Space Information Sharing and Analysis Center

Packet identity

Packet ID: organizations:entity-space-isac
Packet SHA-256 identity: e9096b109db8694ad627b4e55c1fb08ad9129ec0e44cd92eaf30a9390d1c4580
Corpus SHA-256 identity: 8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d
Release ID: public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14
Source commit: 3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0
Frozen corpus date: 2026-07-25
Primary records: 2
Reference sources: 1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

ecosystem-organization · entity-space-isac

Space Information Sharing and Analysis Center

Record fingerprint
9c660d3f9e3b54dc6e54bf6439c51c2d4a7b96116b679a75169f13531f36038a

Minimum approvals
1

Required scope groups
bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

High-consequence domains
None under the named two-person rule

Review state
pending

Published human decisions
0
Inspect the complete frozen review surface
ID
entity-space-isac
Legacy ID
org-spaceisac-001
Slug
space-isac
Name
Space Information Sharing and Analysis Center
URL
https://spaceisac.org/ (opens external site in a new tab)
Category
Public interest, governance, culture, and capital
Geography
United States / international
Relevance
direct
Engagement
Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current membership and handling rules: use public guidance first, then assess membership or exercise participation only for an operating civil system with a defined security need. No outreach, membership, information exchange, commitment, or procurement has occurred.
Capability
Space cybersecurity information sharing, threat and vulnerability coordination, exercises, training, supply-chain resilience, and community convening.
Entity Kind
nonprofit space-sector information sharing and analysis center
Link Checked At
2026-07-25
Relationship
indexed only; no formal relationship
Engagement Status
proposed; not undertaken
Profile Summary
Space ISAC facilitates sharing about space-system vulnerabilities, threats, incidents, and mitigations among members and public-sector partners. Its public mission covers cyber resilience, supply-chain risk, education, exercises, and community coordination rather than product certification.
Potential Fit
Could inform defensive cyber threat models, incident coordination, supplier risk, tabletop exercises, and sector-specific security practices for precursor habitats if membership and information-handling rules fit.
Risks
Sensitive threat information may be restricted and could not be republished in an open Atlas.
Membership fees, vetting, legal agreements, and operational maturity requirements may limit access.
Cybersecurity knowledge is dual-use; GShips excludes offensive operations and must prevent disclosure that increases exploitability.
Evidence Boundary
Official-link review: the site was reachable and describes the information-sharing mission, resilience focus, community, and programs. Membership eligibility, current services, incident performance, data handling, and any fit with GShips were not independently verified; independent review pending.
Conflicts
Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; members, government relationships, sponsors, vendors, and threat-intelligence conflicts were not independently investigated.
What Would Change
A live precursor system, published membership terms, a civil defensive use case, acceptable disclosure rules, and independently tested incident processes would strengthen fit.
ecosystem-relationship · relationship-space-isac-organizes-voss

entity-space-isac organizes series-space-isac-value-of-space-summit

Record fingerprint
e2280d33ad74f9b614e6a6c392e4c2da9c590fcd841e299d5eed2b5c18800edc

Minimum approvals
1

Required scope groups
bounded-competence: affected-public-rights, ecosystem-due-diligence

High-consequence domains
None under the named two-person rule

Review state
pending

Published human decisions
0

Inspect the complete frozen review surface

ID
relationship-space-isac-organizes-voss
Subject Type
organization
Subject ID
entity-space-isac
Predicate
organizes
Object Type
Event series (exact value: event-series)
Object ID
series-space-isac-value-of-space-summit
Relationship State
indexed only; no formal relationship
Evidence Boundary
The existing reviewed organization and occurrence records identify the organizer and series; classification and access remain separately bounded.

Equivalent record table for this packet
Record	Subject	Fingerprint	Approvals	Scope groups
ecosystem-organization:entity-space-isac	Space Information Sharing and Analysis Center	`9c660d3f9e3b54dc6e54bf6439c51c2d4a7b96116b679a75169f13531f36038a`	1	bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence
ecosystem-relationship:relationship-space-isac-organizes-voss	entity-space-isac organizes series-space-isac-value-of-space-summit	`e2280d33ad74f9b614e6a6c392e4c2da9c590fcd841e299d5eed2b5c18800edc`	1	bounded-competence: affected-public-rights, ecosystem-due-diligence

Linked records—not review targets here

These records provide dependency or relationship context. Their decisions belong to their single primary packet, preventing double counting.

disconnected-cyber-recovery · entity-space-isac partner-task-match:match-disconnected-cyber-recovery-space-isac · 45299181c08e97ad02b2420ac126578d285ed139a52fd8fd052f78507d7df1f3

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Sources, verification dates, scope notes, and exact fingerprints
Source ID	Source	Checked	Scope boundary	Fingerprint
official-ecosystem-organization-entity-space-isac	Space Information Sharing and Analysis Center (opens external site in a new tab)	2026-07-25	Official-link review: the site was reachable and describes the information-sharing mission, resilience focus, community, and programs. Membership eligibility, current services, incident performance, data handling, and any fit with GShips were not independently verified; independent review pending.	`5b2f30fade499d6daa6ccf19e6c88f4ce0cb0b1e4fe18139b237de0388843ae2`

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Frozen packet · JSON

15.8 KB · packet identity e9096b109db8694a…

Download packet

Blank decision worksheet · JSON

3.6 KB · template identity d0d45eecdc167a3c…

Download blank JSON

Review-notes worksheet · Markdown

Readable notes companion only—not a decision-bundle equivalent. Use the closed JSON template for structural validation.

Download notes worksheet

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
Finalize a separate output file.
```
node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
  --input DRAFT.json \
  --output COMPLETED.json
```
This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.
Validate the packet and completed copy.
```
node check-review-decisions.mjs \
  --packet PACKET.json \
  --decision COMPLETED.json
```
Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.
Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

Completion criteria

Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.

Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes.

Reviewer identity, qualification, independence, conflicts, and compensation must be assessed by accountable human governance; local validation can only report structural validity.
Approve, revise, contest, reject, and recuse remain visible. A negative finding cannot be hidden by an aggregate approval percentage.
Revision creates a new record and packet fingerprint. Prior approvals do not carry forward automatically.
AI may assist with clerical comparison but cannot count as an independent reviewer, identity attestor, appeal authority, or second person.