{ "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1", "packetId": "systems:mission-architecture", "stableId": "mission-architecture", "family": "systems", "slug": "mission-architecture", "title": "Mission architecture & requirements", "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started", "release": { "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14", "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0", "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25", "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z", "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com" }, "paths": { "human": "/review/systems/mission-architecture", "family": "/review/systems", "packet": "/review-packets/systems/mission-architecture.d7daa815f5fc0711.json", "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/systems/mission-architecture.d7daa815f5fc0711.decision-template.json", "worksheet": "/review-packets/systems/mission-architecture.d7daa815f5fc0711.worksheet.md", "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/d7daa815f5fc0711f24c36783e9d89911d531459112453391959fc9f0c0167ba.json" }, "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.", "governingPolicies": [ { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/editorial-policy", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Editorial governance and independent review", "publisher": "GShips Project", "maintainer": "Dammon Burden", "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.", "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.", "reviewerSelection": [ "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.", "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.", "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim." ], "reviewProcess": [ "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.", "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.", "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.", "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.", "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label." ], "appealAndCorrection": [ "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.", "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.", "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.", "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade." ], "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } }, { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/dual-use", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary", "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.", "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.", "allowedInPrinciple": [ "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection", "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response", "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity", "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery", "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research" ], "prohibited": [ "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause", "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support", "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads", "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems", "Autonomous force application", "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control", "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments" ], "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [ "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening", "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable", "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses", "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal", "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review", "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths", "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security" ], "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.", "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } } ], "reviewContract": { "questions": [ { "id": "question-1", "text": "Does each evidence basis, readiness level, confidence level, rationale, and locator match the frozen sources?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-2", "text": "Are dependencies, failure modes, precursors, unknowns, Earthside benefits, and the stop gate technically and ethically bounded?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-3", "text": "Which conclusion should be approved, revised, contested, rejected, or recused from at its current fingerprint?", "required": true } ], "exclusions": [ "A system packet is not a complete spacecraft design, feasibility proof, safety case, or launch authorization.", "Context sources do not become direct support unless the record says so with an exact locator and relation." ], "requestedScopeCodes": [ "information-science", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ], "dispositions": [ "approve", "revise", "contest", "reject", "recuse" ], "prohibitedInputs": [ "private legal names or contact details", "identity documents or raw credential files", "accessibility or medical records", "confidential conflict evidence", "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material" ], "freshness": { "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 365, "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family." }, "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.", "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes." }, "primaryRecords": [ { "recordType": "system", "recordId": "mission-architecture", "title": "Mission architecture & requirements", "publicPath": "/systems/mission-architecture", "recordFingerprint": "9cffe2c03337cdf1fe89b87afe2e8397f2e5fbc2704b8dbe4bc9d7691469b4e0", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "slug": "mission-architecture", "name": "Mission architecture & requirements", "shortName": "Architecture", "index": 1, "thesis": "A generation ship is a civilization-scale system of systems; propulsion cannot be evaluated independently from population, maintenance, ecology, governance, arrival, and the possibility of not going.", "currentState": [ "Daedalus and Longshot are uncrewed interstellar probe studies; HERITAGE is a demographic simulation; Project Hyperion is a 2025 generation-ship design competition. Each exposes a different bounded trade, and none is a validated integrated mission.", "NASA systems-engineering practice supplies mature methods for requirements, interfaces, verification, risk, and lifecycle decisions.", "No accepted reference architecture joins technical, biological, institutional, legal, and intergenerational requirements for a crewed stellar mission." ], "unknowns": [ "The destination, cruise speed, population, industrial closure, mission duration, and arrival strategy remain architecture-driving unknowns.", "There is no validated way to assign requirements to people who will be born generations after departure.", "Economic feasibility depends on a mature Solar System industrial base that does not yet exist." ], "earthBenefits": [ "Reference architectures improve coordination among remote habitats, disaster systems, research stations, and long-lived infrastructure.", "Open dependency models help funders compare reversible experiments instead of rewarding disconnected grand claims." ], "dependencies": [ "propulsion", "life-support", "manufacturing-isru", "governance-law" ], "gate": "Do not approve an irreversible mission architecture until alternatives, arrival, braking, rights, rescue limits, and whole-lifecycle maintenance have independent evidence.", "sources": [ { "title": "NASA Systems Engineering Handbook", "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf", "kind": "Primary or institutional source" }, { "title": "World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04100", "kind": "Peer-reviewed synthesis" }, { "title": "Project Hyperion", "url": "https://www.projecthyperion.org/", "kind": "Concept competition" } ], "failureModes": [ "Requirements growth hides mass, energy, braking, logistics, and contingency costs until the design is no longer coherent.", "A favored reference mission crowds out safer probes, Solar System habitats, waiting, or a valid do-not-launch decision." ], "precursors": [ "Auditable requirements and digital-twin exercises for remote habitats, disaster logistics, and long-duration Solar System missions.", "Robotic interstellar precursor studies that close acceleration, cruise, communications, arrival, and braking budgets." ] } }, { "recordType": "claim", "recordId": "claim-01-01", "title": "A generation ship is a civilization-scale system of systems; propulsion cannot be evaluated independently from population, maintenance, ecology, governance, arrival, and the possibility of not going.", "publicPath": "/claims/claim-01-01", "recordFingerprint": "b27bd54ad0555e3ee263911cd61951c321afc73de5abf2b31cfc9c626fb9e880", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2, "highConsequenceDomains": [ "governance", "intergenerational-rights" ], "requiredDomainCodes": [ "governance-law-rights" ], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "domain-method", "scopeClass": "domain-method", "oneOf": [ "governance-law-rights", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] }, { "id": "rights-public-interest", "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [ "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "src-po-hein-world-ships", "src-po-unesco-future-generations" ], "snapshot": { "id": "claim-01-01", "systemSlug": "mission-architecture", "kind": "thesis", "statementRef": { "field": "thesis" }, "statement": "A generation ship is a civilization-scale system of systems; propulsion cannot be evaluated independently from population, maintenance, ecology, governance, arrival, and the possibility of not going.", "statementFingerprint": "c414b34732eaf60fc1e1d9ab06183554707da29073af0755ab2004baff377241", "assessment": { "status": "editorial-assessed", "basis": "proposed", "readiness": "early-research", "confidence": "supported", "rationale": "The literature treats a world ship as a coupled sociotechnical system, and established systems-engineering practice requires lifecycle and interface analysis. No complete generation-ship system has been demonstrated, so this is a supported architecture rule rather than an operational result." }, "citations": [ { "sourceId": "src-po-hein-world-ships", "locator": "Sections 2–4, definitions, world-ship characteristics, feasibility boundaries, and principal roadblocks.", "relation": "context-only" }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "locator": "Sections 2.0–2.2 and 6.4–6.8, lifecycle systems view, interfaces, risk, assessment, and decision analysis.", "relation": "direct-method" }, { "sourceId": "src-po-unesco-future-generations", "locator": "Articles 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 11, future interests, freedom of choice, diversity, and consequence assessment.", "relation": "context-only" } ], "contextSourceIds": [ "core-01-1", "core-01-2", "core-01-3" ], "editorialProvenance": { "status": "substantive-editorial-review", "reviewers": [ "GShips Project editorial synthesis" ], "conflicts": [ "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work; no entity, customer, sponsor, or partner relationship currently exists." ] }, "whatWouldChange": "A validated architecture showing that propulsion choices can vary without materially changing population, maintenance, ecology, governance, arrival, or refusal requirements would narrow or overturn this coupling claim.", "highConsequence": [ "governance", "intergenerational-rights" ] } }, { "recordType": "claim", "recordId": "claim-01-02", "title": "Daedalus and Longshot are uncrewed interstellar probe studies; HERITAGE is a demographic simulation; Project Hyperion is a 2025 generation-ship design competition. Each exposes a different bounded trade, and none is a validated integrated mission.", "publicPath": "/claims/claim-01-02", "recordFingerprint": "07ec662c85a9e07b8e8bb0ffc53b6e9f8b435745cb01e081eda141eebbb7ab12", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [ "src-mp-bis-daedalus", "src-mp-dragonfly", "src-mp-heritage", "src-mp-longshot", "src-mp-project-hyperion" ], "snapshot": { "id": "claim-01-02", "systemSlug": "mission-architecture", "kind": "current state", "statementRef": { "field": "currentState", "index": 0 }, "statement": "Daedalus and Longshot are uncrewed interstellar probe studies; HERITAGE is a demographic simulation; Project Hyperion is a 2025 generation-ship design competition. Each exposes a different bounded trade, and none is a validated integrated mission.", "statementFingerprint": "4822da4f1dbde6fcffb695b676707894971b4fbd223b0f5ad2be786b4e263403", "assessment": { "status": "editorial-assessed", "basis": "observed", "readiness": "early-research", "confidence": "supported", "rationale": "The cited artifacts exist but belong to different evidence classes: Daedalus and Longshot are uncrewed probe studies, HERITAGE is a demographic simulation, and Project Hyperion is a design competition. Their bounded trades do not combine into a validated integrated mission." }, "citations": [ { "sourceId": "src-mp-longshot", "locator": "Executive summary and mission profile.", "relation": "direct-observation" }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-bis-daedalus", "locator": "Project Daedalus history and final-report publication context.", "relation": "direct-observation" }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-heritage", "locator": "Title, abstract, model description, free parameters, and publication classification.", "relation": "direct-observation" }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-project-hyperion", "locator": "Official 2025 results, competition requirements, awarded concepts, and jury feedback.", "relation": "direct-observation" }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-dragonfly", "locator": "Abstract, robotic laser-sail mission architecture, and technology caveats; retained as a contrasting concept-study class.", "relation": "context-only" } ], "contextSourceIds": [ "core-01-1", "core-01-2", "core-01-3" ], "editorialProvenance": { "status": "substantive-editorial-review", "reviewers": [ "GShips Project editorial synthesis" ], "conflicts": [ "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work." ] }, "whatWouldChange": "A flown integrated mission, representative system demonstration, or evidence that one of the cited studies completed and validated its assumed subsystems would change the readiness conclusion.", "highConsequence": [] } }, { "recordType": "claim", "recordId": "claim-01-03", "title": "NASA systems-engineering practice supplies mature methods for requirements, interfaces, verification, risk, and lifecycle decisions.", "publicPath": "/claims/claim-01-03", "recordFingerprint": "85b52180fa56eaa803b56e23752307e2c72fd6a2d8301e44635205338aef19d1", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2, "highConsequenceDomains": [ "governance", "spacecraft-safety" ], "requiredDomainCodes": [ "governance-law-rights" ], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "domain-method", "scopeClass": "domain-method", "oneOf": [ "governance-law-rights", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] }, { "id": "rights-public-interest", "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [ "src-im-nasa-rm-8729", "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "src-po-nasa-ridm" ], "snapshot": { "id": "claim-01-03", "systemSlug": "mission-architecture", "kind": "current state", "statementRef": { "field": "currentState", "index": 1 }, "statement": "NASA systems-engineering practice supplies mature methods for requirements, interfaces, verification, risk, and lifecycle decisions.", "statementFingerprint": "3d619e2d056b175bbb77c0067b31e533f9aef314a1831a18e223375865e69e6d", "assessment": { "status": "editorial-assessed", "basis": "observed", "readiness": "operational", "confidence": "strong", "rationale": "NASA publishes and applies lifecycle methods for stakeholder expectations, requirements, interfaces, risk, verification, validation, reliability, maintainability, and decision analysis. Their maturity within bounded programs does not validate any generation-ship architecture or remove the need for domain-specific evidence." }, "citations": [ { "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "locator": "Sections 4–6 on stakeholder expectations, technical requirements, interfaces, verification, validation, technical assessment, risk, and decision analysis.", "relation": "direct-method" }, { "sourceId": "src-po-nasa-ridm", "locator": "Chapters 1–3 on objectives, alternatives, performance measures, uncertainty characterization, risk analysis, and risk-informed decision making.", "relation": "direct-method" }, { "sourceId": "src-im-nasa-rm-8729", "locator": "Sections on reliability and maintainability planning, allocations, analysis, demonstration, verification, operations, and lifecycle evaluation.", "relation": "direct-normative-authority" } ], "contextSourceIds": [ "core-01-1", "core-01-2", "core-01-3" ], "editorialProvenance": { "status": "substantive-editorial-review", "reviewers": [ "GShips Project editorial synthesis" ], "conflicts": [ "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work and could benefit from systems-assurance methods; no NASA, standards-body, customer, sponsor, or partner relationship currently exists." ] }, "whatWouldChange": "Withdrawal or replacement of the cited NASA methods, evidence that they systematically fail in comparable long-lived safety-critical programs, or a reviewed alternative lifecycle framework with stronger outcomes would revise this assessment.", "highConsequence": [ "spacecraft-safety", "governance" ] } }, { "recordType": "claim", "recordId": "claim-01-04", "title": "No accepted reference architecture joins technical, biological, institutional, legal, and intergenerational requirements for a crewed stellar mission.", "publicPath": "/claims/claim-01-04", "recordFingerprint": "92994a6ff52eb8c44e579c57b07d399a1495c34e311be2c14334bf26784d0666", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2, "highConsequenceDomains": [ "governance", "intergenerational-rights" ], "requiredDomainCodes": [ "governance-law-rights" ], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "domain-method", "scopeClass": "domain-method", "oneOf": [ "governance-law-rights", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] }, { "id": "rights-public-interest", "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [ "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "src-po-hein-world-ships", "src-po-nasa-interstellar-propulsion" ], "snapshot": { "id": "claim-01-04", "systemSlug": "mission-architecture", "kind": "current state", "statementRef": { "field": "currentState", "index": 2 }, "statement": "No accepted reference architecture joins technical, biological, institutional, legal, and intergenerational requirements for a crewed stellar mission.", "statementFingerprint": "16cf928de1c342df878c787a4775d5ad2d1a70c49df1c22d4ac1e412bf5c120a", "assessment": { "status": "editorial-assessed", "basis": "observed", "readiness": "early-research", "confidence": "tentative", "rationale": "The reviewed world-ship literature and official interstellar strategy documents expose partial architectures and open gaps, while established systems practice defines what integration would require. This is a scoped negative finding, not proof that no relevant architecture exists anywhere." }, "citations": [ { "sourceId": "src-po-hein-world-ships", "locator": "Sections 3–5, feasibility assessment, roadblocks, alternatives, and research questions.", "relation": "direct-observation" }, { "sourceId": "src-po-nasa-interstellar-propulsion", "locator": "Abstract and workshop synthesis of scientific-probe concepts, technical challenges, readiness, risks, milestones, and staged development.", "relation": "scope-boundary" }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "locator": "Sections 2.0–2.2, stakeholder expectations, requirements, interfaces, lifecycle integration, verification, and validation.", "relation": "direct-method" } ], "contextSourceIds": [ "core-01-1", "core-01-2", "core-01-3" ], "editorialProvenance": { "status": "substantive-editorial-review", "reviewers": [ "GShips Project editorial synthesis" ], "conflicts": [ "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work; no entity, customer, sponsor, or partner relationship currently exists." ] }, "whatWouldChange": "Publication and independent multidisciplinary acceptance of a traceable reference architecture joining technical, biological, institutional, legal, and intergenerational requirements would directly change this negative assessment.", "highConsequence": [ "governance", "intergenerational-rights" ] } }, { "recordType": "claim", "recordId": "claim-01-05", "title": "The destination, cruise speed, population, industrial closure, mission duration, and arrival strategy remain architecture-driving unknowns.", "publicPath": "/claims/claim-01-05", "recordFingerprint": "98a92c48ed1cde6c9f6f552b40738cd84d466aa04675745e7fc9dbc829f06a7d", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [ "src-mp-gaia-nearby-stars", "src-mp-longshot", "src-mp-semay-relativistic-flight" ], "snapshot": { "id": "claim-01-05", "systemSlug": "mission-architecture", "kind": "unknown", "statementRef": { "field": "unknowns", "index": 0 }, "statement": "The destination, cruise speed, population, industrial closure, mission duration, and arrival strategy remain architecture-driving unknowns.", "statementFingerprint": "3b172cc950414174ba5a5e57be2f44d5faf1118b053e6d3c592da63553e67a4b", "assessment": { "status": "editorial-assessed", "basis": "modeled", "readiness": "early-research", "confidence": "supported", "rationale": "Astrometry and relativistic flight mechanics establish how distance, target state, speed, and acceleration alter a mission, while population, industry, and arrival choices remain unresolved architecture variables." }, "citations": [ { "sourceId": "src-mp-gaia-nearby-stars", "locator": "Catalogue construction, astrometric quality, and distance-posterior methodology.", "relation": "direct-model" }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-semay-relativistic-flight", "locator": "Cruise and constant-proper-acceleration equations.", "relation": "direct-model" }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-longshot", "locator": "Mission requirements and profile assumptions.", "relation": "context-only" } ], "contextSourceIds": [ "core-01-1", "core-01-2", "core-01-3" ], "editorialProvenance": { "status": "substantive-editorial-review", "reviewers": [ "GShips Project editorial synthesis" ], "conflicts": [ "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work." ] }, "whatWouldChange": "A selected target, reviewed population and industrial case, demonstrated speed profile, or verified arrival strategy would convert unknown architecture variables into bounded requirements.", "highConsequence": [] } }, { "recordType": "claim", "recordId": "claim-01-06", "title": "There is no validated way to assign requirements to people who will be born generations after departure.", "publicPath": "/claims/claim-01-06", "recordFingerprint": "7313f6e7d109a2f850a2b9fe0504732da866b2dc0ed9ab66c3eb227861946d15", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2, "highConsequenceDomains": [ "governance", "intergenerational-rights" ], "requiredDomainCodes": [ "governance-law-rights" ], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "domain-method", "scopeClass": "domain-method", "oneOf": [ "governance-law-rights", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] }, { "id": "rights-public-interest", "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [ "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "src-po-unesco-future-generations", "src-po-unicef-crc" ], "snapshot": { "id": "claim-01-06", "systemSlug": "mission-architecture", "kind": "unknown", "statementRef": { "field": "unknowns", "index": 1 }, "statement": "There is no validated way to assign requirements to people who will be born generations after departure.", "statementFingerprint": "93acd70dcf1f8735901d41470637ee56007e7a8744486c6657c484778d7a1a85", "assessment": { "status": "editorial-assessed", "basis": "unknown", "readiness": "no-known-path", "confidence": "supported", "rationale": "Systems engineering can elicit current stakeholder expectations, and rights instruments protect children and future freedom of choice, but neither supplies a validated method by which founders can obtain or permanently substitute for the choices of people not yet born." }, "citations": [ { "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "locator": "Sections 4.1 and 6.2, stakeholder expectations definition and technical requirements definition.", "relation": "scope-boundary" }, { "sourceId": "src-po-unicef-crc", "locator": "Articles 3, 5, 12–17, 28–31, best interests, evolving capacities, voice, privacy, education, and culture.", "relation": "direct-normative-authority" }, { "sourceId": "src-po-unesco-future-generations", "locator": "Articles 1, 2, 7, 10, and 11, future interests, freedom of choice, diversity, and public awareness.", "relation": "direct-normative-authority" } ], "contextSourceIds": [ "core-01-1", "core-01-2", "core-01-3" ], "editorialProvenance": { "status": "substantive-editorial-review", "reviewers": [ "GShips Project editorial synthesis" ], "conflicts": [ "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work; no entity, customer, sponsor, or partner relationship currently exists." ] }, "whatWouldChange": "A legally legitimate, rights-compatible, independently validated process that reliably represents future residents while preserving their later amendment, refusal, and remedy could change the no-known-path assessment.", "highConsequence": [ "governance", "intergenerational-rights" ] } }, { "recordType": "claim", "recordId": "claim-01-07", "title": "Economic feasibility depends on a mature Solar System industrial base that does not yet exist.", "publicPath": "/claims/claim-01-07", "recordFingerprint": "9e05e292667ba0aa71264df3111c7a50bbc83c2ca9c4ca8bf7449eefed668e74", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2, "highConsequenceDomains": [ "dual-use", "energy", "governance", "labor", "materials" ], "requiredDomainCodes": [ "dual-use-risk", "governance-law-rights" ], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "domain-method", "scopeClass": "domain-method", "oneOf": [ "dual-use-risk", "governance-law-rights", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] }, { "id": "rights-public-interest", "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [ "src-im-gao-isam-2025", "src-im-nasa-ism-portfolio-2025", "src-im-nasa-isru-priorities" ], "snapshot": { "id": "claim-01-07", "systemSlug": "mission-architecture", "kind": "unknown", "statementRef": { "field": "unknowns", "index": 2 }, "statement": "Economic feasibility depends on a mature Solar System industrial base that does not yet exist.", "statementFingerprint": "1a745c6e58a83ac13d5853b98ea543dbf966f18339048cae09fe7d53f77b62de", "assessment": { "status": "editorial-assessed", "basis": "proposed", "readiness": "breakthrough-dependent", "confidence": "tentative", "rationale": "Current official assessments describe in-space servicing, manufacturing, and resource-use capabilities as incomplete programs with major technical, policy, supply-chain, and economic gaps. A mature Solar System industrial base is a plausible dependency for affordability, but no cited source establishes a unique economic threshold or proves that no alternative financing and architecture could work." }, "citations": [ { "sourceId": "src-im-gao-isam-2025", "locator": "Highlights and report sections on present ISAM benefits, technical maturity, market uncertainty, standards, coordination, policy options, and unresolved economic barriers.", "relation": "direct-observation" }, { "sourceId": "src-im-nasa-isru-priorities", "locator": "Program overview, resource-to-product capability areas, planned demonstrations, dependencies, and staged lunar and Mars development priorities.", "relation": "scope-boundary" }, { "sourceId": "src-im-nasa-ism-portfolio-2025", "locator": "Portfolio roadmap for fabrication, recycling, joining, electronics, logistics reduction, technology maturation, and remaining in-space manufacturing gaps.", "relation": "scope-boundary" } ], "contextSourceIds": [ "core-01-1", "core-01-2", "core-01-3" ], "editorialProvenance": { "status": "substantive-editorial-review", "reviewers": [ "GShips Project editorial synthesis" ], "conflicts": [ "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work and could benefit from describing a large precursor market; no industrial operator, investor, agency, customer, sponsor, or partner relationship currently exists." ] }, "whatWouldChange": "A reviewed costed architecture showing credible construction, replenishment, launch, energy, labor, insurance, and lifecycle financing without a mature off-Earth industrial base—or operational evidence that such a base now exists—would materially change the conclusion.", "highConsequence": [ "governance", "dual-use", "labor", "materials", "energy" ] } }, { "recordType": "claim", "recordId": "claim-01-08", "title": "Reference architectures improve coordination among remote habitats, disaster systems, research stations, and long-lived infrastructure.", "publicPath": "/claims/claim-01-08", "recordFingerprint": "dadc6a077df41c112c03f541795f5b0a60331bb004be86605bb39af3c6fe25e7", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2, "highConsequenceDomains": [ "critical-infrastructure", "cybersecurity", "governance", "spacecraft-safety" ], "requiredDomainCodes": [ "defensive-cyber-safety", "governance-law-rights" ], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "domain-method", "scopeClass": "domain-method", "oneOf": [ "defensive-cyber-safety", "governance-law-rights", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] }, { "id": "rights-public-interest", "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [ "src-gr-undrr-sendai", "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "src-pa-doe-microgrids" ], "snapshot": { "id": "claim-01-08", "systemSlug": "mission-architecture", "kind": "earth benefit", "statementRef": { "field": "earthBenefits", "index": 0 }, "statement": "Reference architectures improve coordination among remote habitats, disaster systems, research stations, and long-lived infrastructure.", "statementFingerprint": "db0426672cdd4adf5ee3eebe40039b9d82b9d0cd9e95fc8c8efbbbc0229d2cc3", "assessment": { "status": "editorial-assessed", "basis": "proposed", "readiness": "operational", "confidence": "tentative", "rationale": "Systems architecture, resilience planning, intentional islanding, and disaster-risk frameworks are operational practices. Reusing a common reference architecture can improve shared requirements and interfaces, but benefits across remote habitats, research stations, disaster systems, and long-lived infrastructure remain context-dependent and are not demonstrated by a single comparative program." }, "citations": [ { "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "locator": "Sections 4–6 on stakeholder expectations, architecture, requirements, interfaces, lifecycle integration, verification, validation, and technical assessment.", "relation": "direct-method" }, { "sourceId": "src-pa-doe-microgrids", "locator": "Report sections on microgrid resilience objectives, intentional islanding, local generation and storage, community use cases, planning, and recovery.", "relation": "context-only" }, { "sourceId": "src-gr-undrr-sendai", "locator": "Priorities 1–4 on understanding risk, governance, resilience investment, preparedness, recovery, and build-back-better coordination.", "relation": "context-only" } ], "contextSourceIds": [ "core-01-1", "core-01-2", "core-01-3" ], "editorialProvenance": { "status": "substantive-editorial-review", "reviewers": [ "GShips Project editorial synthesis" ], "conflicts": [ "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work and could benefit from cross-sector habitat-assurance applications; no emergency agency, utility, research station, customer, sponsor, or partner relationship currently exists." ] }, "whatWouldChange": "Comparative deployments showing that a shared reference architecture increases coordination cost, hides local hazards, or performs worse than sector-specific methods—or repeated evidence of measurable cross-sector gains—would change the confidence and scope.", "highConsequence": [ "governance", "critical-infrastructure", "cyber", "spacecraft-safety" ] } }, { "recordType": "claim", "recordId": "claim-01-09", "title": "Open dependency models help funders compare reversible experiments instead of rewarding disconnected grand claims.", "publicPath": "/claims/claim-01-09", "recordFingerprint": "ffb9a14bbe9dc1e9f3e57bfc70b154c16ddea21e1d6da8dd0c265b9261cbcd58", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2, "highConsequenceDomains": [ "dual-use", "governance" ], "requiredDomainCodes": [ "dual-use-risk", "governance-law-rights" ], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "domain-method", "scopeClass": "domain-method", "oneOf": [ "dual-use-risk", "governance-law-rights", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] }, { "id": "rights-public-interest", "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [ "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "src-po-nasa-propulsion-breakthroughs", "src-po-nasa-ridm", "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation" ], "snapshot": { "id": "claim-01-09", "systemSlug": "mission-architecture", "kind": "earth benefit", "statementRef": { "field": "earthBenefits", "index": 1 }, "statement": "Open dependency models help funders compare reversible experiments instead of rewarding disconnected grand claims.", "statementFingerprint": "f4ae920e436a1f8a989b9466472bf6908b10de5064aab0274d51f23ade09ffe5", "assessment": { "status": "editorial-assessed", "basis": "proposed", "readiness": "early-research", "confidence": "tentative", "rationale": "Systems and risk-informed decision methods support explicit dependencies, alternatives, measures, uncertainty, and review. Whether an open dependency model actually improves funding decisions over existing practice requires prospective use and evaluation." }, "citations": [ { "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "locator": "Sections 6.4–6.8, technical risk, assessment, decision analysis, alternatives, criteria, and uncertainty.", "relation": "direct-method" }, { "sourceId": "src-po-nasa-ridm", "locator": "Chapters 1–3, objectives, alternatives, performance measures, uncertainty, and risk-informed comparison.", "relation": "direct-method" }, { "sourceId": "src-po-nasa-propulsion-breakthroughs", "locator": "Research-selection discussion emphasizing immediate unknowns, assertion reliability, credibility review, and bounded next questions.", "relation": "context-only" }, { "sourceId": "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation", "locator": "Ten-step participation process and quality principles for clarity, accountability, transparency, feedback, and evaluation.", "relation": "direct-normative-authority" } ], "contextSourceIds": [ "core-01-1", "core-01-2", "core-01-3" ], "editorialProvenance": { "status": "substantive-editorial-review", "reviewers": [ "GShips Project editorial synthesis" ], "conflicts": [ "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work and could benefit if funders adopt its framing; no funding relationship currently exists." ] }, "whatWouldChange": "Comparative evaluation showing that open dependency models do not improve traceability, reversibility, portfolio coherence, conflict detection, or funding outcomes would weaken or reverse this recommendation.", "highConsequence": [ "governance", "dual-use" ] } }, { "recordType": "claim", "recordId": "claim-01-10", "title": "Do not approve an irreversible mission architecture until alternatives, arrival, braking, rights, rescue limits, and whole-lifecycle maintenance have independent evidence.", "publicPath": "/claims/claim-01-10", "recordFingerprint": "148f439e2e396c3d97bac90eb7fdcc74dc1308b47cb56e091215b7ba800572b0", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 2, "highConsequenceDomains": [ "governance", "intergenerational-rights" ], "requiredDomainCodes": [ "governance-law-rights" ], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "domain-method", "scopeClass": "domain-method", "oneOf": [ "governance-law-rights", "mission-physics", "systems-engineering" ] }, { "id": "rights-public-interest", "scopeClass": "rights-public-interest", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [ "src-mp-longshot", "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook" ], "snapshot": { "id": "claim-01-10", "systemSlug": "mission-architecture", "kind": "decision gate", "statementRef": { "field": "gate" }, "statement": "Do not approve an irreversible mission architecture until alternatives, arrival, braking, rights, rescue limits, and whole-lifecycle maintenance have independent evidence.", "statementFingerprint": "0487eb7035a0518a3029fdaa5229110ccdb1208b26c05b95f1111a9259f006a7", "assessment": { "status": "editorial-assessed", "basis": "normative", "readiness": "early-research", "confidence": "supported", "rationale": "The claim is a GShips decision rule grounded in lifecycle systems practice and the irreversible consequences of an unbraked or unmaintainable mission; it is not a physical law." }, "citations": [ { "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "locator": "Stakeholder expectations, requirements, lifecycle, decision analysis, verification, validation, and technical risk.", "relation": "direct-method" }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-longshot", "locator": "Arrival, long-life power, autonomy, communication, and enabling-technology assumptions.", "relation": "context-only" } ], "contextSourceIds": [ "core-01-1", "core-01-2", "core-01-3" ], "editorialProvenance": { "status": "substantive-editorial-review", "reviewers": [ "GShips Project editorial synthesis" ], "conflicts": [ "Publisher intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work." ] }, "whatWouldChange": "A legitimate, independently reviewed decision framework that better protects future people, alternatives, arrival safety, and reversibility could replace this gate; evidence closing only propulsion would not.", "highConsequence": [ "governance", "intergenerational-rights" ] } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-gr-undrr-sendai", "title": "Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030", "publicPath": "https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030", "recordFingerprint": "db9ef73f3cd53d5bf08e3a0644c8780cf0e7b70c5eeda4b377530b9854b31ced", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-gr-undrr-sendai", "title": "Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030", "authors": [ "United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction" ], "publisher": "UNDRR", "year": 2015, "url": "https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030", "kind": "intergovernmental-disaster-risk-framework", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Risk understanding, disaster-risk governance, resilience investment, preparedness, inclusive response, recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-im-gao-isam-2025", "title": "In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Options", "publicPath": "https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107555", "recordFingerprint": "f34a4c41466659821eede3dfde4b257733374fd7d50c558c8f7d1bbb1078a8e7", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-im-gao-isam-2025", "title": "In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Options", "authors": [ "U.S. Government Accountability Office" ], "publisher": "U.S. Government Accountability Office", "year": 2025, "url": "https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107555", "kind": "government-technology-assessment", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Independent government assessment of demonstrated servicing, limited robotic use, test-access gaps, emerging standards, serviceability, costs, and policy options." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-im-nasa-ism-portfolio-2025", "title": "In-Space Manufacturing Portfolio Plan", "publicPath": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250004020", "recordFingerprint": "06cea319893cf8240cb44a60e3ce511ca3f41a48b46c87b9915567ef6fc29ba1", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-im-nasa-ism-portfolio-2025", "title": "In-Space Manufacturing Portfolio Plan", "authors": [ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" ], "publisher": "NASA Technical Reports Server", "year": 2025, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250004020", "kind": "institutional-technology-portfolio", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Program record for polymer, metal, electronics, welding, recycling, inspection, and biomanufacturing work, including the incomplete ISS Refabricator demonstration." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-im-nasa-isru-priorities", "title": "Overview of NASA ISRU Plans, Priorities, and Activities", "publicPath": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220007350", "recordFingerprint": "751943e37363db62202ca505da89bdf66ce92100ad7f54d63af0c5e0618cb6fb", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-im-nasa-isru-priorities", "title": "Overview of NASA ISRU Plans, Priorities, and Activities", "authors": [ "Gerald B. Sanders", "Julie E. Kleinhenz" ], "publisher": "NASA Technical Reports Server", "year": 2022, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220007350", "kind": "institutional-technology-roadmap", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "NASA priorities for water and oxygen mining, metal and manufacturing feedstock, resource assessment, integration, and end-to-end pilot demonstrations." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-im-nasa-rm-8729", "title": "NASA Reliability and Maintainability Standard for Spaceflight and Support Systems", "publicPath": "https://standards.nasa.gov/node/279", "recordFingerprint": "1adc452418fbda7d9b7258bee174773a26d9b60c7ee5859ac78c77443cf1866d", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-im-nasa-rm-8729", "title": "NASA Reliability and Maintainability Standard for Spaceflight and Support Systems", "authors": [ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" ], "publisher": "NASA", "year": 2017, "url": "https://standards.nasa.gov/node/279", "kind": "active-reliability-maintainability-standard", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Lifecycle reliability and maintainability objectives, planning, analysis, verification, validation, and evidence for NASA programs." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-mp-bis-daedalus", "title": "British Interplanetary Society Technical Projects: Project Daedalus", "publicPath": "https://www.bis-space.com/technical-projects/", "recordFingerprint": "9d848f145111709ea3875e705e79a9ed5251c93a821bf539a2718a794dac324f", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-bis-daedalus", "title": "British Interplanetary Society Technical Projects: Project Daedalus", "authors": [ "British Interplanetary Society" ], "publisher": "British Interplanetary Society", "year": 1978, "url": "https://www.bis-space.com/technical-projects/", "kind": "official-project-history", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Official history and publication context for the uncrewed Daedalus flyby study." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-mp-dragonfly", "title": "Project Dragonfly: A Feasibility Study of Interstellar Travel Using Laser-Powered Light Sail Propulsion", "publicPath": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.09.030", "recordFingerprint": "524e64d1ba7c78b6946cb4db73a484350f61749ee00a9be7b291d9ad62782395", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-dragonfly", "title": "Project Dragonfly: A Feasibility Study of Interstellar Travel Using Laser-Powered Light Sail Propulsion", "authors": [ "Andreas M. Hein", "Nikolaos Perakis", "Tobias Eubanks", "Kevin Long", "Adam Crowl", "James Benford", "Rachel Armstrong", "Kenneth Roy", "Martin Ciupa" ], "publisher": "Acta Astronautica", "year": 2016, "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.09.030", "kind": "peer-reviewed-concept-study", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Conditional small robotic laser-sail mission, payload, communication, and braking trade study." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-mp-gaia-nearby-stars", "title": "Gaia Early Data Release 3: The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars", "publicPath": "https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2021/05/aa39498-20/aa39498-20.html", "recordFingerprint": "bcac7474911cabcf9f5e44a4a12332f634018a979c2b545f943ec7c87862ca28", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-gaia-nearby-stars", "title": "Gaia Early Data Release 3: The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars", "authors": [ "Gaia Collaboration" ], "publisher": "Astronomy & Astrophysics", "year": 2021, "url": "https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2021/05/aa39498-20/aa39498-20.html", "kind": "peer-reviewed-observational-catalogue", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Astrometry, distance posteriors, and catalogue-quality methods for nearby stars." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-mp-heritage", "title": "HERITAGE: a Monte Carlo code to evaluate the viability of interstellar travels using a multi-generational crew", "publicPath": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08649", "recordFingerprint": "614aeccdbc8d40fcf21f0cc9ebb3ee7ad63c15f008688646425eb4b4d2119aad", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-heritage", "title": "HERITAGE: a Monte Carlo code to evaluate the viability of interstellar travels using a multi-generational crew", "authors": [ "Frédéric Marin" ], "publisher": "Journal of the British Interplanetary Society / arXiv", "year": 2017, "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08649", "kind": "demographic-simulation-paper", "checkedAt": "2026-07-26", "scopeNote": "Monte Carlo kin-based crew simulation with explicit population-control assumptions; it is not a spacecraft design, clinical result, rights authorization, or integrated mission demonstration." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-mp-longshot", "title": "Project Longshot: An Unmanned Probe to Alpha Centauri", "publicPath": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890007533", "recordFingerprint": "69cb3815e691b9439a24906b7ee6b1306640ed51360e7601f570320e2e697909", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-longshot", "title": "Project Longshot: An Unmanned Probe to Alpha Centauri", "authors": [ "Keith A. Beals", "Martin Beaulieu", "Frank J. Dembia", "Joseph Kerstiens", "Daniel L. Kramer", "Jeffrey R. West", "James A. Zito" ], "publisher": "NASA Technical Reports Server", "year": 1988, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890007533", "kind": "government-sponsored-concept-study", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Preliminary uncrewed Alpha Centauri rendezvous architecture and stated enabling technologies." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "title": "NASA Systems Engineering Handbook", "publicPath": "https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf", "recordFingerprint": "3337ce334909311c3ab1c604773fdcc31a01dd8e0e781d040debd3b6e33cea22", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "title": "NASA Systems Engineering Handbook", "authors": [ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" ], "publisher": "NASA", "year": 2016, "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf", "kind": "institutional-handbook", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Lifecycle, requirements, interfaces, verification, validation, decision analysis, and risk." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-mp-project-hyperion", "title": "Project Hyperion Design Competition Results 2025", "publicPath": "https://www.projecthyperion.org/", "recordFingerprint": "3bc145b572765b3adac640460dfc09f177dd859cc91a282bbec841d662fd7905", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-project-hyperion", "title": "Project Hyperion Design Competition Results 2025", "authors": [ "Initiative for Interstellar Studies" ], "publisher": "Project Hyperion", "year": 2025, "url": "https://www.projecthyperion.org/", "kind": "official-design-competition-record", "checkedAt": "2026-07-26", "scopeNote": "Official competition requirements, awarded concepts, jury feedback, and participant statements; it is a design competition record, not validation, qualification, partnership, or mission approval." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-mp-semay-relativistic-flight", "title": "Relativistic rocket and space flight", "publicPath": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.03.007", "recordFingerprint": "a76854df17f07fc94e424e9f2e5502d5f194f9a3a27a3682bf91bf8bb72eeb16", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-semay-relativistic-flight", "title": "Relativistic rocket and space flight", "authors": [ "Claude Semay", "Bernard Silvestre-Brac" ], "publisher": "Acta Astronautica", "year": 2006, "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.03.007", "kind": "peer-reviewed-model", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Cruise, constant-proper-acceleration, and relativistic rocket equations." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-pa-doe-microgrids", "title": "Microgrids for Resiliency", "publicPath": "https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/28-01-2021_doe-voe-microgrids-for-resiliency-report-2.pdf", "recordFingerprint": "74396b6f9d8fb2430311685ac2173717c0b967aaa92d8a1306d94c3ecb7f3f5d", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-pa-doe-microgrids", "title": "Microgrids for Resiliency", "authors": [ "United States Department of Energy" ], "publisher": "U.S. Department of Energy", "year": 2021, "url": "https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/28-01-2021_doe-voe-microgrids-for-resiliency-report-2.pdf", "kind": "government-technical-report", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Controller functions, islanding, black start, resynchronization, ownership, and operating lessons." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-po-hein-world-ships", "title": "World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale", "publicPath": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04100", "recordFingerprint": "7fd7d8cf4182911c9600b43dee89dcf970b0eaa290b69f12500273114297c28b", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-hein-world-ships", "title": "World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale", "authors": [ "Andreas M. Hein", "Cameron Smith", "Frédéric Marin", "Kai Staats" ], "publisher": "Acta Futura", "year": 2020, "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04100", "kind": "peer-reviewed-synthesis", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Definitions, feasibility boundaries, roadblocks, alternatives, and sociotechnical requirements for hypothetical world ships." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-po-nasa-interstellar-propulsion", "title": "Prospects for Interstellar Propulsion", "publicPath": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20200000759/downloads/20200000759.pdf", "recordFingerprint": "fea9412feeb0fd996832716565716c3ca7ee80b57958dfa7032b1840679eb9f5", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-nasa-interstellar-propulsion", "title": "Prospects for Interstellar Propulsion", "authors": [ "Ronald J. Litchford", "Jeffrey A. Sheehy" ], "publisher": "NASA Technical Reports Server", "year": 2020, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20200000759/downloads/20200000759.pdf", "kind": "government-conference-paper", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "NASA workshop synthesis covering scientific-probe concepts, technical challenges, readiness, risks, milestones, funding, and staged development." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-po-nasa-propulsion-breakthroughs", "title": "Assessing Potential Propulsion Breakthroughs", "publicPath": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060000022.pdf", "recordFingerprint": "5a4c16222976a95576e21ba5c8633865a26f4be58cad2698eb13431f77b318b0", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-nasa-propulsion-breakthroughs", "title": "Assessing Potential Propulsion Breakthroughs", "authors": [ "Marc G. Millis" ], "publisher": "NASA Glenn Research Center", "year": 2005, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060000022.pdf", "kind": "government-technical-assessment", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Historical framework for assessing speculative propulsion claims, energy implications, evidentiary maturity, and claimed breakthrough potential." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-po-nasa-ridm", "title": "NASA Risk-Informed Decision Making Handbook", "publicPath": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20100021361.pdf", "recordFingerprint": "901b35585226d759b25047071feca554ca535c8ffd0335b3667814f4b7fe116a", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-nasa-ridm", "title": "NASA Risk-Informed Decision Making Handbook", "authors": [ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" ], "publisher": "NASA", "year": 2010, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20100021361.pdf", "kind": "institutional-decision-handbook", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Objectives, alternatives, performance measures, uncertainty, stakeholder inputs, and risk-informed comparison for consequential decisions." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation", "title": "OECD Guidelines for Citizen Participation Processes", "publicPath": "https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2022/09/oecd-guidelines-for-citizen-participation-processes_63b34541.html", "recordFingerprint": "2fcb0a0d2c7f8211e53ec1f000ef94f2486f1a2b18e16a39511ce3c25b2130c2", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation", "title": "OECD Guidelines for Citizen Participation Processes", "authors": [ "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development" ], "publisher": "OECD Publishing", "year": 2022, "url": "https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2022/09/oecd-guidelines-for-citizen-participation-processes_63b34541.html", "kind": "intergovernmental-governance-guidance", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Ten-step participation process and quality principles for purpose, accountability, transparency, inclusion, accessibility, feedback, and evaluation." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-po-unesco-future-generations", "title": "Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations Towards Future Generations", "publicPath": "https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/declaration-responsibilities-present-generations-towards-future-generations", "recordFingerprint": "1abd40816de69f992c66c209f2302d950336c9372d5f2685773b47715b00ef2b", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-unesco-future-generations", "title": "Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations Towards Future Generations", "authors": [ "United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization" ], "publisher": "UNESCO", "year": 1997, "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/declaration-responsibilities-present-generations-towards-future-generations", "kind": "international-normative-instrument", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Normative principles concerning future interests, freedom of choice, environmental protection, cultural diversity, peace, and consequence assessment." } }, { "recordType": "claim-source", "recordId": "src-po-unicef-crc", "title": "Convention on the Rights of the Child", "publicPath": "https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text", "recordFingerprint": "5bdae8a7100ea191caad9293c738bb6cd277320ab47e1142ae827954b50853fd", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "information-science" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-unicef-crc", "title": "Convention on the Rights of the Child", "authors": [ "United Nations General Assembly" ], "publisher": "UNICEF", "year": 1989, "url": "https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text", "kind": "international-human-rights-treaty", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Treaty text on children's best interests, identity, expression, privacy, education, health, development, culture, protection, and participation." } } ], "linkedRecords": [], "referenceSnapshots": [ { "sourceId": "src-gr-undrr-sendai", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "db9ef73f3cd53d5bf08e3a0644c8780cf0e7b70c5eeda4b377530b9854b31ced", "snapshot": { "id": "src-gr-undrr-sendai", "title": "Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030", "authors": [ "United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction" ], "publisher": "UNDRR", "year": 2015, "url": "https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030", "kind": "intergovernmental-disaster-risk-framework", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Risk understanding, disaster-risk governance, resilience investment, preparedness, inclusive response, recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction." } }, { "sourceId": "src-im-gao-isam-2025", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "f34a4c41466659821eede3dfde4b257733374fd7d50c558c8f7d1bbb1078a8e7", "snapshot": { "id": "src-im-gao-isam-2025", "title": "In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Options", "authors": [ "U.S. Government Accountability Office" ], "publisher": "U.S. Government Accountability Office", "year": 2025, "url": "https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107555", "kind": "government-technology-assessment", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Independent government assessment of demonstrated servicing, limited robotic use, test-access gaps, emerging standards, serviceability, costs, and policy options." } }, { "sourceId": "src-im-nasa-ism-portfolio-2025", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "06cea319893cf8240cb44a60e3ce511ca3f41a48b46c87b9915567ef6fc29ba1", "snapshot": { "id": "src-im-nasa-ism-portfolio-2025", "title": "In-Space Manufacturing Portfolio Plan", "authors": [ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" ], "publisher": "NASA Technical Reports Server", "year": 2025, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250004020", "kind": "institutional-technology-portfolio", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Program record for polymer, metal, electronics, welding, recycling, inspection, and biomanufacturing work, including the incomplete ISS Refabricator demonstration." } }, { "sourceId": "src-im-nasa-isru-priorities", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "751943e37363db62202ca505da89bdf66ce92100ad7f54d63af0c5e0618cb6fb", "snapshot": { "id": "src-im-nasa-isru-priorities", "title": "Overview of NASA ISRU Plans, Priorities, and Activities", "authors": [ "Gerald B. Sanders", "Julie E. Kleinhenz" ], "publisher": "NASA Technical Reports Server", "year": 2022, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220007350", "kind": "institutional-technology-roadmap", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "NASA priorities for water and oxygen mining, metal and manufacturing feedstock, resource assessment, integration, and end-to-end pilot demonstrations." } }, { "sourceId": "src-im-nasa-rm-8729", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "1adc452418fbda7d9b7258bee174773a26d9b60c7ee5859ac78c77443cf1866d", "snapshot": { "id": "src-im-nasa-rm-8729", "title": "NASA Reliability and Maintainability Standard for Spaceflight and Support Systems", "authors": [ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" ], "publisher": "NASA", "year": 2017, "url": "https://standards.nasa.gov/node/279", "kind": "active-reliability-maintainability-standard", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Lifecycle reliability and maintainability objectives, planning, analysis, verification, validation, and evidence for NASA programs." } }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-bis-daedalus", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "9d848f145111709ea3875e705e79a9ed5251c93a821bf539a2718a794dac324f", "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-bis-daedalus", "title": "British Interplanetary Society Technical Projects: Project Daedalus", "authors": [ "British Interplanetary Society" ], "publisher": "British Interplanetary Society", "year": 1978, "url": "https://www.bis-space.com/technical-projects/", "kind": "official-project-history", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Official history and publication context for the uncrewed Daedalus flyby study." } }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-dragonfly", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "524e64d1ba7c78b6946cb4db73a484350f61749ee00a9be7b291d9ad62782395", "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-dragonfly", "title": "Project Dragonfly: A Feasibility Study of Interstellar Travel Using Laser-Powered Light Sail Propulsion", "authors": [ "Andreas M. Hein", "Nikolaos Perakis", "Tobias Eubanks", "Kevin Long", "Adam Crowl", "James Benford", "Rachel Armstrong", "Kenneth Roy", "Martin Ciupa" ], "publisher": "Acta Astronautica", "year": 2016, "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.09.030", "kind": "peer-reviewed-concept-study", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Conditional small robotic laser-sail mission, payload, communication, and braking trade study." } }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-gaia-nearby-stars", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "bcac7474911cabcf9f5e44a4a12332f634018a979c2b545f943ec7c87862ca28", "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-gaia-nearby-stars", "title": "Gaia Early Data Release 3: The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars", "authors": [ "Gaia Collaboration" ], "publisher": "Astronomy & Astrophysics", "year": 2021, "url": "https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2021/05/aa39498-20/aa39498-20.html", "kind": "peer-reviewed-observational-catalogue", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Astrometry, distance posteriors, and catalogue-quality methods for nearby stars." } }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-heritage", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "614aeccdbc8d40fcf21f0cc9ebb3ee7ad63c15f008688646425eb4b4d2119aad", "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-heritage", "title": "HERITAGE: a Monte Carlo code to evaluate the viability of interstellar travels using a multi-generational crew", "authors": [ "Frédéric Marin" ], "publisher": "Journal of the British Interplanetary Society / arXiv", "year": 2017, "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08649", "kind": "demographic-simulation-paper", "checkedAt": "2026-07-26", "scopeNote": "Monte Carlo kin-based crew simulation with explicit population-control assumptions; it is not a spacecraft design, clinical result, rights authorization, or integrated mission demonstration." } }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-longshot", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "69cb3815e691b9439a24906b7ee6b1306640ed51360e7601f570320e2e697909", "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-longshot", "title": "Project Longshot: An Unmanned Probe to Alpha Centauri", "authors": [ "Keith A. Beals", "Martin Beaulieu", "Frank J. Dembia", "Joseph Kerstiens", "Daniel L. Kramer", "Jeffrey R. West", "James A. Zito" ], "publisher": "NASA Technical Reports Server", "year": 1988, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890007533", "kind": "government-sponsored-concept-study", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Preliminary uncrewed Alpha Centauri rendezvous architecture and stated enabling technologies." } }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "3337ce334909311c3ab1c604773fdcc31a01dd8e0e781d040debd3b6e33cea22", "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "title": "NASA Systems Engineering Handbook", "authors": [ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" ], "publisher": "NASA", "year": 2016, "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf", "kind": "institutional-handbook", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Lifecycle, requirements, interfaces, verification, validation, decision analysis, and risk." } }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-project-hyperion", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "3bc145b572765b3adac640460dfc09f177dd859cc91a282bbec841d662fd7905", "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-project-hyperion", "title": "Project Hyperion Design Competition Results 2025", "authors": [ "Initiative for Interstellar Studies" ], "publisher": "Project Hyperion", "year": 2025, "url": "https://www.projecthyperion.org/", "kind": "official-design-competition-record", "checkedAt": "2026-07-26", "scopeNote": "Official competition requirements, awarded concepts, jury feedback, and participant statements; it is a design competition record, not validation, qualification, partnership, or mission approval." } }, { "sourceId": "src-mp-semay-relativistic-flight", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "a76854df17f07fc94e424e9f2e5502d5f194f9a3a27a3682bf91bf8bb72eeb16", "snapshot": { "id": "src-mp-semay-relativistic-flight", "title": "Relativistic rocket and space flight", "authors": [ "Claude Semay", "Bernard Silvestre-Brac" ], "publisher": "Acta Astronautica", "year": 2006, "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.03.007", "kind": "peer-reviewed-model", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Cruise, constant-proper-acceleration, and relativistic rocket equations." } }, { "sourceId": "src-pa-doe-microgrids", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "74396b6f9d8fb2430311685ac2173717c0b967aaa92d8a1306d94c3ecb7f3f5d", "snapshot": { "id": "src-pa-doe-microgrids", "title": "Microgrids for Resiliency", "authors": [ "United States Department of Energy" ], "publisher": "U.S. Department of Energy", "year": 2021, "url": "https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/28-01-2021_doe-voe-microgrids-for-resiliency-report-2.pdf", "kind": "government-technical-report", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Controller functions, islanding, black start, resynchronization, ownership, and operating lessons." } }, { "sourceId": "src-po-hein-world-ships", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "7fd7d8cf4182911c9600b43dee89dcf970b0eaa290b69f12500273114297c28b", "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-hein-world-ships", "title": "World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale", "authors": [ "Andreas M. Hein", "Cameron Smith", "Frédéric Marin", "Kai Staats" ], "publisher": "Acta Futura", "year": 2020, "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04100", "kind": "peer-reviewed-synthesis", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Definitions, feasibility boundaries, roadblocks, alternatives, and sociotechnical requirements for hypothetical world ships." } }, { "sourceId": "src-po-nasa-interstellar-propulsion", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "fea9412feeb0fd996832716565716c3ca7ee80b57958dfa7032b1840679eb9f5", "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-nasa-interstellar-propulsion", "title": "Prospects for Interstellar Propulsion", "authors": [ "Ronald J. Litchford", "Jeffrey A. Sheehy" ], "publisher": "NASA Technical Reports Server", "year": 2020, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20200000759/downloads/20200000759.pdf", "kind": "government-conference-paper", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "NASA workshop synthesis covering scientific-probe concepts, technical challenges, readiness, risks, milestones, funding, and staged development." } }, { "sourceId": "src-po-nasa-propulsion-breakthroughs", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "5a4c16222976a95576e21ba5c8633865a26f4be58cad2698eb13431f77b318b0", "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-nasa-propulsion-breakthroughs", "title": "Assessing Potential Propulsion Breakthroughs", "authors": [ "Marc G. Millis" ], "publisher": "NASA Glenn Research Center", "year": 2005, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060000022.pdf", "kind": "government-technical-assessment", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Historical framework for assessing speculative propulsion claims, energy implications, evidentiary maturity, and claimed breakthrough potential." } }, { "sourceId": "src-po-nasa-ridm", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "901b35585226d759b25047071feca554ca535c8ffd0335b3667814f4b7fe116a", "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-nasa-ridm", "title": "NASA Risk-Informed Decision Making Handbook", "authors": [ "National Aeronautics and Space Administration" ], "publisher": "NASA", "year": 2010, "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20100021361.pdf", "kind": "institutional-decision-handbook", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Objectives, alternatives, performance measures, uncertainty, stakeholder inputs, and risk-informed comparison for consequential decisions." } }, { "sourceId": "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "2fcb0a0d2c7f8211e53ec1f000ef94f2486f1a2b18e16a39511ce3c25b2130c2", "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation", "title": "OECD Guidelines for Citizen Participation Processes", "authors": [ "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development" ], "publisher": "OECD Publishing", "year": 2022, "url": "https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2022/09/oecd-guidelines-for-citizen-participation-processes_63b34541.html", "kind": "intergovernmental-governance-guidance", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Ten-step participation process and quality principles for purpose, accountability, transparency, inclusion, accessibility, feedback, and evaluation." } }, { "sourceId": "src-po-unesco-future-generations", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "1abd40816de69f992c66c209f2302d950336c9372d5f2685773b47715b00ef2b", "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-unesco-future-generations", "title": "Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations Towards Future Generations", "authors": [ "United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization" ], "publisher": "UNESCO", "year": 1997, "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/declaration-responsibilities-present-generations-towards-future-generations", "kind": "international-normative-instrument", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Normative principles concerning future interests, freedom of choice, environmental protection, cultural diversity, peace, and consequence assessment." } }, { "sourceId": "src-po-unicef-crc", "sourceRecordType": "claim-source", "sourceFingerprint": "5bdae8a7100ea191caad9293c738bb6cd277320ab47e1142ae827954b50853fd", "snapshot": { "id": "src-po-unicef-crc", "title": "Convention on the Rights of the Child", "authors": [ "United Nations General Assembly" ], "publisher": "UNICEF", "year": 1989, "url": "https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text", "kind": "international-human-rights-treaty", "checkedAt": "2026-07-25", "scopeNote": "Treaty text on children's best interests, identity, expression, privacy, education, health, development, culture, protection, and participation." } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-gr-undrr-sendai", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "79e1fddf8a294cdc9f856eb287bdad319afa087d043151a384e6ddff9de66e26", "snapshot": { "title": "Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030", "url": "https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-gr-undrr-sendai" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-im-gao-isam-2025", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "2945e9402e27a82b658ee25e5e978e02f3e962ba6697fe6f1e95e5fe3029fcce", "snapshot": { "title": "In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Options", "url": "https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107555", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-im-gao-isam-2025" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-im-nasa-ism-portfolio-2025", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "b2ec8f9034b5d573c57d085445e12c829a0479bc578f61fd4ef15f021ba20438", "snapshot": { "title": "In-Space Manufacturing Portfolio Plan", "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250004020", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-im-nasa-ism-portfolio-2025" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-im-nasa-isru-priorities", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "24f4c9a996469fd583db85e586804daddd1634f795dcb1e9b53b59684e2b6ef2", "snapshot": { "title": "Overview of NASA ISRU Plans, Priorities, and Activities", "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220007350", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-im-nasa-isru-priorities" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-im-nasa-rm-8729", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "6a32f8deb067eed8293d98d23792c6a3b4708245fa30ef685d0a3a94529c86f1", "snapshot": { "title": "NASA Reliability and Maintainability Standard for Spaceflight and Support Systems", "url": "https://standards.nasa.gov/node/279", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-im-nasa-rm-8729" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-mp-bis-daedalus", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "16742daa1464c6df7203e0e8d592d82b3c4a3695a66beb390422d7cab9a4393b", "snapshot": { "title": "British Interplanetary Society Technical Projects: Project Daedalus", "url": "https://www.bis-space.com/technical-projects/", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-mp-bis-daedalus" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-mp-dragonfly", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "b2c81f760da52084332a990e43cde34cec1a52927e8108def17e9720cae85de9", "snapshot": { "title": "Project Dragonfly: A Feasibility Study of Interstellar Travel Using Laser-Powered Light Sail Propulsion", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.09.030", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-mp-dragonfly" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-mp-gaia-nearby-stars", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "f453379f377465d8e806cffacd5f7ea49119e9e8ceda809b1aa4b8238b632e48", "snapshot": { "title": "Gaia Early Data Release 3: The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars", "url": "https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2021/05/aa39498-20/aa39498-20.html", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-mp-gaia-nearby-stars" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-mp-heritage", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "b4e6b71c9e93a326ee5b87a8d3d35f23d9f6df08a8ae2e121a612eb8feefd6b0", "snapshot": { "title": "HERITAGE: a Monte Carlo code to evaluate the viability of interstellar travels using a multi-generational crew", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08649", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-mp-heritage" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-mp-longshot", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "31e6ce4690d818d06839bfc0b362ffc5b5783848790a797c0e1812edd4462cc3", "snapshot": { "title": "Project Longshot: An Unmanned Probe to Alpha Centauri", "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890007533", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-mp-longshot" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-mp-nasa-se-handbook", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "2d536a712dab91e720f6f3123e23881a0ef61185bd227a62a48611b1997a344e", "snapshot": { "title": "NASA Systems Engineering Handbook", "url": "https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-mp-nasa-se-handbook" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-mp-project-hyperion", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "2909eead8b2616fd6356d6eedfc769aa9c403c2bdd09d03254c62c4302fd342d", "snapshot": { "title": "Project Hyperion Design Competition Results 2025", "url": "https://www.projecthyperion.org/", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-mp-project-hyperion" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-mp-semay-relativistic-flight", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "39df79143a488ba5e837648fbc1238600662c3cf30a4af1d449348357c459521", "snapshot": { "title": "Relativistic rocket and space flight", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.03.007", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-mp-semay-relativistic-flight" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-pa-doe-microgrids", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "1f96ac1838926b4d6d8e5deea70f2538695317713f8725d470c617bf0d85e8cb", "snapshot": { "title": "Microgrids for Resiliency", "url": "https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/28-01-2021_doe-voe-microgrids-for-resiliency-report-2.pdf", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-pa-doe-microgrids" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-po-hein-world-ships", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "d2e3582c82d4aef12081f27d9795590648333523e0b073859f1c89c875fc2052", "snapshot": { "title": "World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale", "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04100", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-po-hein-world-ships" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-po-nasa-interstellar-propulsion", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "0b4748fe7567bff2e79fccb16fb27cf0bf3bcbf19d5cdf530e7c85dc9eb36dee", "snapshot": { "title": "Prospects for Interstellar Propulsion", "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20200000759/downloads/20200000759.pdf", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-po-nasa-interstellar-propulsion" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-po-nasa-propulsion-breakthroughs", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "0866c0ce999091d0467abd9c292f52115f10326390e292a1e0f2b3a79061a1fd", "snapshot": { "title": "Assessing Potential Propulsion Breakthroughs", "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060000022.pdf", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-po-nasa-propulsion-breakthroughs" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-po-nasa-ridm", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "66e3702cf002849270da7476d124aa105dca58bad6c69fecf4ba51b5e8086eab", "snapshot": { "title": "NASA Risk-Informed Decision Making Handbook", "url": "https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20100021361.pdf", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-po-nasa-ridm" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-po-oecd-citizen-participation", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "adfdf43b66ae8ce9508d6d6242993a9e917682beeef9a61ca5c5533be9865f70", "snapshot": { "title": "OECD Guidelines for Citizen Participation Processes", "url": "https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2022/09/oecd-guidelines-for-citizen-participation-processes_63b34541.html", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-po-oecd-citizen-participation" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-po-unesco-future-generations", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "4300f387d48f06c5324b3ac3ac24f62775e5d945eae61d798df61b22438b5420", "snapshot": { "title": "Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations Towards Future Generations", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/declaration-responsibilities-present-generations-towards-future-generations", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-po-unesco-future-generations" } }, { "sourceId": "official-claim-source-src-po-unicef-crc", "sourceRecordType": "reference-source", "sourceFingerprint": "23bb4b325dc54792ca2ff0ef3a9df8b75e83f2aae74c2659b0c610f514c1b429", "snapshot": { "title": "Convention on the Rights of the Child", "url": "https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text", "checkedAt": null, "scopeNote": "Official subject link frozen with the reviewed record; it does not independently validate every profile conclusion.", "subjectRecordType": "claim-source", "subjectRecordId": "src-po-unicef-crc" } } ], "packetFingerprint": "d7daa815f5fc0711f24c36783e9d89911d531459112453391959fc9f0c0167ba" }