber-safety, governance-law-rights); rights-public-interest (affected-public-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 5. LLMs may serve bounded advisory uses such as retrieval, tutoring, translation, incident summarization, or candidate plans only with approved source revisions, exact locators, conflict handling, abstention, and independent authority. A signature can establish integrity and authenticity, not truth, currency, authorization, or safety. - Record: `claim:claim-11-04` - Record SHA-256: `56fe8de4eacc7361e91be29cd7d3acd32945264b2202031883139d03e96a065b` - Public record: /claims/claim-11-04 - Minimum independent approvals: 2 - Required scope groups: domain-method (ai-knowledge-assurance, governance-law-rights); rights-public-interest (affected-public-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 6. Digital-twin methods support specific testing and operational tasks within declared validity envelopes; every model is partial and may diverge as physical systems, configurations, and environments change. - Record: `claim:claim-11-05` - Record SHA-256: `ecccb3fd9bc72f211c52006694627970e079c0285b2fa385aa7354f895940e80` - Public record: /claims/claim-11-05 - Minimum independent approvals: 2 - Required scope groups: domain-method (ai-knowledge-assurance, defensive-cyber-safety, governance-law-rights); rights-public-interest (affected-public-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 7. This foundation corpus contains no published demonstration of a generative or autonomous system maintaining safe, legitimate judgment for a diverse crew across generations. - Record: `claim:claim-11-06` - Record SHA-256: `fe5dbd4bf05ae0a9f0ab04b432ded2e149b963bd465b088f67bad33c161b5d48` - Public record: /claims/claim-11-06 - Minimum independent approvals: 2 - Required scope groups: domain-method (ai-knowledge-assurance, defensive-cyber-safety, governance-law-rights); rights-public-interest (affected-public-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 8. Confabulation, invented citations, prompt or tool injection, poisoned procedures or telemetry, stale signed material, automation bias, privacy leakage, evaluator contamination, sensor spoofing, and correlated model/runtime failure threaten epistemic resilience. - Record: `claim:claim-11-07` - Record SHA-256: `768bb2389d46e55e38419c092772ff24a490b471c33fed16d5351f70c3fb3f7c` - Public record: /claims/claim-11-07 - Minimum independent approvals: 2 - Required scope groups: domain-method (ai-knowledge-assurance, defensive-cyber-safety, dual-use-risk, governance-law-rights); rights-public-interest (affected-public-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 9. Robots still lack the broad manipulation, diagnosis, fabrication, and self-repair needed to maintain a worldship. - Record: `claim:claim-11-08` - Record SHA-256: `8e0a459bb7f93a19fc0cacea0dc2b7eb61b1dcfbe408d3a0ec75190c2caf09fb` - Public record: /claims/claim-11-08 - Minimum independent approvals: 2 - Required scope groups: domain-method (ai-knowledge-assurance, defensive-cyber-safety, governance-law-rights); rights-public-interest (affected-public-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 10. Bounded offline operations support, digital-twin fault ranges, knowledge arks, source provenance, skill retention, and AI-off drills may benefit remote industry, disaster response, and long-lived institutions when their limits are independently evaluated. - Record: `claim:claim-11-09` - Record SHA-256: `de198a3912f3c2315c4cbf9edf97b6e782e38a95404da605e1f57c895c550804` - Public record: /claims/claim-11-09 - Minimum independent approvals: 2 - Required scope groups: domain-method (ai-knowledge-assurance, defensive-cyber-safety, governance-law-rights); rights-public-interest (affected-public-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 11. Require independently assessed safety properties, separate physical protection layers, explicit authority gates, tested workload and timing bounds, audited provenance, bounded abstention, manual operation, recovery drills, and independent appeal. - Record: `claim:claim-11-10` - Record SHA-256: `4c48cfe2109462b8663ca6f17458b61b4867bd93f22b1e45b23700765e45589f` - Public record: /claims/claim-11-10 - Minimum independent approvals: 2 - Required scope groups: domain-method (ai-knowledge-assurance, defensive-cyber-safety, dual-use-risk, governance-law-rights); rights-public-interest (affected-public-rights) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 12. The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles - Record: `claim-source:src-ak-nasa-digital-twin-2012` - Record SHA-256: `7dc587fc2cc5f55374f633dae2558909763aeb1c1337e479fd947424badc95ad` - Public record: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20120008178 - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 13. Deep Space 1: Autonomous Remote Agent - Record: `claim-source:src-ak-nasa-ds1-remote-agent` - Record SHA-256: `ec23247e17991e05a5e88a376fd8f21d79009c4d5dff22e7cc230af82f876ac1` - Public record: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/nmp/ds1/tech/autora.html - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 14. Software Assurance and Software Safety Standard - Record: `claim-source:src-ak-nasa-software-assurance-87398b` - Record SHA-256: `d6427b989658379d4754ab20c93d5cf9535fe23c6ca356c7d311a285029d3140` - Public record: https://standards.nasa.gov/standard/NASA/NASA-STD-87398 - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 15. Starling CubeSat Swarm Technology Demonstration Flight Results - Record: `claim-source:src-ak-nasa-starling-flight-results` - Record SHA-256: `c420a1d5ded26b43b4f0db1a9c8c6b965addc96d75026b3ad381bfaa88cd7a77` - Public record: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240006994 - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 16. Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) - Record: `claim-source:src-ak-nist-ai-rmf-100-1` - Record SHA-256: `44ed404a35aadd12a293b2b0f7e8939ef43b5d3c4114c9d456aaec429fd5e411` - Public record: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1 - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 17. Secure Software Development Practices for Generative AI and Dual-Use Foundation Models: An SSDF Community Profile - Record: `claim-source:src-ak-nist-ssdf-ai-800218a` - Record SHA-256: `83d3d0fd2357e1ad2ee1db05b3a6d25921c7e4abd3125132831fff5213ef2148` - Public record: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-218A - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 18. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence - Record: `claim-source:src-ak-unesco-ai-ethics` - Record SHA-256: `5df6900912cc9c2a8b02845211ccf6dff726220b3600e353bb6eaf2e75f0767d` - Public record: https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence?hub=1063 - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 19. Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations - Record: `claim-source:src-cr-nist-aml-100-2e2025` - Record SHA-256: `1573c29a25a7b8302f31f3a676e7e80866b6ff58e0c0718e60a38f52ecbd3e5a` - Public record: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-2e2025 - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 20. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research - Record: `claim-source:src-cu-unesco-genai-education` - Record SHA-256: `ed1746a19077b3ecd178cc5bfff679bf94370ef3e3038770e28b28e0fb515e99` - Public record: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693 - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 21. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2 - Record: `claim-source:src-cu-w3c-wcag22` - Record SHA-256: `36d83ac5a6eceb59dcdfb30918e2154e158d015fa3c29031673845a594599b7e` - Public record: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/ - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 22. Global Report on Assistive Technology - Record: `claim-source:src-cu-who-unicef-assistive-technology` - Record SHA-256: `8453de49aa65cf960e18570b9c038ea2a575728ec37a5a198392e3abd1c6bb36` - Public record: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049451 - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 23. RFC 9171: Bundle Protocol Version 7 - Record: `claim-source:src-pn-ietf-bpv7` - Record SHA-256: `2cc953af46ae7cc31aca7ff9b9cba37bc0bdc5a6f045b41a54e790affdba4395` - Public record: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9171.html - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: ## 24. Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking - Record: `claim-source:src-pn-nasa-dtn` - Record SHA-256: `3940190c4eaa98e8cbef9e104dffd5f111bb61b614373849ee0b327c593d7e75` - Public record: https://www.nasa.gov/communicating-with-missions/delay-disruption-tolerant-networking/ - Minimum independent approvals: 1 - Required scope groups: bounded-competence (information-science) Disposition: [ ] approve [ ] revise [ ] contest [ ] reject [ ] recuse Bounded scope: Rationale: Evidence source ID, exact locator, and finding: Proposed correction or recusal reason: What would change this decision: