Selection note: Curated because “Astrobiology in the Time of Artificial Intelligence” covers Viking, AI, machine learning, astrobiology; it materially informs GShips work on ai and astrobiology.

Evidence boundary: NTRS provides open full text, but this accepted manuscript (version with final changes) was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.

Stable record
ntrs-20260005626
Topic
ai-autonomy
Type
Accepted Manuscript (Version with final changes)
Publisher
SAGE Publishing (United States)
Authors
Caleb Scharf
Year
2026
Editorial state
metadata curated editorial draft
Reviewer
GShips Project editorial synthesis
Official link checked
2026-07-25

Source-supplied abstract

The Viking missions showcased multiple spaceflight technologies representing state-of-the-art capabilities: from digital line-scan imaging to the operation of complex onboard laboratories and software-controlled process autonomy. Since Viking, there have been extraordinary, and still accelerating, advancements in computing technology impacting science, society, and exploration. These developments have occurred in both hardware and software, resulting in increasingly capable devices, advanced programming tools, and algorithmic innovations. The subset of artificial intelligence known as machine learning has emerged as one of the most transformative of these developments, with major implications for space exploration and for improvements to the search for evidence of life beyond the Earth. Those improvements include the integration of data across different scales and increased sensitivity to complex features in data, as well as the generation of adaptive strategies for sampling environments. In this paper, the present and future nature of space exploration and astrobiological research is examined through the contextual lens of Viking, and through the history and possible future of artificial intelligence.

Abstract text has not been adopted as a GShips conclusion.

What would change this record?

A newer or corrected version, a retraction, a verified duplicate, a material topic mismatch, a changed access state, or claim-level review would trigger a dated editorial update.

Open the source record (opens external site in a new tab)

Metadata-curated context; independent domain and claim review pending · Last edited 2026-07-25 · Suggest a correction

Accountability record

How to inspect this page

Scope: Atlas resource ntrs-20260005626

Page citations and accountability links

Assumptions and limits

  • NTRS provides open full text, but this accepted manuscript (version with final changes) was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.
  • Source-supplied titles, abstracts, authors, and dates may require correction against the canonical full text.

What would change this page?

A newer or corrected version, retraction, verified duplicate, material topic mismatch, changed access state, or claim-level assessment would change this record.

People, review, and conflicts

Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
metadata-curated-editorial-draft
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
No editorial-review date recorded
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
Not recorded separately
Official source or link verified
2026-07-25

Declared conflicts

  • The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.

Suggest a correction to this page