Packet identity

Packet ID
opportunities:opp-nasa-exoplanet-watch
Packet SHA-256 identity
3e03ff50d7a427ed9fa82960fc48671136718d61d70a7c88b8bbc006bb11e001
Corpus SHA-256 identity
8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d
Release ID
public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14
Source commit
3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0
Frozen corpus date
2026-07-25
Primary records
1
Reference sources
1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

  1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
    Does the official source support the opportunity identity, status, timing, eligibility, and access constraints?
  2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
    Is the proposed fit specific and proportionate without implying availability, invitation, selection, or funding?
  3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
    What deadline, rule, jurisdiction, cost, conflict, or accessibility fact would change the proposed next action?

Explicit exclusions

  • Review does not submit, register, apply, contact, commit, purchase, or establish eligibility.
  • Provider prestige and apparent fit cannot replace current official terms.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, opportunity-eligibility-access

Frozen-evidence decision window: 30 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

  1. opportunity · opp-nasa-exoplanet-watch

    NASA Exoplanet Watch

    Record fingerprint
    924223e302bbae5153da4925c15ac5046b4c0816c7811c55660848c87d4da45c
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence, opportunity-eligibility-access
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    opp-nasa-exoplanet-watch
    Name
    NASA Exoplanet Watch
    Provider
    NASA Science
    Kind
    Citizen science and data analysis
    Timing
    Ongoing online or outdoor citizen-science project. NASA's page was last updated June 25, 2026 and publishes a current checklist, data-checkout route, tutorials, software, community, and result-upload workflow.
    Fit
    Target-characterization literacy, reproducible data analysis, uncertainty, and public science
    Status
    active; ongoing
    Verified At
    2026-07-26
    Current Until
    2026-08-02
    Eligibility
    NASA states that no prior knowledge is required, a web-connected device is sufficient to start, and the online training takes approximately two to four minutes. Participants may use their own telescope or request robotic-telescope data.
    Access Notes
    The work uses free EXOTIC software to analyze transit observations. Joining Slack, requesting data, downloading or executing software, creating accounts, uploading results to the AAVSO database, and public attribution are distinct actions with their own privacy, security, data-quality, licensing, and community consequences. The route is relevant to target-characterization literacy, not evidence that any destination is habitable.
    Founder Action
    Use the public checklist and tutorial to define a reproducible beginner analysis and data-quality ledger before joining a community or uploading results. Keep observation, model, inference, and habitability interpretation separate; seek separate authorization before creating external accounts, joining Slack, requesting nonpublic access, or publishing under the GShips name.
    Evidence Boundary
    NASA's official Exoplanet Watch page supports the ongoing project, no-telescope data-checkout path, robotic-telescope option, free EXOTIC software, two-to-four-minute training estimate, web-device requirement, no-prior-knowledge statement, upload route, and community channels. It does not establish a participant's result quality, software security, account or privacy terms, acceptance, authorship, discovery, target habitability, or NASA affiliation.
    Relationship
    indexed only; no formal relationship
    Action Status
    proposed; not undertaken
    Conflicts
    Public attribution, software and data provenance, novice analysis quality, NASA name proximity, community accounts, and the project's target-characterization narrative require careful review.
    What Would Change
    A changed project status, checklist, training, data-access, software, upload, privacy, licensing, or community rule—or a completed reproducible analysis with independent quality review—would change this assessment.
Equivalent record table for this packet
RecordSubjectFingerprintApprovalsScope groups
opportunity:opp-nasa-exoplanet-watch NASA Exoplanet Watch 924223e302bbae5153da4925c15ac5046b4c0816c7811c55660848c87d4da45c 1 bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence, opportunity-eligibility-access

Linked records—not review targets here

These records provide dependency or relationship context. Their decisions belong to their single primary packet, preventing double counting.

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Sources, verification dates, scope notes, and exact fingerprints
Source IDSourceCheckedScope boundaryFingerprint
official-opportunity-opp-nasa-exoplanet-watch NASA Exoplanet Watch (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-26 NASA's official Exoplanet Watch page supports the ongoing project, no-telescope data-checkout path, robotic-telescope option, free EXOTIC software, two-to-four-minute training estimate, web-device requirement, no-prior-knowledge statement, upload route, and community channels. It does not establish a participant's result quality, software security, account or privacy terms, acceptance, authorship, discovery, target habitability, or NASA affiliation. e08fb7c564173712b9c3fdf676df554c19b9e179f9a33ff71b651dbc18f3e1cc

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Frozen packet · JSON

14.8 KB · packet identity 3e03ff50d7a427ed…

Download packet

Blank decision worksheet · JSON

3.0 KB · template identity 9464f82adf04524d…

Download blank JSON

Review-notes worksheet · Markdown

Readable notes companion only—not a decision-bundle equivalent. Use the closed JSON template for structural validation.

Download notes worksheet

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

  1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
  2. Finalize a separate output file.
    node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
      --input DRAFT.json \
      --output COMPLETED.json

    This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

  3. Validate the packet and completed copy.
    node check-review-decisions.mjs \
      --packet PACKET.json \
      --decision COMPLETED.json

    Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

  4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

Completion criteria

Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.

Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes.

  • Reviewer identity, qualification, independence, conflicts, and compensation must be assessed by accountable human governance; local validation can only report structural validity.
  • Approve, revise, contest, reject, and recuse remain visible. A negative finding cannot be hidden by an aggregate approval percentage.
  • Revision creates a new record and packet fingerprint. Prior approvals do not carry forward automatically.
  • AI may assist with clerical comparison but cannot count as an independent reviewer, identity attestor, appeal authority, or second person.

Prepared review packet · 0 published human decisions · Independent review pending · Suggest a correction

Accountability record

How to inspect this page

Scope: Prepared review packet opportunities:opp-nasa-exoplanet-watch · 3e03ff50d7a427ed9fa82960fc48671136718d61d70a7c88b8bbc006bb11e001

Page citations and accountability links

  • Exact frozen packet
    Complete packet payload; SHA-256 3e03ff50d7a427ed9fa82960fc48671136718d61d70a7c88b8bbc006bb11e001 · fingerprint-bound review artifact
  • Blank closed decision template
    Offline structured-decision starting point · unsubmitted local artifact
  • Review-notes worksheet
    Human-readable notes companion; not validator input · offline notes aid
  • Review corpus index
    Corpus SHA-256 8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d · release and ownership index

Assumptions and limits

  • The exact packet, record, source, policy, release, and source-commit fingerprints bound this prepared page; human review has not started.
  • Downloading, local structural validation, or completing notes does not appoint or qualify a reviewer, establish independence, accept a decision, authorize publication, or create a relationship.

What would change this page?

Staffed governance, appointed qualified reviewers, completed record-level decisions, published conflicts, minority findings, corrections, or changed review policy would change this page.

People, review, and conflicts

Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
public-alpha accountability pass
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project AI-assisted editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
2026-07-26
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
2026-07-25

Declared conflicts

  • The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.

Suggest a correction to this page