Exoplanet Biosignatures: Understanding Oxygen as a Biosignature in the Context of Its Environment
Here we review how environmental context can be used to interpret whether O<sub>2</sub> is a biosignature in extrasolar planetary observations. This paper builds on the overview of current biosignature research discussed in Schwieterman et al. (2017), and provides an in-depth, in
Selection note: Curated because “Exoplanet Biosignatures: Understanding Oxygen as a Biosignature in the Context of Its Environment” covers Here we review how environmental context can be used to interpret whether O<sub>2</sub> is a biosignature in extrasolar; it materially informs GShips work on biosignatures and target characterization.
Evidence boundary: NTRS provides open full text, but this accepted manuscript (version with final changes) was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.
Stable record
ntrs-20180007564
Topic
destinations-astrobiology
Type
Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Publisher
Mary Ann Liebert (United States)
Authors
Victoria S Meadows; Christopher T Reinhard; Giada N Arney; Mary N Parenteau; Edward W Schwieterman; Shawn D Domagal-Goldman; Andrew P Lincowski; Karl R Stapelfeldt
Year
2018
Editorial state
metadata curated editorial draft
Reviewer
GShips Project editorial synthesis
Official link checked
2026-07-25
Source-supplied abstract
Here we review how environmental context can be used to interpret whether O<sub>2</sub> is a biosignature in extrasolar planetary observations. This paper builds on the overview of current biosignature research discussed in Schwieterman et al. (2017), and provides an in-depth, interdisciplinary example of biosignature identification and observation that serves as a basis for the development of the general framework for biosignature assessment described in Catling et al., (2017). O<sub>2</sub> is a potentially strong biosignature that was originally thought to be an unambiguous indicator for life at high-abundance. In exploring O<sub>2</sub> as a biosignature, we describe the coevolution of life with the early Earth's environment, and how the interplay of sources and sinks in the planetary environment may have resulted in suppression of O<sub>2</sub> release into the atmosphere for several billion years, a false negative for biologically generated O<sub>2</sub>. False positives may also be possible, with recent research showing potential mechanisms in exoplanet environments that may generate relatively high abundances of atmospheric O<sub>2</sub> without a biosphere being present. These studies suggest that planetary characteristics that may enhance false negatives should be considered when selecting targets for biosignature searches. Similarly our ability to interpret O<sub>2</sub> observed in an exoplanetary atmosphere is also crucially dependent on environmental context to rule out false positive mechanisms. We describe future photometric, spectroscopic and time-dependent observations of O<sub>2</sub> and the planetary environment that could increase our confidence that any observed O<sub>2</sub> is a biosignature, and help discriminate it from potential false positives. The rich, interdisciplinary study of O<sub>2</sub> illustrates how a synthesis of our understanding of life's evolution and the early Earth, scientific computer modeling of star-planet interactions and predictive observations can enhance our understanding of biosignatures and guide and inform the development of next-generation planet detection and characterization missions. By observing and understanding O<sub>2</sub> in its planetary context we can increase our confidence in the remote detection of life, and provide a model for biosignature development for other proposed biosignatures.
Abstract text has not been adopted as a GShips conclusion.
What would change this record?
A newer or corrected version, a retraction, a verified duplicate, a material topic mismatch, a changed access state, or claim-level review would trigger a dated editorial update.
NTRS provides open full text, but this accepted manuscript (version with final changes) was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.
Source-supplied titles, abstracts, authors, and dates may require correction against the canonical full text.
What would change this page?
A newer or corrected version, retraction, verified duplicate, material topic mismatch, changed access state, or claim-level assessment would change this record.
People, review, and conflicts
Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
metadata-curated-editorial-draft
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
No editorial-review date recorded
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
Not recorded separately
Official source or link verified
2026-07-25
Declared conflicts
The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.