European Interstellar Symposium call for papers

Packet identity

Packet ID

opportunities:opp-irgsymposium

Packet SHA-256 identity

7ef03dc36e60fd062b66d24f1fa2283b8780193d0811989d4ab072f983fe95ab

Corpus SHA-256 identity

8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d

Release ID

public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14

Source commit

3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0

Frozen corpus date

2026-07-25

Primary records

1

Reference sources

1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
   Does the official source support the opportunity identity, status, timing, eligibility, and access constraints?
2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
   Is the proposed fit specific and proportionate without implying availability, invitation, selection, or funding?
3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
   What deadline, rule, jurisdiction, cost, conflict, or accessibility fact would change the proposed next action?

Explicit exclusions

• Review does not submit, register, apply, contact, commit, purchase, or establish eligibility.
• Provider prestige and apparent fit cannot replace current official terms.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, opportunity-eligibility-access

Frozen-evidence decision window: 30 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

1. opportunity · opp-irgsymposium

   European Interstellar Symposium call for papers

   Record fingerprint

   4d8503304d3e0c290962944b9242e14b185a2ef19ff4ae7c916cbd3a39c775b1

   Minimum approvals

   1

   Required scope groups

   bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence, opportunity-eligibility-access

   High-consequence domains

   None under the named two-person rule

   Review state

   pending

   Published human decisions

   0

   Inspect the complete frozen review surface

   ID

   opp-irgsymposium

   Name

   European Interstellar Symposium call for papers

   URL

   https://irg.space/second-european-interstellar-symposium/↗ (opens external site in a new tab)

   Provider

   Interstellar Research Group

   Kind

   Paper and speaking

   Timing

   Active call: abstracts are due July 31, 2026 with no deadline time zone stated; acceptance notices are scheduled for September 15; the symposium is December 2–4 in Venice, with a December 1 seminar day.

   Fit

   Technology commons, dual-use roadmap, systems integration

   Status

   active; deadline imminent

   Verified At

   2026-07-26

   Current Until

   2026-07-31

   Eligibility

   The official call welcomes original, previously unpublished contributions across the listed interdisciplinary sessions. Presenting authors must actually attend and present; the submission must identify the full author list, oral-or-poster type, target session, and required structured sections.

   Access Notes

   Acceptance is not guaranteed. The official PDF limits the abstract to 350 words and directs it to registrar@irg.space. It says selected papers may be suggested for journal publication and symposium activity may be photographed or recorded under a later release form; submission, attendance, travel, registration, media consent, and publication are separate decisions.

   Founder Action

   Finalize the proposed technology-commons abstract against the official booklet, complete an originality and claims check, and seek separate authorization before any submission; do not register, travel-book, or imply acceptance.

   Evidence Boundary

   The official IRG occurrence page and linked 2EIS call PDF were reviewed. They support the dates, topical scope, 350-word structure, registrar address, originality and presenter-attendance conditions, abstract deadline, notification date, possible publication suggestion, and media-release notice, but do not state a deadline time zone or establish acceptance, accessibility, cost, publication suitability, or media-consent acceptability. No submission, acceptance, registration, or relationship exists.

   Relationship

   indexed only; no formal relationship

   Action Status

   proposed; not undertaken

   Conflicts

   Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in the official call; program, reviewer, sponsorship, financial, and institutional conflicts were not independently investigated.

   What Would Change

   A deadline or time-zone clarification, revised official booklet, submission-channel change, acceptance decision, or change to media, publication, format, venue, registration, or access terms would require an immediate update.

Linked records—not review targets here

These records provide dependency or relationship context. Their decisions belong to their single primary packet, preventing double counting.

• commons-standards-workforce · opp-irgsymposium opportunity-task-match:opportunity-match-commons-irgsymposium · e179aa8c92bf285ef4c7ef09b91f88a15bee241bb555eb054000e17f40d9dd08

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
2. Finalize a separate output file.

   node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
     --input DRAFT.json \
     --output COMPLETED.json

   This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

3. Validate the packet and completed copy.

   node check-review-decisions.mjs \
     --packet PACKET.json \
     --decision COMPLETED.json

   Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

• Bundle finalizer
• Validator command
• Decision policy module
• Fingerprint and packet-integrity module
• Review-domain policy module
• Canonical synthesis and interactive review specs