Selection note: Curated for Space Station module power-management automation, including topology, functional partitioning, rack autonomy, an AI testbed, and identified future needs.

Evidence boundary: Only NTRS metadata and an abstract are open here; the viewgraphs, testbed results, and transfer to modern safety-critical power systems were not validated. It is historical autonomy context, not claim evidence.

Stable record
ntrs-19930018627
Topic
power-thermal
Type
Conference Paper
Publisher
Legacy CDMS
Authors
Bechtel, Robert; Weeks, Dave; Walls, Bryan
Year
1990
Editorial state
metadata curated editorial draft
Reviewer
GShips Project editorial synthesis
Official link checked
2026-07-25

Source-supplied abstract

Viewgraphs on automation of space station module (SSM) power management and distribution (PMAD) system are presented. Topics covered include: reasons for power system automation; SSM/PMAD approach to automation; SSM/PMAD test bed; SSM/PMAD topology; functional partitioning; SSM/PMAD control; rack level autonomy; FRAMES AI system; and future technology needs for power system automation.

Abstract text has not been adopted as a GShips conclusion.

What would change this record?

A newer or corrected version, a retraction, a verified duplicate, a material topic mismatch, a changed access state, or claim-level review would trigger a dated editorial update.

Open the source record (opens external site in a new tab)

Metadata-curated context; independent domain and claim review pending · Last edited 2026-07-25 · Suggest a correction

Accountability record

How to inspect this page

Scope: Atlas resource ntrs-19930018627

Page citations and accountability links

Assumptions and limits

  • Only NTRS metadata and an abstract are open here; the viewgraphs, testbed results, and transfer to modern safety-critical power systems were not validated. It is historical autonomy context, not claim evidence.
  • Source-supplied titles, abstracts, authors, and dates may require correction against the canonical full text.

What would change this page?

A newer or corrected version, retraction, verified duplicate, material topic mismatch, changed access state, or claim-level assessment would change this record.

People, review, and conflicts

Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
metadata-curated-editorial-draft
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
No editorial-review date recorded
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
Not recorded separately
Official source or link verified
2026-07-25

Declared conflicts

  • The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.

Suggest a correction to this page