International Atomic Energy Agency

Packet identity

Packet ID

organizations:entity-international-atomic-energy-agency

Packet SHA-256 identity

711d103ba7dfa53c3b511b606d7564b3e683a5e1010bbae7813d039f6962bb20

Corpus SHA-256 identity

8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d

Release ID

public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14

Source commit

3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0

Frozen corpus date

2026-07-25

Primary records

1

Reference sources

1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
   Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
   Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
   Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

• Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
• No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

1. ecosystem-organization · entity-international-atomic-energy-agency

   International Atomic Energy Agency

   Record fingerprint

   503ca68b10607736da21aa622014835f90e4b0e6888b6eb944e8678b75ae5871

   Minimum approvals

   1

   Required scope groups

   bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

   High-consequence domains

   None under the named two-person rule

   Review state

   pending

   Published human decisions

   0

   Inspect the complete frozen review surface

   ID

   entity-international-atomic-energy-agency

   Legacy ID

   org-agency-s-029

   Slug

   international-atomic-energy-agency

   Name

   International Atomic Energy Agency

   URL

   https://www.iaea.org/↗ (opens external site in a new tab)

   Category

   Agency, standards, and public research infrastructure

   Geography

   International

   Relevance

   enabling

   Engagement

   Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current access rules: use public standards and safeguards materials in a formal requirements review; any future contact would require a defined peaceful-use question and appropriate state or institutional channel. No outreach, eligibility determination, commitment, or procurement has occurred.

   Capability

   Nuclear safety standards, security guidance, safeguards and nonproliferation, technical cooperation, verification, and regulatory capacity building.

   Entity Kind

   intergovernmental nuclear organization

   Link Checked At

   2026-07-25

   Relationship

   indexed only; no formal relationship

   Engagement Status

   proposed; not undertaken

   Profile Summary

   The IAEA is the intergovernmental center for cooperation on peaceful nuclear technology, nuclear safety and security, safeguards, verification, technical cooperation, and consensus safety standards.

   Potential Fit

   Could provide authoritative public safety, security, safeguards, waste, and governance references for any civil space-nuclear work; it is not a project design partner by default.

   Risks

   1. IAEA standards and services operate through Member States and formal mandates; direct project access is not assumed.
   2. Space nuclear systems may fall across national regulators and treaty regimes beyond IAEA guidance.
   3. Nuclear safety, security, safeguards, waste, liability, and public consent remain high-consequence independent-review areas.

   Evidence Boundary

   Official-link review: the official site was reachable and documents safety standards, safeguards, security, and technical-cooperation roles. Public descriptions, performance, maturity, access, procurement, and current availability were not independently verified; independent review pending.

   Conflicts

   Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; financial, contracting, leadership, and institutional conflicts were not independently investigated.

   What Would Change

   A regulator-led civil project, safeguards determination, applicable standard set, and independent safety case would materially change the engagement assessment.

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
2. Finalize a separate output file.

   node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
     --input DRAFT.json \
     --output COMPLETED.json

   This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

3. Validate the packet and completed copy.

   node check-review-decisions.mjs \
     --packet PACKET.json \
     --decision COMPLETED.json

   Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

• Bundle finalizer
• Validator command
• Decision policy module
• Fingerprint and packet-integrity module
• Review-domain policy module
• Canonical synthesis and interactive review specs