{
  "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1",
  "packetId": "systems:analogs-verification",
  "stableId": "analogs-verification",
  "family": "systems",
  "slug": "analogs-verification",
  "title": "Analogs, testbeds, simulation & verification",
  "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started",
  "release": {
    "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14",
    "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0",
    "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25",
    "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z",
    "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com"
  },
  "paths": {
    "human": "/review/systems/analogs-verification",
    "family": "/review/systems",
    "packet": "/review-packets/systems/analogs-verification.bae96613b3775653.json",
    "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/systems/analogs-verification.bae96613b3775653.decision-template.json",
    "worksheet": "/review-packets/systems/analogs-verification.bae96613b3775653.worksheet.md",
    "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/bae96613b377565339057a41fd9d5d149416676148e517f6e317470f52776396.json"
  },
  "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.",
  "governingPolicies": [
    {
      "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001",
      "version": "0.1.0",
      "path": "/editorial-policy",
      "recordType": "governing-policy",
      "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001",
        "version": "0.1.0",
        "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed",
        "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25",
        "title": "Editorial governance and independent review",
        "publisher": "GShips Project",
        "maintainer": "Dammon Burden",
        "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.",
        "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.",
        "reviewerSelection": [
          "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.",
          "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.",
          "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim."
        ],
        "reviewProcess": [
          "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.",
          "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.",
          "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.",
          "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.",
          "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label."
        ],
        "appealAndCorrection": [
          "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.",
          "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.",
          "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.",
          "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade."
        ],
        "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.",
        "correctionPath": "/corrections"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "policy-dual-use-001",
      "version": "0.1.0",
      "path": "/dual-use",
      "recordType": "governing-policy",
      "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "policy-dual-use-001",
        "version": "0.1.0",
        "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational",
        "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25",
        "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary",
        "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.",
        "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.",
        "allowedInPrinciple": [
          "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection",
          "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response",
          "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity",
          "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery",
          "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research"
        ],
        "prohibited": [
          "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause",
          "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support",
          "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads",
          "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems",
          "Autonomous force application",
          "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control",
          "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments"
        ],
        "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [
          "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening",
          "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable",
          "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses",
          "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal",
          "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review",
          "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths",
          "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security"
        ],
        "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.",
        "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.",
        "correctionPath": "/corrections"
      }
    }
  ],
  "reviewContract": {
    "questions": [
      {
        "id": "question-1",
        "text": "Does each evidence basis, readiness level, confidence level, rationale, and locator match the frozen sources?",
        "required": true
      },
      {
        "id": "question-2",
        "text": "Are dependencies, failure modes, precursors, unknowns, Earthside benefits, and the stop gate technically and ethically bounded?",
        "required": true
      },
      {
        "id": "question-3",
        "text": "Which conclusion should be approved, revised, contested, rejected, or recused from at its current fingerprint?",
        "required": true
      }
    ],
    "exclusions": [
      "A system packet is not a complete spacecraft design, feasibility proof, safety case, or launch authorization.",
      "Context sources do not become direct support unless the record says so with an exact locator and relation."
    ],
    "requestedScopeCodes": [
      "information-science",
      "security-assurance",
      "systems-engineering"
    ],
    "dispositions": [
      "approve",
      "revise",
      "contest",
      "reject",
      "recuse"
    ],
    "prohibitedInputs": [
      "private legal names or contact details",
      "identity documents or raw credential files",
      "accessibility or medical records",
      "confidential conflict evidence",
      "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material"
    ],
    "freshness": {
      "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 365,
      "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family."
    },
    "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.",
    "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes."
  },
  "primaryRecords": [
    {
      "recordType": "system",
      "recordId": "analogs-verification",
      "title": "Analogs, testbeds, simulation & verification",
      "publicPath": "/systems/analogs-verification",
      "recordFingerprint": "2713a7b5c12845ef5b7bc0c2a10f637072749782824b5aa7d51bcc21f7feda02",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "slug": "analogs-verification",
        "name": "Analogs, testbeds, simulation & verification",
        "shortName": "Proof ladder",
        "index": 18,
        "thesis": "Worldship capability must climb a transparent proof ladder from components to integrated analogs to autonomous space habitats; no single analog validates the whole mission.",
        "currentState": [
          "ISS, HERA, CHAPEA, Concordia, Biosphere 2, MELiSSA, Lunar Palace, and habitat laboratories each test different slices.",
          "Digital twins, fault injection, model-based engineering, hardware-in-the-loop, and human-in-the-loop testing are mature methods.",
          "Negative results often provide the most useful evidence about hidden couplings and institutional behavior."
        ],
        "unknowns": [
          "Short duration, small crew, Earth support, 1 g, and easy rescue limit transfer from present analogs.",
          "There is no shared benchmark for material closure, autonomous recovery, governance stress, knowledge loss, or multi-domain faults.",
          "Organizations can distort analog outcomes when branding, schedules, or funding discourage transparent failure reporting."
        ],
        "earthBenefits": [
          "Open stress tests improve resilience of buildings, utilities, hospitals, farms, and emergency organizations.",
          "Shared datasets and reference scenarios reduce duplicated effort across research programs."
        ],
        "dependencies": [
          "mission-architecture",
          "institutions-workforce",
          "cybersecurity"
        ],
        "gate": "Every claimed capability must identify its environment, duration, scale, intervention, failure history, evidence boundary, and next harder test.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NASA Analog Missions",
            "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/analog-missions/",
            "kind": "Primary or institutional source"
          },
          {
            "title": "Biosphere 2 user facilities",
            "url": "https://biosphere2.org/research/user-facility-information",
            "kind": "Primary or institutional source"
          },
          {
            "title": "NASA HERA",
            "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/hera-about-hera/",
            "kind": "Primary or institutional source"
          }
        ],
        "failureModes": [
          "Short duration, selected crews, hidden resupply, sponsor pressure, or weak instrumentation makes an analog look more complete than it is.",
          "Subsystem success is extrapolated to an integrated habitat without shared-boundary, common-cause, or recovery evidence."
        ],
        "precursors": [
          "Cross-site protocols spanning sealed habitats, stations, polar bases, submarines, farms, hospitals, and remote industry.",
          "Open benchmark scenarios with fault injection, mass and energy balances, preregistration, and publication of negative results."
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-18-01",
      "title": "Worldship capability must climb a transparent proof ladder from components to integrated analogs to autonomous space habitats; no single analog validates the whole mission.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-18-01",
      "recordFingerprint": "77117d77c9cb8341e62b6814aa513f9a9eac87ced6ba1c1437f0579b4b8f8bd6",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-pa-nasa-chapea",
        "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-18-01",
        "systemSlug": "analogs-verification",
        "kind": "thesis",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "thesis"
        },
        "statement": "Worldship capability must climb a transparent proof ladder from components to integrated analogs to autonomous space habitats; no single analog validates the whole mission.",
        "statementFingerprint": "2225ba17ba38267b268b8c71190925991a69597bfd6f81828fb15848ea47c5e3",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "normative",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "strong",
          "rationale": "Systems practice and the sharply different boundaries of current analogs support a staged proof ladder. The ladder is an editorial evidence rule, not proof that a worldship can be built."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Lifecycle, verification, validation, technical assessment, and progressively representative evidence.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-chapea",
            "locator": "Program goals, habitat, stressors, schedule, and research scope.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars",
            "locator": "Objectives-first architecture, use cases, segments, and annual revision process.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-18-1",
          "core-18-2",
          "core-18-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "A reviewed evidence framework that predicts transfer and failure better with fewer or different stages would replace the ladder; one successful analog alone would not.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-18-02",
      "title": "ISS, HERA, CHAPEA, Concordia, Biosphere 2, MELiSSA, Lunar Palace, and habitat laboratories each test different slices.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-18-02",
      "recordFingerprint": "c1a07e65803cf9368db208d581c604d0e94ff34fea2b3b68403d7853f0234cad",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-pa-esa-concordia",
        "src-pa-esa-melissa",
        "src-pa-nasa-chapea"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-18-02",
        "systemSlug": "analogs-verification",
        "kind": "current state",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "currentState",
          "index": 0
        },
        "statement": "ISS, HERA, CHAPEA, Concordia, Biosphere 2, MELiSSA, Lunar Palace, and habitat laboratories each test different slices.",
        "statementFingerprint": "d54722405a80780d5582a98247d7c24596f1f9af7f659366d360643af60cccfb",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "observed",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "strong",
          "rationale": "Official program and facility records document distinct experimental environments and objectives. This assessment does not extend to every named analog's unpublished results."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-chapea",
            "locator": "Habitat, crew, mission duration, stressors, and research goals.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-esa-concordia",
            "locator": "Isolation, hypoxia, sleep, small-team, and countermeasure studies.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-esa-melissa",
            "locator": "Compartment functions and regenerative-loop research boundary.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-18-1",
          "core-18-2",
          "core-18-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Program closure, major redesign, contradictory official records, or evidence that the facilities exercise equivalent system boundaries would require remapping the analogs.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-18-03",
      "title": "Digital twins, fault injection, model-based engineering, hardware-in-the-loop, and human-in-the-loop testing are mature methods.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-18-03",
      "recordFingerprint": "155abde0cbd28ea009869744d5db36e99448071933f1b328bb3d7c22da5f5989",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars",
        "src-pa-nist-ai-600-1"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-18-03",
        "systemSlug": "analogs-verification",
        "kind": "current state",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "currentState",
          "index": 1
        },
        "statement": "Digital twins, fault injection, model-based engineering, hardware-in-the-loop, and human-in-the-loop testing are mature methods.",
        "statementFingerprint": "c937deb9b253e84f03c902f16a443ca752cd588d54fd0c2c61bffc13a8935937",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "demonstrated",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "strong",
          "rationale": "Model-based engineering, verification and validation, simulations, hardware testing, and human-in-the-loop evaluation are established current practices, while their transfer remains specific to the represented system and environment."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Modeling and simulation, verification, validation, technical assessment, test, and human-system lifecycle practice.",
            "relation": "direct-demonstration"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars",
            "locator": "Objectives, architecture decomposition, use cases, segments, and documented data and technology gaps.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nist-ai-600-1",
            "locator": "Predeployment testing, evaluation, red-teaming, provenance, and monitoring for generative-AI systems.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-18-1",
          "core-18-2",
          "core-18-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Evidence that these methods fail to predict representative hardware, software, human, or organizational behavior in a named domain would narrow their use; no method label validates an unrepresented worldship environment.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-18-04",
      "title": "Negative results often provide the most useful evidence about hidden couplings and institutional behavior.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-18-04",
      "recordFingerprint": "7b8eb5cc95f3650171295810b6eaf85ce179417cb51777aa3e47bea5f57b5c82",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-18-04",
        "systemSlug": "analogs-verification",
        "kind": "current state",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "currentState",
          "index": 2
        },
        "statement": "Negative results often provide the most useful evidence about hidden couplings and institutional behavior.",
        "statementFingerprint": "4b64fa22327d47dce4c76824189effad3ccb895d521ac8737db1ccd59cbcbce7",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "normative",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "Failure, dissent, and discrepancy records can reveal missing requirements, interfaces, assumptions, and organizational pressures; 'often most useful' is an editorial priority rather than a universal measured ranking."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Technical assessment, risk, nonconformance, verification, validation, independent review, and lessons across lifecycle.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
            "locator": "Psychological safety, learning, evaluation, collective leadership, and institutional incentives.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
            "locator": "Reproducibility, open data, software, publications, and transparent scientific practice.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-18-1",
          "core-18-2",
          "core-18-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Comparative evidence showing that negative-result publication produces less learning or more harm than a better disclosure method in a defined context would change the priority wording.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-18-05",
      "title": "Short duration, small crew, Earth support, 1 g, and easy rescue limit transfer from present analogs.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-18-05",
      "recordFingerprint": "68d0ab4d0f7a73ef2d7348837ebe78606482c52da7fbcaaebd6f505ef57bc7ee",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-pa-biosphere-energy-water",
        "src-pa-esa-concordia",
        "src-pa-nasa-chapea"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-18-05",
        "systemSlug": "analogs-verification",
        "kind": "unknown",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "unknowns",
          "index": 0
        },
        "statement": "Short duration, small crew, Earth support, 1 g, and easy rescue limit transfer from present analogs.",
        "statementFingerprint": "d03cd1abe1422e70612aa11327684bb313e9f4a33697ebd15d09481524910d24",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "observed",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "strong",
          "rationale": "Current analog descriptions expose finite duration, small crews, Earth infrastructure, terrestrial gravity, and intervention or rescue paths. These conditions constrain transfer to an isolated multigenerational habitat."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-chapea",
            "locator": "Crew size, mission schedule, simulated stressors, and Earth-based habitat.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-biosphere-energy-water",
            "locator": "External power, cooling, heating, and water infrastructure.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-esa-concordia",
            "locator": "Terrestrial isolation environment and research subjects.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-18-1",
          "core-18-2",
          "core-18-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Longer and larger integrated trials with autonomous logistics, unavailable rescue, representative gravity and radiation, and published failure histories would narrow these transfer limits.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-18-06",
      "title": "There is no shared benchmark for material closure, autonomous recovery, governance stress, knowledge loss, or multi-domain faults.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-18-06",
      "recordFingerprint": "67af42c08f79394648284ce0aca656c9ce54d2917a442daf6981191e87cd5176",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars",
        "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-18-06",
        "systemSlug": "analogs-verification",
        "kind": "unknown",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "unknowns",
          "index": 1
        },
        "statement": "There is no shared benchmark for material closure, autonomous recovery, governance stress, knowledge loss, or multi-domain faults.",
        "statementFingerprint": "570e38c5cc99f918bd366ecf1f97d0c917a1cd82987a187f2a30abc84320ebef",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "observed",
          "readiness": "early-research",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "Reviewed programs publish domain-specific architectures, tests, and taxonomies, but this corpus found no shared cross-program benchmark spanning the five listed worldship-scale outcomes."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars",
            "locator": "Architecture-specific objectives, decomposition, use cases, and gaps.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
            "locator": "Technology taxonomy and portfolio-classification purpose rather than integrated closure or governance benchmark.",
            "relation": "limitation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Program-specific verification, validation, measures, and test planning.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-18-1",
          "core-18-2",
          "core-18-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "A discoverable, adopted, independently governed benchmark covering material closure, autonomous recovery, governance stress, knowledge loss, and multi-domain faults would change the claim.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-18-07",
      "title": "Organizations can distort analog outcomes when branding, schedules, or funding discourage transparent failure reporting.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-18-07",
      "recordFingerprint": "6053d5f4182a4f14c41d72362c2666f977ce78329b7283964dfd4393ab8cdb91",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [
          "governance"
        ],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [
          "governance-law-rights"
        ],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "domain-method",
            "scopeClass": "domain-method",
            "oneOf": [
              "governance-law-rights",
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rights-public-interest",
            "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-18-07",
        "systemSlug": "analogs-verification",
        "kind": "unknown",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "unknowns",
          "index": 2
        },
        "statement": "Organizations can distort analog outcomes when branding, schedules, or funding discourage transparent failure reporting.",
        "statementFingerprint": "dad87fd5865a4ace184bfe161a8c994c06617cf12912482d2ef5abd9feb9dff5",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "modeled",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "Team-science and systems-assurance guidance identify incentives, psychological safety, independence, conflicts, and schedule pressure as factors that can affect reporting and decision quality."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
            "locator": "Psychological safety, institutional incentives, evaluation, leadership, and collaboration conditions.",
            "relation": "direct-model"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Independent review, risk, dissent, technical assessment, decision analysis, and review criteria.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
            "locator": "Open publication, data, software, and reproducibility commitments.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-18-1",
          "core-18-2",
          "core-18-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Independent comparative evidence that disclosure controls, review independence, and incentive design do not affect analog reporting would narrow this institutional-risk conclusion.",
        "highConsequence": [
          "governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-18-08",
      "title": "Open stress tests improve resilience of buildings, utilities, hospitals, farms, and emergency organizations.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-18-08",
      "recordFingerprint": "f3305bf7d399c58cb708c68fc7ae4d530b4085cba8815c5d53ef41b8ca54b683",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-pa-doe-microgrids",
        "src-pa-nist-csf-2"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-18-08",
        "systemSlug": "analogs-verification",
        "kind": "earth benefit",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "earthBenefits",
          "index": 0
        },
        "statement": "Open stress tests improve resilience of buildings, utilities, hospitals, farms, and emergency organizations.",
        "statementFingerprint": "c1a4ba9b2cb2ae160f15f3190cd7c6ce0bf2a988b3f9913d59f5f09b4042f57f",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "proposed",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "Fault injection, exercises, verification, and recovery testing are established methods across engineered systems; benefits to any named facility depend on representative scenarios and safe execution."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Test, verification, validation, risk, failure, and technical assessment methods.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nist-csf-2",
            "locator": "Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover outcomes and profiles.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-doe-microgrids",
            "locator": "Islanding, black start, resynchronization, controller functions, and operational lessons.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-18-1",
          "core-18-2",
          "core-18-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Measured exercises that increase harm, fail to transfer, or produce no resilience gain in a defined sector would require narrower scenarios or a different assurance method.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-18-09",
      "title": "Shared datasets and reference scenarios reduce duplicated effort across research programs.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-18-09",
      "recordFingerprint": "1ab59dc4e143f90b62d98f70ba7fa3d5adf2af4a72eabd61711cf1f3724c444d",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
        "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars",
        "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-18-09",
        "systemSlug": "analogs-verification",
        "kind": "earth benefit",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "earthBenefits",
          "index": 1
        },
        "statement": "Shared datasets and reference scenarios reduce duplicated effort across research programs.",
        "statementFingerprint": "2b1919ea0315e2512e92f39adb9950c0172522cc48d2141e3fce82df0c037e80",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "proposed",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "Shared taxonomies, open artifacts, and common models support reuse and comparison; the magnitude of reduced duplication has not been measured for GShips."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
            "locator": "Common technology classification for portfolio communication and discovery.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
            "locator": "Open data, software, publications, tools, participation, and reproducibility.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars",
            "locator": "Shared objectives, architecture definitions, use cases, and documented gaps.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-18-1",
          "core-18-2",
          "core-18-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Program evidence showing that shared scenarios create coordination cost, suppress useful diversity, or do not reduce duplicate work would change the recommendation.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-18-10",
      "title": "Every claimed capability must identify its environment, duration, scale, intervention, failure history, evidence boundary, and next harder test.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-18-10",
      "recordFingerprint": "e298befeb55ba21ccee84294ad8676ec7ae82e52d1ebe456ee4ed7f52d056f49",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "security-assurance",
              "systems-engineering"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-18-10",
        "systemSlug": "analogs-verification",
        "kind": "decision gate",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "gate"
        },
        "statement": "Every claimed capability must identify its environment, duration, scale, intervention, failure history, evidence boundary, and next harder test.",
        "statementFingerprint": "7534b5978a4bf85869182c795156627f6d6e5fb2e59fe8c8f69c0863edf0e879",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "normative",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "strong",
          "rationale": "This is a reproducible evidence-admission rule grounded in verification, validation, and explicit environment and lifecycle boundaries."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Product verification, product validation, intended environment, stakeholder expectations, risk, and captured evidence.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars",
            "locator": "Architecture decomposition, objectives, functions, segments, use cases, and documented gaps.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-18-1",
          "core-18-2",
          "core-18-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "A stronger independently reviewed schema that preserves experimental boundary, intervention, failure, scale, duration, and next-test information could replace this checklist.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim-source",
      "recordId": "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
      "title": "Open Science",
      "publicPath": "https://science.nasa.gov/open-science/",
      "recordFingerprint": "97a09c788cd8ed1efb6c0d704d9d40a3e55f7c8eaadce2c2a993375041fbc8ae",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "information-science"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
        "title": "Open Science",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA Science",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://science.nasa.gov/open-science/",
        "kind": "active-institutional-policy-program",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "NASA open-science policy, data, software, publication, participation, and reproducibility context."
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim-source",
      "recordId": "src-pa-esa-concordia",
      "title": "Isolation studies in Antarctica",
      "publicPath": "https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Exploration/Isolation_studies_in_Antarctica",
      "recordFingerprint": "43ec053dddc5b835520a04b8f3d66f34c7369efd300eb39ca9b22f3d2be3eb1b",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "information-science"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-esa-concordia",
        "title": "Isolation studies in Antarctica",
        "authors": [
          "European Space Agency"
        ],
        "publisher": "ESA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Exploration/Isolation_studies_in_Antarctica",
        "kind": "active-analog-program-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Isolation, hypoxia, sleep, small-team, and countermeasure research at Concordia Station."
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim-source",
      "recordId": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
      "title": "2024 NASA Technology Taxonomy",
      "publicPath": "https://www.nasa.gov/otps/2024-nasa-technology-taxonomy/",
      "recordFingerprint": "87d47de6cbbc1a4457881fef14a44e22fd463bc17a64dbdf794f22e208fc7915",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "information-science"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
        "title": "2024 NASA Technology Taxonomy",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2024,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/otps/2024-nasa-technology-taxonomy/",
        "kind": "institutional-capability-taxonomy",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Three-level classification of seventeen technology areas for portfolio communication and discovery."
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim-source",
      "recordId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
      "title": "The Science and Practice of Team Science",
      "publicPath": "https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/29043/interactive/",
      "recordFingerprint": "a3fab330d13623cf46ab40800fadb9ded54218cbf943b34c6e94b01f384bf5ba",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "information-science"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
        "title": "The Science and Practice of Team Science",
        "authors": [
          "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine"
        ],
        "publisher": "National Academies Press",
        "year": 2025,
        "url": "https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/29043/interactive/",
        "kind": "consensus-study",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Collective leadership, team charters, psychological safety, collaboration infrastructure, evaluation, and institutional support."
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim-source",
      "recordId": "src-pa-nist-csf-2",
      "title": "The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0",
      "publicPath": "https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/CSWP/NIST.CSWP.29.pdf",
      "recordFingerprint": "dc71e2ac06d05e0a7a6c032f0df743d1fcf357ae95d866a7f755df060bddb6fe",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "information-science"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nist-csf-2",
        "title": "The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0",
        "authors": [
          "National Institute of Standards and Technology"
        ],
        "publisher": "NIST",
        "year": 2024,
        "url": "https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/CSWP/NIST.CSWP.29.pdf",
        "kind": "government-cybersecurity-framework",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover outcomes and organizational profiles."
      }
    }
  ],
  "linkedRecords": [],
  "referenceSnapshots": [
    {
      "sourceId": "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "97a09c788cd8ed1efb6c0d704d9d40a3e55f7c8eaadce2c2a993375041fbc8ae",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
        "title": "Open Science",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA Science",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://science.nasa.gov/open-science/",
        "kind": "active-institutional-policy-program",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "NASA open-science policy, data, software, publication, participation, and reproducibility context."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "3337ce334909311c3ab1c604773fdcc31a01dd8e0e781d040debd3b6e33cea22",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "title": "NASA Systems Engineering Handbook",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2016,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf",
        "kind": "institutional-handbook",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Lifecycle, requirements, interfaces, verification, validation, decision analysis, and risk."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-biosphere-energy-water",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "412602f73e4a7ea574d79f59d2b9a841c1ce19f150d7f57ad4fc34e737bc2071",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-biosphere-energy-water",
        "title": "Energy and Water",
        "authors": [
          "University of Arizona Biosphere 2"
        ],
        "publisher": "University of Arizona",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://biosphere2.org/research/user-facility-information/energy-and-water",
        "kind": "research-facility-technical-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "External power, cooling, heating, and water infrastructure supporting the enclosed research facility."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-doe-microgrids",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "74396b6f9d8fb2430311685ac2173717c0b967aaa92d8a1306d94c3ecb7f3f5d",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-doe-microgrids",
        "title": "Microgrids for Resiliency",
        "authors": [
          "United States Department of Energy"
        ],
        "publisher": "U.S. Department of Energy",
        "year": 2021,
        "url": "https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/28-01-2021_doe-voe-microgrids-for-resiliency-report-2.pdf",
        "kind": "government-technical-report",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Controller functions, islanding, black start, resynchronization, ownership, and operating lessons."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-esa-concordia",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "43ec053dddc5b835520a04b8f3d66f34c7369efd300eb39ca9b22f3d2be3eb1b",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-esa-concordia",
        "title": "Isolation studies in Antarctica",
        "authors": [
          "European Space Agency"
        ],
        "publisher": "ESA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Exploration/Isolation_studies_in_Antarctica",
        "kind": "active-analog-program-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Isolation, hypoxia, sleep, small-team, and countermeasure research at Concordia Station."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-esa-melissa",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "90915f60b25154aeb56cd818aa4e039f67f99b7f1324b4f80ea2cc7c1e133e43",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-esa-melissa",
        "title": "MELiSSA Closed Loop Compartments",
        "authors": [
          "European Space Agency"
        ],
        "publisher": "ESA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/Melissa/Closed_Loop_Compartments",
        "kind": "active-technology-program-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Five-compartment regenerative life-support concept, unit functions, and incomplete waste-conversion boundary."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-chapea",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "6cd53784e44d0b1aa513a944a0cea3c6ec9be3c0cea643aa29258f41114bab1b",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasa-chapea",
        "title": "About CHAPEA",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/chapea/about-chapea/",
        "kind": "active-analog-program-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Habitat, schedule, stressors, research goals, and stated limits of NASA's Mars surface simulation."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "a6d6ee3a2c6a911b59805537f738347ad0b375e0860e6a2b7ebd1cedc0ab5253",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasa-moon-mars",
        "title": "Moon to Mars Architecture Definition Documents",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/moontomarsarchitecture-architecturedefinitiondocuments/",
        "kind": "active-architecture-program-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Objectives-first architecture, annual revision process, use cases, segments, and documented technology and data gaps."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "87d47de6cbbc1a4457881fef14a44e22fd463bc17a64dbdf794f22e208fc7915",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
        "title": "2024 NASA Technology Taxonomy",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2024,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/otps/2024-nasa-technology-taxonomy/",
        "kind": "institutional-capability-taxonomy",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Three-level classification of seventeen technology areas for portfolio communication and discovery."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "a3fab330d13623cf46ab40800fadb9ded54218cbf943b34c6e94b01f384bf5ba",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
        "title": "The Science and Practice of Team Science",
        "authors": [
          "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine"
        ],
        "publisher": "National Academies Press",
        "year": 2025,
        "url": "https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/29043/interactive/",
        "kind": "consensus-study",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Collective leadership, team charters, psychological safety, collaboration infrastructure, evaluation, and institutional support."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nist-ai-600-1",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "4066eeecafdc810d0ad828dd8bd53e4a05daeb6b03dde36fafe581976402cb59",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nist-ai-600-1",
        "title": "Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile",
        "authors": [
          "National Institute of Standards and Technology"
        ],
        "publisher": "NIST",
        "year": 2024,
        "url": "https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.600-1",
        "kind": "government-risk-management-profile",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Generative-AI governance, provenance, evaluation, security, confabulation, privacy, and incident disclosure."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nist-csf-2",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "dc71e2ac06d05e0a7a6c032f0df743d1fcf357ae95d866a7f755df060bddb6fe",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nist-csf-2",
        "title": "The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0",
        "authors": [
          "National Institute of Standards and Technology"
        ],
        "publisher": "NIST",
        "year": 2024,
        "url": "https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/CSWP/NIST.CSWP.29.pdf",
        "kind": "government-cybersecurity-framework",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover outcomes and organizational profiles."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-cd-nasa-open-science",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "2bcc150176f05fd2620cd306987f0829c1e57415ff992be738e1aa0966fe1629",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "Open Science",
        "url": "https://science.nasa.gov/open-science/",
        "checkedAt": null,
        "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.",
        "subjectRecordType": "claim-source",
        "subjectRecordId": "src-cd-nasa-open-science"
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-pa-esa-concordia",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "4bb77d4395e6eb82147e317e6151858baf5aef749f77f8a44f418aa9c784642a",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "Isolation studies in Antarctica",
        "url": "https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Exploration/Isolation_studies_in_Antarctica",
        "checkedAt": null,
        "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.",
        "subjectRecordType": "claim-source",
        "subjectRecordId": "src-pa-esa-concordia"
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "027931cb044353cfe3df4670b913adbacfb6809aa3a795426c704791a3cd5e09",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "2024 NASA Technology Taxonomy",
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/otps/2024-nasa-technology-taxonomy/",
        "checkedAt": null,
        "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.",
        "subjectRecordType": "claim-source",
        "subjectRecordId": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy"
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "7396fc5f73aa6e0fc68b4058127aecad98f45d85b09b4b61b35862e6d41475e2",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "The Science and Practice of Team Science",
        "url": "https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/29043/interactive/",
        "checkedAt": null,
        "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.",
        "subjectRecordType": "claim-source",
        "subjectRecordId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025"
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-pa-nist-csf-2",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "50fcd3e6a645e9ffd11600e0cba7c9a40ea3ecc10918dc32ce5e8bfce638a4aa",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0",
        "url": "https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/CSWP/NIST.CSWP.29.pdf",
        "checkedAt": null,
        "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.",
        "subjectRecordType": "claim-source",
        "subjectRecordId": "src-pa-nist-csf-2"
      }
    }
  ],
  "packetFingerprint": "bae96613b377565339057a41fd9d5d149416676148e517f6e317470f52776396"
}