NASA Human Research Program

Packet identity

Packet ID

organizations:entity-nasa-human-research-program

Packet SHA-256 identity

1bf2ccbf492ef9707ea92386b35a3d422317a0b75d8365e03e499eaffabf24eb

Corpus SHA-256 identity

8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d

Release ID

public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14

Source commit

3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0

Frozen corpus date

2026-07-25

Primary records

1

Reference sources

1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
   Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
   Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
   Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

• Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
• No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

1. ecosystem-organization · entity-nasa-human-research-program

   NASA Human Research Program

   Record fingerprint

   4f44a82563268cb38129b6ee0a07e78ef2b4ee273b9f6306037d86ce1ef9fa63

   Minimum approvals

   1

   Required scope groups

   bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

   High-consequence domains

   None under the named two-person rule

   Review state

   pending

   Published human decisions

   0

   Inspect the complete frozen review surface

   ID

   entity-nasa-human-research-program

   Legacy ID

   org-agency-s-001

   Slug

   nasa-human-research-program

   Name

   NASA Human Research Program

   URL

   https://www.nasa.gov/hrp/↗ (opens external site in a new tab)

   Category

   Agency, standards, and public research infrastructure

   Geography

   United States

   Relevance

   enabling

   Engagement

   Proposed, not undertaken: use public risk records, standards, solicitations, and datasets; any study or collaboration requires a published eligible route, independent ethics review, human-subject protections, and separate authorization.

   Capability

   Human-spaceflight risk research, analogs, spaceflight studies, standards support, countermeasure development, health and performance data, and research coordination.

   Entity Kind

   United States government human-spaceflight research programme

   Link Checked At

   2026-07-25

   Relationship

   indexed only; no formal relationship

   Engagement Status

   proposed; not undertaken

   Profile Summary

   NASA's Human Research Program studies and mitigates health and performance risks of human spaceflight using ground research, analogs, the International Space Station, missions, standards, data, and countermeasure development.

   Potential Fit

   HRP evidence is essential precursor context for radiation, altered gravity, isolation, human factors, medical support, nutrition, sleep, teamwork, and performance. Its present mission horizons and adult astronaut populations do not cover lifelong, reproductive, pediatric, aging, or multigenerational habitation.

   Risks

   1. Current evidence is sparse for partial gravity, combined hazards, lifetime exposure, reproduction, development, aging, and multiple generations.
   2. Human-subject data may be restricted, small-sample, mission-specific, or privacy-sensitive.
   3. Medical claims are high consequence and require independent domain review.
   4. NASA research priorities and risk classifications evolve.

   Evidence Boundary

   The official HRP site establishes current research goals and risk areas; it does not validate generation-ship habitability, provide medical advice, establish access to restricted data, or imply NASA endorsement.

   Conflicts

   1. GShips could seek federal research support and may use NASA evidence to support future habitat-safety claims.

   What Would Change

   Longitudinal and combined-hazard evidence across relevant life stages, an eligible authorized study, open representative data, and independent medical review would change the assessment.

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
2. Finalize a separate output file.

   node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
     --input DRAFT.json \
     --output COMPLETED.json

   This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

3. Validate the packet and completed copy.

   node check-review-decisions.mjs \
     --packet PACKET.json \
     --decision COMPLETED.json

   Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

• Bundle finalizer
• Validator command
• Decision policy module
• Fingerprint and packet-integrity module
• Review-domain policy module
• Canonical synthesis and interactive review specs