Purdue RETHi

Packet identity

Packet ID

organizations:entity-purdue-rethi

Packet SHA-256 identity

cdedefb824d1681686ef0d52b4ec1baded39c53b907b1b2c01746c0bc7b6a011

Corpus SHA-256 identity

8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d

Release ID

public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14

Source commit

3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0

Frozen corpus date

2026-07-25

Primary records

1

Reference sources

1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
   Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
   Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
   Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

• Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
• No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

1. ecosystem-organization · entity-purdue-rethi

   Purdue RETHi

   Record fingerprint

   a28818c58a07e553cd6ec5b8c2be787683c26c54feb0f7bfc607f5cd197f94b9

   Minimum approvals

   1

   Required scope groups

   bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

   High-consequence domains

   None under the named two-person rule

   Review state

   pending

   Published human decisions

   0

   Inspect the complete frozen review surface

   ID

   entity-purdue-rethi

   Legacy ID

   org-universi-011

   Slug

   purdue-rethi

   Name

   Purdue RETHi

   URL

   https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/stmd/space-tech-research-grants/resilient-extraterrestrial-habitats-institute-rethi/↗ (opens external site in a new tab)

   Category

   University and national laboratory

   Geography

   Indiana, United States

   Relevance

   enabling

   Engagement

   Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current university and NASA rules: review published testbed work, then consider a bounded research seminar, dataset inquiry, or sponsored test only around a defined assurance question. No outreach, eligibility determination, commitment, or procurement has occurred.

   Capability

   Resilient habitat architecture, cyber-physical testing, autonomous sensing and recovery, diagnostics and prognostics, and human-automation research.

   Entity Kind

   NASA-funded university research institute

   Link Checked At

   2026-07-25

   Relationship

   indexed only; no formal relationship

   Engagement Status

   proposed; not undertaken

   Profile Summary

   The Resilient ExtraTerrestrial Habitats Institute is a NASA Space Technology Research Institute led by Purdue University with university and industry participants. Its published program develops control-theoretic resilience, autonomous detection and intervention, diagnostics, human-automation decision methods, and a reconfigurable cyber-physical SmartHab testbed.

   Potential Fit

   Could provide directly relevant methods and test evidence for Autonomous Habitat Assurance, especially disruption injection, health management, recovery logic, and physical-digital testbed design; its deep-space habitat scope is still far shorter and narrower than a multigenerational ship.

   Risks

   1. NASA institute funding, project phase, personnel, and external-access routes may change and must be reconfirmed.
   2. A laboratory cyber-physical testbed cannot validate centuries of operation, full habitat ecology, or institutional continuity.
   3. Software, facility access, background intellectual property, export controls, and publication rights may constrain collaboration.

   Evidence Boundary

   Official-link review: the NASA profile was reachable, updated in June 2026, and describes the institute vision, objectives, participants, and cyber-physical testbed. It does not establish external access, current capacity, full-system validation, or applicability to generation-ship duration; independent review pending.

   Conflicts

   Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; NASA funding, participating organizations, intellectual-property interests, and researcher conflicts were not independently investigated.

   What Would Change

   Current testbed documentation, failure-injection datasets, independent replication, published anomaly results, and a confirmed external research mechanism would materially refine fit.

Linked records—not review targets here

These records provide dependency or relationship context. Their decisions belong to their single primary packet, preventing double counting.

• habitat-assurance-pilot · entity-purdue-rethi partner-task-match:match-habitat-assurance-pilot-purdue-rethi · 6e41f101d452f0a3b520101e381aba6b27747a6295a121522f1de80cacf2abc2

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
2. Finalize a separate output file.

   node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
     --input DRAFT.json \
     --output COMPLETED.json

   This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

3. Validate the packet and completed copy.

   node check-review-decisions.mjs \
     --packet PACKET.json \
     --decision COMPLETED.json

   Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

• Bundle finalizer
• Validator command
• Decision policy module
• Fingerprint and packet-integrity module
• Review-domain policy module
• Canonical synthesis and interactive review specs