Editorial boundary: This public alpha is generated from version-controlled source without third-party application or build packages. It is not the reviewed 1.0 corpus: 60 Academy lessons are substantive editorial drafts, 0 remain foundation outlines, and independent domain review remains open.

Core question

Can the crew keep living while assuming parts of the system are compromised?

Track lessons

  1. Foundation · 35 minutes · substantive-editorial-draft

    Threat-model the whole ship

    Model how software, people, sensors, factories, archives, governance, and physical processes can fail together—and preserve safe recovery without surveillance or offensive capability.

    Substantive, cited editorial draft; independent domain review remains required.
  2. Foundation · 34 minutes · substantive-editorial-draft

    Trust islands and safe conduits

    Partition critical services into independently survivable trust islands, constrain their conduits, and preserve local deterministic operation when identity, networks, AI, or governance fail.

    Substantive, cited editorial draft; independent domain review remains required.
  3. Foundation · 36 minutes · substantive-editorial-draft

    The update airlock

    Move software, firmware, models, data, and engineering changes through an evidence-preserving gate with provenance, compatibility tests, staged rollout, health checks, and recoverable rollback.

    Substantive, cited editorial draft; independent domain review remains required.
  4. Foundation · 36 minutes · substantive-editorial-draft

    Cryptography across generations

    Keep identities, records, commands, and recovery usable as algorithms, hardware, institutions, clocks, and generations change.

    Substantive, cited editorial draft; independent domain review remains required.
  5. Applied · 38 minutes · substantive-editorial-draft

    Incident response without Earth

    Detect, stabilize, contain, investigate, restore, attest, and reconnect locally while protecting life, evidence, privacy, due process, and legitimate authority.

    Substantive, cited editorial draft; independent domain review remains required.

Prepared by GShips Project · Last edited 2026-07-26 · Suggest a correction

Accountability record

How to inspect this page

Scope: Academy track cyber-resilience

Page citations and accountability links

Assumptions and limits

  • The track is organized around the question: Can the crew keep living while assuming parts of the system are compromised?
  • The track overview summarizes linked lessons and systems; it does not create a new evidence grade or independent-review state.

What would change this page?

A changed track scope, lesson evidence, capability dependency, curriculum review, or audience need would trigger revision.

People, review, and conflicts

Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
track synthesis accountability pass
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project AI-assisted accountability pass
Last editorial review
2026-07-26
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
2026-07-26

Declared conflicts

  • The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.

Suggest a correction to this page