GSHIPSEarth-first systems for humanity’s longest journey
Menu

Review Commons · Organization profile packets

GITAI

Frozen organizations review packet with exact record and source fingerprints; human review has not started.

Packet identity

Packet ID
organizations:entity-gitai
Packet SHA-256 identity
614c2417efc697f675d69d91f6341f66912bc34298979ff304edd401d7491220
Corpus SHA-256 identity
8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d
Release ID
public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14
Source commit
3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0
Frozen corpus date
2026-07-25
Primary records
1
Reference sources
1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

  1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
    Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
  2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
    Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
  3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
    Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

  • Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
  • No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

  1. ecosystem-organization · entity-gitai

    GITAI

    Record fingerprint
    b5b5ca699e939d9c6979acfdb267000dc518e226e3d991de6283d8675a47360c
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    entity-gitai
    Legacy ID
    org-company--019
    Slug
    gitai
    Name
    GITAI
    Category
    Company and applied technology
    Geography
    United States / Japan
    Relevance
    enabling
    Engagement
    Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current access rules: if a representative maintenance task is defined, consider a paid interface or test study after verifying flight heritage, safety data, and civil-use terms. No outreach, eligibility determination, commitment, or procurement has occurred.
    Capability
    Space robotics, robotic servicing and assembly, lunar mobility and construction, manipulation, tool use, and remote operations.
    Entity Kind
    private space robotics company
    Link Checked At
    2026-07-25
    Relationship
    indexed only; no formal relationship
    Engagement Status
    proposed; not undertaken
    Profile Summary
    GITAI develops robotic arms, rovers, tool-changing systems, and autonomous or remotely operated technologies for on-orbit servicing, lunar construction, and space infrastructure.
    Potential Fit
    Could inform maintainable robotic workcells, tool interfaces, inspection, construction, and human–robot task allocation for precursor habitats.
    Risks
    1. Robotics claims must be separated between ground demonstrations, flight demonstrations, and operational service.
    2. Autonomous manipulation near crew or critical systems creates safety and cybersecurity hazards.
    3. Company access, pricing, export controls, proprietary interfaces, and schedule are unverified.
    Evidence Boundary
    Official-link review: the official site was reachable and identifies the company as a space-development robotics startup; detailed maturity and performance were not independently verified. Public descriptions, performance, maturity, access, procurement, and current availability were not independently verified; independent review pending.
    Conflicts
    Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; financial, contracting, leadership, and institutional conflicts were not independently investigated.
    What Would Change
    Published test protocols, successful relevant flight operations, open tool interfaces, and independent safety evidence would materially change fit.
Equivalent record table for this packet
RecordSubjectFingerprintApprovalsScope groups
ecosystem-organization:entity-gitai GITAI b5b5ca699e939d9c6979acfdb267000dc518e226e3d991de6283d8675a47360c 1 bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Sources, verification dates, scope notes, and exact fingerprints
Source IDSourceCheckedScope boundaryFingerprint
official-ecosystem-organization-entity-gitai GITAI 2026-07-25 Official-link review: the official site was reachable and identifies the company as a space-development robotics startup; detailed maturity and performance were not independently verified. Public descriptions, performance, maturity, access, procurement, and current availability were not independently verified; independent review pending. 32651664ab1c2a2aea14488e8ba32a6f8a88c5da57eac4f60a4db326ac91a800

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Frozen packet · JSON

13.7 KB · packet identity 614c2417efc697f6…

Download packet

Blank decision worksheet · JSON

3.0 KB · template identity bf89090fe025891f…

Download blank JSON

Review-notes worksheet · Markdown

Readable notes companion only—not a decision-bundle equivalent. Use the closed JSON template for structural validation.

Download notes worksheet

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

  1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
  2. Finalize a separate output file.
    node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
  --input DRAFT.json \
  --output COMPLETED.json

    This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

  3. Validate the packet and completed copy.
    node check-review-decisions.mjs \
  --packet PACKET.json \
  --decision COMPLETED.json

    Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

  4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

Completion criteria

Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.

Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes.

  • Reviewer identity, qualification, independence, conflicts, and compensation must be assessed by accountable human governance; local validation can only report structural validity.
  • Approve, revise, contest, reject, and recuse remain visible. A negative finding cannot be hidden by an aggregate approval percentage.
  • Revision creates a new record and packet fingerprint. Prior approvals do not carry forward automatically.
  • AI may assist with clerical comparison but cannot count as an independent reviewer, identity attestor, appeal authority, or second person.

Prepared review packet · 0 published human decisions · Independent review pending · Suggest a correction

Accountability record

How to inspect this page

Scope: Prepared review packet organizations:entity-gitai · 614c2417efc697f675d69d91f6341f66912bc34298979ff304edd401d7491220

Page citations and accountability links

  • Exact frozen packet
    Complete packet payload; SHA-256 614c2417efc697f675d69d91f6341f66912bc34298979ff304edd401d7491220 · fingerprint-bound review artifact
  • Blank closed decision template
    Offline structured-decision starting point · unsubmitted local artifact
  • Review-notes worksheet
    Human-readable notes companion; not validator input · offline notes aid
  • Review corpus index
    Corpus SHA-256 8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d · release and ownership index

Assumptions and limits

  • The exact packet, record, source, policy, release, and source-commit fingerprints bound this prepared page; human review has not started.
  • Downloading, local structural validation, or completing notes does not appoint or qualify a reviewer, establish independence, accept a decision, authorize publication, or create a relationship.

What would change this page?

Staffed governance, appointed qualified reviewers, completed record-level decisions, published conflicts, minority findings, corrections, or changed review policy would change this page.

People, review, and conflicts

Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
public-alpha accountability pass
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project AI-assisted editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
2026-07-26
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
2026-07-25

Declared conflicts

  • The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.

Suggest a correction to this page