Centre for Astrosociology

Packet identity

Packet ID

organizations:entity-centre-for-astrosociology

Packet SHA-256 identity

8a0bc68d743ba02aed55716548955ff77c783c1ceed8c4ad262d1d8377d57426

Corpus SHA-256 identity

8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d

Release ID

public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14

Source commit

3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0

Frozen corpus date

2026-07-25

Primary records

1

Reference sources

1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
   Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
   Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
   Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

• Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
• No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

1. ecosystem-organization · entity-centre-for-astrosociology

   Centre for Astrosociology

   Record fingerprint

   0522044da208f4bc366d53b00a7a0b7dfb3c14a11d4aba2a3b68ec1403cb7c06

   Minimum approvals

   1

   Required scope groups

   bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

   High-consequence domains

   None under the named two-person rule

   Review state

   pending

   Published human decisions

   0

   Inspect the complete frozen review surface

   ID

   entity-centre-for-astrosociology

   Legacy ID

   org-interste-015

   Slug

   centre-for-astrosociology

   Name

   Centre for Astrosociology

   URL

   https://astrosociology.io/↗ (opens external site in a new tab)

   Category

   Interstellar and settlement community

   Geography

   United Kingdom / international

   Relevance

   direct

   Engagement

   Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current access rules: review course content and faculty credentials before considering a bounded curriculum exchange or guest critique. No outreach, eligibility determination, commitment, or procurement has occurred.

   Capability

   Astrosociology education, space-law and governance training, participation, careers, and public engagement.

   Entity Kind

   space-governance education and research centre

   Link Checked At

   2026-07-25

   Relationship

   indexed only; no formal relationship

   Engagement Status

   proposed; not undertaken

   Profile Summary

   The Centre of Astrosociology presents education and training in space law, governance, and the social relationship between space activity and society, with an emphasis on participation and equitable access to decision-making.

   Potential Fit

   Could contribute social-science curriculum, governance scenarios, and critiques of exclusion or inequitable benefit, but should not substitute for representative institutions or empirical community research.

   Risks

   1. The reviewed public page emphasizes courses and mission language more than independently evaluated research outputs.
   2. Legal and governance instruction may be jurisdiction-specific or introductory.
   3. Equity claims require validation through representative participation, not solely provider framing.

   Evidence Boundary

   Official-link review: the official site was reachable and documents current course offerings, governance focus, and stated equity mission; legal status and research-review processes were not clear from the reviewed page. Public descriptions, performance, maturity, access, procurement, and current availability were not independently verified; independent review pending.

   Conflicts

   Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; financial, contracting, leadership, and institutional conflicts were not independently investigated.

   What Would Change

   Published research methods, faculty governance, learner outcomes, and representative-community review would materially refine this profile.

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
2. Finalize a separate output file.

   node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
     --input DRAFT.json \
     --output COMPLETED.json

   This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

3. Validate the packet and completed copy.

   node check-review-decisions.mjs \
     --packet PACKET.json \
     --decision COMPLETED.json

   Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

• Bundle finalizer
• Validator command
• Decision policy module
• Fingerprint and packet-integrity module
• Review-domain policy module
• Canonical synthesis and interactive review specs