{ "schemaVersion": "gships-review-packet-1", "packetId": "tasks:accessible-human-habitat", "stableId": "accessible-human-habitat", "family": "tasks", "slug": "accessible-human-habitat", "title": "Accessible human habitat", "status": "prepared-human-review-not-started", "release": { "releaseId": "public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14", "sourceCommit": "3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0", "corpusGeneratedAt": "2026-07-25", "frozenAt": "2026-07-26T22:50:50.000Z", "canonicalOrigin": "https://gships.dammonburden.com" }, "paths": { "human": "/review/tasks/accessible-human-habitat", "family": "/review/tasks", "packet": "/review-packets/tasks/accessible-human-habitat.c4c77ed44ca659a1.json", "decisionTemplate": "/review-packets/tasks/accessible-human-habitat.c4c77ed44ca659a1.decision-template.json", "worksheet": "/review-packets/tasks/accessible-human-habitat.c4c77ed44ca659a1.worksheet.md", "byFingerprint": "/review-packets/by-fingerprint/c4c77ed44ca659a10d3e9d2f0c6b4ae31863f9a382b22730528383ecc3919e4e.json" }, "boundary": "Prepared review packet; human review has not started. This packet is not a completed review, endorsement, reviewer appointment, partnership, or authorization to act.", "governingPolicies": [ { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/editorial-policy", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "1f6a1f823e8bfe891b6a707c5dce2ee2337c0bb7d915b48d6060ca82b8da1b47", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-editorial-governance-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "foundation-policy-controls-not-yet-staffed", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Editorial governance and independent review", "publisher": "GShips Project", "maintainer": "Dammon Burden", "publisherInterest": "The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.", "currentBoundary": "No independent domain reviewer or review council is currently appointed. Foundation records and outlines may not be represented as independently reviewed.", "reviewerSelection": [ "Publish the reviewer’s name, relevant credentials or lived expertise, review scope, compensation status, and declared conflicts with consent.", "Select for the actual claim domain rather than general prestige; include affected-community and disability-led expertise where rights or access are involved.", "Do not treat an employee, investor, customer, sponsor, source author, or directly supervised collaborator as independent for the affected claim." ], "reviewProcess": [ "Provide the exact claim, sources, locators, assumptions, counterevidence, transfer limits, and proposed evidence dimensions.", "Record approve, revise, contest, or reject at claim level; silence and event attendance never count as review.", "Publish material minority findings and the editor’s reasoned response.", "High-consequence medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use claims require two qualified independent reviewers with complementary scopes.", "A reviewer may recuse at any time; unresolved conflicts or missing expertise block the reviewed label." ], "appealAndCorrection": [ "A correction receives a reference identifier and triage record; safety-critical allegations receive priority.", "A material editorial decision may be appealed to a reviewer not involved in the original decision once such a panel exists.", "Substantive reversals, unresolved disputes, and removed conclusions receive a dated public record that protects reporter privacy.", "No sponsor, customer, founder, or reviewer may purchase, suppress, or unilaterally assign an evidence grade." ], "publicationGate": "Public 1.0 requires named review coverage across every Academy track, documented high-consequence two-person review, a material-corrections log, reviewer conflict records, and an operating appeal path.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } }, { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "path": "/dual-use", "recordType": "governing-policy", "fingerprint": "81637e2849f9c0866d23f7174eb9a2ce522b86313167ebf5022fca122d6e506c", "snapshot": { "id": "policy-dual-use-001", "version": "0.1.0", "status": "planned-controls-not-yet-operational", "adoptedForFoundation": "2026-07-25", "title": "Civil, defensive, and rights-preserving use boundary", "summary": "GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.", "scopeTrigger": "Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.", "allowedInPrinciple": [ "Safety engineering and independently assessed protection", "Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response", "Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity", "Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery", "Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research" ], "prohibited": [ "Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause", "Weapons command-and-control or targeting support", "Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads", "Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems", "Autonomous force application", "Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control", "Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments" ], "reviewRequiredBeforeAnyRelevantWork": [ "Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening", "Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable", "Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses", "Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal", "Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review", "Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths", "Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security" ], "currentBoundary": "No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.", "changeControl": "Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.", "correctionPath": "/corrections" } } ], "reviewContract": { "questions": [ { "id": "question-1", "text": "Is the task concrete, Earth-first, evidence-bearing, reversible, and bounded by explicit veto conditions?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-2", "text": "Do every candidate tier, rationale, and next action remain specific to this task without becoming an entity ranking?", "required": true }, { "id": "question-3", "text": "Would the proposed evidence artifact let an independent person falsify or stop the work?", "required": true } ], "exclusions": [ "Task matches do not authorize outreach, registration, application, funding, procurement, or commitment.", "A candidate tier is not an organization, event, or opportunity quality score." ], "requestedScopeCodes": [ "affected-public-rights", "ecosystem-due-diligence", "institution-building" ], "dispositions": [ "approve", "revise", "contest", "reject", "recuse" ], "prohibitedInputs": [ "private legal names or contact details", "identity documents or raw credential files", "accessibility or medical records", "confidential conflict evidence", "classified, export-controlled, proprietary, or exploit material" ], "freshness": { "maximumDecisionAgeFromFreezeDays": 90, "eventOccurrenceRule": "Not applicable to this packet family." }, "completionRule": "Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.", "highConsequenceRule": "Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes." }, "primaryRecords": [ { "recordType": "ecosystem-task", "recordId": "accessible-human-habitat", "title": "Accessible human habitat", "publicPath": "/partners/tasks/accessible-human-habitat", "recordFingerprint": "3daf838c0ea4f823c91f1e511c5d63f59c44416fec6169008c9407e0e3a48ea7", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "affected-public-rights", "institution-building" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "accessible-human-habitat", "slug": "accessible-human-habitat", "title": "Accessible human habitat", "publicQuestion": "Can disabled people and diverse operators use, understand, refuse, and recover a life-critical habitat workflow without symbolic consultation?", "summary": "Make accessibility, privacy, emergency use, fatigue, culture, and resident authority testable habitat requirements from the beginning.", "systemSlugs": [ "structures-shielding", "health-medicine", "human-factors", "governance-law" ], "institutionalRoles": [ "operator", "testbed-facility", "standards-assurance", "public-interest-affected-community", "education-workforce" ], "preferredEngagementModes": [ "compensated disability-led review", "accessible workflow test", "bounded analog study" ], "requiredEvidence": [ "Participant-led scope and compensation", "Accessible emergency, maintenance, and civic workflows", "Barrier log, remediation, and retest", "Independent privacy, clinical, and stop-work authority" ], "leadershipPathwayIds": [ "human-health-access" ], "fitDimensionIds": [ "task-fit", "evidence-relevance", "access-feasibility", "public-benefit-alignment", "independence", "rights-environmental-compatibility", "civil-defensive-compatibility", "failure-learning-value" ], "mandatoryVetoIds": [ "relationship-accuracy", "civil-defensive-boundary", "rights-consent-accessibility", "clinical-biosafety-participant-protection", "environmental-planetary-protection", "information-security-export-sanctions", "editorial-independence-conflict", "legitimate-access-and-authority" ], "conflicts": "No participant, disability organization, facility, sponsor, customer, or partner relationship exists.", "whatWouldChange": "Disabled-user evidence, participant-protection review, or a finding that the proposed workflow excludes or burdens a group would change the task." } }, { "recordType": "partner-task-match", "recordId": "match-accessible-human-habitat-astroaccess", "title": "accessible-human-habitat · entity-astroaccess", "publicPath": "/partners", "recordFingerprint": "a797462366fce86eb9678866e5c148c1f12f881284cc44de0ac16dc33b8c59df", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "ecosystem-due-diligence", "institution-building" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "match-accessible-human-habitat-astroaccess", "taskId": "accessible-human-habitat", "organizationId": "entity-astroaccess", "tier": "monitor", "priorityOrder": null, "dimensions": { "task-fit": "strong", "evidence-relevance": "supported", "access-feasibility": "unknown", "public-benefit-alignment": "strong", "independence": "unknown", "rights-environmental-compatibility": "supported", "civil-defensive-compatibility": "supported", "failure-learning-value": "strong" }, "vetoChecks": { "relationship-accuracy": "pass", "civil-defensive-boundary": "unknown", "rights-consent-accessibility": "unknown", "clinical-biosafety-participant-protection": "unknown", "environmental-planetary-protection": "unknown", "information-security-export-sanctions": "unknown", "editorial-independence-conflict": "unknown", "legitimate-access-and-authority": "unknown" }, "rationale": "The reviewed disability-led profile is directly relevant, but availability, compensation, participant-led scope, and long-duration transfer remain unverified.", "boundedNextAction": "First define compensation, authority, data, and anti-tokenism requirements for any future disability-led review.", "relationshipState": "indexed only; no formal relationship", "actionStatus": "proposed; not undertaken" } }, { "recordType": "partner-task-match", "recordId": "match-accessible-human-habitat-uc-davis-home", "title": "accessible-human-habitat · entity-uc-davis-home-institute", "publicPath": "/partners", "recordFingerprint": "40e983bf506a903cd45cd108e3a94737a69972ac60390a34b186e0aaf37edc11", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "ecosystem-due-diligence", "institution-building" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "match-accessible-human-habitat-uc-davis-home", "taskId": "accessible-human-habitat", "organizationId": "entity-uc-davis-home-institute", "tier": "monitor", "priorityOrder": null, "dimensions": { "task-fit": "supported", "evidence-relevance": "supported", "access-feasibility": "unknown", "public-benefit-alignment": "supported", "independence": "unknown", "rights-environmental-compatibility": "unknown", "civil-defensive-compatibility": "unknown", "failure-learning-value": "supported" }, "vetoChecks": { "relationship-accuracy": "pass", "civil-defensive-boundary": "unknown", "rights-consent-accessibility": "unknown", "clinical-biosafety-participant-protection": "unknown", "environmental-planetary-protection": "unknown", "information-security-export-sanctions": "unknown", "editorial-independence-conflict": "unknown", "legitimate-access-and-authority": "unknown" }, "rationale": "The profile supports human-robotic habitat and mission research relevance, but a specific accessible workflow, participant protections, and access remain unverified.", "boundedNextAction": "Compare public human-systems work with the task's accessible emergency and no-model requirements.", "relationshipState": "indexed only; no formal relationship", "actionStatus": "proposed; not undertaken" } }, { "recordType": "event-task-match", "recordId": "event-match-access-spacechi-2026", "title": "accessible-human-habitat · event-spacechi-2026", "publicPath": "/partners", "recordFingerprint": "cbcce18ff34c43b1a8df2c388d879584b950366f08f420a428b9b410867fdd0d", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "ecosystem-due-diligence", "institution-building" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "event-match-access-spacechi-2026", "taskId": "accessible-human-habitat", "eventId": "event-spacechi-2026", "tier": "monitor", "fitRationale": "Relevant to space human-computer interaction, accessibility, and habitat workflows.", "intendedArtifact": "An accessible life-critical workflow and barrier log reviewed by affected users.", "actionStatus": "proposed; not undertaken" } }, { "recordType": "opportunity-task-match", "recordId": "opportunity-match-access-hrp", "title": "accessible-human-habitat · opp-hrp", "publicPath": "/partners", "recordFingerprint": "3e57baef72749bab9ab492bc0d08f3f8ac8dbda86e6e5a6bfbe231e92fc74e2e", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "ecosystem-due-diligence", "institution-building" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "opportunity-match-access-hrp", "taskId": "accessible-human-habitat", "opportunityId": "opp-hrp", "tier": "monitor", "fitRationale": "Current HRP routes may support bounded human-systems research, but a matching call, participant protections, and accessibility scope require verification.", "requiredArtifact": "A participant-led accessible workflow question with ethics and privacy review.", "actionStatus": "proposed; not undertaken" } }, { "recordType": "opportunity-task-match", "recordId": "opportunity-match-access-nasa-mmea", "title": "accessible-human-habitat · opp-nasa-mmea", "publicPath": "/partners", "recordFingerprint": "75d2c2b9f2c6998802c5a73134f857000b9606ee2efcc00445c96fc0d3cce367", "reviewRequirements": { "minimumIndependentApprovals": 1, "highConsequenceDomains": [], "requiredDomainCodes": [], "requiredComplementaryScopeGroups": [ { "id": "bounded-competence", "scopeClass": "bounded-competence", "oneOf": [ "ecosystem-due-diligence", "institution-building" ] } ], "unresolvedNegativeFindingBlocksPublication": true }, "referenceIds": [], "snapshot": { "id": "opportunity-match-access-nasa-mmea", "taskId": "accessible-human-habitat", "opportunityId": "opp-nasa-mmea", "tier": "monitor", "fitRationale": "The integrated long-duration analog is highly relevant to habitat operations and human factors, but participation is a high-consequence personal and research decision with strict medical, psychological, privacy, accessibility, and consent boundaries.", "requiredArtifact": "An independent participant-protection, consent, privacy, accessibility, medical, psychological, employment-leave, and personal-risk review; the listing is not a recommendation to apply.", "actionStatus": "proposed; not undertaken" } } ], "linkedRecords": [ { "recordType": "ecosystem-organization", "recordId": "entity-astroaccess", "title": "AstroAccess", "publicPath": "/partners/astroaccess", "recordFingerprint": "49a0864f99b1e75c6d90eb9ac404129c385f857c2d29dc669fafe5397d7d6b37" }, { "recordType": "ecosystem-organization", "recordId": "entity-uc-davis-home-institute", "title": "UC Davis HOME Institute", "publicPath": "/partners/uc-davis-home-institute", "recordFingerprint": "df969070d49cd415dfbba6aa7237ee73575936f3e9a4d4ff3b60556778039e50" }, { "recordType": "event-occurrence", "recordId": "event-spacechi-2026", "title": "SpaceCHI 2026", "publicPath": "/events/spacechi-2026", "recordFingerprint": "738b085a1b0060c40f5a00503a21b9654c8b27f24b574475604a3af59814aa57" }, { "recordType": "opportunity", "recordId": "opp-hrp", "title": "NASA HRP collaboration", "publicPath": "/opportunities/opp-hrp", "recordFingerprint": "54e1953976202d77d648416af956559f46ad987b7c327a5fba8d4a838f211a13" }, { "recordType": "opportunity", "recordId": "opp-nasa-mmea", "title": "NASA Moon and Mars Exploration Analog participant recruitment", "publicPath": "/opportunities/opp-nasa-mmea", "recordFingerprint": "8538bf65f5c4eabe2a0fa73bb1c11ea232759b14f28f513ec6f3f8bb11f5263c" } ], "referenceSnapshots": [], "packetFingerprint": "c4c77ed44ca659a10d3e9d2f0c6b4ae31863f9a382b22730528383ecc3919e4e" }