International Association for the Study of the Commons

Packet identity

Packet ID

organizations:entity-international-association-for-the-study-of-the-commons

Packet SHA-256 identity

ce18079a624740bbd4ea2834f46e9914998cf6376946e265533fe7431331c7d2

Corpus SHA-256 identity

8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d

Release ID

public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14

Source commit

3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0

Frozen corpus date

2026-07-25

Primary records

1

Reference sources

1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
   Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
   Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
   Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

• Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
• No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

1. ecosystem-organization · entity-international-association-for-the-study-of-the-commons

   International Association for the Study of the Commons

   Record fingerprint

   c85e22c7674c4498b568206871f0308ad6474c38a2d9695d61920930aa35f3df

   Minimum approvals

   1

   Required scope groups

   bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

   High-consequence domains

   None under the named two-person rule

   Review state

   pending

   Published human decisions

   0

   Inspect the complete frozen review surface

   ID

   entity-international-association-for-the-study-of-the-commons

   Legacy ID

   org-public-i-004

   Slug

   international-association-for-the-study-of-the-commons

   Name

   International Association for the Study of the Commons

   URL

   https://iasc-commons.org/↗ (opens external site in a new tab)

   Category

   Public interest, governance, culture, and capital

   Geography

   International

   Relevance

   adjacent

   Engagement

   Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current access rules: consider membership or a future conference paper only after developing an empirically grounded commons question and following published participation rules. No outreach, eligibility determination, commitment, or procurement has occurred.

   Capability

   Commons scholarship and practice, conferences, comparative governance, professional networks, and research dissemination.

   Entity Kind

   nonprofit professional association

   Link Checked At

   2026-07-25

   Relationship

   indexed only; no formal relationship

   Engagement Status

   proposed; not undertaken

   Profile Summary

   The International Association for the Study of the Commons connects researchers, practitioners, and policymakers studying shared resources through conferences, workshops, regional networks, and an associated open-access journal.

   Potential Fit

   Could inform governance of shared infrastructure, knowledge commons, common-pool resources, conflict, monitoring, and institutional adaptation for GShips and Earthside testbeds.

   Risks

   1. Commons frameworks do not automatically transfer to coercive, closed, life-critical environments.
   2. Membership and conference participation have fees, timelines, and review processes; availability is not assumed.
   3. Academic association with a framework can be mistaken for endorsement unless independence is explicit.

   Evidence Boundary

   Official-link review: the official site was reachable and documents activities, nonprofit disclosures, conferences, membership context, and journal linkage. Public descriptions, performance, maturity, access, procurement, and current availability were not independently verified; independent review pending.

   Conflicts

   Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; financial, contracting, leadership, and institutional conflicts were not independently investigated.

   What Would Change

   Peer-reviewed work on closed or high-dependency communities, practitioner evidence, and a relevant current call would strengthen fit.

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
2. Finalize a separate output file.

   node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
     --input DRAFT.json \
     --output COMPLETED.json

   This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

3. Validate the packet and completed copy.

   node check-review-decisions.mjs \
     --packet PACKET.json \
     --decision COMPLETED.json

   Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

• Bundle finalizer
• Validator command
• Decision policy module
• Fingerprint and packet-integrity module
• Review-domain policy module
• Canonical synthesis and interactive review specs