Editorial boundary: This public alpha is generated from version-controlled source without third-party application or build packages. It is not the reviewed 1.0 corpus: 60 Academy lessons are substantive editorial drafts, 0 remain foundation outlines, and independent domain review remains open.

Foundation dependency and decision-gate index
CapabilityDirect dependenciesDecision gate
Mission architecture & requirements Propulsion, Life support, Industry, Governance Do not approve an irreversible mission architecture until alternatives, arrival, braking, rights, rescue limits, and whole-lifecycle maintenance have independent evidence.
Propulsion & trajectory Power & heat, Habitat, Connection No propulsion claim advances beyond concept status without a complete mass, energy, acceleration, braking, thermal, shielding, and failure analysis.
Power generation & thermal rejection Industry, Habitat, Cyber resilience Demonstrate isolated power trains, black start, representative heat rejection, local repair, and stable operation through injected failures.
Structures, habitats & shielding Power & heat, Health, Human life Require full-scale human-in-the-loop mockups, diverse-body accessibility review, fire/refuge tests, and long-duration rotating-environment evidence.
Air, water & waste life support Ecology & food, Industry, Power & heat Demonstrate bounded material accounting with a declared system boundary, interval, inventories, flows, losses, maintenance media, and measurement uncertainty, plus independent emergency reserves, manual control, and recovery from contamination.
Food, agriculture & closed ecology Life support, Power & heat, Health Operate an integrated hybrid ecology through multi-season failures while measuring every essential element and publishing negative results.
Medicine, public health & human performance Habitat, Ecology & food, AI & autonomy, Governance Do not rely on reproduction until independent evidence supports the intended environment and the architecture remains viable under voluntary reproductive choices, accessible clinical care, privacy, appeal, disability support, and no coercive quotas.
Reproduction, genetics & population Health, Governance, Human life Reject any architecture that requires forced reproduction, forced abortion, nonconsensual genetic intervention, disability exclusion, or hereditary legal status; require equal access to contraception, abortion care, assisted reproduction, parenting, genetic counseling, disability support, and accessible information.
Psychology, culture, education & meaning Habitat, Governance, AI & autonomy Demonstrate that residents can retain privacy, education, cultural choice, political agency, and meaningful non-mission lives under scarcity.
Governance, law, economics & rights Human continuity, Human life, Cyber resilience Require an independently reviewed rights floor, civic constitution separate from corporate control, due process, amendment, youth voice, and limits on emergency authority.
AI, LLMs, autonomy & digital twins Cyber resilience, Industry, Coordination Require independently assessed safety properties, separate physical protection layers, explicit authority gates, tested workload and timing bounds, audited provenance, bounded abstention, manual operation, recovery drills, and independent appeal.
Cybersecurity, software assurance & recovery AI & autonomy, Connection, Industry Mixed crews must repeatedly isolate a compromised zone, maintain life support, investigate locally, rebuild from known-good material, and rejoin safely.
Communications, navigation & knowledge Power & heat, AI & autonomy, Coordination Demonstrate navigation and archive recovery without current experts, cloud services, vendor activation, or a single surviving medium.
Manufacturing, repair, recycling & ISRU Power & heat, AI & autonomy, Assembly Operate an integrated factory cell through tool wear, sensor drift, contaminated feedstock, missing specialists, and injected cyber faults.
Radiation, dust & the space environment Habitat, Health, Propulsion Validate representative spectra, impact regimes, secondary particles, inspection, repair, and lifetime biological risk before relying on a shield architecture.
Launch, assembly, logistics & supply chains Industry, Architecture, Coordination Require nonexclusive interfaces, multiple suppliers, transparent logistics assumptions, staged assembly demonstrations, and a complete commissioning plan.
Destinations, astronomy & planetary protection Connection, Architecture, Governance No crew launch without high-confidence robotic characterization and a presumption against settlement where credible indigenous life is detected.
Analogs, testbeds, simulation & verification Architecture, Coordination, Cyber resilience Every claimed capability must identify its environment, duration, scale, intervention, failure history, evidence boundary, and next harder test.
Ethics, alternatives & decision gates Architecture, Governance, Destinations At every major stage, rerun launch, wait, habitat, probe, and do-not-go alternatives; treat pause or abandonment as valid outcomes.
Institutions, capital, standards & workforce Architecture, Proof ladder, Governance Fund only work with a real near-term beneficiary, a measurable capability gap, reversible tests, transparent conflicts, and an independent review path.

Systems lab

Six inspectable teaching tools connect arithmetic, system relationships, leadership pathways, and explicit uncertainty. Every tool retains its documented example, result, and table without JavaScript.

Distance, speed, energy, and braking

Compare idealized constant-speed coasting times and relativistic payload-energy changes.

Idealized mission inputs

Interface range: 0.001 to 1,000,000 light-years.

Interface range: 0.000001 to 0.999999 c.

Interface range: 1 to 10¹⁸ kilograms.

Interface guardrail: These input limits prevent unusable browser values; they are not a feasible or safe mission envelope. The model assumes ideal coasting in flat spacetime and reports payload kinetic-energy change. It excludes acceleration duration, propulsion and braking efficiency, propellant, power, heat rejection, shielding, navigation, reliability, communications, ecology, and human viability.

At 0.1 c, the ideal selected-frame coasting time is 42.465 years.
Idealized mission calculation; the table remains available without JavaScript
MeasureIllustrative value
Earth-frame coasting time42.465 years
Traveler-frame coasting time42.2521 years
Lorentz factor1.005
Acceleration energy change4.5278e+20 J
Braking energy change4.5278e+20 J
Acceleration plus braking9.0555e+20 J

Artificial-gravity rotation

Relate a rigid habitat radius and target floor acceleration to rotation rate.

Rotating-habitat inputs

Interface range: 1 to 100,000 metres.

Interface range: 0.01 to 2 standard gravities.

Interface guardrail: The radius and acceleration limits are teaching-interface limits, not evidence of human safety or engineering feasibility. This rigid-body relation does not establish vestibular tolerance, acceptable Coriolis effects, structural margins, dynamic balance, pressure integrity, radiation protection, habitability, or long-duration health. The one-metre gravity drop is only a comparison measure.

A 100-metre radius at 1 g₀ requires about 2.99 revolutions per minute.
Rigid-body artificial-gravity calculation; the table remains available without JavaScript
MeasureIllustrative value
Rotation rate2.99 rpm
Rotation period20.06 seconds/revolution
Floor rim speed31.32 m/s
Acceleration drop one metre inward1% of floor value

Closed-loop material explorer

Vary three independent, normalized recovery inputs and expose each illustrative gap.

Independent normalized recovery inputs

Independent interface range: 0–100%.

Independent interface range: 0–100%.

Independent interface range: 0–100%.

Interface guardrail: Each 0–100% value is an independent declared normalization boundary, not a whole-habitat closure estimate. The arithmetic gaps are percentage points. This explorer does not mass-balance coupled water, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, food, waste, trace contaminants, stored inventory, time dynamics, microbiomes, maintenance, or crew health.

The illustrative unmet water, food, and oxygen fractions are 10, 50, and 5 percentage points.
Independent normalized material-stream inputs; the table remains available without JavaScript
StreamEntered recoveryIllustrative gap (percentage points)
Water90%10
Food50%50
Oxygen95%5

Census-index sensitivity comparison

Compare compound arithmetic paths without converting the result into a demographic prescription.

Illustrative arithmetic inputs

Interface range: a whole starting census-index value from 2 to 10,000,000.

Interface range: 1 to 100 modeled generation steps.

Interface range: an arithmetic sensitivity rate from 0–20%.

Ethical and interface guardrail: These are arithmetic interface inputs, not viable-population bounds. The imposed rate is not fertility, consent, viability, policy, or biological fitness. The comparison cannot justify reproductive targets, assigned pairing, genetic selection, coercion, discrimination, or restrictions on bodily autonomy. If voluntary human choices make a mission infeasible, the mission is infeasible.

After 10 modeled steps, the illustrative decline, no-change, and growth census-index values are 904, 1,000, and 1,105.
Compound census-index sensitivity comparison; the table remains available without JavaScript
Arithmetic scenarioImposed sensitivity rateCensus-index value after 10 steps
Decline−1% per modeled step904
No change0%1,000
Growth+1% per modeled step1,105

Leadership and event matcher

Choose a pathway to inspect task-linked events and one evidence-bearing starting action.

Leadership interest

Choose one editorial pathway; this is not a qualification assessment.

Editorial guardrail: A match is a starting point, not an endorsement, affiliation, invitation, credential, or finding of leadership fitness. Verify dates, deadlines, eligibility, access, accessibility, cost, travel, safety, and program details with the official organizer before acting.

Systems assurance. 5 current editorial event matches are shown.

Starter action: Trace one public claim to its source, locator, assumptions, and change condition.

First artifact: An independently checked evidence-and-requirements graph.

All pathway and event relationships; JavaScript narrows this table without removing the complete no-JavaScript fallback
PathwayEventTierRecorded datesStatusIntended artifactLast verified
Systems assurance 2nd European Interstellar Symposium A0 monitor A frozen, originality-checked, evidence-reviewed abstract packet on shared evidence, interfaces, failure, alternatives, and public-benefit institutions; preparation is prioritized, but submission is not authorized. 2026-07-26
Systems assurance INCOSE EMEASEC 2026 A2 monitor; current access details require verification A bounded assurance-method critique or learning agenda; current program and registration access must be verified before effort. 2026-07-26
Systems assurance ASCEND 2027 A2 active call; civil-and-defensive review required A measured, reviewed technical contribution derived from an actual pilot; no broad generation-ship vision paper and no national-security expansion. 2026-07-26
Systems assurance NASA Space Apps Challenge 2026 B monitor A small public prototype using open data with a declared beneficiary, reproducible source, accessible documentation, and no NASA-affiliation claim. 2026-07-26
Systems assurance INCOSE International Symposium 2027 monitor monitor A measured assurance-method paper or review packet, not a generation-ship overview. 2026-07-25
Living systems ASGSR Annual Meeting 2026 monitor monitor A material-boundary and failure-recovery comparison prepared only after domain review. 2026-07-26
Industrial autonomy COSMIC-CONFERS CONFERgence 2026 monitor monitor A repair, commissioning, inspection, and evidence-interface scenario. 2026-07-25
Industrial autonomy NETS 2027 monitor monitor A complete public mass-energy-heat-safety balance with nuclear and dual-use boundaries. 2026-07-25
Cyber and knowledge resilience NIST Software and Supply Chain Assurance Forum monitor monitor A public defensive recovery requirements crosswalk; no implication of NIST approval. 2026-07-26
Human health and access SpaceCHI 2026 monitor monitor An accessible life-critical workflow and barrier log reviewed by affected users. 2026-07-26
Human health and access ASGSR Annual Meeting 2026 monitor monitor A high-consequence evidence-boundary review, not a clinical claim. 2026-07-26
Mission science EANA 2026 monitor monitor A probe-first destination evidence framework; no submission is authorized. 2026-07-26
Mission science ASGSR Annual Meeting 2026 monitor monitor A high-consequence evidence-boundary review, not a clinical claim. 2026-07-26
Mission science NETS 2027 monitor monitor A complete public mass-energy-heat-safety balance with nuclear and dual-use boundaries. 2026-07-25
Governance and rights Summit for Space Sustainability monitor monitor An expiring decision gate with rights, environmental, minority-finding, and appeal requirements. 2026-07-25
Public-benefit institution building 2nd European Interstellar Symposium A0 monitor A frozen, originality-checked, evidence-reviewed abstract packet on shared evidence, interfaces, failure, alternatives, and public-benefit institutions; preparation is prioritized, but submission is not authorized. 2026-07-26
Public-benefit institution building INCOSE EMEASEC 2026 A2 monitor; current access details require verification A bounded assurance-method critique or learning agenda; current program and registration access must be verified before effort. 2026-07-26
Public-benefit institution building ASCEND 2027 A2 active call; civil-and-defensive review required A measured, reviewed technical contribution derived from an actual pilot; no broad generation-ship vision paper and no national-security expansion. 2026-07-26
Public-benefit institution building NASA Space Apps Challenge 2026 B monitor A small public prototype using open data with a declared beneficiary, reproducible source, accessible documentation, and no NASA-affiliation claim. 2026-07-26
Public-benefit institution building INCOSE International Symposium 2027 monitor monitor A measured assurance-method paper or review packet, not a generation-ship overview. 2026-07-25

Systems dependency selector

Inspect curated direct dependencies, dependents, failure modes, precursors, and the current decision gate.

Capability selection

Choose one foundation capability record.

Evidence guardrail: A recorded arrow means the selected foundation synthesis asserts a direct dependency. It does not prove completeness, causality, readiness, safety, or priority; an absent arrow does not establish independence. The relationship table is not a validated engineering model, and indexed context sources are not automatically claim citations.

Mission architecture & requirements has 4 recorded direct dependencies and 5 recorded direct dependents.

Depends on

PropulsionLife supportIndustryGovernance

Selected system

Architecture

Direct dependents

AssemblyDestinationsProof ladderAlternativesCoordination
Recorded direct relationships for Mission architecture & requirements
RelationshipCapabilityEvidence boundaryDetail
This system depends on Propulsion & trajectory Foundation synthesis; linked claims editorially assessed; independent system review pending Open system
This system depends on Air, water & waste life support Foundation synthesis; linked claims editorially assessed; independent system review pending Open system
This system depends on Manufacturing, repair, recycling & ISRU Foundation synthesis; linked claims editorially assessed; independent system review pending Open system
This system depends on Governance, law, economics & rights Foundation synthesis; linked claims editorially assessed; independent system review pending Open system
Selected system Mission architecture & requirements Foundation synthesis; linked claims editorially assessed; independent system review pending Open system
Depends on this system Launch, assembly, logistics & supply chains Foundation synthesis; linked claims editorially assessed; independent system review pending Open system
Depends on this system Destinations, astronomy & planetary protection Foundation synthesis; linked claims editorially assessed; independent system review pending Open system
Depends on this system Analogs, testbeds, simulation & verification Foundation synthesis; linked claims editorially assessed; independent system review pending Open system
Depends on this system Ethics, alternatives & decision gates Foundation synthesis; linked claims editorially assessed; independent system review pending Open system
Depends on this system Institutions, capital, standards & workforce Foundation synthesis; linked claims editorially assessed; independent system review pending Open system

Recorded failure modes

  • Requirements growth hides mass, energy, braking, logistics, and contingency costs until the design is no longer coherent.
  • A favored reference mission crowds out safer probes, Solar System habitats, waiting, or a valid do-not-launch decision.

Useful precursors

  • Auditable requirements and digital-twin exercises for remote habitats, disaster logistics, and long-duration Solar System missions.
  • Robotic interstellar precursor studies that close acceleration, cruise, communications, arrival, and braking budgets.

Decision gate

Do not approve an irreversible mission architecture until alternatives, arrival, braking, rights, rescue limits, and whole-lifecycle maintenance have independent evidence.

Linked claims are editorially assessed; system-level synthesis and maturity interpretation still require independent review · Read the method

Accountability record

How to inspect this page

Scope: GShips page /systems

Page citations and accountability links

Assumptions and limits

  • The map shows declared direct dependencies and does not prove completeness, independence, or feasibility.
  • Calculator outputs are illustrative models with explicit assumptions and equivalent non-JavaScript tables.

What would change this page?

A changed capability dependency, failure mode, maturity assessment, precursor result, or decision gate would change the map.

People, review, and conflicts

Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
public-alpha accountability pass
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project AI-assisted editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
2026-07-26
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
2026-07-25

Declared conflicts

  • The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.

Suggest a correction to this page