CisLunar Industries

Packet identity

Packet ID

organizations:entity-cislunar-industries

Packet SHA-256 identity

5a021f3704b59b3b0236a7536f19ab4ecce643c55f27c176d0a494aa1c1c970d

Corpus SHA-256 identity

8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d

Release ID

public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14

Source commit

3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0

Frozen corpus date

2026-07-25

Primary records

1

Reference sources

1

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
   Does the official source establish the entity, current program, and bounded capability described?
2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
   Are potential fit, risks, access, geography, and engagement boundaries current and proportionate?
3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
   Could any wording imply partnership, endorsement, availability, procurement, authority, or affiliation that does not exist?

Explicit exclusions

• Indexing is not endorsement, due diligence completion, outreach, procurement, or a relationship.
• No aggregate organization score or sponsor-purchased ranking is permitted.

Requested controlled scopes: ecosystem-due-diligence, information-science

Frozen-evidence decision window: 90 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

1. ecosystem-organization · entity-cislunar-industries

   CisLunar Industries

   Record fingerprint

   b7cf9354fbed150f658b6c13a9229fb80e1e3f8c0a41d0bbb293e37459c76da1

   Minimum approvals

   1

   Required scope groups

   bounded-competence: ecosystem-due-diligence

   High-consequence domains

   None under the named two-person rule

   Review state

   pending

   Published human decisions

   0

   Inspect the complete frozen review surface

   ID

   entity-cislunar-industries

   Legacy ID

   org-company--033

   Slug

   cislunar-industries

   Name

   CisLunar Industries

   URL

   https://www.cislunarindustries.com/↗ (opens external site in a new tab)

   Category

   Company and applied technology

   Geography

   Colorado, United States

   Relevance

   enabling

   Engagement

   Proposed only, subject to a future fit check and then-current access rules: if a closed-loop materials test requires relevant hardware, consider a paid data or test inquiry after confirming maturity, safety, and intellectual-property terms. No outreach, eligibility determination, commitment, or procurement has occurred.

   Capability

   Orbital metal processing, recycling, feedstock production, power-processing hardware, and in-space manufacturing infrastructure.

   Entity Kind

   private space materials and infrastructure company

   Link Checked At

   2026-07-25

   Relationship

   indexed only; no formal relationship

   Engagement Status

   proposed; not undertaken

   Profile Summary

   CisLunar Industries develops concepts and hardware for processing metal in orbit, including metal production, recycling, and feedstock intended for in-space manufacturing and logistics.

   Potential Fit

   Could inform circular-material flows, waste-to-feedstock requirements, and orbital manufacturing precursors if demonstrated process data and compatible interfaces become available.

   Risks

   1. Public evidence for operational scale, product maturity, yields, contamination, and energy intensity is limited.
   2. Metal processing in orbit introduces thermal, particulate, toxicology, and debris hazards.
   3. A small company may have constrained capacity, and commercial availability or pricing cannot be assumed.

   Evidence Boundary

   Official-link review: the official site was reachable but exposed limited descriptive text in the reviewed page; classification therefore relies on the company’s own public product framing. Public descriptions, performance, maturity, access, procurement, and current availability were not independently verified; independent review pending.

   Conflicts

   Conflicts were not assessed beyond publisher disclosure in this official-link review; financial, contracting, leadership, and institutional conflicts were not independently investigated.

   What Would Change

   Third-party test results, mass and energy balances, flight demonstrations, safety evidence, and a current product specification would change the assessment.

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
2. Finalize a separate output file.

   node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
     --input DRAFT.json \
     --output COMPLETED.json

   This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

3. Validate the packet and completed copy.

   node check-review-decisions.mjs \
     --packet PACKET.json \
     --decision COMPLETED.json

   Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

• Bundle finalizer
• Validator command
• Decision policy module
• Fingerprint and packet-integrity module
• Review-domain policy module
• Canonical synthesis and interactive review specs