Choose the work. Inspect every signal.

Not a qualification, personality, credential, eligibility, or leadership-fitness assessment: This tool compares three declared work preferences with the published task/pathway relationships. It does not register, contact, authorize, rank people, or create a relationship. No answer is saved by the GShips application; selections appear in the URL and may remain in browser or infrastructure access history.

Questions concern only the work and evidence you want to produce. Do not provide personal, medical, disability, identity, employment, or other sensitive information; the form has no free-text fields.

1. Which bounded public problem do you want to make inspectable?

Choose the work, not an identity.

Habitat assurance pilotCan one real or synthetic habitat review connect requirements, hazards, evidence, maintenance, and recovery without giving an AI operational authority?Closed-loop material accountingCan a testbed account for air, water, food, nutrients, waste, labor, energy, losses, intervention, and recovery across a declared boundary?Autonomous maintenance and circular industryCan a remote system diagnose, repair, remanufacture, and verify critical parts while accounting for tools, feedstock, metrology, software, and correlated failures?Disconnected cyber recoveryCan a safety-critical habitat restore trusted software, procedures, keys, and configuration without cloud access or offensive capability?Accessible human habitatCan disabled people and diverse operators use, understand, refuse, and recover a life-critical habitat workflow without symbolic consultation?Radiation and life-course healthWhat evidence can bound radiation, development, reproduction, clinical autonomy, and multigenerational health without extrapolating beyond current data?Long-life power, propulsion, and thermal balanceCan a proposed architecture publish one auditable mass, energy, momentum, heat, shielding, braking, lifetime, and failure balance?Robotic destination characterizationWhat can robotic observation and precursor missions establish before any human commitment to a destination?Rights, governance, and decision gatesCan a program publish appealable gates that protect consent, disability access, childhood, medicine, dissent, labor, and legitimate do-not-launch outcomes?Commons, standards, and workforceCan many institutions share evidence, interfaces, failure cases, and education without one company owning the field or purchasing editorial treatment?

2. Which first evidence artifact would keep your work concrete?

Choose one artifact you would most like to learn how to produce.

Systems assuranceAn independently checked evidence-and-requirements graph.Living systemsA test protocol and negative-result record.Industrial autonomyA repairable-component test with feedstock, metrology, spares, and recovery criteria.Cyber and knowledge resilienceA bounded threat model and rehearsed recovery record.Human health and accessA rights-preserving assurance case with an AI-off path.Mission scienceAn auditable trade with mass, energy, heat, braking, uncertainty, and planetary-protection limits.Governance and rightsAn appealable noncompensatory decision gate.Public-benefit institution buildingA public-benefit task charter with measures, conflicts, review, and a kill gate.

3. Which decision boundary do you most want the work to preserve?

Choose the safeguard you most want to make operational.

Systems assuranceNo unilateral technical, safety, or mission acceptance.Living systemsStop ecological claims outside the demonstrated boundary and never treat closure percentage as autonomy.Industrial autonomyNo claim that a factory can reproduce itself without a complete dependency and acceptance record.Cyber and knowledge resilienceIndependent cyber stop-work; no offensive scope and no generative model with direct authority.Human health and accessIndependent confidentiality, participant protection, and stop-work authority.Mission scienceNo mission-readiness inference from a model, laboratory effect, component, or small robotic payload.Governance and rightsNo founder, company, employer, or vendor may control evidence, essential services, citizenship, and appeal.Public-benefit institution buildingCannot override editorial, rights, safety, clinical, accessibility, cyber, or dual-use review.

Compare transparent pathway signals

Manual comparison—complete without JavaScript

The form submits with an ordinary URL request. You can also ignore it and inspect the complete canonical relationship table and all eight pathway summaries below.

Complete manual relationship table; available without JavaScript

Bounded task	Systems assurance	Living systems	Industrial autonomy	Cyber and knowledge resilience	Human health and access	Mission science	Governance and rights	Public-benefit institution building
Habitat assurance pilot	Mapped	—	—	—	—	—	—	Mapped
Closed-loop material accounting	—	Mapped	—	—	—	—	—	—
Autonomous maintenance and circular industry	—	—	Mapped	—	—	—	—	—
Disconnected cyber recovery	—	—	—	Mapped	—	—	—	—
Accessible human habitat	—	—	—	—	Mapped	—	—	—
Radiation and life-course health	—	—	—	—	Mapped	Mapped	—	—
Long-life power, propulsion, and thermal balance	—	—	Mapped	—	—	Mapped	—	—
Robotic destination characterization	—	—	—	—	—	Mapped	—	—
Rights, governance, and decision gates	—	—	—	—	—	—	Mapped	—
Commons, standards, and workforce	Mapped	—	—	—	—	—	—	Mapped

All eight pathways remain available for manual comparison

Pathway	Purpose	First evidence artifact	Decision boundary
Systems assurance	Connect requirements, hazards, interfaces, evidence, verification, and explicit unknowns without claiming unilateral acceptance authority.	An independently checked evidence-and-requirements graph.	No unilateral technical, safety, or mission acceptance.
Living systems	Study ecology, food, air, water, microbes, waste, and recovery within declared material, energy, labor, and intervention boundaries.	A test protocol and negative-result record.	Stop ecological claims outside the demonstrated boundary and never treat closure percentage as autonomy.
Industrial autonomy	Make maintenance, manufacturing, metrology, logistics, feedstock, power, software, and human skill one auditable recovery system.	A repairable-component test with feedstock, metrology, spares, and recovery criteria.	No claim that a factory can reproduce itself without a complete dependency and acceptance record.
Cyber and knowledge resilience	Preserve trustworthy software, procedures, archives, keys, and recovery while excluding offensive use and life-critical AI authority.	A bounded threat model and rehearsed recovery record.	Independent cyber stop-work; no offensive scope and no generative model with direct authority.
Human health and access	Join health, development, reproduction, disability access, privacy, clinical independence, and human factors without coercive mission optimization.	A rights-preserving assurance case with an AI-off path.	Independent confidentiality, participant protection, and stop-work authority.
Mission science	Bound propulsion, power, radiation, destination, astrobiology, probes, and planetary protection through evidence that preserves wait and non-settlement outcomes.	An auditable trade with mass, energy, heat, braking, uncertainty, and planetary-protection limits.	No mission-readiness inference from a model, laboratory effect, component, or small robotic payload.
Governance and rights	Build legitimate, amendable, appealable institutions that protect dissent, childhood, reproduction, disability, labor, privacy, and do-not-launch authority.	An appealable noncompensatory decision gate.	No founder, company, employer, or vendor may control evidence, essential services, citizenship, and appeal.
Public-benefit institution building	Create present value, shared infrastructure, succession, review, funding boundaries, and stop capacity without making the founder or company the mission.	A public-benefit task charter with measures, conflicts, review, and a kill gate.	Cannot override editorial, rights, safety, clinical, accessibility, cyber, or dual-use review.

Editorial diagnostic interface; independent accessibility, human-factors, curriculum, and governance review pending · Owner-alpha foundation · Independent review pending · Suggest a correction