Parametric Trade Space Investigation of Particle Bed Reactors for Nuclear Thermal Propulsion
Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) systems utilizing particle bed reactors (PBR) offer performance advantages over traditional NTP propulsion system designs. In addition to low pressure drop requirements through the reactor, PBRs can deliver high power density, potentially leading
Selection note: Curated for its parametric particle-bed-reactor trade space spanning geometry, particle size, flow, packing, power density, mass, and performance for nuclear thermal propulsion.
Evidence boundary: NTRS lists open full text, but this pass did not reproduce calculations or assess safety, proliferation, test, or licensing constraints. It is civil high-consequence concept context, not design validation.
Stable record
ntrs-20250000752
Topic
power-thermal
Type
Conference Paper
Publisher
Marshall Space Flight Center
Authors
Jacob Stonehill; Corey Smith; Daria Nikitaeva; Matthew Duchek
Year
2025
Editorial state
metadata curated editorial draft
Reviewer
GShips Project editorial synthesis
Official link checked
2026-07-25
Source-supplied abstract
Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) systems utilizing particle bed reactors (PBR) offer performance advantages over traditional NTP propulsion system designs. In addition to low pressure drop requirements through the reactor, PBRs can deliver high power density, potentially leading to lower mass designs. This work seeks to
investigate various design points of PBR-based NTP systems. The DOD Space Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (SNTP) PBR design is a template for the trade space investigation. Parameter sweeps of core length, particle radius, system mass flow rate, packing fraction, bed thickness, and many other variables inform point design definitions. Coupled multiphysics modeling methodology yields data on the performance of design points, while ruling out any infeasible configurations. This study captures the mass and performance trades of feasible PBR designs.
A PBR trade space database is generated and reveals that for a given thrust class, the SNTP-derived designs offer low mass, critical reactor options with reduced pressure drop requirements while using high-assay low-enriched uranium fuel. A comparison of the trade space summarizes the performance capabilities of PBR NTP reactors.
Abstract text has not been adopted as a GShips conclusion.
What would change this record?
A newer or corrected version, a retraction, a verified duplicate, a material topic mismatch, a changed access state, or claim-level review would trigger a dated editorial update.
NTRS lists open full text, but this pass did not reproduce calculations or assess safety, proliferation, test, or licensing constraints. It is civil high-consequence concept context, not design validation.
Source-supplied titles, abstracts, authors, and dates may require correction against the canonical full text.
What would change this page?
A newer or corrected version, retraction, verified duplicate, material topic mismatch, changed access state, or claim-level assessment would change this record.
People, review, and conflicts
Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
metadata-curated-editorial-draft
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
No editorial-review date recorded
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
Not recorded separately
Official source or link verified
2026-07-25
Declared conflicts
The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.