International Disability Alliance

Packet identity

Packet ID

organizations:entity-international-disability-alliance

Packet SHA-256 identity

a077267830fc2f7d79bd2a56677c7d0e1422ccd30385f860ab488a29977f466c

Corpus SHA-256 identity

8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d

Release ID

public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14

Source commit

3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0

Frozen corpus date

2026-07-25

Primary records

1

Reference sources

1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
   Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
   Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
   Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

• Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
• No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

1. ecosystem-organization · entity-international-disability-alliance

   International Disability Alliance

   Record fingerprint

   c8f2d92828bc2481ffd2778ae1066294ea2babe057e688286623d02c6c64d17b

   Minimum approvals

   1

   Required scope groups

   bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

   High-consequence domains

   None under the named two-person rule

   Review state

   pending

   Published human decisions

   0

   Inspect the complete frozen review surface

   ID

   entity-international-disability-alliance

   Legacy ID

   org-public-i-012

   Slug

   international-disability-alliance

   Name

   International Disability Alliance

   URL

   https://www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org/↗ (opens external site in a new tab)

   Category

   Public interest, governance, culture, and capital

   Geography

   International

   Relevance

   adjacent

   Engagement

   Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current access rules: first adopt CRPD-aligned design and paid participation practices; only then consider a bounded policy consultation through an appropriate representative channel if invited and resourced. No outreach, eligibility determination, commitment, or procurement has occurred.

   Capability

   Disability-rights advocacy, representative participation, CRPD implementation, capacity building, and engagement with UN processes.

   Entity Kind

   alliance of representative organizations of persons with disabilities

   Link Checked At

   2026-07-25

   Relationship

   indexed only; no formal relationship

   Engagement Status

   proposed; not undertaken

   Profile Summary

   The International Disability Alliance is a member-governed alliance of global and regional organizations of persons with disabilities that advances implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and inclusive sustainable development.

   Potential Fit

   Could inform rights-based participation, representative consultation, accessibility governance, and accountability standards; it should not be asked to endorse a technical venture or substitute for paid disabled experts.

   Risks

   1. Tokenistic or unpaid consultation would be harmful and inconsistent with representative participation.
   2. A global alliance cannot speak for every disabled person, impairment, culture, or operational context.
   3. The organization’s mandate is human rights, not spacecraft engineering, medical screening, or venture validation.

   Evidence Boundary

   Official-link review: the official about and history pages were reachable and describe member governance, global and regional networks, CRPD focus, and representative role. Public descriptions, performance, maturity, access, procurement, and current availability were not independently verified; independent review pending.

   Conflicts

   Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; financial, contracting, leadership, and institutional conflicts were not independently investigated.

   What Would Change

   A co-designed, compensated process requested by representative organizations, plus independently audited accessibility outcomes, would change engagement priority.

Linked records—not review targets here

These records provide dependency or relationship context. Their decisions belong to their single primary packet, preventing double counting.

• rights-governance-decision-gates · entity-international-disability-alliance partner-task-match:match-rights-governance-decision-gates-disability-alliance · 79f49bd87b7f6efdfbba40b7970e3743b4705272ab9ab01549233de2f306665b

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
2. Finalize a separate output file.

   node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
     --input DRAFT.json \
     --output COMPLETED.json

   This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

3. Validate the packet and completed copy.

   node check-review-decisions.mjs \
     --packet PACKET.json \
     --decision COMPLETED.json

   Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

• Bundle finalizer
• Validator command
• Decision policy module
• Fingerprint and packet-integrity module
• Review-domain policy module
• Canonical synthesis and interactive review specs