GSHIPSEarth-first systems for humanity’s longest journey
Menu

Review Commons · Atlas resource packets

Atlas stable hash bucket 0D

Frozen resources review packet with exact record and source fingerprints; human review has not started.

Packet identity

Packet ID
resources:bucket-0d
Packet SHA-256 identity
d6e10ade16af13b64f548cfeae4b6ad8fb4e5526f58ddba0b79c6847232d5e9e
Corpus SHA-256 identity
8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d
Release ID
public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14
Source commit
3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0
Frozen corpus date
2026-07-25
Primary records
17
Reference sources
17

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

  1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
    Is each canonical record correctly identified, deduplicated, classified, dated, and scoped?
  2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
    Does the selection note explain relevance without automatically treating the resource as claim support?
  3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
    Are access, source class, version, retraction, rights, and transfer limits represented accurately?

Explicit exclusions

  • Atlas inclusion is not endorsement and does not make a source evidence for a claim.
  • Metadata review does not certify the full text, methods, data, or conclusions.

Requested controlled scopes: information-science, systems-engineering

Frozen-evidence decision window: 365 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

  1. atlas-resource · core-09-3

    ESA Concordia

    Record fingerprint
    a358464db9de543f73da1e48b8d1ad300493ed54144afe11ec40b592593054d5
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    core-09-3
    Title
    ESA Concordia
    Topic
    human-factors
    Year
    Not recorded
    Authors
    None recorded
    Publisher
    Primary or institutional source
    Resource Type
    Primary or institutional source
    Access
    official link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Selection Note
    Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim.

  2. atlas-resource · core-10-3

    UN Declaration on Future Generations

    Record fingerprint
    0b8078165243b5816f3628677071a2a6a0a5579cde0b5d390d77e3dbaa04ac69
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    core-10-3
    Title
    UN Declaration on Future Generations
    Topic
    governance-law
    Year
    Not recorded
    Authors
    None recorded
    Publisher
    Primary or institutional source
    Resource Type
    Primary or institutional source
    Access
    official link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Selection Note
    Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim.

  3. atlas-resource · core-13-3

    IETF Bundle Protocol Security

    Record fingerprint
    a8b63377e9c5ff167c2d1e50568e14043ae0d863fdda23b0fd3740c2ab93838b
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    core-13-3
    Title
    IETF Bundle Protocol Security
    Topic
    communications-navigation
    Year
    Not recorded
    Authors
    None recorded
    Publisher
    Primary or institutional source
    Resource Type
    Primary or institutional source
    Access
    official link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Selection Note
    Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim.

  4. atlas-resource · ntrs-19680032519

    Synthetic fats as part of a closed-loop life support system.

    Record fingerprint
    eb264a49258053cd32e9e33a4ff0ac28696f734b1ab16a27f2db95e41bee35ce
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-19680032519
    Title
    Synthetic fats as part of a closed-loop life support system.
    Topic
    life-support
    Year
    1967
    Published At
    1967-12-01T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Frankenfeld, J. W.
    2. Kaback, S. M.
    3. Shapira, J.
    4. Skopp, A.
    Publisher
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, VOL. 4, P. 1671-1673.
    Resource Type
    Reprint (Version printed in journal)
    Access
    open metadata
    Abstract
    Chemical synthesis of caloric sources from metabolic wastes /especially carbon dioxide/ under space travel conditions for closed loop life support system
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 1967 reprint (version printed in journal) from JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, VOL. 4, P. 1671-1673. specifically covers “Synthetic fats as part of a closed-loop life support system.”; its abstract describes Chemical synthesis of caloric sources from metabolic wastes /especially carbon dioxide/ under space travel conditions for closed loop life support system This materially informs GShips regenerative life support.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    regenerative life support
    Evidence Boundary
    Only NTRS metadata and abstract are open here; full-text methods and results were unavailable for this pass. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.

  5. atlas-resource · ntrs-19880020977

    Verification and validation of rulebased systems for Hubble Space Telescope ground support

    Record fingerprint
    c66906e99acc4782a335032e91c9a1897b89d0a38904fb121d57cfb70a622805
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-19880020977
    Title
    Verification and validation of rulebased systems for Hubble Space Telescope ground support
    Topic
    analogs-verification
    Year
    1988
    Published At
    1988-08-01T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Vick, Shon
    2. Lindenmayer, Kelly
    Publisher
    Legacy CDMS
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    As rulebase systems become more widely used in operational environments, the focus is on the problems and concerns of maintaining expert systems. In the conventional software model, the verification and validation of a system have two separate and distinct meanings. To validate a system means to demonstrate that the system does what is advertised. The verification process refers to investigating the actual code to identify inconsistencies and redundancies within the logic path. In current literature regarding maintaining rulebased systems, little distinction is made between these two terms. In fact, often the two terms are used interchangeably. Verification and validation of rulebased systems are discussed as separate but equally important aspects of the maintenance phase. Also described are some of the tools and methods that were developed at the Space Telescope Science Institute to aid in the maintenance of the rulebased system.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because “Verification and validation of rulebased systems for Hubble Space Telescope ground support” covers As rulebase systems become more widely used in operational environments, the focus is on the problems and concerns; it materially informs GShips work on verification and validation.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    verification-and-validation
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides open full text, but this conference paper was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.

  6. atlas-resource · ntrs-20070013706

    Space Exploration: Challenges in Medicine, Research, and Ethics

    Record fingerprint
    f142f0ff264cb8b63e4e1be80a6248cec0cb1735faf02d60f7275370a2b242f0
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20070013706
    Title
    Space Exploration: Challenges in Medicine, Research, and Ethics
    Topic
    governance-law
    Year
    2007
    Published At
    2007-04-27T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Davis, Jeffrey R.
    Publisher
    Johnson Space Center
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    This viewgraph presentation describes the challenges that space exploration faces in terms of medicine, research and ethics. The topics include: 1) Effects of Microgravity on Human Physiology; 2) Radiation; 3) Bone; 4) Behavior and Performance; 5) Muscle; 6) Cardiovascular; 7) Neurovestibular; 8) Food and Nutrition; 9) Immunology and Hematology; 10) Environment; 11) Exploration; 12) Building Block Approach; 13) Exploration Issues; 14) Life Sciences Contributions; 15) Health Care; and 17) Habitability.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 2007 conference paper from Johnson Space Center specifically covers “Space Exploration: Challenges in Medicine, Research, and Ethics”; its abstract describes This viewgraph presentation describes the challenges that space exploration faces in terms of medicine, research and ethics. The topics include: 1) Effects of Microgravity… This materially informs GShips governance and law.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    governance and law
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.

  7. atlas-resource · ntrs-20110012713

    Radiation Shielding of Lunar Regolith/Polyethylene Composites and Lunar Regolith/Water Mixtures

    Record fingerprint
    d3521360d643a10206ae392c81a00247c72f513d60934a90704948e87e100650
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20110012713
    Title
    Radiation Shielding of Lunar Regolith/Polyethylene Composites and Lunar Regolith/Water Mixtures
    Topic
    structures-shielding
    Year
    2011
    Published At
    2011-01-01T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Johnson, Quincy F.
    2. Gersey, Brad
    3. Wilkins, Richard
    4. Zhou, Jianren
    Publisher
    Johnson Space Center
    Resource Type
    Abstract
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    Space radiation is a complex mixed field of ionizing radiation that can pose hazardous risks to sophisticated electronics and humans. Mission planning for lunar exploration and long duration habitat construction will face tremendous challenges of shielding against various types of space radiation in an attempt to minimize the detrimental effects it may have on materials, electronics, and humans. In late 2009, the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) discovered that water content in lunar regolith found in certain areas on the moon can be up to 5.6 +/-2.8 weight percent (wt%) [A. Colaprete, et. al., Science, Vol. 330, 463 (2010). ]. In this work, shielding studies were performed utilizing ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and aluminum, both being standard space shielding materials, simulated lunar regolith/ polyethylene composites, and simulated lunar regolith mixed with UHMWPE particles and water. Based on the LCROSS findings, radiation shielding experiments were conducted to test for shielding efficiency of regolith/UHMWPE/water mixtures with various percentages of water to compare relative shielding characteristics of these materials. One set of radiation studies were performed using the proton synchrotron at the Loma Linda Medical University where high energy protons similar to those found on the surface of the moon can be generated. A similar experimental protocol was also used at a high energy spalation neutron source at Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE). These experiments studied the shielding efficiency against secondary neutrons, another major component of space radiation field. In both the proton and neutron studies, shielding efficiency was determined by utilizing a tissue equivalent proportional counter (TEPC) behind various thicknesses of shielding composite panels or mixture materials. Preliminary results from these studies indicated that adding 2 wt% water to regolith particles could increase shielding of the regolith materials by about 6%. The findings may be utilized to extend the possibilities of potential candidate materials for lunar habitat structures, will potentially impact the design criteria of future human bases on the moon, and provide some guidelines for future space mission planning with respect to radiation exposure and risks posed on astronauts.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated for experimental testing of lunar-regolith and polyethylene shielding combinations, relevant to local-material use and hydrogen-rich passive protection.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    regolith composite shielding tests
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS metadata and abstract indicate test results, but curation did not reproduce exposures, material composition, transport analysis, or scaling to habitats. It is experimental context, not certified shielding evidence.

  8. atlas-resource · ntrs-20140008674

    Global Climate Change, Food Security and the U.S. Food System

    Record fingerprint
    f22f0ca74b5c4e8ebfd3a672582194fb201295d442d9a7e8b52fd6e03218d23f
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20140008674
    Title
    Global Climate Change, Food Security and the U.S. Food System
    Topic
    ecology-food
    Year
    2013
    Published At
    2013-06-25T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Brown, Molly Elizabeth
    2. Walsh, Margaret
    3. Hauser, Rachel
    4. Murray, Anthony
    5. Jadin, Jenna
    6. Baklund, Peter
    7. Robinson, Paula
    Publisher
    Goddard Space Flight Center
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    Climate change influences on the major pillars of food security. Each of the four elements of food security (availability,access,utilization,andstability) is vulnerable to changes in climate. For example,reductions in production related to regional drought influence food availability at multiple scales. Changes in price influences the ability of certain populations to purchase food (access). Utilization maybe affected when production zones shift, reducing the availability of preferred or culturally appropriate types of food within a region. Stability of the food supply may be highly uncertain given an increased incidence of extreme climatic events and their influence on production patterns.
    Keywords
    1. Climate
    2. Food Security
    3. Global
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because “Global Climate Change, Food Security and the U.S. Food System” covers Climate, Food Security, Global; it materially informs GShips work on earthside food system resilience.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    earthside-food-system-resilience
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides open full text, but this conference paper was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.

  9. atlas-resource · ntrs-20140017101

    Assessing 'Dangerous Climate Change': Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature

    Record fingerprint
    ef97f2fac18c8550ae1d23d851151f4e51cf5022ac277c8d9941e4d495eb8327
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20140017101
    Title
    Assessing 'Dangerous Climate Change': Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature
    Topic
    ethics-alternatives
    Year
    2013
    Published At
    2013-12-03T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Hansen, James
    2. Kharecha, Pushker
    3. Sato, Makiko
    4. Masson-Demotte, Valerie
    5. Ackerman, Frank
    6. Beerling, David J.
    7. Hearty, Paul J.
    8. Hoegh-Guldberg, Ove
    Publisher
    PLOS
    Resource Type
    Reprint (Version printed in journal)
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    We assess climate impacts of global warming using ongoing observations and paleoclimate data. We use Earth's measured energy imbalance, paleoclimate data, and simple representations of the global carbon cycle and temperature to define emission reductions needed to stabilize climate and avoid potentially disastrous impacts on today's young people, future generations, and nature. A cumulative industrial-era limit of approx.500 GtC fossil fuel emissions and 100 GtC storage in the biosphere and soil would keep climate close to the Holocene range to which humanity and other species are adapted. Cumulative emissions of approx.1000 GtC, sometimes associated with 2 C global warming, would spur "slow" feedbacks and eventual warming of 3-4 C with disastrous consequences. Rapid emissions reduction is required to restore Earth's energy balance and avoid ocean heat uptake that would practically guarantee irreversible effects. Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be an act of extraordinary witting intergenerational injustice. Responsible policymaking requires a rising price on carbon emissions that would preclude emissions from most remaining coal and unconventional fossil fuels and phase down emissions from conventional fossil fuels.
    Keywords
    1. climate
    2. fossil fuels
    3. global warming
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 2013 reprint (version printed in journal) from PLOS specifically covers “Assessing 'Dangerous Climate Change': Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature”; its abstract describes We assess climate impacts of global warming using ongoing observations and paleoclimate data. We use Earth's measured energy imbalance, paleoclimate data, and simple… This materially informs GShips ethics and alternatives.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    ethics and alternatives
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.

  10. atlas-resource · ntrs-20150015991

    Growing Food for Space and Earth: NASA's Contributions to Vertical Agriculture

    Record fingerprint
    0bf95b3fca1c4a1607fdbe4162bd38e5df28754a5daf89054c08747204ac7731
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20150015991
    Title
    Growing Food for Space and Earth: NASA's Contributions to Vertical Agriculture
    Topic
    ecology-food
    Year
    2015
    Published At
    2015-08-04T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Wheeler, Raymond M.
    Publisher
    Kennedy Space Center
    Resource Type
    Presentation
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    Beginning in the 1980s with NASA's Controlled Ecological Life Support System (CELSS) Program and later the 1990s and early 2000s with the Advanced Life Support Project, NASA conducted extensive testing with crops in controlled environment conditions. One series of tests conducted at Kennedy Space Center used a large chamber with vertically stacked shelves to support hydroponic growing trays, with a bank of electric lamps above each shelf. This is essentially the same approach that has become popular for use in so-called vertical agriculture systems, which attempts to optimize plant production in a fixed volume. Some of the findings and commonalities of NASA's work during this period and how it overlaps with current interests in vertical agriculture will be presented in the talk.
    Keywords
    1. Controlled Environment Agriculture
    2. Bioregenerative Life Support
    3. Advanced Life Support Project
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because “Growing Food for Space and Earth: NASA's Contributions to Vertical Agriculture” covers Controlled Environment Agriculture, Bioregenerative Life Support, Advanced Life Support Project; it materially informs GShips work on controlled environment agriculture.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    controlled-environment-agriculture
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides open full text, but this presentation was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.

  11. atlas-resource · ntrs-20170008989

    Ionic Liquids Enabling Revolutionary Closed-Loop Life Support

    Record fingerprint
    45bb49fb59ffd0373ae2ca6d798dd22c852a2415e9aa38ce84dfffed8ded37d2
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20170008989
    Title
    Ionic Liquids Enabling Revolutionary Closed-Loop Life Support
    Topic
    life-support
    Year
    2017
    Published At
    2017-07-16T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Brown, Brittany R.
    2. Abney, Morgan B.
    3. Karr, Laurel
    4. Stanley, Christine M.
    5. Paley, Steve
    Publisher
    Marshall Space Flight Center
    Resource Type
    Abstract
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    Minimizing resupply from Earth is essential for future long duration manned missions. The current oxygen recovery system aboard the International Space Station is capable of recovering approximately 50% of the oxygen from metabolic carbon dioxide. For long duration manned missions, a minimum of 75% oxygen recovery is targeted with a goal of greater than 90%. Theoretically, the Bosch process can recover 100% of oxygen, making it a promising technology for oxygen recovery for long duration missions. However, the Bosch process produces elemental carbon which ultimately fouls the catalyst. Once the catalyst performance is compromised, it must be replaced resulting in undesired resupply mass. Based on the performance of a Bosch system designed by NASA in the 1990's, a three year Martian mission would require approximately 1315 kg (2850 lbs) of catalyst resupply. It may be possible to eliminate catalyst resupply with a fully regenerable system using an Ionic Liquid (IL)-based Bosch system. In 2016, we reported the feasibility of using ILs to produce an iron catalyst on a copper substrate and to regenerate the iron catalyst by extracting the iron from the copper substrate and product carbon. Additionally, we described a basic system concept for an IL-based Bosch. Here we report the results of efforts to scale catalyst preparation, to scale catalyst regeneration, and to scale the carbon formation processing rate of a single reactor.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 2017 abstract from Marshall Space Flight Center specifically covers “Ionic Liquids Enabling Revolutionary Closed-Loop Life Support”; its abstract describes Minimizing resupply from Earth is essential for future long duration manned missions. The current oxygen recovery system aboard the International Space Station is capable… This materially informs GShips regenerative life support.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    regenerative life support
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.

  12. atlas-resource · ntrs-20190030471

    NASA GeneLab Space Omics Database: Expanding from Space to Ionizing Radiation Data on the Ground

    Record fingerprint
    6c29e1c6446681708d017cd77035bd4c8e11ea2709431eba9e3ca108a07ca96b
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20190030471
    Title
    NASA GeneLab Space Omics Database: Expanding from Space to Ionizing Radiation Data on the Ground
    Topic
    reproduction-genetics
    Year
    2019
    Published At
    2019-09-03T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Costes, Sylvain V.
    Publisher
    Ames Research Center
    Resource Type
    Presentation
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    NASA GeneLab is an open-access repository for omics datasets generated by biological experiments conducted in space or ground experiments relevant to spaceflight (e.g. simulated cosmic radiation, simulated microgravity, bed rest studies). The GeneLab Data Systems (GLDS) version 4.0 will be available on October 1st 2019, and will provide a state-of-the-art bioinformatics platform for the space biology and radiation communities to upload their data into an omics data commons, to process their data with vetted standard workflows and to compare with existing analyses. Started in 2015 as a repository designed to archive omics data from space experiments, GeneLab has expanded its scope to all ionizing radiation omics experiments conducted on the ground and has put considerable effort in providing carefully characterized radiation metadata on all datasets. GeneLab is also providing processed data derived from the raw data covering a large spectrum of omics (genome, epigenome, transcriptome, epitranscriptome, proteome, metabolome) to help users explore important questions: 1) Which genes or proteins are expressed differently in space for various living organisms? 2) What specific DNA mutations or epigenetic changes happen in space or after exposure to ionizing radiation? and 3) How does genetics affect these responses? Processed data available on GeneLab are derived by standard data analysis workflows vetted by hundreds of scientists who volunteered to join one of the four GeneLab Analysis Working Groups (Animal AWG, Plant AWG, Microbe AWG, Multi-Omics AWG). In this presentation, we will discuss how to bridge the gap between irradiation studies performed on earth and biological experiments conducted in space since the early 1990's. We will discuss how radiation dosimetry was estimated for datasets derived from samples collected during the Space Shuttle era on the International Space Station and on other orbiting platforms. Finally, we will address future strategies regarding dose monitoring in future missions into space, inter-agency efforts to unify data under one umbrella, and knowledge dissemination across the radiation research community and the space biology community.
    Keywords
    1. open-science
    2. database
    3. radiation
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated for extending GeneLab's data model to ground-based radiation studies, improving comparability between spaceflight omics and controlled exposure experiments.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    radiation omics data
    Evidence Boundary
    The NTRS presentation record indicates scope expansion, but this pass did not audit datasets, harmonization, or analytical validity. It is data-infrastructure context, not evidence for radiation effects.

  13. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-c1517-nasa-rrm

    Robotic Refueling Mission 1 and 2

    Record fingerprint
    65db6a562d47f173344e11e45a0de161a695cc231db6096a20127f21ea99f58d
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-c1517-nasa-rrm
    Title
    Robotic Refueling Mission 1 and 2
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2026
    Authors
    1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Publisher
    NASA
    Resource Type
    Operational technology demonstration record (exact value: operational-technology-demonstration-record)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    ISS-hosted demonstrations of remotely controlled inspection, access, valve manipulation, fluid transfer, and servicing tasks on representative interfaces, including interfaces not originally designed for servicing.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  14. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-cu-ilo-r208

    Quality Apprenticeships Recommendation, 2023 (No. 208)

    Record fingerprint
    9259ef6174b709c9d92c79f4df4774747f9424485a4ded739e93d0043f186f35
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-cu-ilo-r208
    Title
    Quality Apprenticeships Recommendation, 2023 (No. 208)
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2023
    Authors
    1. International Labour Organization
    Publisher
    International Labour Organization
    Resource Type
    International labour recommendation (exact value: international-labour-recommendation)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Recommendation text on structured learning, agreements, inclusion, worker participation, safety, compensation, mentoring, assessment, qualifications, and apprentices' rights.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  15. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-hc-nasa-nscr-background-2025

    Updated Background Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Rates for the NASA Cancer Risk Model: 2018, 2019, 2021 Combined Data

    Record fingerprint
    7b225367219e556f399dd4a2532ca5c9674e7128f4a709bf276e23a0dce16713
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-hc-nasa-nscr-background-2025
    Title
    Updated Background Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Rates for the NASA Cancer Risk Model: 2018, 2019, 2021 Combined Data
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2025
    Authors
    1. Shirin Rahmanian
    2. Tony C. Slaba
    3. Charles Werneth
    Publisher
    NASA Technical Reports Server
    Resource Type
    Nasa technical publication (exact value: nasa-technical-publication)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Updates U.S. male and female average and never-smoker background incidence, mortality, and survival inputs and compares nominal 365-day astronaut cancer-risk calculations at ages 35 and 55. It illustrates model maintenance and population assumptions rather than a public, developmental, hereditary, or century-scale safety certificate.
    Verified At
    2026-07-26
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  16. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-im-nasa-std-6016

    Standard Materials and Processes Requirements for Spacecraft

    Record fingerprint
    f215ceae15de3fc3126cb3fc59915167a9f43e64bc0466c17d0b4961a755d412
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-im-nasa-std-6016
    Title
    Standard Materials and Processes Requirements for Spacecraft
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2023
    Authors
    1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Publisher
    NASA
    Resource Type
    Active spacecraft materials processes standard (exact value: active-spacecraft-materials-processes-standard)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Materials and processes selection, control, verification, contamination prevention, documentation, and lifecycle application for spacecraft hardware.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  17. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-pn-jpl-dsoc

    Deep Space Optical Communications

    Record fingerprint
    861429afa677052b6eb3ada24ecbb0fb70272834e15df9389e9b87845a80245a
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-pn-jpl-dsoc
    Title
    Deep Space Optical Communications
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2025
    Authors
    1. Jet Propulsion Laboratory
    Publisher
    NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
    Resource Type
    Technology demonstration record (exact value: technology-demonstration-record)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    DSOC flight and ground terminals, achieved rates and distances, cumulative delivered data, pointing architecture, and completed demonstration boundary.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.
Equivalent record table for this packet
RecordSubjectFingerprintApprovalsScope groups
atlas-resource:core-09-3 ESA Concordia a358464db9de543f73da1e48b8d1ad300493ed54144afe11ec40b592593054d5 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:core-10-3 UN Declaration on Future Generations 0b8078165243b5816f3628677071a2a6a0a5579cde0b5d390d77e3dbaa04ac69 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:core-13-3 IETF Bundle Protocol Security a8b63377e9c5ff167c2d1e50568e14043ae0d863fdda23b0fd3740c2ab93838b 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-19680032519 Synthetic fats as part of a closed-loop life support system. eb264a49258053cd32e9e33a4ff0ac28696f734b1ab16a27f2db95e41bee35ce 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-19880020977 Verification and validation of rulebased systems for Hubble Space Telescope ground support c66906e99acc4782a335032e91c9a1897b89d0a38904fb121d57cfb70a622805 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20070013706 Space Exploration: Challenges in Medicine, Research, and Ethics f142f0ff264cb8b63e4e1be80a6248cec0cb1735faf02d60f7275370a2b242f0 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20110012713 Radiation Shielding of Lunar Regolith/Polyethylene Composites and Lunar Regolith/Water Mixtures d3521360d643a10206ae392c81a00247c72f513d60934a90704948e87e100650 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20140008674 Global Climate Change, Food Security and the U.S. Food System f22f0ca74b5c4e8ebfd3a672582194fb201295d442d9a7e8b52fd6e03218d23f 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20140017101 Assessing 'Dangerous Climate Change': Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature ef97f2fac18c8550ae1d23d851151f4e51cf5022ac277c8d9941e4d495eb8327 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20150015991 Growing Food for Space and Earth: NASA's Contributions to Vertical Agriculture 0bf95b3fca1c4a1607fdbe4162bd38e5df28754a5daf89054c08747204ac7731 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20170008989 Ionic Liquids Enabling Revolutionary Closed-Loop Life Support 45bb49fb59ffd0373ae2ca6d798dd22c852a2415e9aa38ce84dfffed8ded37d2 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20190030471 NASA GeneLab Space Omics Database: Expanding from Space to Ionizing Radiation Data on the Ground 6c29e1c6446681708d017cd77035bd4c8e11ea2709431eba9e3ca108a07ca96b 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-c1517-nasa-rrm Robotic Refueling Mission 1 and 2 65db6a562d47f173344e11e45a0de161a695cc231db6096a20127f21ea99f58d 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-cu-ilo-r208 Quality Apprenticeships Recommendation, 2023 (No. 208) 9259ef6174b709c9d92c79f4df4774747f9424485a4ded739e93d0043f186f35 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-hc-nasa-nscr-background-2025 Updated Background Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Rates for the NASA Cancer Risk Model: 2018, 2019, 2021 Combined Data 7b225367219e556f399dd4a2532ca5c9674e7128f4a709bf276e23a0dce16713 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-im-nasa-std-6016 Standard Materials and Processes Requirements for Spacecraft f215ceae15de3fc3126cb3fc59915167a9f43e64bc0466c17d0b4961a755d412 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-pn-jpl-dsoc Deep Space Optical Communications 861429afa677052b6eb3ada24ecbb0fb70272834e15df9389e9b87845a80245a 1 bounded-competence: information-science

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Sources, verification dates, scope notes, and exact fingerprints
Source IDSourceCheckedScope boundaryFingerprint
official-atlas-resource-core-09-3 ESA Concordia 2026-07-25 Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim. 72380c78b9deec5c94773314fbe586507ced4d1ac60084f720e4954b078bfe08
official-atlas-resource-core-10-3 UN Declaration on Future Generations 2026-07-25 Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim. ad1246ff3e23ace3f640e8343da4f3fe5325557edcb2f0f0b39fc73ee79ce6d2
official-atlas-resource-core-13-3 IETF Bundle Protocol Security 2026-07-25 Inspected as a core capability-area source. Inclusion supplies context; it is not automatically evidence for a provisional claim. 9e59d277113540645c884269675f9e688f03efe8e954d5df4e6b07f67fd84169
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-19680032519 Synthetic fats as part of a closed-loop life support system. 2026-07-25 Only NTRS metadata and abstract are open here; full-text methods and results were unavailable for this pass. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. 0046f7d5a9de79de9d59fe20222e351221166f004090adf20f32dbb30dae9499
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-19880020977 Verification and validation of rulebased systems for Hubble Space Telescope ground support 2026-07-25 NTRS provides open full text, but this conference paper was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. 50efca86ba1372b9d764fe8fee3deb2a0a53b62b01853838882bcc668dcb7c59
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20070013706 Space Exploration: Challenges in Medicine, Research, and Ethics 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. bd937caf54b62957caeb87555ca3970d765ce648dd97e45dc10e8d7512af593d
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20110012713 Radiation Shielding of Lunar Regolith/Polyethylene Composites and Lunar Regolith/Water Mixtures 2026-07-25 NTRS metadata and abstract indicate test results, but curation did not reproduce exposures, material composition, transport analysis, or scaling to habitats. It is experimental context, not certified shielding evidence. 82ab1378bff8fbe9aadb91bdccb5a756a32a6ba2f30851b77366c3b7cabb99e9
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20140008674 Global Climate Change, Food Security and the U.S. Food System 2026-07-25 NTRS provides open full text, but this conference paper was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. 590127ed03ad60fcaae2e11a0cd315e2e892316cbb2e22be539060c8321e1853
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20140017101 Assessing 'Dangerous Climate Change': Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. 60afd6b96bd48eae8a632f25a391c0a709fe37bdfc5e9e93f832dbcb6a5c962e
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20150015991 Growing Food for Space and Earth: NASA's Contributions to Vertical Agriculture 2026-07-25 NTRS provides open full text, but this presentation was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. b708e69f0057b85c59db431cf81ffb3ed93303e1e9f2b0dee4a413d238a2821f
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20170008989 Ionic Liquids Enabling Revolutionary Closed-Loop Life Support 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. ca517441a3f97d7574c8aadf7e5ace3c526ea0c3f8853ae69b395ca2d67b3d12
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20190030471 NASA GeneLab Space Omics Database: Expanding from Space to Ionizing Radiation Data on the Ground 2026-07-25 The NTRS presentation record indicates scope expansion, but this pass did not audit datasets, harmonization, or analytical validity. It is data-infrastructure context, not evidence for radiation effects. 69c24b3549febb91820e4be4576aabc5a52937bc4b66c3ff009508cffb632a49
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-c1517-nasa-rrm Robotic Refueling Mission 1 and 2 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. abdc5c4f37ea9ba54929e3fc7d35aaa7f8aa9272cd803f584e0645a031526a9d
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-cu-ilo-r208 Quality Apprenticeships Recommendation, 2023 (No. 208) 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. fd02520dd0604588d132a0bebbf5d495ad1667a8d1deb0b3a7e9430d639561e9
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-hc-nasa-nscr-background-2025 Updated Background Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Rates for the NASA Cancer Risk Model: 2018, 2019, 2021 Combined Data 2026-07-26 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 945c5619e3d6c23bd563906e95f67f549f8b6520ca0f1b332cd588fe4dbb7936
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-im-nasa-std-6016 Standard Materials and Processes Requirements for Spacecraft 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 80e3822a24c70acc13e81f883c156d61a039b87945b4777af40427ce2eaa74f6
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-pn-jpl-dsoc Deep Space Optical Communications 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 413cb6ffc6da9c1d5f408e7319394d88de4863b33ce81488a4b9c1a9c77551c1

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Frozen packet · JSON

65.5 KB · packet identity d6e10ade16af13b6…

Download packet

Blank decision worksheet · JSON

12.9 KB · template identity 9137d4d9c7705c38…

Download blank JSON

Review-notes worksheet · Markdown

Readable notes companion only—not a decision-bundle equivalent. Use the closed JSON template for structural validation.

Download notes worksheet

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

  1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
  2. Finalize a separate output file.
    node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
  --input DRAFT.json \
  --output COMPLETED.json

    This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

  3. Validate the packet and completed copy.
    node check-review-decisions.mjs \
  --packet PACKET.json \
  --decision COMPLETED.json

    Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

  4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

Completion criteria

Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.

Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes.

  • Reviewer identity, qualification, independence, conflicts, and compensation must be assessed by accountable human governance; local validation can only report structural validity.
  • Approve, revise, contest, reject, and recuse remain visible. A negative finding cannot be hidden by an aggregate approval percentage.
  • Revision creates a new record and packet fingerprint. Prior approvals do not carry forward automatically.
  • AI may assist with clerical comparison but cannot count as an independent reviewer, identity attestor, appeal authority, or second person.

Prepared review packet · 0 published human decisions · Independent review pending · Suggest a correction

Accountability record

How to inspect this page

Scope: Prepared review packet resources:bucket-0d · d6e10ade16af13b64f548cfeae4b6ad8fb4e5526f58ddba0b79c6847232d5e9e

Page citations and accountability links

  • Exact frozen packet
    Complete packet payload; SHA-256 d6e10ade16af13b64f548cfeae4b6ad8fb4e5526f58ddba0b79c6847232d5e9e · fingerprint-bound review artifact
  • Blank closed decision template
    Offline structured-decision starting point · unsubmitted local artifact
  • Review-notes worksheet
    Human-readable notes companion; not validator input · offline notes aid
  • Review corpus index
    Corpus SHA-256 8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d · release and ownership index

Assumptions and limits

  • The exact packet, record, source, policy, release, and source-commit fingerprints bound this prepared page; human review has not started.
  • Downloading, local structural validation, or completing notes does not appoint or qualify a reviewer, establish independence, accept a decision, authorize publication, or create a relationship.

What would change this page?

Staffed governance, appointed qualified reviewers, completed record-level decisions, published conflicts, minority findings, corrections, or changed review policy would change this page.

People, review, and conflicts

Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
public-alpha accountability pass
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project AI-assisted editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
2026-07-26
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
2026-07-25

Declared conflicts

  • The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.

Suggest a correction to this page