GSHIPSEarth-first systems for humanity’s longest journey
Menu

Review Commons · Atlas resource packets

Atlas stable hash bucket 04

Frozen resources review packet with exact record and source fingerprints; human review has not started.

Packet identity

Packet ID
resources:bucket-04
Packet SHA-256 identity
a96586817cfc0a237ccd230044152628d77c85d5aa2b6408128661835a54f266
Corpus SHA-256 identity
8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d
Release ID
public-alpha-2026-07-26-research-visuals-r14
Source commit
3eb036fce3d711336c8c605625895e8a2e799ab0
Frozen corpus date
2026-07-25
Primary records
24
Reference sources
24

Questions and exclusions

Required questions

  1. Required question 1 (exact ID: question-1)
    Is each canonical record correctly identified, deduplicated, classified, dated, and scoped?
  2. Required question 2 (exact ID: question-2)
    Does the selection note explain relevance without automatically treating the resource as claim support?
  3. Required question 3 (exact ID: question-3)
    Are access, source class, version, retraction, rights, and transfer limits represented accurately?

Explicit exclusions

  • Atlas inclusion is not endorsement and does not make a source evidence for a claim.
  • Metadata review does not certify the full text, methods, data, or conclusions.

Requested controlled scopes: information-science, systems-engineering

Frozen-evidence decision window: 365 days from the packet freeze. Not applicable to this packet family.

Complete primary record set

Every record below has one primary packet owner. Decisions must bind to the exact record and packet fingerprints; a changed lesson body, evidence grade, citation, locator, source snapshot, requirement, policy, release, or commit expires the old packet.

  1. atlas-resource · ntrs-19910025494

    The Physical/Chemical Closed-Loop Life Support Research Project

    Record fingerprint
    473f43ade333fadf23aa3db59925a38f61631b7dfdf3594c6f9801c90f5bc572
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-19910025494
    Title
    The Physical/Chemical Closed-Loop Life Support Research Project
    Topic
    life-support
    Year
    1990
    Published At
    1990-09-01T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Bilardo, Vincent J., Jr.
    Publisher
    Legacy CDMS
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open metadata
    Abstract
    The various elements of the Physical/Chemical Closed-Loop Life Support Research Project (P/C CLLS) are described including both those currently funded and those planned for implementation at ARC and other participating NASA field centers. The plan addresses the entire range of regenerative life support for Space Exploration Initiative mission needs, and focuses initially on achieving technology readiness for the Initial Lunar Outpost by 1995-97. Project elements include water reclamation, air revitalization, solid waste management, thermal and systems control, and systems integration. Current analysis estimates that each occupant of a space habitat will require a total of 32 kg/day of supplies to live and operate comfortably, while an ideal P/C CLLS system capable of 100 percent reclamation of air and water, but excluding recycling of solid wastes or foods, will reduce this requirement to 3.4 kg/day.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 1990 conference paper from Legacy CDMS specifically covers “The Physical/Chemical Closed-Loop Life Support Research Project”; its abstract describes The various elements of the Physical/Chemical Closed-Loop Life Support Research Project (P/C CLLS) are described including both those currently funded and those planned for… This materially informs GShips regenerative life support.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    regenerative life support
    Evidence Boundary
    Only NTRS metadata and abstract are open here; full-text methods and results were unavailable for this pass. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.

  2. atlas-resource · ntrs-20040013505

    Closed-Loop Life Support Systems

    Record fingerprint
    842d2d00c4830bae0878d83a7cee63fa66d5a885a8621f75a78f15e42acc48d4
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20040013505
    Title
    Closed-Loop Life Support Systems
    Topic
    life-support
    Year
    2003
    Published At
    2003-01-01T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Fisher, John W.
    Publisher
    Ames Research Center
    Resource Type
    Preprint (Draft being sent to journal)
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    Contents include the following: 1. Advanced life support requirements document-high level: (a) high level requirements and standards, (b) advanced life support requirements documents-air, food, water. 2. Example technologies that satisfy requrements: air system-carbon dioxide removal. 3. Air-sabatter. 4. International Space Station water treatment subsystem.5. Direct osmotic concentrator. 6. Mass, volume and power estimates.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 2003 preprint (draft being sent to journal) from Ames Research Center specifically covers “Closed-Loop Life Support Systems”; its abstract describes Contents include the following: 1. Advanced life support requirements document-high level: (a) high level requirements and standards, (b) advanced life support requirements… This materially informs GShips regenerative life support.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    regenerative life support
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.

  3. atlas-resource · ntrs-20060032807

    Hard-real-time resource management for autonomous spacecraft

    Record fingerprint
    22013453aa35c4f16824af7c87912e5f5040681a41ca066ae72233e7760f436b
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20060032807
    Title
    Hard-real-time resource management for autonomous spacecraft
    Topic
    ai-autonomy
    Year
    2000
    Published At
    2000-03-18T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Gat, E.
    Publisher
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory
    Resource Type
    Conference Proceedings
    Access
    open metadata
    Abstract
    This paper describes tickets, a computational mechanism for hard-real-time autonomous resource management. Autonomous spacecraftcontrol can be considered abstractly as a computational process whose outputs are spacecraft commands.
    Keywords
    1. Computational mechism autonomous spacecraft
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because “Hard-real-time resource management for autonomous spacecraft” covers Computational mechism autonomous spacecraft; it materially informs GShips work on real time resource management.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    real-time-resource-management
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides metadata and an abstract, not reviewed full text; methods, results, and current applicability remain unverified. Inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.

  4. atlas-resource · ntrs-20060033036

    Control Architecture for the Deep Space Mission System (DSMS)

    Record fingerprint
    4a14aa266c039d6e9bc521893e593a6d6886d70fd58cc65aa89187fc686757f1
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20060033036
    Title
    Control Architecture for the Deep Space Mission System (DSMS)
    Topic
    mission-architecture
    Year
    2000
    Published At
    2000-06-19T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Tai, W.
    2. Shames, P.
    3. Schell, R.
    Publisher
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open metadata
    Abstract
    As NASA moves int an era of flying more missions at much lower cost and shorter development duration, the Deep Space Mission System (DSMS) has been redesigned to provide services to approximately 50 missions during the next 10 years.
    Keywords
    1. architecture Deep Space Mission
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated as historical control-architecture context for redesigning a Deep Space Mission System to serve roughly fifty lower-cost, shorter-development missions.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    mission operations
    Evidence Boundary
    Only NTRS metadata and an abstract are available here; architecture details, operational outcomes, and present applicability were not validated. It is historical scale-up context, not claim evidence.

  5. atlas-resource · ntrs-20090035371

    Analytic Shielding Optimization to Reduce Crew Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Inside Space Vehicles

    Record fingerprint
    6f5fced68f87b1b0cd71f5ce0f66cd4146c2e44cb76067de0b7d91461ddcae21
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20090035371
    Title
    Analytic Shielding Optimization to Reduce Crew Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Inside Space Vehicles
    Topic
    structures-shielding
    Year
    2009
    Published At
    2009-01-01T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Gaza, Razvan
    2. Cooper, Tim P.
    3. Hanzo, Arthur
    4. Hussein, Hesham
    5. Jarvis, Kandy S.
    6. Kimble, Ryan
    7. Lee, Kerry T.
    8. Patel, Chirag
    Publisher
    Johnson Space Center
    Resource Type
    Extended Abstract
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    A sustainable lunar architecture provides capabilities for leveraging out-of-service components for alternate uses. Discarded architecture elements may be used to provide ionizing radiation shielding to the crew habitat in case of a Solar Particle Event. The specific location relative to the vehicle where the additional shielding mass is placed, as corroborated with particularities of the vehicle design, has a large influence on protection gain. This effect is caused by the exponential- like decrease of radiation exposure with shielding mass thickness, which in turn determines that the most benefit from a given amount of shielding mass is obtained by placing it so that it preferentially augments protection in under-shielded areas of the vehicle exposed to the radiation environment. A novel analytic technique to derive an optimal shielding configuration was developed by Lockheed Martin during Design Analysis Cycle 3 (DAC-3) of the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV). [1] Based on a detailed Computer Aided Design (CAD) model of the vehicle including a specific crew positioning scenario, a set of under-shielded vehicle regions can be identified as candidates for placement of additional shielding. Analytic tools are available to allow capturing an idealized supplemental shielding distribution in the CAD environment, which in turn is used as a reference for deriving a realistic shielding configuration from available vehicle components. While the analysis referenced in this communication applies particularly to the Orion vehicle, the general method can be applied to a large range of space exploration vehicles, including but not limited to lunar and Mars architecture components. In addition, the method can be immediately applied for optimization of radiation shielding provided to sensitive electronic components.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated for analytical optimization of radiation shielding under mass and geometry constraints, a reusable method for whole-system habitat trades.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    shielding optimization methods
    Evidence Boundary
    The NTRS record describes an optimization method, but assumptions, radiation models, objective functions, and solutions were not independently reproduced. It is method context, not evidence that any resulting shield is adequate.

  6. atlas-resource · ntrs-20110011226

    Space Weather Models and Their Validation and Verification at the CCMC

    Record fingerprint
    932787adad15e288426ea4082810802eda594871bacea2d109e2999fcfcc630b
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20110011226
    Title
    Space Weather Models and Their Validation and Verification at the CCMC
    Topic
    analogs-verification
    Year
    2010
    Published At
    2010-07-18T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Hesse, Michael
    Publisher
    Goddard Space Flight Center
    Resource Type
    Abstract
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    The Community Coordinated l\lodeling Center (CCMC) is a US multi-agency activity with a dual mission. With equal emphasis, CCMC strives to provide science support to the international space research community through the execution of advanced space plasma simulations, and it endeavors to support the space weather needs of the CS and partners. Space weather support involves a broad spectrum, from designing robust forecasting systems and transitioning them to forecasters, to providing space weather updates and forecasts to NASA's robotic mission operators. All of these activities have to rely on validation and verification of models and their products, so users and forecasters have the means to assign confidence levels to the space weather information. In this presentation, we provide an overview of space weather models resident at CCMC, as well as of validation and verification activities undertaken at CCMC or through the use of CCMC services.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because it documents validation and verification practices for operational space-weather models, relevant to model credibility and radiation-environment decisions.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    verification-and-validation
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides open full text, but this abstract was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.

  7. atlas-resource · ntrs-20110023074

    Autonomous, In-Flight Crew Health Risk Management for Exploration-Class Missions: Leveraging the Integrated Medical Model for the Exploration Medical System Demonstration Project

    Record fingerprint
    fa6816ba7116e70e0d5152ced4d20a3e3c6f6c7ccf9451d7ac7f226dd5572459
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20110023074
    Title
    Autonomous, In-Flight Crew Health Risk Management for Exploration-Class Missions: Leveraging the Integrated Medical Model for the Exploration Medical System Demonstration Project
    Topic
    health-medicine
    Year
    2011
    Published At
    2011-01-01T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Butler, D. J.
    2. Kerstman, E.
    3. Saile, L.
    4. Myers, J.
    5. Walton, M.
    6. Lopez, V.
    7. McGrath, T.
    Publisher
    Johnson Space Center
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    The Integrated Medical Model (IMM) captures organizational knowledge across the space medicine, training, operations, engineering, and research domains. IMM uses this knowledge in the context of a mission and crew profile to forecast risks to crew health and mission success. The IMM establishes a quantified, statistical relationship among medical conditions, risk factors, available medical resources, and crew health and mission outcomes. These relationships may provide an appropriate foundation for developing an in-flight medical decision support tool that helps optimize the use of medical resources and assists in overall crew health management by an autonomous crew with extremely limited interactions with ground support personnel and no chance of resupply.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 2011 conference paper from Johnson Space Center specifically covers “Autonomous, In-Flight Crew Health Risk Management for Exploration-Class Missions: Leveraging the Integrated Medical Model for the Exploration Medical System Demonstration Project”; its abstract describes The Integrated Medical Model (IMM) captures organizational knowledge across the space medicine, training, operations, engineering, and research domains. IMM uses this… This materially informs GShips health and autonomous medicine.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    health and autonomous medicine
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.

  8. atlas-resource · ntrs-20140010449

    America's Next Great Ship: Space Launch System Core Stage Transitioning from Design to Manufacturing

    Record fingerprint
    10116a7250e8c304aff0395985dec41802bdd9b2ec40356ead2d250c93f51db9
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20140010449
    Title
    America's Next Great Ship: Space Launch System Core Stage Transitioning from Design to Manufacturing
    Topic
    mission-architecture
    Year
    2014
    Published At
    2014-05-19T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Birkenstock, Benjamin
    2. Kauer, Roy
    Publisher
    Marshall Space Flight Center
    Resource Type
    Abstract
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    The Space Launch System (SLS) Program is essential to achieving the Nation's and NASA's goal of human exploration and scientific investigation of the solar system. As a multi-element program with emphasis on safety, affordability, and sustainability, SLS is becoming America's next great ship of exploration. The SLS Core Stage includes avionics, main propulsion system, pressure vessels, thrust vector control, and structures. Boeing manufactures and assembles the SLS core stage at the Michoud Assembly Facility (MAF) in New Orleans, LA, a historical production center for Saturn V and Space Shuttle programs. As the transition from design to manufacturing progresses, the importance of a well-executed manufacturing, assembly, and operation (MA&O) plan is crucial to meeting performance objectives. Boeing employs classic techniques such as critical path analysis and facility requirements definition as well as innovative approaches such as Constraint Based Scheduling (CBS) and Cirtical Chain Project Management (CCPM) theory to provide a comprehensive suite of project management tools to manage the health of the baseline plan on both a macro (overall project) and micro level (factory areas). These tools coordinate data from multiple business systems and provide a robust network to support Material & Capacity Requirements Planning (MRP/CRP) and priorities. Coupled with these tools and a highly skilled workforce, Boeing is orchestrating the parallel buildup of five major sub assemblies throughout the factory. Boeing and NASA are transforming MAF to host state of the art processes, equipment and tooling, the most prominent of which is the Vertical Assembly Center (VAC), the largest weld tool in the world. In concert, a global supply chain is delivering a range of structural elements and component parts necessary to enable an on-time delivery of the integrated Core Stage. SLS is on plan to launch humanity into the next phase of space exploration.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated for its transition from design to manufacturing of the multi-element SLS core stage, including avionics, propulsion, pressure vessels, structures, production facilities, safety, and affordability framing.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    industrial manufacturing
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but curation used the abstract and metadata rather than auditing manufacturing outcomes or program claims. Launch-stage experience is precursor context, not proof of worldship-scale production.

  9. atlas-resource · ntrs-20150023606

    Swamp Works: A New Approach to Develop Space Mining and Resource Extraction Technologies at the National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) Kennedy Space Center (KSC)

    Record fingerprint
    d169d74cfd3cac13f6b15222fa271eac8c9e1dea37d186d22fdb3a01db076d81
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20150023606
    Title
    Swamp Works: A New Approach to Develop Space Mining and Resource Extraction Technologies at the National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) Kennedy Space Center (KSC)
    Topic
    manufacturing-isru
    Year
    2015
    Published At
    2015-11-04T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Mueller, R. P.
    2. Sibille, L.
    3. Leucht, K.
    4. Smith, J. D.
    5. Townsend, I. I.
    6. Nick, A. J.
    7. Schuler, J. M.
    Publisher
    Kennedy Space Center
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    The first steps for In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) on target bodies such as the Moon, Mars and Near Earth Asteroids (NEA), and even comets, involve the same sequence of steps as in the terrestrial mining of resources. First exploration including prospecting must occur, and then the resource must be acquired through excavation methods if it is of value. Subsequently a load, haul and dump sequence of events occurs, followed by processing of the resource in an ISRU plant, to produce useful commodities. While these technologies and related supporting operations are mature in terrestrial applications, they will be different in space since the environment and indigenous materials are different than on Earth. In addition, the equipment must be highly automated, since for the majority of the production cycle time, there will be no humans present to assist or intervene. This space mining equipment must withstand a harsh environment which includes vacuum, radical temperature swing cycles, highly abrasive lofted dust, electrostatic effects, van der Waals forces effects, galactic cosmic radiation, solar particle events, high thermal gradients when spanning sunlight terminators, steep slopes into craters / lava tubes and cryogenic temperatures as low as 40 K in permanently shadowed regions. In addition the equipment must be tele-operated from Earth or a local base where the crew is sheltered. If the tele-operation occurs from Earth then significant communications latency effects mandate the use of autonomous control systems in the mining equipment. While this is an extremely challenging engineering design scenario, it is also an opportunity, since the technologies developed in this endeavor could be used in the next generations of terrestrial mining equipment, in order to mine deeper, safer, more economical and with a higher degree of flexibility. New space technologies could precipitate new mining solutions here on Earth. The NASA KSC Swamp Works is an innovation environment and methodology, with associated laboratories that uses lean development methods and creativity-enhancing processes to invent and develop new solutions for space exploration. This paper will discuss the Swamp Works approach to developing space mining and resource extraction systems and the vision of space development it serves. The ultimate goal of the Swamp Works is to expand human civilization into the solar system via the use of local resources utilization. By mining and using the local resources in situ, it is conceivable that one day the logistics supply train from Earth can be eliminated and Earth independence of a space-based community will be enabled.
    Keywords
    1. Resource Extraction
    2. Technologies
    3. Space Mining
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because the Swamp Works paper connects prospecting, excavation, haulage, processing, and technology-development practice for lunar, Martian, asteroid, and comet resources.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    manufacturing and ISRU
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but curation relied on record metadata and abstract; terrestrial mining maturity does not validate extraterrestrial integration, economics, or safety. This is context, not claim evidence or independent review.

  10. atlas-resource · ntrs-20170009480

    Earth to Orbit Beamed Energy Experiment

    Record fingerprint
    bb9e51019fc6632ef1466799faeb1343db902599ae3fe8f13c922bafa070fd1e
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20170009480
    Title
    Earth to Orbit Beamed Energy Experiment
    Topic
    propulsion
    Year
    2017
    Published At
    2017-09-25T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Johnson, Les
    2. Montgomery, Edward E.
    Publisher
    Marshall Space Flight Center
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    As a means of primary propulsion, beamed energy propulsion offers the benefit of offloading much of the propulsion system mass from the vehicle, increasing its potential performance and freeing it from the constraints of the rocket equation. For interstellar missions, beamed energy propulsion is arguably the most viable in the near- to mid-term. A near-term demonstration showing the feasibility of beamed energy propulsion is necessary and, fortunately, feasible using existing technologies. Key enabling technologies are large area, low mass spacecraft and efficient and safe high power laser systems capable of long distance propagation. NASA is currently developing the spacecraft technology through the Near Earth Asteroid Scout solar sail mission and has signed agreements with the Planetary Society to study the feasibility of precursor laser propulsion experiments using their LightSail-2 solar sail spacecraft. The capabilities of Space Situational Awareness assets and the advanced analytical tools available for fine resolution orbit determination now make it possible to investigate the practicalities of an Earth-to-orbit Beamed Energy eXperiment (EBEX) - a demonstration at delivered power levels that only illuminate a spacecraft without causing damage to it. The degree to which this can be expected to produce a measurable change in the orbit of a low ballistic coefficient spacecraft is investigated. Key system characteristics and estimated performance are derived for a near term mission opportunity involving the LightSail-2 spacecraft and laser power levels modest in comparison to those proposed previously. While the technology demonstrated by such an experiment is not sufficient to enable an interstellar precursor mission, if approved, then it would be the next step toward that goal.
    Keywords
    1. CubeSat
    2. Beamed Energ
    3. Space Exploration
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated for a near-term Earth-to-orbit experiment intended to test low-mass vehicles, high-power lasers, beam safety, and beamed-energy propulsion integration.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    beamed-energy propulsion
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but a proposed experiment does not validate safe atmospheric beam propagation or interstellar propulsion. It is precursor context only, not automatic claim evidence.

  11. atlas-resource · ntrs-20190025283

    In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Living off the Land on the Moon and Mars

    Record fingerprint
    56e2ff305fced5067aea0934d83fa918ab6c22e4dd75edf93f0a5515c48dbe2b
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20190025283
    Title
    In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Living off the Land on the Moon and Mars
    Topic
    manufacturing-isru
    Year
    2019
    Published At
    2019-03-21T00:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Green, Robert D.
    2. Kleinhenz, Julie E.
    Publisher
    Glenn Research Center
    Resource Type
    Presentation
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) is the concept of using local resources at various destinations to provide products and services for robotic and human explorers. This idea of 'living off the land' has the potential of reducing reliance on earth to supply mission consumables such as propellants and life support consumables. Local resources include: water, oxygen, and metals within the surface soil material (regolith), atmospheric gases (eg CO2 on Mars), and the regolith material itself. ISRU systems involve physically and chemically extracting these resources and converting them into desired products.
    Keywords
    1. In-situ resource utilization
    2. Mars
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this 2019 presentation from Glenn Research Center specifically covers “In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Living off the Land on the Moon and Mars”; its abstract describes In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) is the concept of using local resources at various destinations to provide products and services for robotic and human explorers. This… This materially informs GShips manufacturing and ISRU.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    manufacturing and ISRU
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim.

  12. atlas-resource · ntrs-20240015462

    Artificial Intelligence Workshop Report

    Record fingerprint
    e196cf5a9c57a239db169cfe309cac8715a64258d9b95ab001e43ce910ec9e2b
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20240015462
    Title
    Artificial Intelligence Workshop Report
    Topic
    ai-autonomy
    Year
    2024
    Published At
    2024-03-01T05:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Manil Maskey
    Publisher
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Resource Type
    Other - Workshop Report
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    The 4th NASA Science Mission Directorate (SMD) Artificial Intelligence (AI) Workshop, held during March 25-27, 2024, in Huntsville, AL, highlighted the significant potential of AI and machine learning (ML) in scientific research and processes. The workshop, supported by the NASA Office of Chief Science Data Officer (OCSDO), emphasized the critical role of foundation models (FMs) and large language models (LLMs) in advancing scientific disciplines. The event brought together domain scientists, computer scientists, AI experts, program managers, program scientists, and industry partners to address key challenges and explore opportunities in applying these advanced technologies.
    Keywords
    None recorded
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because this NASA SMD workshop report maps AI/ML opportunities, barriers, responsible-use concerns, and research coordination relevant to an evidence-bounded offline AI program.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    ai-program-landscape
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides open full text, but this other - workshop report was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.

  13. atlas-resource · ntrs-20260000331

    Apollo 11 Lunar Module Touchdown Dynamics Reconstruction Verification and Validation for Human Landing Systems

    Record fingerprint
    00245540e260e9e958e6bac0cfc45bc3287208d378ec0efb86ab0ad2e415e5b7
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    ntrs-20260000331
    Title
    Apollo 11 Lunar Module Touchdown Dynamics Reconstruction Verification and Validation for Human Landing Systems
    Topic
    analogs-verification
    Year
    2026
    Published At
    2026-01-30T06:00:00.0000000+00:00
    Authors
    1. Rekesh M Ali
    2. Adam C Slagle
    3. Alessandro Mordasiewicz
    4. Juan Orphee
    5. Peter J McDonough
    Publisher
    Marshall Space Flight Center
    Resource Type
    Conference Paper
    Access
    open full text
    Abstract
    This paper presents an updated high-fidelity lunar landing dynamics simulation test bed developed at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in support of the Human Landing System (HLS) program, with verification support from NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). The MSFC GeneraLized Aerospace Simulation in Simulink® (GLASS) program uses MATLAB®/Simulink® and Simscape™ Multibody™ to model detailed contact dynamics of lunar regolith, shock absorbers, footpads, and multibody linkages, laying the groundwork for integrated analyses incorporating in-the-loop guidance, navigation, and control systems. For validation, the simulation focuses on pure landing dynamics and is benchmarked against Apollo 11 flight data and independent modern reconstructions.

The GLASS simulation demonstrates excellent agreement with historical Apollo data, validating the approach against real-world landing dynamics. Further, strong correlation between the MSFC and LaRC simulation results across different platforms provides verification of the modeling methodology. This collaborative effort establishes confidence in the simulation framework and provides a solid foundation for comprehensive HLS system analysis. The paper details the modeling methodology, validation against Apollo data, and verification through comparison with Zupp’s reconstruction and LaRC’s MSC Automated Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems (Adams) reconstruction results.
    Keywords
    1. Shock Absorbers
    2. Dampers
    3. Struts
    4. Linkages
    5. Multibody
    6. Contact
    7. Regolith
    8. Touchdown
    9. Lunar Landing
    10. Artemis
    11. Apollo
    12. Apollo 11
    13. Human Landing Systems
    14. HLS
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Curated because “Apollo 11 Lunar Module Touchdown Dynamics Reconstruction Verification and Validation for Human Landing Systems” covers Shock Absorbers, Dampers, Struts, Linkages; it materially informs GShips work on verification and validation.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Curation Topic
    verification-and-validation
    Evidence Boundary
    NTRS provides open full text, but this conference paper was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence.

  14. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-ak-nist-digital-twin-8356

    Security and Trust Considerations for Digital Twin Technology

    Record fingerprint
    dc83084c18ee9703fdec51f359c5636f7c2ba664d7aa52465ebae514ad0d97ad
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-ak-nist-digital-twin-8356
    Title
    Security and Trust Considerations for Digital Twin Technology
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2025
    Authors
    1. Jeff Voas
    2. Peter Mell
    3. Phillip Laplante
    4. Vartan Piroumian
    Publisher
    NIST
    Resource Type
    Government digital twin trust report (exact value: government-digital-twin-trust-report)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Digital-twin concepts, components, operations, use scenarios, applications, cybersecurity considerations, and trust limitations; does not define or certify a universal digital twin.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  15. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-ak-unesco-ai-ethics

    Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

    Record fingerprint
    12e86590d076bea00a5b56a22ead5ee165080b1d039645dd2b77752116e7636a
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-ak-unesco-ai-ethics
    Title
    Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2021
    Authors
    1. UNESCO General Conference
    Publisher
    UNESCO
    Resource Type
    Intergovernmental normative recommendation (exact value: intergovernmental-normative-recommendation)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Normative values, principles, and policy actions concerning human dignity, rights, proportionality, safety, fairness, privacy, oversight, responsibility, transparency, governance, and ethical impact.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  16. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-c814-nih-allofus-research

    All of Us Research Program: Research

    Record fingerprint
    e6dcaa2f8e132ce86890e0b40093c487b3e8f405178523d92eba174746f25009
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-c814-nih-allofus-research
    Title
    All of Us Research Program: Research
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2026
    Authors
    1. National Institutes of Health
    Publisher
    National Institutes of Health
    Resource Type
    Official longitudinal research program record (exact value: official-longitudinal-research-program-record)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Diverse longitudinal health, electronic-health-record, survey, physical-measurement, wearable, biospecimen, and genomic data; tiered researcher access, training, institutional agreements, and privacy controls.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  17. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-gr-ohchr-icescr

    International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

    Record fingerprint
    a78a2eab28dddf42ccb7fb45ebd7d4b606efd848109e4d21c84f360a7a7b8f90
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-gr-ohchr-icescr
    Title
    International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    1966
    Authors
    1. United Nations General Assembly
    Publisher
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
    Resource Type
    International human rights treaty (exact value: international-human-rights-treaty)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Treaty rights concerning work, just conditions, social protection, family, adequate living standards, health, education, science, and culture.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  18. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-ag-evidence-report

    Human Research Program Human Health Countermeasures Element: Evidence Report — Artificial Gravity

    Record fingerprint
    b6612df595930de8ce79264ef7d6facb5bfecd5783162d4527a5299a0baba959
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-ag-evidence-report
    Title
    Human Research Program Human Health Countermeasures Element: Evidence Report — Artificial Gravity
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2015
    Authors
    1. Gilles Clément
    Publisher
    NASA Johnson Space Center
    Resource Type
    Government evidence report (exact value: government-evidence-report)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Human artificial-gravity evidence, short-radius centrifugation, rotation tolerance, physiological countermeasure hypotheses, and explicit research limitations.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  19. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-beam-techport

    Bigelow Expandable Activity Module Project

    Record fingerprint
    73e170dbbf76bfc057ece8f160eef33a5d9959ffecee1547a4329341a3cc4d10
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-beam-techport
    Title
    Bigelow Expandable Activity Module Project
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2025
    Authors
    1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Publisher
    NASA TechPort
    Resource Type
    Official project record (exact value: official-project-record)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Objectives and results for deployment, pressure retention, structural performance, radiation sensing, inspection, and operation of an expandable human-rated volume in low Earth orbit.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  20. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-langley-radiation

    Radiation Analysis and Shielding Design

    Record fingerprint
    c99725b158e5361e7dae78342a3bd0d356f14f9ef0dfc8888e974c3a76a0c10e
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-langley-radiation
    Title
    Radiation Analysis and Shielding Design
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2026
    Authors
    1. NASA Langley Research Center
    Publisher
    NASA
    Resource Type
    Institutional analysis capability (exact value: institutional-analysis-capability)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Primary and secondary radiation environments, transport analysis, low-atomic-number and hydrogen-rich materials, geometry-specific assessment, and systems-level shielding design.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  21. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-mp-london-dust

    Evaluation of the Hazard of Dust Impacts on Interstellar Spacecraft

    Record fingerprint
    26b509638201018ac308d9d80176e6c4f9d1a7c19826959535022180971c0cd2
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-mp-london-dust
    Title
    Evaluation of the Hazard of Dust Impacts on Interstellar Spacecraft
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2018
    Authors
    1. Richard A. London
    2. James T. Early
    Publisher
    Journal of the British Interplanetary Society
    Resource Type
    Peer reviewed model (exact value: peer-reviewed-model)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Hydrodynamic simulations of relativistic dust-impact material response.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  22. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-pn-nasa-nuclear-propulsion

    Space Nuclear Propulsion

    Record fingerprint
    3e63546a4234670d586a5462a22e1d3bd21c184c82e399ad473cea61afab04f6
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-pn-nasa-nuclear-propulsion
    Title
    Space Nuclear Propulsion
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2026
    Authors
    1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Publisher
    NASA
    Resource Type
    Active technology program record (exact value: active-technology-program-record)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Current NASA development boundary for nuclear thermal and nuclear electric propulsion and their proposed Solar System mission roles.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  23. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-po-nasa-voyager-thrusters

    NASA's Voyager 1 Revives Backup Thrusters Before Command Pause

    Record fingerprint
    a12748747d7600a324cabffa06f98864055121dcd6f410b71526a1d1cd3e81eb
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-po-nasa-voyager-thrusters
    Title
    NASA's Voyager 1 Revives Backup Thrusters Before Command Pause
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2025
    Authors
    1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    2. Jet Propulsion Laboratory
    Publisher
    NASA Science
    Resource Type
    Operational mission record (exact value: operational-mission-record)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Bounded evidence of long-lived robotic spacecraft operations, diagnosis, recovery, delayed commanding, and reliance on Earth-based expertise.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.

  24. atlas-resource · reviewed-source-src-po-un-crpd

    Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

    Record fingerprint
    a66805f2ef0c595d288911c4aeaddc9da91350f358f8e3bad22c1c50f24178f4
    Minimum approvals
    1
    Required scope groups
    bounded-competence: information-science
    High-consequence domains
    None under the named two-person rule
    Review state
    pending
    Published human decisions
    0
    Inspect the complete frozen review surface
    ID
    reviewed-source-src-po-un-crpd
    Title
    Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
    Topic
    reviewed-claim-source
    Year
    2006
    Authors
    1. United Nations General Assembly
    Publisher
    United Nations
    Resource Type
    International human rights treaty (exact value: international-human-rights-treaty)
    Access
    official or primary link
    Source Class
    Editor selected context (exact value: editor-selected-context)
    Selection Note
    Treaty text on dignity, autonomy, accessibility, legal capacity, inclusion, health, education, culture, and political participation.
    Verified At
    2026-07-25
    Evidence Boundary
    This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending.
Equivalent record table for this packet
RecordSubjectFingerprintApprovalsScope groups
atlas-resource:ntrs-19910025494 The Physical/Chemical Closed-Loop Life Support Research Project 473f43ade333fadf23aa3db59925a38f61631b7dfdf3594c6f9801c90f5bc572 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20040013505 Closed-Loop Life Support Systems 842d2d00c4830bae0878d83a7cee63fa66d5a885a8621f75a78f15e42acc48d4 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20060032807 Hard-real-time resource management for autonomous spacecraft 22013453aa35c4f16824af7c87912e5f5040681a41ca066ae72233e7760f436b 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20060033036 Control Architecture for the Deep Space Mission System (DSMS) 4a14aa266c039d6e9bc521893e593a6d6886d70fd58cc65aa89187fc686757f1 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20090035371 Analytic Shielding Optimization to Reduce Crew Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Inside Space Vehicles 6f5fced68f87b1b0cd71f5ce0f66cd4146c2e44cb76067de0b7d91461ddcae21 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20110011226 Space Weather Models and Their Validation and Verification at the CCMC 932787adad15e288426ea4082810802eda594871bacea2d109e2999fcfcc630b 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20110023074 Autonomous, In-Flight Crew Health Risk Management for Exploration-Class Missions: Leveraging the Integrated Medical Model for the Exploration Medical System Demonstration Project fa6816ba7116e70e0d5152ced4d20a3e3c6f6c7ccf9451d7ac7f226dd5572459 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20140010449 America's Next Great Ship: Space Launch System Core Stage Transitioning from Design to Manufacturing 10116a7250e8c304aff0395985dec41802bdd9b2ec40356ead2d250c93f51db9 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20150023606 Swamp Works: A New Approach to Develop Space Mining and Resource Extraction Technologies at the National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) Kennedy Space Center (KSC) d169d74cfd3cac13f6b15222fa271eac8c9e1dea37d186d22fdb3a01db076d81 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20170009480 Earth to Orbit Beamed Energy Experiment bb9e51019fc6632ef1466799faeb1343db902599ae3fe8f13c922bafa070fd1e 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20190025283 In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Living off the Land on the Moon and Mars 56e2ff305fced5067aea0934d83fa918ab6c22e4dd75edf93f0a5515c48dbe2b 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20240015462 Artificial Intelligence Workshop Report e196cf5a9c57a239db169cfe309cac8715a64258d9b95ab001e43ce910ec9e2b 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:ntrs-20260000331 Apollo 11 Lunar Module Touchdown Dynamics Reconstruction Verification and Validation for Human Landing Systems 00245540e260e9e958e6bac0cfc45bc3287208d378ec0efb86ab0ad2e415e5b7 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-ak-nist-digital-twin-8356 Security and Trust Considerations for Digital Twin Technology dc83084c18ee9703fdec51f359c5636f7c2ba664d7aa52465ebae514ad0d97ad 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-ak-unesco-ai-ethics Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence 12e86590d076bea00a5b56a22ead5ee165080b1d039645dd2b77752116e7636a 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-c814-nih-allofus-research All of Us Research Program: Research e6dcaa2f8e132ce86890e0b40093c487b3e8f405178523d92eba174746f25009 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-gr-ohchr-icescr International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights a78a2eab28dddf42ccb7fb45ebd7d4b606efd848109e4d21c84f360a7a7b8f90 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-ag-evidence-report Human Research Program Human Health Countermeasures Element: Evidence Report — Artificial Gravity b6612df595930de8ce79264ef7d6facb5bfecd5783162d4527a5299a0baba959 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-beam-techport Bigelow Expandable Activity Module Project 73e170dbbf76bfc057ece8f160eef33a5d9959ffecee1547a4329341a3cc4d10 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-langley-radiation Radiation Analysis and Shielding Design c99725b158e5361e7dae78342a3bd0d356f14f9ef0dfc8888e974c3a76a0c10e 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-mp-london-dust Evaluation of the Hazard of Dust Impacts on Interstellar Spacecraft 26b509638201018ac308d9d80176e6c4f9d1a7c19826959535022180971c0cd2 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-pn-nasa-nuclear-propulsion Space Nuclear Propulsion 3e63546a4234670d586a5462a22e1d3bd21c184c82e399ad473cea61afab04f6 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-po-nasa-voyager-thrusters NASA's Voyager 1 Revives Backup Thrusters Before Command Pause a12748747d7600a324cabffa06f98864055121dcd6f410b71526a1d1cd3e81eb 1 bounded-competence: information-science
atlas-resource:reviewed-source-src-po-un-crpd Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities a66805f2ef0c595d288911c4aeaddc9da91350f358f8e3bad22c1c50f24178f4 1 bounded-competence: information-science

Frozen source snapshots

Source inclusion does not determine the disposition. Reviewers must inspect the cited locator and relation, note inaccessible material, and identify stronger or conflicting evidence.

Sources, verification dates, scope notes, and exact fingerprints
Source IDSourceCheckedScope boundaryFingerprint
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-19910025494 The Physical/Chemical Closed-Loop Life Support Research Project 2026-07-25 Only NTRS metadata and abstract are open here; full-text methods and results were unavailable for this pass. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. 93da143f210dccd777dd24707a0367925d01ec67fdd62b7b88075c2a848101c4
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20040013505 Closed-Loop Life Support Systems 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. bf42c5459c7249a77ad6e211462c7e0d61d6a63203632ae44415f00d06e5ad0d
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20060032807 Hard-real-time resource management for autonomous spacecraft 2026-07-25 NTRS provides metadata and an abstract, not reviewed full text; methods, results, and current applicability remain unverified. Inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. ac8c611fd5e78c687e352838996e9639d96632fb2c3f7a1f9d9b721ecf82863c
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20060033036 Control Architecture for the Deep Space Mission System (DSMS) 2026-07-25 Only NTRS metadata and an abstract are available here; architecture details, operational outcomes, and present applicability were not validated. It is historical scale-up context, not claim evidence. 1d84d65494f99a65a6446bd384484bec06b6db6776f75b4a5636fc4d19e8be8e
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20090035371 Analytic Shielding Optimization to Reduce Crew Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Inside Space Vehicles 2026-07-25 The NTRS record describes an optimization method, but assumptions, radiation models, objective functions, and solutions were not independently reproduced. It is method context, not evidence that any resulting shield is adequate. 6713c2832734474fcbed8072b4f61964c078b0fab4b08bf8d744f050bf8779b9
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20110011226 Space Weather Models and Their Validation and Verification at the CCMC 2026-07-25 NTRS provides open full text, but this abstract was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. c28638f55213a63be2f51a7ee51c3790f9837b13e77fa3713b805e542d23b604
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20110023074 Autonomous, In-Flight Crew Health Risk Management for Exploration-Class Missions: Leveraging the Integrated Medical Model for the Exploration Medical System Demonstration Project 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. 18a310d9681999364693c84e66e42e55cc8d2061813f29c3eac4431fe98faf7e
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20140010449 America's Next Great Ship: Space Launch System Core Stage Transitioning from Design to Manufacturing 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but curation used the abstract and metadata rather than auditing manufacturing outcomes or program claims. Launch-stage experience is precursor context, not proof of worldship-scale production. 0f68c27790882302d5efc433cfa4fd4449b4a94430c5955fd152b200a77a8932
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20150023606 Swamp Works: A New Approach to Develop Space Mining and Resource Extraction Technologies at the National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) Kennedy Space Center (KSC) 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but curation relied on record metadata and abstract; terrestrial mining maturity does not validate extraterrestrial integration, economics, or safety. This is context, not claim evidence or independent review. 5adba2f829772dc31a5c93e25a13ce4e146a0100d6b3ee934f6bb00923c51621
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20170009480 Earth to Orbit Beamed Energy Experiment 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but a proposed experiment does not validate safe atmospheric beam propagation or interstellar propulsion. It is precursor context only, not automatic claim evidence. bf4eea13f077d9b492d263d3bc4c84229cd3ec8617d0fc7fcf059d78e66b0f2d
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20190025283 In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) Living off the Land on the Moon and Mars 2026-07-25 NTRS lists open full text, but this pass assessed catalog metadata and abstract rather than independently validating the document. Inclusion is contextual discovery support, not automatic evidence for a GShips claim. 6074aaad1a1445bbd5de48bcaee5eb0d3c8173e0dd5ac2faa5b3d43c01cf8a9e
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20240015462 Artificial Intelligence Workshop Report 2026-07-25 NTRS provides open full text, but this other - workshop report was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. 23aad2a6e106cd7f6417612025f92ecc0f2f53e05c2d1b57576fc95a95ea20ef
official-atlas-resource-ntrs-20260000331 Apollo 11 Lunar Module Touchdown Dynamics Reconstruction Verification and Validation for Human Landing Systems 2026-07-25 NTRS provides open full text, but this conference paper was screened for curation rather than independently or domain reviewed; inclusion is contextual, not automatic claim evidence. 65998bbd588c96c205573b75e4d038612ecbb04aadaecc2a763ebc9bd7c24bc4
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-ak-nist-digital-twin-8356 Security and Trust Considerations for Digital Twin Technology 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 4d2aaaf2a3b1680a3ef3f37f9e02378bf4ab0516c46b34a360af47a466a0377a
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-ak-unesco-ai-ethics Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. c753534ab6314f0ce5a72beb8986f0e1d907a729fb58522a26f6658deb8fc2dc
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-c814-nih-allofus-research All of Us Research Program: Research 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. f3efbe7719aff5b73af80b90ca66025c0b8b18fc3613c32277b99522ae484f01
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-gr-ohchr-icescr International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 5e9ce9ece3589b06797eabbfd6a230724bdfaebb8a86c07cc40d234d9c367fe0
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-ag-evidence-report Human Research Program Human Health Countermeasures Element: Evidence Report — Artificial Gravity 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 2c6bf069aec4b6c48112b76b8806f599290b81b7cf82c839553c313742ebf722
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-beam-techport Bigelow Expandable Activity Module Project 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 5bd4d525aa090ca9d2b6deba8f3828d0b427e216bc0fa7cc36afbd8914b2171b
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-hp-nasa-langley-radiation Radiation Analysis and Shielding Design 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. 1a542c848f2a177a6a795adacef0aaa601aa0793259ec0455660ef4abae8b180
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-mp-london-dust Evaluation of the Hazard of Dust Impacts on Interstellar Spacecraft 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. a1e087a7ea34bc349a52425f71025268c47ff700edcacd4c0444e07c05f0c3bd
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-pn-nasa-nuclear-propulsion Space Nuclear Propulsion 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. d87541a8a8d91fe240cab8cf605ff5e4df35b6a3d2d17f13ad38f54ce6f37c4c
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-po-nasa-voyager-thrusters NASA's Voyager 1 Revives Backup Thrusters Before Command Pause 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. bf426c3daf5b063cc7770237a53841c5dcb2dcc501a11cd1ccf7697ca120c104
official-atlas-resource-reviewed-source-src-po-un-crpd Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2026-07-25 This stable source is used by at least one editorially assessed claim. Its claim-specific relation and locator—not Atlas inclusion—define the evidence use; independent domain review remains pending. f4a820f987145020d08eb71fc969ce14b632d68be0ce52b7167201613e0b7a1b

Offline packet and worksheet

Downloads contain no reviewer contact details. Downloading does not create an account or store a review response in the GShips application. Ordinary provider request or analytics logs may record the download request. Work locally: the public site has no review account, upload endpoint, or decision-submission API.

Frozen packet · JSON

90.2 KB · packet identity a96586817cfc0a23…

Download packet

Blank decision worksheet · JSON

17.4 KB · template identity 6963fe315e16303e…

Download blank JSON

Review-notes worksheet · Markdown

Readable notes companion only—not a decision-bundle equivalent. Use the closed JSON template for structural validation.

Download notes worksheet

Do not paste a completed decision, identity documents, private contact data, confidential conflict evidence, medical information, controlled material, or exploit details into a public form. Until a separately authorized private handoff exists, retain the completed worksheet locally.

Packet schema · JSON · Decision-bundle schema · JSON

Validate offline

Use Node.js 22.13.0 or later. Keep the packet, worksheet, completed decision, and all six kit files together in a local directory.

  1. Download the six kit files below. Complete a copy of the JSON template offline and preserve its templateFingerprint.
  2. Finalize a separate output file.
    node finalize-review-decision.mjs \
  --input DRAFT.json \
  --output COMPLETED.json

    This marks the copy complete and calculates an unkeyed canonical bundle fingerprint. A fingerprint detects changes; it is not a reviewer signature.

  3. Validate the packet and completed copy.
    node check-review-decisions.mjs \
  --packet PACKET.json \
  --decision COMPLETED.json

    Add another --decision for each independent reviewer.

  4. Interpret the result narrowly. A zero exit proves structural consistency only. Neither command appoints or qualifies a reviewer, establishes independence, accepts a decision, or authorizes publication.

Completion criteria

Every primary record must receive the required number of valid, current-fingerprint approvals; every complementary scope group and required domain must be covered; any unresolved revise, contest, or reject disposition blocks publication.

Named medical, reproductive, nuclear, radiation, cybersecurity, governance, and dual-use conclusions require two distinct qualified independent humans covering complementary domain-method and rights/public-interest scopes.

  • Reviewer identity, qualification, independence, conflicts, and compensation must be assessed by accountable human governance; local validation can only report structural validity.
  • Approve, revise, contest, reject, and recuse remain visible. A negative finding cannot be hidden by an aggregate approval percentage.
  • Revision creates a new record and packet fingerprint. Prior approvals do not carry forward automatically.
  • AI may assist with clerical comparison but cannot count as an independent reviewer, identity attestor, appeal authority, or second person.

Prepared review packet · 0 published human decisions · Independent review pending · Suggest a correction

Accountability record

How to inspect this page

Scope: Prepared review packet resources:bucket-04 · a96586817cfc0a237ccd230044152628d77c85d5aa2b6408128661835a54f266

Page citations and accountability links

  • Exact frozen packet
    Complete packet payload; SHA-256 a96586817cfc0a237ccd230044152628d77c85d5aa2b6408128661835a54f266 · fingerprint-bound review artifact
  • Blank closed decision template
    Offline structured-decision starting point · unsubmitted local artifact
  • Review-notes worksheet
    Human-readable notes companion; not validator input · offline notes aid
  • Review corpus index
    Corpus SHA-256 8fa944604ca189f5a9216ca59f640ad2ca20972ad512f2f4970764716782e18d · release and ownership index

Assumptions and limits

  • The exact packet, record, source, policy, release, and source-commit fingerprints bound this prepared page; human review has not started.
  • Downloading, local structural validation, or completing notes does not appoint or qualify a reviewer, establish independence, accept a decision, authorize publication, or create a relationship.

What would change this page?

Staffed governance, appointed qualified reviewers, completed record-level decisions, published conflicts, minority findings, corrections, or changed review policy would change this page.

People, review, and conflicts

Prepared by
GShips Project
Editorial status
public-alpha accountability pass
Editorial reviewer
GShips Project AI-assisted editorial synthesis
Last editorial review
2026-07-26
Independent review
pending
Independent reviewer
No independent reviewer assigned
Last independent review
No independent-review date exists
Last content edit
2026-07-25

Declared conflicts

  • The maintainer intends to explore a commercial venture based on some GShips work. No entity, outside funding, customer, sponsor, or indexed-organization relationship currently exists.

Suggest a correction to this page