Packet identity

Packet ID
resources:bucket-1b
Packet SHA-256 identity
a4ded4fee5d274de9ce9d17f5f41a525354dbac0f0c3047d15abf2d5ecf64751
Corpus SHA-256 identity
8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d
Release ID
public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14
Source commit
3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0
Frozen corpus date
2026-07-25
Primary records
21
Reference sources
21

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

  1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
    Is each canonical record correctly identified, deduplicated, classified, dated, and scoped?
  2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
    Does the selection note explain relevance without automatically treating the resource as claim support?
  3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
    Are access, source class, version, retraction, rights, and transfer limits represented accurately?

Explicit exclusions

  • Atlas inclusion is not endorsement and does not make a source evidence for a claim.
  • Metadata review does not certify the full text, methods, data, or conclusions.

Requested controlled scopes: information-science, systems-engineering

Frozen-evidence decision window: 365 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

  1. atlas-resource · core-06-3

    Biosphere 2 research initiatives

    Record fingerprint
    8b076dc7861ea97499af0e52d3ffeded2fc4c824247a831ea62a2db94fbc58fa
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    core-06-3
    Title
    Biosphere 2 research initiatives
    Topic
    ecology-food
    Year
    Not recorded
    Authors
    None recorded
    Publisher
    Primary or institutional source
    Resource Type
    Primary or institutional source
    Access
    official link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Selection Note
    Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim.
  2. atlas-resource · core-08-5

    Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

    Record fingerprint
    b883523d59116c5e5dc7771a6f97c0cbd2dd00b471198787a47b9cf5050532a6
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    core-08-5
    Title
    Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
    Topic
    reproduction-genetics
    Year
    Not recorded
    Authors
    None recorded
    Publisher
    Human-rights treaty
    Resource Type
    Human-rights treaty
    Access
    official link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Selection Note
    Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim.
  3. atlas-resource · core-20-1

    NASA Technology Taxonomy

    Record fingerprint
    a00dcb6e29b2062dca1c102bd7152da9d38cc6f957112c37587453dd32410bb2
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    core-20-1
    Title
    NASA Technology Taxonomy
    Topic
    institutions-workforce
    Year
    Not recorded
    Authors
    None recorded
    Publisher
    Primary or institutional source
    Resource Type
    Primary or institutional source
    Access
    official link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Selection Note
    Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim.
  4. atlas-resource · ntrs-19840009784

    Inorganic analysis in a controlled ecological life support system

    Record fingerprint
    1b477dbd2def02c4e35ba6a17b9096603200bb61b30b1b14c9c209dc32c170fd
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-19840009784
    Title
    Inorganic analysis in a controlled ecological life support system
    Topic
    ecology-food
    Year
    1983
    Published At
    1983-06-01T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Carden, J. L.
    2. Browner, R. F.
    Publisher
    Legacy CDMS
    Resource Type
    Contractor Report (CR)
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    Techniques useful for the elemental analysis of samples of types which might require analysis within a controlled ecological life support system are investigated.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 1983 contractor report (cr) from Legacy CDMS specifically covers “Inorganic analysis in a controlled ecological life support system”; its abstract describes Techniques useful for the elemental analysis of samples of types which might require analysis within a controlled ecological life support system are investigated. This materially informs GShips closed ecology and food.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    closed ecology and food
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.
  5. atlas-resource · ntrs-19970025374

    Astrobiology Workshop: Leadership in Astrobiology

    Record fingerprint
    38ccc9b51566d7ac342214cb3713e2591d9aaeef6b3fa817d6858f5033b15330
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-19970025374
    Title
    Astrobiology Workshop: Leadership in Astrobiology
    Topic
    destinations-astrobiology
    Year
    1996
    Published At
    1996-12-01T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. DeVincenzi, D.
    2. Briggs, G.
    3. Cohen, M.
    4. Cuzzi, J.
    5. DesMarais, D.
    6. Harper, L.
    7. Morrison, D.
    8. Pohorille, A.
    Publisher
    Ames Research Center
    Resource Type
    Conference Proceedings
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    Astrobiology is defined in the 1996 NASA Strategic Plan as 'The study of the living universe.' At NASA's Ames Research Center, this endeavor encompasses the use of space to understand life's origin, evolution, and destiny in the universe. Life's origin refers to understanding the origin of life in the context of the origin and diversity of planetary systems. Life's evolution refers to understanding how living systems have adapted to Earth's changing environment, to the all-pervasive force of gravity, and how they may adapt to environments beyond Earth. Life's destiny refers to making long-term human presence in space a reality, and laying the foundation for understanding and managing changes in Earth's environment. The first Astrobiology Workshop brought together a diverse group of researchers to discuss the following general questions: Where and how are other habitable worlds formed? How does life originate? How have the Earth and its biosphere influenced each other over time? Can terrestrial life be sustained beyond our planet? How can we expand the human presence to Mars? The objectives of the Workshop included: discussing the scope of astrobiology, strengthening existing efforts for the study of life in the universe, identifying new cross-disciplinary programs with the greatest potential for scientific return, and suggesting steps needed to bring this program to reality. Ames has been assigned the lead role for astrobiology by NASA in recognition of its strong history of leadership in multidisciplinary research in the space, Earth, and life sciences and its pioneering work in studies of the living universe. This initial science workshop was established to lay the foundation for what is to become a national effort in astrobiology, with anticipated participation by the university community, other NASA centers, and other agencies. This workshop (the first meeting of its kind ever held) involved life, Earth, and space scientists in a truly interdisciplinary sharing of ideas related to life in the universe, and by all accounts was a resounding success.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because “Astrobiology Workshop: Leadership in Astrobiology” covers Astrobiology is defined in the 1996 NASA Strategic Plan as 'The study of the living universe.' At NASA's; it materially informs GShips work on astrobiology research coordination.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    astrobiology-research-coordination
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides open full text, but this conference proceedings was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.
  6. atlas-resource · ntrs-20000005106

    Single Step to Orbit; a First Step in a Cooperative Space Exploration Initiative

    Record fingerprint
    9c89c3bc01a3c04a035de7dece77ae1da7d1bb074fc1e887ff668af0bb423338
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20000005106
    Title
    Single Step to Orbit; a First Step in a Cooperative Space Exploration Initiative
    Topic
    governance-law
    Year
    1999
    Published At
    1999-08-19T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Lusignan, Bruce
    2. Sivalingam, Shivan
    Publisher
    Ames Research Center
    Resource Type
    Other - Collected Works
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    At the end of the Cold War, disarmament planners included a recommendation to ease reduction of the U.S. and Russian aerospace industries by creating cooperative scientific pursuits. The idea was not new, having earlier been suggested by Eisenhower and Khrushchev to reduce the pressure of the "Military Industrial Complex" by undertaking joint space exploration. The Space Exploration Initiative (SEI) proposed at the end of the Cold War by President Bush and Premier Gorbachev was another attempt to ease the disarmament process by giving the bloated war industries something better to do. The engineering talent and the space rockets could be used for peaceful pursuits, notably for going back to the Moon and then on to Mars with human exploration and settlement. At the beginning of this process in 1992 staff of the Stanford Center for International Cooperation in Space attended the International Space University in Canada, met with Russian participants and invited a Russian team to work with us on a joint Stanford-Russian Mars Exploration Study. A CIA student and Airforce and Navy students just happened to join the Stanford course the next year and all students were aware that the leader of the four Russian engineers was well versed in Russian security. But, as long as they did their homework, they were welcome to participate with other students in defining the Mars mission and the three engineers they sent were excellent. At the end of this study we were invited to give a briefing to Dr. Edward Teller at Stanford's Hoover Institution of War and Peace. We were also encouraged to hold a press conference on Capitol Hill to introduce the study to the world. At a pre-conference briefing at the Space Council, we were asked to please remind the press that President Bush had asked for a cooperative exploration proposal not a U.S. alone initiative. The Stanford-Russian study used Russia's Energia launchers, priced at $300 Million each. The mission totaled out to $71.5 Billion, to send a six-person crew to establish a Mars base and return. It was an on going international venture with plans for new crews, base expansion, and extended exploration at every two year opportunity. The $71.5 Billion international approach contrasted with NASA's own 90-day U.S. - alone study that proposed a package topping $500 Billion by some admissions. NASA's approach was also challenged by an internal D.O.E. proposal at much lower cost, described to the Mars Society last year by Lowell Wood and, of course, by Bob Zubrin's "Mars Direct" proposal.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 1999 other - collected works from Ames Research Center specifically covers “Single Step to Orbit; a First Step in a Cooperative Space Exploration Initiative”; its abstract describes At the end of the Cold War, disarmament planners included a recommendation to ease reduction of the U.S. and Russian aerospace industries by creating cooperative scientific… This materially informs GShips governance and law.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    governance and law
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.
  7. atlas-resource · ntrs-20090000975

    NASA Johnson Space Center's Energy and Sustainability Efforts

    Record fingerprint
    05bd56ce7f5c8ce113e73097aa3a46176b5c0085dc1dfc93e5124c66c3ddb83c
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20090000975
    Title
    NASA Johnson Space Center's Energy and Sustainability Efforts
    Topic
    ethics-alternatives
    Year
    2008
    Published At
    2008-09-01T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Ewert, Michael K.
    Publisher
    Johnson Space Center
    Resource Type
    Other - Other
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    This viewgraph presentation reviews the efforts that NASA is making to assure a sustainable environment and energy savings at the Johnson Space Center. Sustainability is defined as development that meets the needs of present generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The new technologies that are required for sustainable closed loop life support for space exploration have uses on the ground to reduce energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and water use. Some of these uses are reviewed.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 2008 other - other from Johnson Space Center specifically covers “NASA Johnson Space Center's Energy and Sustainability Efforts”; its abstract describes This viewgraph presentation reviews the efforts that NASA is making to assure a sustainable environment and energy savings at the Johnson Space Center. Sustainability is… This materially informs GShips ethics and alternatives.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    ethics and alternatives
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.
  8. atlas-resource · ntrs-20100009702

    Space Computing Systems Validation Challenges

    Record fingerprint
    b214a820235b40712c67a72aaadde9934d80313ea72e185ef819810f3f0c23bc
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20100009702
    Title
    Space Computing Systems Validation Challenges
    Topic
    analogs-verification
    Year
    2008
    Published At
    2008-01-11T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Some, Raphael R.
    2. Feather, Martin
    3. Nikora, Al
    Publisher
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open metadata
    Abstract
    To examine the challenges of spaceborne computing systems and the past, present and future approaches to verification and validation in hardware and software systems.
    Keywords
    1. Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS)
    2. spaceborne computer systems
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because it identifies validation challenges for spaceborne computing, directly relevant to long-lived safety-critical hardware and software assurance.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    verification-and-validation
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides metadata and an abstract, not reviewed full text; methods, results, and current applicability remain unverified. Inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.
  9. atlas-resource · ntrs-20170001298

    Beaconless Pointing for Deep-Space Optical Communication

    Record fingerprint
    6400347e00babecb8cba6e9ad4823b169a342adda0da65ac2b9c40bb9e418df9
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20170001298
    Title
    Beaconless Pointing for Deep-Space Optical Communication
    Topic
    communications-navigation
    Year
    2016
    Published At
    2016-10-18T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Swank, Aaron J.
    2. Aretskin-Hariton, Eliot
    3. Le, Dzu K.
    4. Sands, Obed S.
    5. Wroblewski, Adam
    Publisher
    Glenn Research Center
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    Free space optical communication is of interest to NASA as a complement to existing radio frequency communication methods. The potential for an increase in science data return capability over current radio-frequency communications is the primary objective. Deep space optical communication requires laser beam pointing accuracy on the order of a few microradians. The laser beam pointing approach discussed here operates without the aid of a terrestrial uplink beacon. Precision pointing is obtained from an on-board star tracker in combination with inertial rate sensors and an outgoing beam reference vector. The beaconless optical pointing system presented in this work is the current approach for the Integrated Radio and Optical Communication (iROC) project.
    Keywords
    1. free-space optical communication
    2. deep-space
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because “Beaconless Pointing for Deep-Space Optical Communication” covers free-space optical communication, deep-space; it materially informs GShips work on deep space communications.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    deep-space-communications
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides open full text, but this conference paper was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.
  10. atlas-resource · ntrs-20170009462

    Enabling Future Science and Human Exploration with NASA's Next Generation near Earth and Deep Space Communications and Navigation Architecture

    Record fingerprint
    85b28fac8fa9d93ce8abcbf0b7fad9bbafd3bfdab5efeee3a36a619e946e5b20
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20170009462
    Title
    Enabling Future Science and Human Exploration with NASA's Next Generation near Earth and Deep Space Communications and Navigation Architecture
    Topic
    mission-architecture
    Year
    2017
    Published At
    2017-09-25T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Reinhart, Richard C.
    2. Schier, James S.
    3. Israel, David J.
    4. Tai, Wallace
    5. Liebrecht, Philip E.
    6. Townes, Stephen A.
    Publisher
    Glenn Research Center
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is studying alternatives for the United States space communications architecture through the 2040 timeframe. This architecture provides communication and navigation services to both human exploration and science missions throughout the solar system. Several of NASA's key space assets are approaching their end of design life and major systems are in need of replacement. The changes envisioned in the relay satellite architecture and capabilities around both Earth and Mars are significant undertakings and occur only once or twice each generation, and therefore is referred to as NASA's next generation space communications architecture. NASA's next generation architecture will benefit from technology and services developed over recent years. These innovations will provide missions with new operations concepts, increased performance, and new business and operating models. Advancements in optical communications will enable high-speed data channels and the use of new and more complex science instruments. Modern multiple beam/multiple access technologies such as those employed on commercial high throughput satellites will enable enhanced capabilities for on-demand service, and with new protocols will help provide Internet-like connectivity for cooperative spacecraft to improve data return and coordinate joint mission objectives. On-board processing with autonomous and cognitive networking will play larger roles to help manage system complexity. Spacecraft and ground systems will coordinate among themselves to establish communications, negotiate link connectivity, and learn to share spectrum to optimize resource allocation. Spacecraft will autonomously navigate, plan trajectories, and handle off-nominal events. NASA intends to leverage the ever-expanding capabilities of the satellite communications industry and foster its continued growth. NASA's technology development will complement and extend commercial capabilities to meet unique space environment requirements and to provide capabilities that are beyond the commercial marketplace. The progress of the communications industry, including the emerging global space internet segment and its planned constellations of 100's of satellites offer additional opportunities for new capability and mission concepts. The opportunities and challenges of a future space architecture require an optimal solution encompassing a global perspective. The concepts and technologies intentionally define an architecture that applies not only to NASA, but to other U.S. government agencies, international space and government agencies, and domestic and international industries to advance the openness, interoperability, and affordability of space communications. Cooperation among the worlds space agencies, their capabilities, standards, operations, and interoperability are key to advancing humankind's understand of the universe and extending human presence into the solar system.
    Keywords
    1. Communications
    2. architecture
    3. relay satellite
    4. deep space
    5. space archtiecture
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated for the conference paper's analysis of NASA's prospective 2040 near-Earth and deep-space relay architecture, aging assets, service demand, and architecture-transition drivers.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    communications and navigation
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass reviewed metadata and abstract rather than validating forecasts, costs, or the current architecture. It is planning context, not automatic claim evidence.
  11. atlas-resource · ntrs-20180003400

    Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life

    Record fingerprint
    facb59c0921ce1cdce4422cc37f3e9101672fd1b2baadaaf46dd251c8011afd8
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20180003400
    Title
    Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life
    Topic
    destinations-astrobiology
    Year
    2018
    Published At
    2018-05-04T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Schwieterman, Edward W.
    2. Kiang, Nancy Y.
    3. Parenteau, Mary N.
    4. Harman, Chester E.
    5. Dassarma, Shiladitya
    6. Fisher, Theresa M.
    7. Arney, Giada N.
    8. Hartnett, Hilairy E.
    Publisher
    Mary Ann Liebert
    Resource Type
    Reprint (Version printed in journal)
    Access
    open metadata
    Abstract
    In the coming years and decades, advanced space- and ground-based observatories will allow an unprecedented opportunity to probe the atmospheres and surfaces of potentially habitable exoplanets for signatures of life. Life on Earth, through its gaseous products and reflectance and scattering properties, has left its fingerprint on the spectrum of our planet. Aided by the universality of the laws of physics and chemistry, we turn to Earth's biosphere, both in the present and through geologic time, for analog signatures that will aid in the search for life elsewhere. Considering the insights gained from modern and ancient Earth, and the broader array of hypothetical exoplanet possibilities, we have compiled a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of potential exoplanet biosignatures, including gaseous, surface, and temporal biosignatures. We additionally survey biogenic spectral features that are well known in the specialist literature but have not yet been robustly vetted in the context of exoplanet biosignatures. We briefly review advances in assessing biosignature plausibility, including novel methods for determining chemical disequilibrium from remotely obtainable data and assessment tools for determining the minimum biomass required to maintain short-lived biogenic gases as atmospheric signatures. We focus particularly on advances made since the seminal review by Des Marais et al. The purpose of this work is not to propose new biosignature strategies, a goal left to companion articles in this series, but to review the current literature, draw meaningful connections between seemingly disparate areas, and clear the way for a path forward.
    Keywords
    1. biosignatures
    2. habitability markers
    3. planetary surfaces
    4. exoplanets
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because “Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life” covers biosignatures, habitability markers, planetary surfaces, exoplanets; it materially informs GShips work on biosignatures and target characterization.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    biosignatures-and-target-characterization
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides metadata and an abstract, not reviewed full text; methods, results, and current applicability remain unverified. Inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.
  12. atlas-resource · ntrs-20205009706

    On-orbit Servicing, Assembly and Manufacturing (OSAM) Near-Term in-Space Developmental Test Persistent Platform: ESPA-Star Based Implementation

    Record fingerprint
    8337520449edc584d7e34c2b2d94fa5d05e19522e9debca1bfe1d149953c8529
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20205009706
    Title
    On-orbit Servicing, Assembly and Manufacturing (OSAM) Near-Term in-Space Developmental Test Persistent Platform: ESPA-Star Based Implementation
    
    Topic
    assembly-logistics
    Year
    2020
    Published At
    2020-11-16T05:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Bill Doggett
    2. John T Dorsey
    Publisher
    Langley Research Center
    Resource Type
    Presentation
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    Roundtable Session on In-Space Developmental Test: Springboard for Rapid Development. Presentation is a brief description of the On-orbit Servicing Assembly & Manufacturing (OSAM) national initiative & using standard EELV Secondary Payload Adapters (ESPAs) as the core building block to construct an ESPA-Star based implementation for an iSDT persistent platform in space.
    Keywords
    1. Persistent Platform
    2. Orbital Testbed
    3. Orbital Servicing
    4. Assembly and Manufacturing
    5. Automated/Robotic Assembly
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because “On-orbit Servicing, Assembly and Manufacturing (OSAM) Near-Term in-Space Developmental Test Persistent Platform: ESPA-Star Based Implementation” covers Persistent Platform, Orbital Testbed, Orbital Servicing, Assembly and Manufacturing; it materially informs GShips work on isam testbeds.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    isam-testbeds
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides open full text, but this presentation was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.
  13. atlas-resource · ntrs-20220013722

    Isolation Standard Measures: A Set of Validated and Feasible Measurements Ensuring Comparability Across Isolation and Confinement Studies

    Record fingerprint
    0170ba59af4ba64caf64b1e36d965bff9ee36e6f893167d6ed865eba6044a118
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20220013722
    Title
    Isolation Standard Measures: A Set of Validated and Feasible Measurements Ensuring Comparability Across Isolation and Confinement Studies
    Topic
    human-factors
    Year
    2022
    Published At
    2022-09-30T05:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Angelique Van Ombergen
    2. Didier Chaput
    3. Elena Fomina
    4. Valérie Gil
    5. Michaela Girgenrath
    6. Natalie Hirsch
    7. Natsuhiko Inoue
    8. Perry Johnson-Green
    Publisher
    Johnson Space Center
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    Isolation and confinement studies have been essential to the preparation of crewed long-duration space missions, acting as analogues that facilitate the study of psychological and physiological responses to isolation and confinement. They also serve as opportunities for the development, testing, and validation of countermeasures and coping methods to handle the challenges that arise in such scenarios. Due to the small sample sizes in combination with high inter-individual variability, single isolation campaigns are not always sufficient for obtaining statistically significant scientific findings. To address this issue and improve comparability between different studies, the need for standardized measures to be collected in all future isolation and confinement studies was identified. Additionally, these measures should also be shown to be generally valid, reliable, feasible and acceptable in analogue and spaceflight environments. Standard measures in isolation and confinement studies allow for more direct comparisons of results and synthesis of data across isolation and confinement studies as well as provide an important step toward standard measures in spaceflight. An international expert group with representatives from different space agencies worldwide was brought together to define a core set of standard measures for isolation and confinement studies. This paper provides an overview of the expert group’s recommendations for international standard measures for future isolation and confinement studies, along with subsequent updates coordinated by the International Countermeasures Working Group (ICMWG), which was established as a sub-Working Group under the International Space Life Sciences Working Group (ISLSWG). Additional experts were consulted by the ICMWG partner agencies as required. 
    
    The collection of the described set of isolation standard measures will provide data on the following parameters: sleep, mood, psychological state, psychophysiology, cognitive performance, stress and the immune system, general health and well-being, team measures, nutritional measures, and environmental conditions. For each measure, recommendations were made about duration and frequency of administration, along with specific implementation recommendations in relation to the duration of the isolation study. The set of isolation standard measures will be reassessed every two years at a minimum to ensure they are up to date and reflect the current state-of-the-art. 
    Keywords
    1. Isolation
    2. Confinement
    3. Standard Measures
    4. Spaceflight
    5. Space Analog
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 2022 conference paper from Johnson Space Center specifically covers “Isolation Standard Measures: A Set of Validated and Feasible Measurements Ensuring Comparability Across Isolation and Confinement Studies”; its abstract describes Isolation and confinement studies have been essential to the preparation of crewed long-duration space missions, acting as analogues that facilitate the study of… This materially informs GShips human factors and habitability.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    human factors and habitability
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.
  14. atlas-resource · ntrs-20230010855

    Beyond BioSentinel: Iterative Development of Automated Microfluidics

    Record fingerprint
    43363dd3ed35bd05496d04789c1d178808e11ef4660fa42ef80574e9ca6178aa
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20230010855
    Title
    Beyond BioSentinel: Iterative Development of Automated Microfluidics
    Topic
    reproduction-genetics
    Year
    2023
    Published At
    2023-08-08T07:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Mike Padgen
    Publisher
    Ames Research Center
    Resource Type
    Presentation
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    NASA Ames has flown a series of Bio-CubeSats that performed biology experiments supported by automated fluidic systems. Since Genesat-1 in 2006, these payloads have increased in complexity and functionality, building upon previous successes, and applying lessons learned. BioSentinel was the most recent of this series, launched into heliocentric orbit onboard Artemis-1 in 2022. This presentation will discuss how the fluidic technology developed for these Bio-CubeSat missions, including the multi-layer polycarbonate manifolds at the heart of the BioSentinel BioSensor, have spurred the development of several additional projects. Most directly is the modified BioSensor that will be a part of LEIA, which will perform its Lunar biology experiment onboard a Commercial Lunar Payload Services lander. Several search-for-life manifolds have been designed to prepare samples from icy moons for downstream analyses. Two early career Polaris projects are developing fluidics to perform genetic sequencing on samples from multigenerational cell culture and to extract and quantify target miRNAs to support astronaut radiation health assessment. Improving the readiness of these systems has been accelerated by adopting the established flight heritage and microgravity-compatibility of the Bio-CubeSat fluidic hardware and designs, while focusing development efforts on the integration of novel functionalities and components.
    Keywords
    1. microfluidics
    2. Bio-CubeSats
    3. life detection
    4. space biology
    5. BioSentinel
    6. LEIA
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated for BioSentinel's automated microfluidic cultivation and measurement of yeast beyond low Earth orbit, a precursor for unattended biological monitoring.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    autonomous space biology
    Evidence Boundary
    The NTRS record summarizes the payload, but this pass did not audit instrument reliability, data reduction, or biological results. It is autonomous-lab context, not direct radiation-health evidence.
  15. atlas-resource · ntrs-20240001820

    Concept, Design, & Implementation of a Remote Vehicle Operations Center for Autonomous Missions

    Record fingerprint
    e7402ce5abdf24a1933c9c2abd19823701b76b237a0144fa226218cca0985330
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20240001820
    Title
    Concept, Design, & Implementation of a Remote Vehicle Operations Center for Autonomous Missions
    Topic
    ai-autonomy
    Year
    2024
    Published At
    2024-11-01T04:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Bill K Buck
    Publisher
    Langley Research Center
    Resource Type
    Technical Publication (TP)
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is supporting research to develop a prototype remote vehicle operations center at Langley Research Center to explore current and future advanced air mobility operations using small unmanned aerial systems vehicles as surrogates for future, larger-scale passenger carrying vehicles. The prototype facility known as the Remote Operations for Autonomous Missions (ROAM) Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operations Center is being used to explore different roles and responsibilities of remote operators managing multiple autonomous vehicles, with the goal of exploring human-autonomy teaming concepts that enable m:N operations (i.e., m operators managing N vehicles). ROAM has developed into a world-class research, development, and technology (RD&T) environment that can support both the collection of human factors data and the command and control of remote vehicles in beyond visual line of sight conditions. ROAM provides a key capability to enable full end-to-end hardware- and human-in-the-loop simulation testing, connecting with simulated small-UAS and creating a seamless Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) environment. This report describes the development of the ROAM UAS Operations Center from concept through design, culminating in the current implementation at NASA’s Langley Research Center.
    Keywords
    1. CERTAIN
    2. Flight Test Operations
    3. Simulation
    4. Ground Control Station Operator
    5. Remote Operator
    6. Autonomous Vehicles
    7. Remote Operations
    8. Human-Autonomy Teaming
    9. Human Factors
    10. User-Centered Design
    11. Role-Based Ontology
    12. Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS)
    13. Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)
    14. ROAM UAS Operations Center
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because “Concept, Design, & Implementation of a Remote Vehicle Operations Center for Autonomous Missions” covers CERTAIN, Flight Test Operations, Simulation, Ground Control Station Operator; it materially informs GShips work on remote operations.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    remote-operations
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides open full text, but this technical publication (tp) was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.
  16. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-ca-nasa-aircraft-thermal

    Thermal Management for Aircraft Propulsion Systems

    Record fingerprint
    4a7106ae774dc93cc17f60faad26588d6694458fc9b53be4e2d0d26304c62350
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-ca-nasa-aircraft-thermal
    Title
    Thermal Management for Aircraft Propulsion Systems
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2026
    Authors
    1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Publisher
    NASA Technology Transfer Program
    Resource Type
    Government technology transfer record (exact value: government-technology-transfer-record)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    NASA Glenn technology record for a proposed lightweight thermoacoustic aircraft-propulsion thermal-management system; a transfer opportunity, not evidence of fleet-scale adoption.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.
  17. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-hp-ecss-pressurized-hardware-2025

    ECSS-E-ST-32-02C Rev.2 — Structural design and verification of pressurized hardware

    Record fingerprint
    1b08bc192cfc54da32d049e08f26acba3f86218b0f18cef29b4a3ed16e9e3bec
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-hp-ecss-pressurized-hardware-2025
    Title
    ECSS-E-ST-32-02C Rev.2 — Structural design and verification of pressurized hardware
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2025
    Authors
    1. European Cooperation for Space Standardization
    Publisher
    ECSS
    Resource Type
    Space engineering standard (exact value: space-engineering-standard)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Current pressurized-hardware design and verification scope, including vessels, structures, lines, pumps, valves, heat pipes, cryostats, batteries, and space-station applications, with explicit exclusions and incomplete coverage at seals, inflatables, composites, interfaces, and other functional domains. It is not an integrated civil-habitat standard.
    Verified At
    2026-07-26
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.
  18. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-hp-un-crpd

    Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

    Record fingerprint
    69a25b8a858be183fb702b33dc31552b4c9962dbe61cbebd2daf5b9fb694ae52
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-hp-un-crpd
    Title
    Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2006
    Authors
    1. United Nations
    Publisher
    United Nations Treaty Collection
    Resource Type
    Certified international treaty text (exact value: certified-international-treaty-text)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Certified treaty text on equality, accessibility, independent living, privacy and family, health, participation, and culture; its legal applicability to a future off-Earth polity is not asserted.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.
  19. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-im-gao-isam-2025

    In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Options

    Record fingerprint
    e3a8a3246d2ae1bc3a5ee7d4bbe6a363a84f90774435f1cfe7209d46e7ab96f5
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-im-gao-isam-2025
    Title
    In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Options
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2025
    Authors
    1. U.S. Government Accountability Office
    Publisher
    U.S. Government Accountability Office
    Resource Type
    Government technology assessment (exact value: government-technology-assessment)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Independent government assessment of demonstrated servicing, limited robotic use, test-access gaps, emerging standards, serviceability, costs, and policy options.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.
  20. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-im-moxie-science

    Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment (MOXIE)—Preparing for Human Mars Exploration

    Record fingerprint
    2689c96e2ad4b7ad0da2561236deec86d2729038849af99248556d6f52c93b21
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-im-moxie-science
    Title
    Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment (MOXIE)—Preparing for Human Mars Exploration
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2022
    Authors
    1. Jeffrey A. Hoffman
    2. Michael H. Hecht
    3. Donald Rapp
    4. MOXIE Team
    Publisher
    Science Advances
    Resource Type
    Peer reviewed off earth demonstration (exact value: peer-reviewed-off-earth-demonstration)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Primary results and scale boundary for oxygen production from Martian atmospheric carbon dioxide. The stable DOI resolves in browser access but the publisher returns HTTP 403 to automated checks.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.
  21. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-pn-naif-spice

    SPICE: An Observation Geometry System for Space Science Missions

    Record fingerprint
    4d4e0c8b3cd6e607757c1be333a5610adfaa49492edea154f520d7c4fd414c93
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-pn-naif-spice
    Title
    SPICE: An Observation Geometry System for Space Science Missions
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2026
    Authors
    1. NASA Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility
    Publisher
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
    Resource Type
    Operational navigation software record (exact value: operational-navigation-software-record)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Archived software, kernels, reference frames, time systems, observation-geometry methods, tutorials, and required-reading documentation.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.
Equivalent record table for this packet
RecordSubjectFingerprintApprovalsScope groups
atlas-resource:core-06-3 Biosphere 2 research initiatives 8b076dc7861ea97499af0e52d3ffeded2fc4c824247a831ea62a2db94fbc58fa 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:core-08-5 Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities b883523d59116c5e5dc7771a6f97c0cbd2dd00b471198787a47b9cf5050532a6 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:core-20-1 NASA Technology Taxonomy a00dcb6e29b2062dca1c102bd7152da9d38cc6f957112c37587453dd32410bb2 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-19840009784 Inorganic analysis in a controlled ecological life support system 1b477dbd2def02c4e35ba6a17b9096603200bb61b30b1b14c9c209dc32c170fd 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-19970025374 Astrobiology Workshop: Leadership in Astrobiology 38ccc9b51566d7ac342214cb3713e2591d9aaeef6b3fa817d6858f5033b15330 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20000005106 Single Step to Orbit; a First Step in a Cooperative Space Exploration Initiative 9c89c3bc01a3c04a035de7dece77ae1da7d1bb074fc1e887ff668af0bb423338 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20090000975 NASA Johnson Space Center's Energy and Sustainability Efforts 05bd56ce7f5c8ce113e73097aa3a46176b5c0085dc1dfc93e5124c66c3ddb83c 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20100009702 Space Computing Systems Validation Challenges b214a820235b40712c67a72aaadde9934d80313ea72e185ef819810f3f0c23bc 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20170001298 Beaconless Pointing for Deep-Space Optical Communication 6400347e00babecb8cba6e9ad4823b169a342adda0da65ac2b9c40bb9e418df9 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20170009462 Enabling Future Science and Human Exploration with NASA's Next Generation near Earth and Deep Space Communications and Navigation Architecture 85b28fac8fa9d93ce8abcbf0b7fad9bbafd3bfdab5efeee3a36a619e946e5b20 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20180003400 Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life facb59c0921ce1cdce4422cc37f3e9101672fd1b2baadaaf46dd251c8011afd8 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20205009706 On-orbit Servicing, Assembly and Manufacturing (OSAM) Near-Term in-Space Developmental Test Persistent Platform: ESPA-Star Based Implementation 8337520449edc584d7e34c2b2d94fa5d05e19522e9debca1bfe1d149953c8529 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20220013722 Isolation Standard Measures: A Set of Validated and Feasible Measurements Ensuring Comparability Across Isolation and Confinement Studies 0170ba59af4ba64caf64b1e36d965bff9ee36e6f893167d6ed865eba6044a118 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20230010855 Beyond BioSentinel: Iterative Development of Automated Microfluidics 43363dd3ed35bd05496d04789c1d178808e11ef4660fa42ef80574e9ca6178aa 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20240001820 Concept, Design, & Implementation of a Remote Vehicle Operations Center for Autonomous Missions e7402ce5abdf24a1933c9c2abd19823701b76b237a0144fa226218cca0985330 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-ca-nasa-aircraft-thermal Thermal Management for Aircraft Propulsion Systems 4a7106ae774dc93cc17f60faad26588d6694458fc9b53be4e2d0d26304c62350 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-hp-ecss-pressurized-hardware-2025 ECSS-E-ST-32-02C Rev.2 — Structural design and verification of pressurized hardware 1b08bc192cfc54da32d049e08f26acba3f86218b0f18cef29b4a3ed16e9e3bec 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-hp-un-crpd Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 69a25b8a858be183fb702b33dc31552b4c9962dbe61cbebd2daf5b9fb694ae52 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-im-gao-isam-2025 In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Options e3a8a3246d2ae1bc3a5ee7d4bbe6a363a84f90774435f1cfe7209d46e7ab96f5 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-im-moxie-science Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment (MOXIE)—Preparing for Human Mars Exploration 2689c96e2ad4b7ad0da2561236deec86d2729038849af99248556d6f52c93b21 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-pn-naif-spice SPICE: An Observation Geometry System for Space Science Missions 4d4e0c8b3cd6e607757c1be333a5610adfaa49492edea154f520d7c4fd414c93 1 bounded-competence: information-science

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Sources, verification dates, scope notes, and exact fingerprints
Source IDSourceCheckedScope boundaryFingerprint
official-atlas-resource-core-06-3 Biosphere 2 research initiatives (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim. e3a8710269bd77729b1508355db382c5f42edcf6ad89efb09d93ae14ccbd64bb
official-atlas-resource-core-08-5 Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim. c6492ac68563724640bb0bba8cde99d3c15e76cdc8f2e097b7898cec3d41a8e3
official-atlas-resource-core-20-1 NASA Technology Taxonomy (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim. 25cc16624b0068a82d617f03adf51f602ca1338569993acdd7575cf67e308f27
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-19840009784 Inorganic analysis in a controlled ecological life support system (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. 1c65bc53b03e61266a67490b91c1e618275a14f0ff4f4117f7659b464aac2deb
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-19970025374 Astrobiology Workshop: Leadership in Astrobiology (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS provides open full text, but this conference proceedings was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. 8e9f2d3e0e328282267fc20f0863e83a08fbe0a2b93e165be5a540107e562843
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20000005106 Single Step to Orbit; a First Step in a Cooperative Space Exploration Initiative (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. b2b867378d76c8dadec906da3a55dae20f73bc549e653e699bd52f3bf63aac90
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20090000975 NASA Johnson Space Center's Energy and Sustainability Efforts (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. ce5ce447252e0479f20b525f09cdabdf005375115c1085233568223f3e9c77be
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20100009702 Space Computing Systems Validation Challenges (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS provides metadata and an abstract, not reviewed full text; methods, results, and current applicability remain unverified. Inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. 4a76f8ee459a8f5642577c956a06d93c1910db67d4bf5398525caa3acd046110
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20170001298 Beaconless Pointing for Deep-Space Optical Communication (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS provides open full text, but this conference paper was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. ba960ad065b7d8023d7ccf3f5028a1ae4fb7eb15ab0bc933a4824648f17027b7
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20170009462 Enabling Future Science and Human Exploration with NASA's Next Generation near Earth and Deep Space Communications and Navigation Architecture (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass reviewed metadata and abstract rather than validating forecasts, costs, or the current architecture. It is planning context, not automatic claim evidence. 8e9747b52538b5f369d1e0c6d5254c47aa9650724bb744d88776177b449fc8ae
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20180003400 Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS provides metadata and an abstract, not reviewed full text; methods, results, and current applicability remain unverified. Inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. 8890eda85bc8960545015a995bf5bf75b1cec65019e2436dede259f47b425674
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20205009706 On-orbit Servicing, Assembly and Manufacturing (OSAM) Near-Term in-Space Developmental Test Persistent Platform: ESPA-Star Based Implementation (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS provides open full text, but this presentation was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. 73e3e4db314a8280b2eadd4f4a30ceba0e42ccc994e88f5781edb775d840b405
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20220013722 Isolation Standard Measures: A Set of Validated and Feasible Measurements Ensuring Comparability Across Isolation and Confinement Studies (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. c52a637602963a201fa7e2586f321808b3cde5492e6079358203de8c79941fc5
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20230010855 Beyond BioSentinel: Iterative Development of Automated Microfluidics (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 The NTRS record summarizes the payload, but this pass did not audit instrument reliability, data reduction, or biological results. It is autonomous-lab context, not direct radiation-health evidence. 13c7f2a056b5f2d2145977de529e8cf6b9b90568ed333368eb9fd031babea48c
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20240001820 Concept, Design, & Implementation of a Remote Vehicle Operations Center for Autonomous Missions (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 NTRS provides open full text, but this technical publication (tp) was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. 09f32c6dfab5a454283f8cc5d3fa27ca08a779215443410840b112090b443644
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-ca-nasa-aircraft-thermal Thermal Management for Aircraft Propulsion Systems (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 3c1808efb4ac4e924f38ccf50616dbc14cb18cc04b0ff17ef9491adc25243d9e
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-hp-ecss-pressurized-hardware-2025 ECSS-E-ST-32-02C Rev.2 — Structural design and verification of pressurized hardware (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-26 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 56033e6e33e434e15b39b684dcc136003445ebe150e29e96b132823c19537f4c
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-hp-un-crpd Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 72432202277548109a0f4236ae31cff610be87f6ede33ed931187e299760d12f
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-im-gao-isam-2025 In-Space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing: Benefits, Challenges, and Policy Options (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. dcbad4aa9d75c30c4194140c506d1c9f67177ed5d76761671a83835ed811d14d
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-im-moxie-science Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment (MOXIE)—Preparing for Human Mars Exploration (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. dedb15b0f57e9117c4070452b12dbf1654add4e1f307ff826718b0a2469caba6
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-pn-naif-spice SPICE: An Observation Geometry System for Space Science Missions (opens external site in a new tab) 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. d8b02094a71e2eaea15ff931a6b54e2f8750b398858887d04c3ee42ee99fa6a2

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Frozen packet · JSON

83.9 KB · packet identity a4ded4fee5d274de…

Download packet

Blank decision worksheet · JSON

15.4 KB · template identity 5a3552f2c6a71b96…

Download blank JSON

Review-notes worksheet · Markdown

Readable notes companion only—not a decision-bundle equivalent. Use the closed JSON template for structural validation.

Download notes worksheet

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

  1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
  2. Finalize a separate output file.
    node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
      --input DRAFT.json \
      --output COMPLETED.json

    This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

  3. Validate the packet and completed copy.
    node check-review-decisions.mjs \
      --packet PACKET.json \
      --decision COMPLETED.json

    Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

  4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

Completion criteria

Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.

Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes.

  • Reviewer identity, qualification, independence, conflicts, and compensation must be assessed by accountable human governance; local validation can only report structural validity.
  • Approve, revise, contest, reject, and recuse remain visible. A negative finding cannot be hidden by an aggregate approval percentage.
  • Revision creates a new record and packet fingerprint. Prior approvals do not carry forward automatically.
  • AI may assist with clerical comparison but cannot count as an independent reviewer, identity attestor, appeal authority, or second person.

Prepared review packet · 0 published human decisions · Independent review pending · Suggest a correction

Accountability record

How to inspect this page

Scope: Prepared review packet resources:bucket-1b · a4ded4fee5d274de9ce9d17f5f41a525354dbac0f0c3047d15abf2d5ecf64751

Page citations and accountability links

  • Exact frozen packet
    Complete packet payload; SHA-256 a4ded4fee5d274de9ce9d17f5f41a525354dbac0f0c3047d15abf2d5ecf64751 · fingerprint-bound review artifact
  • Blank closed decision template
    Offline structured-decision starting point · unsubmitted local artifact
  • Review-notes worksheet
    Human-readable notes companion; not validator input · offline notes aid
  • Review corpus index
    Corpus SHA-256 8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d · release and ownership index

Assumptions and limits

  • The exact packet, record, source, policy, release, and source-commit fingerprints bound this prepared page; human review has not started.
  • Downloading, local structural validation, or completing notes does not appoint or qualify a reviewer, establish independence, accept a decision, authorize publication, or create a relationship.

What would change this page?

Staffed governance, appointed qualified reviewers, completed record-level decisions, published conflicts, minority findings, corrections, or changed review policy would change this page.

People, review, and conflicts

Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
public-alpha accountability pass
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project AI-assisted editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
2026-07-26
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
2026-07-25

Declared conflicts

  • The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.

Suggest a correction to this page