Secure World Foundation

Packet identity

Packet ID

organizations:entity-secure-world-foundation

Packet SHA-256 identity

ff746b3aaf0dc39ab4c8a322baaa4ed7032e09e4bd2843b397de3207ab3ade42

Corpus SHA-256 identity

8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d

Release ID

public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14

Source commit

3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0

Frozen corpus date

2026-07-25

Primary records

1

Reference sources

1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
   Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
   Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
   Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

• Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
• No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

1. ecosystem-organization · entity-secure-world-foundation

   Secure World Foundation

   Record fingerprint

   ceb51682ff0112fdcabbb51109ee35994ba2bbe12adefcda608d3db16134f0a1

   Minimum approvals

   1

   Required scope groups

   bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

   High-consequence domains

   None under the named two-person rule

   Review state

   pending

   Published human decisions

   0

   Inspect the complete frozen review surface

   ID

   entity-secure-world-foundation

   Legacy ID

   org-interste-013

   Slug

   secure-world-foundation

   Name

   Secure World Foundation

   URL

   https://swfound.org/↗ (opens external site in a new tab)

   Category

   Interstellar and settlement community

   Geography

   United States / international

   Relevance

   direct

   Engagement

   Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current participation rules: use public reports and consider attending an open event or requesting critique of a bounded governance paper after a concrete Solar System precursor issue exists. No outreach, invitation, commitment, or funding has occurred.

   Capability

   Space sustainability policy, security analysis, international dialogue, capacity building, orbital-debris and space-traffic governance, and public education.

   Entity Kind

   nonprofit space sustainability and security foundation

   Link Checked At

   2026-07-25

   Relationship

   indexed only; no formal relationship

   Engagement Status

   proposed; not undertaken

   Profile Summary

   Secure World Foundation is a private nonprofit working on the secure, sustainable, and peaceful uses of outer space through policy research, convening, capacity building, and public information. The source record's inherited interstellar-research label is not supported by the reviewed official site and should not define this profile.

   Potential Fit

   Could inform space-governance, debris, transparency, norms, traffic coordination, and peaceful-use framing for Solar System precursor infrastructure; it is not indexed as a generation-ship engineering organization.

   Risks

   1. Policy expertise does not validate propulsion, habitat, or life-support engineering.
   2. Space security work intersects defense, geopolitical, and dual-use debates that require neutral attribution and civil boundaries.
   3. Foundation priorities, event access, and staff capacity may change and cannot be inferred from indexing.

   Evidence Boundary

   Official-link review: the site was reachable and supports a space sustainability, security, and policy remit. It did not support the source record's generic interstellar capability text, and no current willingness to engage, endorsement, or program fit was established; independent review pending.

   Conflicts

   Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; funders, government relationships, event sponsors, and policy-position conflicts were not independently investigated.

   What Would Change

   A current program addressing long-duration habitat governance or precursor infrastructure, transparent funding disclosures, and a mutually scoped public-interest review would refine fit.

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
2. Finalize a separate output file.

   node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
     --input DRAFT.json \
     --output COMPLETED.json

   This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

3. Validate the packet and completed copy.

   node check-review-decisions.mjs \
     --packet PACKET.json \
     --decision COMPLETED.json

   Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

• Bundle finalizer
• Validator command
• Decision policy module
• Fingerprint and packet-integrity module
• Review-domain policy module
• Canonical synthesis and interactive review specs