Current boundary: No screening body, independent stop-work authority, contractual controls, or appeal body currently exists. Therefore no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized by this policy.

Purpose and scope

GShips may research safety, resilience, logistics, communications, recovery, and cyber defense only within explicit end-use, rights, and independent-review controls. Calling an activity defensive is never sufficient by itself.

Apply dual-use review before accepting or materially advancing customer, funder, collaborator, operational, procurement, or publication-sensitive work whose capability, data, end use, or transfer could reasonably enable a prohibited use. Public non-actionable education still follows prohibited-content and sensitive-publication controls.

Allowed in principle

  • Safety engineering and independently assessed protection
  • Resilience, graceful degradation, recovery, and disaster response
  • Civil logistics, maintenance, communications, and knowledge continuity
  • Cyber defense, secure software, incident response, and recovery
  • Rights-preserving health, accessibility, ecology, education, and governance research

Prohibited

  • Identification, tracking, prioritization, or engagement of people or assets for force, weapons, repression, or offensive operations; safety navigation, astronomy, collision avoidance, search and rescue, and independently governed planetary defense are not prohibited by this clause
  • Weapons command-and-control or targeting support
  • Offensive access, persistence, exploitation, or destructive cyber payloads
  • Mass surveillance, biometric repression, or political-control systems
  • Autonomous force application
  • Coercive reproductive, medical, genetic, disability, or civic control
  • Nonconsensual experimentation or treating residents as research instruments

Required before relevant work

  • Customer, funder, collaborator, jurisdiction, beneficial-owner, and end-use screening
  • Export-control and sanctions review by qualified counsel when applicable
  • Written scope, allowed-use, prohibited-use, audit, termination, and incident clauses
  • Independent stop-work authority with a named alternate and founder recusal
  • Sensitive-publication and information-hazard review
  • Whistleblowing, escalation, incident response, appeal, and anti-retaliation paths
  • Aggregate transparency reporting that protects legitimate privacy and security

Change control

Material changes require a dated public rationale, independent review, and may not be approved by the founder alone.

No current project or revenue opportunity is authorized to bypass screening because it is prestigious, urgent, publicly funded, or described as resilience.

Dual-use policy 0.1.0; controls not yet operational · Owner-alpha foundation · Independent review pending · Suggest a correction

Accountability record

How to inspect this page

Scope: GShips page /dual-use

Page citations and accountability links

  • Editorial governance
    Independent review, conflicts, correction, appeal, and publication gate · internal accountability record
  • Review Commons
    Bounded review process and high-consequence two-person rule · internal accountability record
  • Cyber resilience
    Civil and defensive security curriculum with recovery and offensive-scope boundaries · internal accountability record

Assumptions and limits

  • A capability can create harmful use even when its developer describes the intended purpose as civil or defensive.
  • The current controls are not staffed or operational, so no relevant customer, defense, dual-use, or operational engagement is authorized.

What would change this page?

Independent policy review, staffed screening and appeal bodies, named stop-work authority, audited decisions, incidents, legal changes, or new information hazards would change this policy page.

People, review, and conflicts

Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
public-alpha accountability pass
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project AI-assisted editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
2026-07-26
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
2026-07-25

Declared conflicts

  • The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.

Suggest a correction to this page