{
  "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1",
  "packetId": "systems:institutions-workforce",
  "stableId": "institutions-workforce",
  "family": "systems",
  "slug": "institutions-workforce",
  "title": "Institutions, capital, standards & workforce",
  "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started",
  "release": {
    "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14",
    "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0",
    "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25",
    "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z",
    "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com"
  },
  "paths": {
    "human": "/review/systems/institutions-workforce",
    "family": "/review/systems",
    "packet": "/review-packets/systems/institutions-workforce.d79e33c128f5f4da.json",
    "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/systems/institutions-workforce.d79e33c128f5f4da.decision-template.json",
    "worksheet": "/review-packets/systems/institutions-workforce.d79e33c128f5f4da.worksheet.md",
    "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/d79e33c128f5f4da8b9da34129116b8d3e789865d15051be0ff6fa0db2e7cc5d.json"
  },
  "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.",
  "governingPolicies": [
    {
      "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001",
      "version": "0.1.0",
      "path": "/editorial-policy",
      "recordType": "governing-policy",
      "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001",
        "version": "0.1.0",
        "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed",
        "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25",
        "title": "Editorial governance and independent review",
        "publisher": "GShips Project",
        "maintainer": "Dammon Burden",
        "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.",
        "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.",
        "reviewerSelection": [
          "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.",
          "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.",
          "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim."
        ],
        "reviewProcess": [
          "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.",
          "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.",
          "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.",
          "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.",
          "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label."
        ],
        "appealAndCorrection": [
          "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.",
          "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.",
          "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.",
          "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade."
        ],
        "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.",
        "correctionPath": "/corrections"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "policy-dual-use-001",
      "version": "0.1.0",
      "path": "/dual-use",
      "recordType": "governing-policy",
      "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "policy-dual-use-001",
        "version": "0.1.0",
        "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational",
        "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25",
        "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary",
        "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.",
        "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.",
        "allowedInPrinciple": [
          "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection",
          "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response",
          "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity",
          "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery",
          "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research"
        ],
        "prohibited": [
          "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause",
          "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support",
          "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads",
          "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems",
          "Autonomous force application",
          "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control",
          "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments"
        ],
        "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [
          "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening",
          "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable",
          "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses",
          "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal",
          "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review",
          "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths",
          "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security"
        ],
        "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.",
        "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.",
        "correctionPath": "/corrections"
      }
    }
  ],
  "reviewContract": {
    "questions": [
      {
        "id": "question-1",
        "text": "Does each evidence basis, readiness level, confidence level, rationale, and locator match the frozen sources?",
        "required": true
      },
      {
        "id": "question-2",
        "text": "Are dependencies, failure modes, precursors, unknowns, Earthside benefits, and the stop gate technically and ethically bounded?",
        "required": true
      },
      {
        "id": "question-3",
        "text": "Which conclusion should be approved, revised, contested, rejected, or recused from at its current fingerprint?",
        "required": true
      }
    ],
    "exclusions": [
      "A system packet is not a complete spacecraft design, feasibility proof, safety case, or launch authorization.",
      "Context sources do not become direct support unless the record says so with an exact locator and relation."
    ],
    "requestedScopeCodes": [
      "governance-law-rights",
      "information-science",
      "institution-building",
      "systems-engineering"
    ],
    "dispositions": [
      "approve",
      "revise",
      "contest",
      "reject",
      "recuse"
    ],
    "prohibitedInputs": [
      "private legal names or contact details",
      "identity documents or raw credential files",
      "accessibility or medical records",
      "confidential conflict evidence",
      "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material"
    ],
    "freshness": {
      "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 365,
      "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family."
    },
    "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.",
    "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes."
  },
  "primaryRecords": [
    {
      "recordType": "system",
      "recordId": "institutions-workforce",
      "title": "Institutions, capital, standards & workforce",
      "publicPath": "/systems/institutions-workforce",
      "recordFingerprint": "182659f3d9f465916bf309fc9d81cc51d77458050bc6b5040e7b4d44a54f1368",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "slug": "institutions-workforce",
        "name": "Institutions, capital, standards & workforce",
        "shortName": "Coordination",
        "index": 20,
        "thesis": "The enduring product is an institution that can learn, publish failure, transfer leadership, fund useful modules, and coordinate many organizations without pretending one company can vertically integrate a civilization.",
        "currentState": [
          "CERN, ISS, the Human Genome Project, Voyager, standards bodies, and open-science communities demonstrate durable coordination patterns.",
          "NASA, ESA, DOE, universities, national labs, professional societies, startups, and analog facilities already own many enabling capabilities.",
          "SBIR/STTR, user facilities, Space Act Agreements, prizes, philanthropy, venture capital, and paid studies provide staged funding paths."
        ],
        "unknowns": [
          "No procurement market for generation ships was identified in the reviewed corpus; any near-term product needs a separately validated customer and measurable Earth or Solar System outcome.",
          "Open knowledge, public trust, proprietary product work, defense funding, export controls, and sponsor influence require explicit firewalls.",
          "Charismatic-founder dependence is incompatible with a century-scale mission."
        ],
        "earthBenefits": [
          "Open standards, shared test infrastructure, transparent evidence, and leadership succession improve any long-horizon public-interest program.",
          "A trusted capability map helps researchers, students, funders, and customers find useful work now."
        ],
        "dependencies": [
          "mission-architecture",
          "analogs-verification",
          "governance-law"
        ],
        "gate": "Fund only work with a real near-term beneficiary, a measurable capability gap, reversible tests, transparent conflicts, and an independent review path.",
        "sources": [
          {
            "title": "NASA Technology Taxonomy",
            "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/otps/2024-nasa-technology-taxonomy/",
            "kind": "Primary or institutional source"
          },
          {
            "title": "INCOSE Space Systems Working Group",
            "url": "https://www.incose.org/group/space-systems-working-group/",
            "kind": "Primary or institutional source"
          },
          {
            "title": "NASA Partnering",
            "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/partnerships/how-to-partner/",
            "kind": "Primary or institutional source"
          }
        ],
        "failureModes": [
          "Funding discontinuity, founder capture, sponsor influence, standards fragmentation, or talent loss destroys institutional memory.",
          "A generation-ship narrative outruns useful products and evidence, producing hype, secrecy, or a brittle vertically integrated program."
        ],
        "precursors": [
          "Durable collaborations such as CERN, ISS, standards bodies, open-source foundations, and long-lived public research programs.",
          "Public-benefit ventures and technology commons that earn revenue from bounded Earth or Solar System assurance products."
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-20-01",
      "title": "The enduring product is an institution that can learn, publish failure, transfer leadership, fund useful modules, and coordinate many organizations without pretending one company can vertically integrate a civilization.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-20-01",
      "recordFingerprint": "827e964c87481699e350c161167088452b1c36d96285ca284f925f2e35ad0f2c",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [
          "governance"
        ],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [
          "governance-law-rights"
        ],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "domain-method",
            "scopeClass": "domain-method",
            "oneOf": [
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rights-public-interest",
            "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2015",
        "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-20-01",
        "systemSlug": "institutions-workforce",
        "kind": "thesis",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "thesis"
        },
        "statement": "The enduring product is an institution that can learn, publish failure, transfer leadership, fund useful modules, and coordinate many organizations without pretending one company can vertically integrate a civilization.",
        "statementFingerprint": "163b85266202303b0584c13c998e4e782db7067893ba1459a39241ef941c8e76",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "normative",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "Team-science evidence and systems practice support learning, shared infrastructure, explicit roles, configuration control, and succession. The claim remains a governance prescription, not a forecast of organizational success."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
            "locator": "Collective leadership, charters, psychological safety, infrastructure, evaluation, and institutional support.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Lifecycle, stakeholder, configuration, technical-data, decision, verification, and validation practices.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2015",
            "locator": "Team composition, leadership, collaboration planning, and institutional support.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-20-1",
          "core-20-2",
          "core-20-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Evidence that a different institutional form more reliably preserves truth, accountability, leadership transfer, useful funding, and multi-organization coordination would change the prescription.",
        "highConsequence": [
          "governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-20-02",
      "title": "CERN, ISS, the Human Genome Project, Voyager, standards bodies, and open-science communities demonstrate durable coordination patterns.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-20-02",
      "recordFingerprint": "d0fa5a742cee6e2dae4da8476786f8644cee4b59d9bc1c039a1f7c680425ad03",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-mp-voyager",
        "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-20-02",
        "systemSlug": "institutions-workforce",
        "kind": "current state",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "currentState",
          "index": 0
        },
        "statement": "CERN, ISS, the Human Genome Project, Voyager, standards bodies, and open-science communities demonstrate durable coordination patterns.",
        "statementFingerprint": "de99a796ca2a6e9722e2eb88d0a695151999044647ac7f6ad456eef9eb838c47",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "observed",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "strong",
          "rationale": "The named programs and communities have sustained multi-institution coordination, technical interfaces, data, standards, or long missions within their own mandates; none is a governance template for a worldship."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
            "locator": "Team, institution, infrastructure, collective-leadership, evaluation, and collaboration evidence.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-voyager",
            "locator": "Observed multidecade mission operation, longevity, and institutional continuity.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Standards-based lifecycle, interfaces, configuration, data, review, verification, and validation.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-20-1",
          "core-20-2",
          "core-20-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Historical evidence that a named example did not sustain the claimed coordination function, or that its pattern fails to transfer to a named precursor, would narrow the examples.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-20-03",
      "title": "NASA, ESA, DOE, universities, national labs, professional societies, startups, and analog facilities already own many enabling capabilities.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-20-03",
      "recordFingerprint": "a70b9ffa91f2b35eecac74a26f48e0badafeee9c934186059ea15bd68e2e39dd",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-pa-doe-office-science",
        "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
        "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-20-03",
        "systemSlug": "institutions-workforce",
        "kind": "current state",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "currentState",
          "index": 1
        },
        "statement": "NASA, ESA, DOE, universities, national labs, professional societies, startups, and analog facilities already own many enabling capabilities.",
        "statementFingerprint": "4344ef20ceb71749eac54892edc1665747715e34495abeed0d48367e34f41b22",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "observed",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "strong",
          "rationale": "Public agency, funder, research-infrastructure, taxonomy, and professional-network records show that relevant capabilities are distributed across many existing institutions. Indexing them does not imply a relationship."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
            "locator": "Seventeen technology areas and public portfolio-discovery purpose.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-doe-office-science",
            "locator": "National laboratories, user facilities, research programs, workforce, and funding.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure",
            "locator": "Major and mid-scale facilities, lifecycle, research, data, education, and workforce roles.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-20-1",
          "core-20-2",
          "core-20-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Program closures, reorganizations, stale capability records, or verified evidence that a mapped capability is absent would change individual ecosystem entries.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-20-04",
      "title": "SBIR/STTR, user facilities, Space Act Agreements, prizes, philanthropy, venture capital, and paid studies provide staged funding paths.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-20-04",
      "recordFingerprint": "deb1849794e646250119b3cf8d320e63e6e705c56f24bd2c681f15ad5ed03911",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-cd-nasa-partnerships",
        "src-pa-doe-office-science",
        "src-pa-nasa-sbir",
        "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-20-04",
        "systemSlug": "institutions-workforce",
        "kind": "current state",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "currentState",
          "index": 2
        },
        "statement": "SBIR/STTR, user facilities, Space Act Agreements, prizes, philanthropy, venture capital, and paid studies provide staged funding paths.",
        "statementFingerprint": "c0db69424fa90e5e3e3afca62dc3e3995d138d442597cc2323388c190f11f14d",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "observed",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "strong",
          "rationale": "Official program records document multiple staged research, facility, small-business, and partnership pathways. Eligibility, timing, rights, cost share, and availability remain program-specific."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-sbir",
            "locator": "Small-business eligibility, non-dilutive support, technology maturation, mission relevance, and commercialization.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-doe-office-science",
            "locator": "Research programs, laboratories, user facilities, workforce, and funding.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure",
            "locator": "Major and mid-scale research infrastructure and lifecycle roles.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-cd-nasa-partnerships",
            "locator": "Current NASA partnership pathways and agreement context.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-20-1",
          "core-20-2",
          "core-20-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Program closure, changed eligibility, lack of a matching solicitation, or evidence that a pathway cannot fund a bounded precursor would change its place in a staged plan.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-20-05",
      "title": "No procurement market for generation ships was identified in the reviewed corpus; any near-term product needs a separately validated customer and measurable Earth or Solar System outcome.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-20-05",
      "recordFingerprint": "88a7262686e0cb6d7c9f94158edce798c0044a7b2f0356721b7a9928dbd6e48e",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-pa-doe-microgrids",
        "src-pa-fda-cds-2026",
        "src-pa-nasa-sbir"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-20-05",
        "systemSlug": "institutions-workforce",
        "kind": "unknown",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "unknowns",
          "index": 0
        },
        "statement": "No procurement market for generation ships was identified in the reviewed corpus; any near-term product needs a separately validated customer and measurable Earth or Solar System outcome.",
        "statementFingerprint": "762d8b000a1ee1b82eac874b3c9785eeb4379a3bb4c9dd9ee854f08199cefd34",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "observed",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "tentative",
          "rationale": "This is a bounded corpus finding rather than proof of global market absence. Current reviewed funding and customer pathways address bounded technologies, terrestrial resilience, or nearer space missions."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-sbir",
            "locator": "Small-business eligibility, technology maturation, mission relevance, and commercialization intent.",
            "relation": "direct-observation"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-doe-microgrids",
            "locator": "Present resilience use cases, islanding, black start, controllers, and ownership.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-fda-cds-2026",
            "locator": "Current intended-use and regulatory boundaries for clinical decision-support products.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-20-1",
          "core-20-2",
          "core-20-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "A credible funded buyer with requirements, budget, procurement authority, and a generation-ship delivery timescale would change the market statement; general public interest would not.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-20-06",
      "title": "Open knowledge, public trust, proprietary product work, defense funding, export controls, and sponsor influence require explicit firewalls.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-20-06",
      "recordFingerprint": "471e63c021974d31d5e871549f8cae2a51cf51dfcd96f5cdcabd6ff3442b4f43",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [
          "dual-use",
          "governance"
        ],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [
          "dual-use-risk",
          "governance-law-rights"
        ],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "domain-method",
            "scopeClass": "domain-method",
            "oneOf": [
              "dual-use-risk",
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rights-public-interest",
            "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-cd-bis-ear",
        "src-cd-iaea-nuclear-security",
        "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
        "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-20-06",
        "systemSlug": "institutions-workforce",
        "kind": "unknown",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "unknowns",
          "index": 1
        },
        "statement": "Open knowledge, public trust, proprietary product work, defense funding, export controls, and sponsor influence require explicit firewalls.",
        "statementFingerprint": "bbb0967edf592dd82287143841933c2df8acc9d10f385a1aa3c2766dc4b9a72d",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "normative",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "Open-science goals, proprietary rights, export controls, security, sponsor interests, and public trust create real and sometimes conflicting obligations that require explicit governance rather than one universal openness rule."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
            "locator": "Open data, software, publication, participation, reproducibility, and policy context.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-cd-bis-ear",
            "locator": "Current item, end-user, end-use, destination, and authorization-specific export-control context.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
            "locator": "Institutional incentives, collaboration infrastructure, evaluation, trust, and leadership.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-cd-iaea-nuclear-security",
            "locator": "Security responsibilities for sensitive nuclear material and facilities.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-20-1",
          "core-20-2",
          "core-20-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "A legitimate independently reviewed policy that better protects reproducibility, public trust, lawful controls, safety, contributor rights, and sponsor independence could replace the proposed firewall requirement.",
        "highConsequence": [
          "governance",
          "dual-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-20-07",
      "title": "Charismatic-founder dependence is incompatible with a century-scale mission.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-20-07",
      "recordFingerprint": "facd0bea2a655bd3f62da9e5f338b863bcc39bb5145ae4ec35b3b69ecc5cd02c",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [
          "governance",
          "intergenerational-rights"
        ],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [
          "governance-law-rights"
        ],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "domain-method",
            "scopeClass": "domain-method",
            "oneOf": [
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rights-public-interest",
            "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-gr-ohchr-ungp",
        "src-gr-un-future-generations",
        "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-20-07",
        "systemSlug": "institutions-workforce",
        "kind": "unknown",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "unknowns",
          "index": 2
        },
        "statement": "Charismatic-founder dependence is incompatible with a century-scale mission.",
        "statementFingerprint": "2cfdca0f00fe27c0bc873392a1900b666e60cc567bc9ce66608bd6e94c269b3d",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "normative",
          "readiness": "early-research",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "A century-scale institution must outlive individual officeholders. Participation, grievance, future-generation, and accountability guidance supports distributed authority and succession, but no institution has demonstrated continuity across a generation-ship timescale."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation",
            "locator": "Ten-step participation process and quality principles for purpose, accountability, transparency, inclusion, accessibility, feedback, and evaluation.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-gr-ohchr-ungp",
            "locator": "Principles 25–31, access to remedy and legitimacy, accessibility, predictability, equity, transparency, rights compatibility, and dialogue.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-gr-un-future-generations",
            "locator": "Commitments on institutional foresight, inclusive decision-making, intergenerational dialogue, accountability, and long-term consequences.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-20-1",
          "core-20-2",
          "core-20-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work and is therefore exposed to founder-dependence risk; no incorporated entity, customer, sponsor, or partner relationship currently exists."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Longitudinal evidence that an independently governed founder-led model transfers authority, records, conflicts, funding, technical access, and public accountability as reliably as distributed succession could narrow this claim.",
        "highConsequence": [
          "governance",
          "intergenerational-rights"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-20-08",
      "title": "Open standards, shared test infrastructure, transparent evidence, and leadership succession improve any long-horizon public-interest program.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-20-08",
      "recordFingerprint": "c5bf0192c7b4612b0f9000804751a2f691237c261e1dfc3aeb4316df044514e3",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [
          "governance"
        ],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [
          "governance-law-rights"
        ],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "domain-method",
            "scopeClass": "domain-method",
            "oneOf": [
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rights-public-interest",
            "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2015",
        "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-20-08",
        "systemSlug": "institutions-workforce",
        "kind": "earth benefit",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "earthBenefits",
          "index": 0
        },
        "statement": "Open standards, shared test infrastructure, transparent evidence, and leadership succession improve any long-horizon public-interest program.",
        "statementFingerprint": "6f07eb2273baaa8aa377ccbedcf2421fe349a9d51348cc94a6da86ede704f0a5",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "normative",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "Consensus team-science work and systems practice support transparent evidence, shared collaboration infrastructure, explicit governance, and leadership development. Causal effect sizes will vary by institution."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
            "locator": "Collaboration infrastructure, collective leadership, mentorship, evaluation, charters, and institutional incentives.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2015",
            "locator": "Collaboration planning, leadership, team composition, integration, and institutional support.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Configuration, data, interface, decision, verification, validation, and independent-review practices.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-20-1",
          "core-20-2",
          "core-20-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "Comparative evidence showing that more closed standards, private testing, opaque evidence, or founder-dependent leadership produce better public-interest outcomes without unacceptable harms would change the recommendation.",
        "highConsequence": [
          "governance"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-20-09",
      "title": "A trusted capability map helps researchers, students, funders, and customers find useful work now.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-20-09",
      "recordFingerprint": "f4a6be7207212595e175b2c4684a70913518ff2897fd7949e8d9a0d4955a29e5",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights",
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-pa-doe-office-science",
        "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
        "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-20-09",
        "systemSlug": "institutions-workforce",
        "kind": "earth benefit",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "earthBenefits",
          "index": 1
        },
        "statement": "A trusted capability map helps researchers, students, funders, and customers find useful work now.",
        "statementFingerprint": "a93392f173117f5af4c83aa22dcbb189fac156054f0ff55dff2ab0fceaa4e057",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "proposed",
          "readiness": "early-research",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "Existing public taxonomies and portfolios demonstrate the discovery mechanism, but GShips has not yet measured whether its own map improves participant matching or decisions."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
            "locator": "Classification structure and use for portfolio communication and discovery.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-doe-office-science",
            "locator": "Public descriptions of research programs, facilities, workforce, and funding paths.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure",
            "locator": "Public infrastructure portfolio and lifecycle descriptions.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-20-1",
          "core-20-2",
          "core-20-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "User research showing no improvement in discovery, matching, decision quality, or time-to-contact—or material harms from ranking and omission—would change or end the map.",
        "highConsequence": []
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim",
      "recordId": "claim-20-10",
      "title": "Fund only work with a real near-term beneficiary, a measurable capability gap, reversible tests, transparent conflicts, and an independent review path.",
      "publicPath": "/claims/claim-20-10",
      "recordFingerprint": "4b1369389b84c13a8bef231751cb0741fa4b13c4793e87cc8942a847f6b3684a",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [
          "dual-use",
          "governance"
        ],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [
          "dual-use-risk",
          "governance-law-rights"
        ],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "domain-method",
            "scopeClass": "domain-method",
            "oneOf": [
              "dual-use-risk",
              "governance-law-rights",
              "institution-building"
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "rights-public-interest",
            "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest",
            "oneOf": [
              "affected-public-rights"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [
        "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "src-pa-nasa-sbir",
        "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025"
      ],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "claim-20-10",
        "systemSlug": "institutions-workforce",
        "kind": "decision gate",
        "statementRef": {
          "field": "gate"
        },
        "statement": "Fund only work with a real near-term beneficiary, a measurable capability gap, reversible tests, transparent conflicts, and an independent review path.",
        "statementFingerprint": "20b26a5f5eb712820994a112ce86eb32be1b6f68a7c4fba46599bc8fc6a484ea",
        "assessment": {
          "status": "editorial-assessed",
          "basis": "normative",
          "readiness": "operational",
          "confidence": "supported",
          "rationale": "The rule combines present-value discipline, measurable requirements, reversible experimentation, conflict transparency, and independent review. It is a public-benefit funding policy requiring governance review."
        },
        "citations": [
          {
            "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
            "locator": "Requirements, technical planning, risk, decision analysis, verification, validation, and independent assessment.",
            "relation": "direct-method"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-sbir",
            "locator": "Technology maturation, mission relevance, commercialization, and bounded funding pathway.",
            "relation": "context-only"
          },
          {
            "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
            "locator": "Evaluation, institutional support, collective leadership, and collaboration infrastructure.",
            "relation": "direct-normative-authority"
          }
        ],
        "contextSourceIds": [
          "core-20-1",
          "core-20-2",
          "core-20-3"
        ],
        "editorialProvenance": {
          "status": "substantive-editorial-review",
          "reviewers": [
            "GShips Project editorial synthesis"
          ],
          "conflicts": [
            "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work."
          ]
        },
        "whatWouldChange": "An independently reviewed funding standard that better protects public benefit, reversibility, evidence quality, conflict disclosure, and civil-and-defensive boundaries could replace this rule.",
        "highConsequence": [
          "governance",
          "dual-use"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim-source",
      "recordId": "src-cd-nasa-partnerships",
      "title": "Partnerships",
      "publicPath": "https://www.nasa.gov/partnerships/",
      "recordFingerprint": "9f9cb5a3fcb6b5b3024569b8c222d5c4477c3fcd7404118a64448418e0f100e6",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "information-science"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-cd-nasa-partnerships",
        "title": "Partnerships",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/partnerships/",
        "kind": "active-institutional-partnership-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Current NASA partnership pathways and agreement context; inclusion does not imply a GShips relationship or eligibility."
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim-source",
      "recordId": "src-pa-doe-office-science",
      "title": "Office of Science",
      "publicPath": "https://www.energy.gov/science/office-science",
      "recordFingerprint": "12f7364376353fdf9b20312d393fa084654aa38d880813935bf252b74943a5aa",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "information-science"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-doe-office-science",
        "title": "Office of Science",
        "authors": [
          "United States Department of Energy"
        ],
        "publisher": "U.S. Department of Energy",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.energy.gov/science/office-science",
        "kind": "institutional-program-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "National-laboratory, user-facility, research, workforce, and funding roles."
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim-source",
      "recordId": "src-pa-nasa-sbir",
      "title": "NASA SBIR/STTR Program",
      "publicPath": "https://www.nasa.gov/sbir_sttr/",
      "recordFingerprint": "9f336a52ea6d8e6a633301ad953ab7ba2cb86f26189181a43cb2027700ad8e07",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "information-science"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasa-sbir",
        "title": "NASA SBIR/STTR Program",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/sbir_sttr/",
        "kind": "active-funding-program-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Eligibility, non-dilutive support, technology maturation, mission relevance, and commercialization intent."
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim-source",
      "recordId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2015",
      "title": "Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science",
      "publicPath": "https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/19007/enhancing-the-effectiveness-of-team-science",
      "recordFingerprint": "3e2a454dc0d40c40147cf73a69135649d0abb076552b726be83041ede4041c54",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "information-science"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2015",
        "title": "Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science",
        "authors": [
          "National Research Council"
        ],
        "publisher": "National Academies Press",
        "year": 2015,
        "url": "https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/19007/enhancing-the-effectiveness-of-team-science",
        "kind": "consensus-study",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Team composition, leadership, collaboration planning, interdisciplinary integration, and institutional support."
      }
    },
    {
      "recordType": "claim-source",
      "recordId": "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure",
      "title": "Research Infrastructure",
      "publicPath": "https://www.nsf.gov/od/ori/research-infrastructure",
      "recordFingerprint": "f162274f5f17a2b7f5ea4dfcf0ee2f85d339c1db799e736fc46fb88f9b1e777c",
      "reviewRequirements": {
        "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1,
        "highConsequenceDomains": [],
        "requiredDomainCodes": [],
        "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [
          {
            "id": "bounded-competence",
            "scopeClass": "bounded-competence",
            "oneOf": [
              "information-science"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true
      },
      "referenceIds": [],
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure",
        "title": "Research Infrastructure",
        "authors": [
          "U.S. National Science Foundation"
        ],
        "publisher": "National Science Foundation",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.nsf.gov/od/ori/research-infrastructure",
        "kind": "institutional-infrastructure-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Major and mid-scale facilities, lifecycle stages, data, education, and workforce roles."
      }
    }
  ],
  "linkedRecords": [],
  "referenceSnapshots": [
    {
      "sourceId": "src-cd-bis-ear",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "622d3178f5899e5fcb02ff404fcd533a9408344fbf538e9263f441a5e8467b87",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-cd-bis-ear",
        "title": "Export Administration Regulations",
        "authors": [
          "Bureau of Industry and Security"
        ],
        "publisher": "U.S. Department of Commerce",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.bis.gov/regulations/ear",
        "kind": "government-regulatory-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Current U.S. dual-use export-control framework; applicability is item, destination, end-user, end-use, and jurisdiction specific."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-cd-iaea-nuclear-security",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "60f87f44a4c371347b1b1084d686ee508d40ae5372a42e16c25a313d69a297e1",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-cd-iaea-nuclear-security",
        "title": "Nuclear Security",
        "authors": [
          "International Atomic Energy Agency"
        ],
        "publisher": "IAEA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.iaea.org/topics/nuclear-security",
        "kind": "intergovernmental-security-program-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Current international nuclear-security prevention, detection, response, material, facility, and transport context."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "97a09c788cd8ed1efb6c0d704d9d40a3e55f7c8eaadce2c2a993375041fbc8ae",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-cd-nasa-open-science",
        "title": "Open Science",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA Science",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://science.nasa.gov/open-science/",
        "kind": "active-institutional-policy-program",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "NASA open-science policy, data, software, publication, participation, and reproducibility context."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-cd-nasa-partnerships",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "9f9cb5a3fcb6b5b3024569b8c222d5c4477c3fcd7404118a64448418e0f100e6",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-cd-nasa-partnerships",
        "title": "Partnerships",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/partnerships/",
        "kind": "active-institutional-partnership-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Current NASA partnership pathways and agreement context; inclusion does not imply a GShips relationship or eligibility."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-gr-ohchr-ungp",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "132ba6eefd78883256538b2bdc3da80889617dac29b369a5a599b6cf0ae0ecc1",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-gr-ohchr-ungp",
        "title": "Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights",
        "authors": [
          "Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights"
        ],
        "publisher": "United Nations",
        "year": 2011,
        "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf",
        "kind": "un-endorsed-normative-framework",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "State duty, corporate responsibility to respect human rights, human-rights due diligence, remediation, and grievance-mechanism effectiveness criteria."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-gr-un-future-generations",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "387cb09c176fc27be59c0ba75399e8d0f33b1510db9e2308d9661afcd30b03aa",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-gr-un-future-generations",
        "title": "Declaration on Future Generations",
        "authors": [
          "United Nations General Assembly"
        ],
        "publisher": "United Nations",
        "year": 2024,
        "url": "https://www.un.org/pact-for-the-future/en/annex-ii-declaration-future-generations",
        "kind": "un-general-assembly-normative-declaration",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Guiding principles and commitments concerning future interests, inclusive decision-making, intergenerational dialogue, diversity, accountability, and long-term consequences."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "3337ce334909311c3ab1c604773fdcc31a01dd8e0e781d040debd3b6e33cea22",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook",
        "title": "NASA Systems Engineering Handbook",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2016,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf",
        "kind": "institutional-handbook",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Lifecycle, requirements, interfaces, verification, validation, decision analysis, and risk."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-mp-voyager",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "53b1784a1491523dbf92260429314124413890e3d1c09e62d3a2a6b435e3e421",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-mp-voyager",
        "title": "Voyager: Interstellar Messengers",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration",
          "Jet Propulsion Laboratory"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA/JPL",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/",
        "kind": "active-mission-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Observed mission status, heliopause crossings, longevity, and escape rate."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-doe-microgrids",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "74396b6f9d8fb2430311685ac2173717c0b967aaa92d8a1306d94c3ecb7f3f5d",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-doe-microgrids",
        "title": "Microgrids for Resiliency",
        "authors": [
          "United States Department of Energy"
        ],
        "publisher": "U.S. Department of Energy",
        "year": 2021,
        "url": "https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/28-01-2021_doe-voe-microgrids-for-resiliency-report-2.pdf",
        "kind": "government-technical-report",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Controller functions, islanding, black start, resynchronization, ownership, and operating lessons."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-doe-office-science",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "12f7364376353fdf9b20312d393fa084654aa38d880813935bf252b74943a5aa",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-doe-office-science",
        "title": "Office of Science",
        "authors": [
          "United States Department of Energy"
        ],
        "publisher": "U.S. Department of Energy",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.energy.gov/science/office-science",
        "kind": "institutional-program-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "National-laboratory, user-facility, research, workforce, and funding roles."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-fda-cds-2026",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "7762e93039a1b4bdecef5b28f15006618e0a691680bac99138380839853217f5",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-fda-cds-2026",
        "title": "Clinical Decision Support Software: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff",
        "authors": [
          "U.S. Food and Drug Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "FDA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/clinical-decision-support-software",
        "kind": "government-regulatory-guidance",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Intended use, healthcare-professional decision support, non-device criteria, and continuing device-policy boundaries."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-sbir",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "9f336a52ea6d8e6a633301ad953ab7ba2cb86f26189181a43cb2027700ad8e07",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasa-sbir",
        "title": "NASA SBIR/STTR Program",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/sbir_sttr/",
        "kind": "active-funding-program-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Eligibility, non-dilutive support, technology maturation, mission relevance, and commercialization intent."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "87d47de6cbbc1a4457881fef14a44e22fd463bc17a64dbdf794f22e208fc7915",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasa-taxonomy",
        "title": "2024 NASA Technology Taxonomy",
        "authors": [
          "National Aeronautics and Space Administration"
        ],
        "publisher": "NASA",
        "year": 2024,
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/otps/2024-nasa-technology-taxonomy/",
        "kind": "institutional-capability-taxonomy",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Three-level classification of seventeen technology areas for portfolio communication and discovery."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2015",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "3e2a454dc0d40c40147cf73a69135649d0abb076552b726be83041ede4041c54",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2015",
        "title": "Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science",
        "authors": [
          "National Research Council"
        ],
        "publisher": "National Academies Press",
        "year": 2015,
        "url": "https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/19007/enhancing-the-effectiveness-of-team-science",
        "kind": "consensus-study",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Team composition, leadership, collaboration planning, interdisciplinary integration, and institutional support."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "a3fab330d13623cf46ab40800fadb9ded54218cbf943b34c6e94b01f384bf5ba",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2025",
        "title": "The Science and Practice of Team Science",
        "authors": [
          "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine"
        ],
        "publisher": "National Academies Press",
        "year": 2025,
        "url": "https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/29043/interactive/",
        "kind": "consensus-study",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Collective leadership, team charters, psychological safety, collaboration infrastructure, evaluation, and institutional support."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "f162274f5f17a2b7f5ea4dfcf0ee2f85d339c1db799e736fc46fb88f9b1e777c",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure",
        "title": "Research Infrastructure",
        "authors": [
          "U.S. National Science Foundation"
        ],
        "publisher": "National Science Foundation",
        "year": 2026,
        "url": "https://www.nsf.gov/od/ori/research-infrastructure",
        "kind": "institutional-infrastructure-record",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Major and mid-scale facilities, lifecycle stages, data, education, and workforce roles."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation",
      "sourceRecordType": "claim-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "2fcb0a0d2c7f8211e53ec1f000ef94f2486f1a2b18e16a39511ce3c25b2130c2",
      "snapshot": {
        "id": "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation",
        "title": "OECD Guidelines for Citizen Participation Processes",
        "authors": [
          "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development"
        ],
        "publisher": "OECD Publishing",
        "year": 2022,
        "url": "https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2022/09/oecd-guidelines-for-citizen-participation-processes_63b34541.html",
        "kind": "intergovernmental-governance-guidance",
        "checkedAt": "2026-07-25",
        "scopeNote": "Ten-step participation process and quality principles for purpose, accountability, transparency, inclusion, accessibility, feedback, and evaluation."
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-cd-nasa-partnerships",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "bd143941db06b98457c4e81a80ca21f525119a700eb23449b241260f3d69fae2",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "Partnerships",
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/partnerships/",
        "checkedAt": null,
        "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.",
        "subjectRecordType": "claim-source",
        "subjectRecordId": "src-cd-nasa-partnerships"
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-pa-doe-office-science",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "3572e54cde80a46646bd96e335d7a93fe931418e5897bcd4ba1ef6be2c3cef44",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "Office of Science",
        "url": "https://www.energy.gov/science/office-science",
        "checkedAt": null,
        "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.",
        "subjectRecordType": "claim-source",
        "subjectRecordId": "src-pa-doe-office-science"
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-pa-nasa-sbir",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "6ea0f5068678a2fba352b8d535309d28bf23219ed7ef19d4c2f565cea109984c",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "NASA SBIR/STTR Program",
        "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/sbir_sttr/",
        "checkedAt": null,
        "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.",
        "subjectRecordType": "claim-source",
        "subjectRecordId": "src-pa-nasa-sbir"
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-pa-nasem-team-science-2015",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "e6444cac014aba1989f96670637bdfed788fd3815fe91cc6bcd46d83970d5224",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science",
        "url": "https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/19007/enhancing-the-effectiveness-of-team-science",
        "checkedAt": null,
        "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.",
        "subjectRecordType": "claim-source",
        "subjectRecordId": "src-pa-nasem-team-science-2015"
      }
    },
    {
      "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-pa-nsf-infrastructure",
      "sourceRecordType": "reference-source",
      "sourceFingerprint": "444ee668ebb16f1bab61dbf74c2d5549ff92fef29189829579bd8d4313b22b28",
      "snapshot": {
        "title": "Research Infrastructure",
        "url": "https://www.nsf.gov/od/ori/research-infrastructure",
        "checkedAt": null,
        "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.",
        "subjectRecordType": "claim-source",
        "subjectRecordId": "src-pa-nsf-infrastructure"
      }
    }
  ],
  "packetFingerprint": "d79e33c128f5f4da8b9da34129116b8d3e789865d15051be0ff6fa0db2e7cc5d"
}