International Institute of Space Law

Packet identity

Packet ID

organizations:entity-international-institute-of-space-law

Packet SHA-256 identity

f2e4442ea0a09e1e82e4a2c6acd3a6a15a71ba2ea91fd0db040d5b555d610b52

Corpus SHA-256 identity

8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d

Release ID

public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14

Source commit

3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0

Frozen corpus date

2026-07-25

Primary records

1

Reference sources

1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
   Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
   Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
   Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

• Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
• No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

1. ecosystem-organization · entity-international-institute-of-space-law

   International Institute of Space Law

   Record fingerprint

   3e8135b38797d6fa5e8f4ca2a8afb005449b154c18ae3380c1cb0317b76473f2

   Minimum approvals

   1

   Required scope groups

   bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

   High-consequence domains

   None under the named two-person rule

   Review state

   pending

   Published human decisions

   0

   Inspect the complete frozen review surface

   ID

   entity-international-institute-of-space-law

   Legacy ID

   org-public-i-001

   Slug

   international-institute-of-space-law

   Name

   International Institute of Space Law

   URL

   https://iisl.space/↗ (opens external site in a new tab)

   Category

   Public interest, governance, culture, and capital

   Geography

   International

   Relevance

   adjacent

   Engagement

   Proposed, not undertaken: use public scholarship, attend an open event, and consider submitting a bounded research paper through a published process; any request for review or participation requires separate authorization.

   Capability

   International space-law scholarship, professional networks, conference programming, education, publications, and structured legal debate.

   Entity Kind

   nonprofit professional and scholarly association

   Link Checked At

   2026-07-25

   Relationship

   indexed only; no formal relationship

   Engagement Status

   proposed; not undertaken

   Profile Summary

   The International Institute of Space Law is a nonprofit professional association supporting scholarship, education, and discussion in international space law. Its activities include publications, conferences, awards, and the Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court.

   Potential Fit

   IISL scholarship and forums could help GShips distinguish settled treaty obligations from speculative questions about jurisdiction, registration, responsibility, human rights, resource use, and very long missions. The institute is not a regulator or substitute for retained legal counsel.

   Risks

   1. Most generation-ship legal questions are untested and may have no settled answer under current law.
   2. Membership, conference, publication, and reviewer access follow the institute's own processes and schedules.
   3. Legal analysis can become stale as treaties, national implementation, and state practice evolve.

   Evidence Boundary

   The official institute site supports its scholarly and convening role but does not establish regulatory authority, legal advice to GShips, availability for a project review, or agreement with any GShips interpretation.

   Conflicts

   1. GShips' publisher intends to explore a venture that could seek review, services, publication, or collaboration from indexed organizations.

   What Would Change

   A published IISL programme directly addressing multigenerational settlement law, an accepted paper, or an authorized expert review would permit a more specific assessment while still not creating regulatory approval.

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
2. Finalize a separate output file.

   node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
     --input DRAFT.json \
     --output COMPLETED.json

   This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

3. Validate the packet and completed copy.

   node check-review-decisions.mjs \
     --packet PACKET.json \
     --decision COMPLETED.json

   Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

• Bundle finalizer
• Validator command
• Decision policy module
• Fingerprint and packet-integrity module
• Review-domain policy module
• Canonical synthesis and interactive review specs